Ackerly, D. D., and Cornwell, W. K.. (2007). A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. Ecology Letters 10:135–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ackerly, D. D., Dudley, S. A., Sultan, S. E.et al. (2000). The evolution of plant ecophysiological traits: Recent advances and future directions. BioScience 50:979–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerly, D. D., Knight, C. A., Weiss, S. B., Barton, K., and Starmer, K. P.. (2002). Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia 130:449–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aerts, R. (1990). Nutrient use efficiency in evergreen and deciduous species from heathlands. Oecologia 84:391–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. InPetrov, B. N., and Csaki, F., editors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.Google Scholar

Allen, A. P., Li, B., and Charnov, E. L.. (2001). Population fluctuations, power laws and mixtures of lognormal distributions. Ecology Letters 4:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, S. J. (1983). Morphology, performance and fitness. American Zoologist 23:347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, M. P. (1985). Continuum concept, ordination methods, and niche theory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, M. P., and Smith, T. M.. (1989). A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 83:35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, M. P., Cunningham, R. B., and Fleming, P. M.. (1984). New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures. Vegetatio 55:11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, R., and Christakos, G.. (2007). Revisiting prior distributions, Part I: Priors based on a physical invariance principle. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 21:427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baraloto, C., Goldberg, D. E., and Bonal, D.. (2005). Performance trade-offs among tropical tree seedlings in contrasting microhabitats. Ecology 86:2461–2472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazzaz, F. A. (1979). The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazzaz, F. A., and Sipe, T. W.. (1987). Physiological ecology, disturbance, and ecosystem recovery. Ecological Studies 61:203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becks, L., Hilker, F. M., Malchow, H., Jurgens, K., and Arndt, H.. (2005). Experimental demonstration of chaos in a microbial food web. Nature 435:1226–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, G. (1996). The Basics of Selection. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar

Bell, G. (2000). The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. American Naturalist 155:606–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bell, G., and Lechowicz, M. J.. (1994). The flip side: manifestations of how plants perceive patchiness at different scales. InCaldwell, M. M., and Pearcy, R. W., editors. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Ecophysiological processes above and below ground. Academic Press, New York, pp. 391–414.Google Scholar

Bell, G., Lechowicz, M. J., and Waterway, M. J.. (2006). The comparative evidence relating to functional and neutral interpretations of biological communities. Ecology 87:1378–1386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beninca, E., Huisman, J., Heerkloss, R.et al. (2008). Chaos in a long-term experiment with a plankton community. Nature 451:822–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beveridge, W. I. B. (1957). The Art of Scientific Investigation, 3rd edition. Random House, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackman, G. E., and Wilson, G. L.. (1951). Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment. VII. An analysis of the differential effects of light intensity on the net assimilation rate, leaf-area ratio, and relative growth rate of different species. Annals of Botany 15:373–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, B. D., and Larson, D. W.. (1999). Impact of language, history, and choice of system on the study of assembly rules. InWeiher, E., and Keddy, P., editors. Ecological Assembly Rules. Perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 206–229.Google Scholar

Borcard, D., Legendre, P., and Drapeau, P.. (1992). Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouma, J. (1989). Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. InStewart, B. A., editor. Advances in Soil Science. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 225–239.Google Scholar

Box, E. O. (1981). Macroclimate and Plant Forms: An introduction to predictive modelling in phytogeography. Kluwer, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Box, E. O. (1995). Factors determining distributions of tree species and plant functional types. Vegetatio 121:101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Box, E. O. (1996). Plant functional types and climate at the global scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braak, C. J. F. t. (1994). Canonical community ordination. Part I: basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience 1:127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1987). Functional ecology = comparative ecology?Functional Ecology 1:71–72.Google Scholar

Braun-Blanquet, J. (1919). Notions d'élément et de territoire phytogéographiques. Archives des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles 1:497–512.Google Scholar

Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R.. (2004). Multimodel inference – understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 33:261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caccianiga, M., Luzzaro, A., Pierce, S., Ceriani, R. M., and Cerabolini, B.. (2006). The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification. Oikos 112:10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calow, P. (1987). Towards a definition of functional ecology. Functional Ecology 1:57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerabolini, B., Ceriani, R. M., Caccianiga, M., Andreis, R. D., and Raimondi, B.. (2003). Seed size, shape and persistence in soil: a test on Italian flora from Alps to Mediterranean coasts. Seed Science Research 13:75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, R. (1931). Animal Ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Cingolani, A. M., Cabido, M., Gurvich, D. E., Renison, D., and Diaz, S.. (2007). Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: Are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits?Journal of Vegetation Science 18:911–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clatworthy, J. N., and Harper, J. L.. (1962). The comparative biology of closely related species living in the same area. V. Inter- and intraspecific interference within cultures of Lemna spp. and Salvinia natans. Journal of Experimental Botany 13:307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, F. E. (1936). Nature and structure of the climax. Journal of Ecology 24:252–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conner, E. F., and Simberloff, D.. (1979). The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology:1132–1140.

Cooper, W. S. (1926). The fundamentals of vegetational change. Ecology 7:391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbet, A. S. (1941). The distribution of butterflies in the Malay Peninsula (Lepid.). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society, Series A 16:101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornelissen, J. H. C. (1996). An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. Journal of Ecology 84:573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornelissen, J. H. C., and Thompson, K.. (1997). Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytologist 135:109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornelissen, J. H. C., Quested, H. M., Gwynn-Jones, D.et al. (2004). Leaf digestibility and litter decomposability are related in a wide range of subarctic plant species and types. Functional Ecology 18:779–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornelissen, J. H. C., Lang, S. I., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., and During, H. J.. (2007). Comparative cryptogam ecology: a review of bryophyte and lichen traits that drive biogeography. Annals of Botany 99:987–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornwell, W. K., Schwilk, D. W., and Ackerly, D. D.. (2006). A trait-based test for habitat filtering: Convex hull volume. Ecology 87:1465–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costantino, R. F., Desharnais, R. A., Cushing, J. M.et al. (2005). Nonlinear stochastic population dynamics: The Flour Beetle Tribolium as an effective tool of discovery. In Advances in Ecological Research, Vol. 37: Population Dynamics and Laboratory Ecology. Academic Press, London, pp. 101–141.Google Scholar

Craine, J. M., Tilman, D., Wedin, D., Reich, P., and Tjoelker, M.. (2002). Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Functional Ecology 16:563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cramér, H. (1946). Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar

Dale, M. R. T., and Fortin, M. J.. (2002). Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology. Ecoscience 9:162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.Google Scholar

Darwin, C., and Wallace, A. R.. (1858). On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Proceedings of the Linnean Society London, Zoology 3:45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bello, F., Leps, J., and Sebastia, M. T.. (2005). Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:824–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dear, P. (2007). The Intelligibility of Nature. How science makes sense of the world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Debussche, M., Lepart, J., and Dervieux, A.. (1999). Mediterranean landscape changes: evidence from old postcards. Global Ecology and Biogeography 8:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Pietra, S., Pietra, V. Della, and Lafferty, J.. (1997). Inducing features of random fields. IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon and Schuster.

Dewar, R. (2003). Information theory explanation of the fluctuation theorem, maximum entropy production and self-organized criticality in non-equilibrium stationary states. Journal of Physics A – Mathematical and General 36:631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewar, R. (2004). Maximum entropy production and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. InKliedon, A., and Lorenz, R. D., editors. Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics and the Production of Entropy: Life, earth and beyond. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar

Dewar, R. (2005). Maximum entropy production and the fluctuation theorem. Journal of Physics A – Mathematical and General 38:L371–L381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewar, R. C., and Porté, A.. (2008). Statistical mechanics unifies different ecological patterns. Journal of Theoretical Biology 251:389–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diamond, J. M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. InCody, M. L., and Diamond, J. M., editors. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, pp. 342–444.Google Scholar

Diaz, S., and Cabido, M.. (2001). Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diaz, S., Cabido, M., and Casanoves, F.. (1998). Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diaz, S., Hodgson, J. G., Thompson, K.et al. (2004). The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diekmann, M. (2003). Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review. Basic and Applied Ecology 4:493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diemer, M. (1998). Life span and dynamics of leaves of herbaceous perennials in high-elevation environments: ‘news from the elephant's leg’. Functional Ecology 12:413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dormann, C. F., and Roxburgh, S. H.. (2005). Experimental evidence rejects pairwise modelling approach to coexistence in plant communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272:1279–1285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DuRietz, G. E. (1931). Life-forms of terrestrial flowering plants I. Acta Phytogeog. Suecica 3:1–95.Google Scholar

Dybzinski, R., and Tilman, D.. (2007). Resource use patterns predict long-term outcomes of plant competition for nutrients and light. American Naturalist 170:305–318.Google ScholarPubMed

Dykserhuis, E. J. (1949). Condition and management of range land, based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2:104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egolf, D. A. (2001). Equilibrium regained: from nonequilibrium chaos to statistical mechanics. Science 287:101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elger, A., and Willby, N. J.. (2003). Leaf dry matter content as an integrative expression of plant palatability: the case of freshwater macrophytes. Functional Ecology 17:58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellenberg, H. (1978). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht. Verlag.Google Scholar

Escarré, J., Houssard, C., Debussche, M., and Lepart, J.. (1983). Évolution de la végétation et du sol après abandon cultural en région méditerranéene: étude de succession dans les garrigues du Montpelliérais (France). Acta Oecologica 4:221–239.Google Scholar

Etienne, R. S. (2005). A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecology Letters 8:253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etienne, R. S. (2007). A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an ‘exact’ test of neutrality. Ecology Letters 10:608–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Falconer, D. S., and Mackay, T. F. C.. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Prentice Hall, London.Google Scholar

Fenner, M., and Kitajima, K.. (1999). Seed and seedling ecology. In Pugnaire, F., and F. Valladares, editors. Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 589–621.Google Scholar

Fenner, M., and Lee, T.. (1989). Growth of seedlings of pasture grasses and legumes deprived of single mineral nutrients. Journal of Applied Ecology 26:223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, first edition. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1928a). The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 121:654–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1928b). Moments and product moments of sampling distributions. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 30:199–238.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., and Williams, C. B.. (1943). The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample from an animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology 12:42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fonseca, C. R., Overton, J. M., Collins, B., and Westoby, M.. (2000). Shifts in trait-combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients. Journal of Ecology 88:964–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, S. A. (1986). On the adaptive value of large seeds for tropical moist forest trees: a review and synthesis. The Botanical Review 52:260–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fougere, P. F. (1988). Maximum entropy calculations on a discrete probability space. InErickson, G. J., and Smith, C. R., editors. Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Science and Engineering. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 205–234.Google Scholar

Franzaring, J., Fangmeier, A., and Hunt, R.. (2007). On the consistencies between CSR plant strategies and Ellenberg ecological indicator values. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality-Angewandte Botanik 81:86–94.Google Scholar

Fukami, T., Bezemer, T. M., Mortimer, S. R., and Putten, W. H. (2005). Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecology Letters 8:1283–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnier, E. (1991). Resource capture, biomass allocation and growth in herbaceous plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6:126–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garnier, E., Laurent, G., Bellmann, A.et al. (2001). Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. New Phytologist 152:69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billes, G.et al. (2004). Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Ansquer, P.et al. (2007). Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: A standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites. Annals of Botany 99:967–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gassmann, F., Klotzli, F., and Walther, G. R.. (2005). Vegetation change shows generic features of non-linear dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaucherand, S., and Lavorel, S.. (2007). New method for rapid assessment of the functional composition of herbaceous plant communities. Austral Ecology 32:927–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaudet, C. L., and Keddy, P. A.. (1988). A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334:242–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gause, G. F. (1934). The Struggle for Existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilpin, M. E. (1979). Spiral chaos in a predator-prey model. American Naturalist 113:306–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, M. E., Carpenter, M. P., and Pomerantz, M. J.. (1986). The assembly of a laboratory community: multispecies competition in Drosophila. InDiamond, J. M., and Case, T., editors. Community Ecology. Harper & Row, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Givnish, T. J. (2002). Adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves: solving the triple paradox. Silva Fennica 36:703–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleason, H. A. (1926). The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torry Club. 53:7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. Penguin, New York.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, F. B. (1978). Interaction (competition) studies as a step towards the synthesis of sea-cliff vegetation. Journal of Ecology 66:921–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grace, J. B. (1999). The factors controlling species density on herbaceous plant communities: an assessment. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grace, J. B., and Pugesek, B. H.. (1997). A structural equation model of plant species richness and its application to coastal wetland. American Naturalist 149:436–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grace, J. B., and Pugesek, B. H.. (1998). On the use of path analysis and related procedures for the investigation of ecological problems. American Naturalist 152:151–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grace, J. B., Allain, L., and Allen, C.. (1999). Plant species density in a coastal tallgrass prairie: the importance of environmental effects. In review.

Grime, J. P. (1974). Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250:26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevence to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111:1169–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grime, J. P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar

Grime, J. P. (1998). Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86:902–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grime, J. P. (2001). Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar

Grime, J. P. (2007). Comparative Plant Ecology. Castlepoint Press, Colvend.Google Scholar

Grime, J. P., and Hunt, R.. (1975). Relative growth rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. Journal of Ecology 63:393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haegeman, B., and Loreau, M.. (2008). Limitations of entropy maximization in ecology. Oikos 117:1700–1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halloy, S. R. P., and Mark, A. F.. (1996). Comparative leaf morphology spectra of plant communities in New Zealand, the Andes and the European Alps. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 26:41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harper, J. L. (1982). After description. InNewman, E. I., editor. The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar

Hasti, T. J., and Tibshirani, R. J.. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar

Hastings, A., and Powell, T.. (1991). Chaos in a 3-Species Food-Chain. Ecology 72:896–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Free Press., New York.Google Scholar

Hendry, G. A. F., and Grime, J. P.. (1993). Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herschel, J. F. W. (1872). Physical Geography of the Globe. A. and C. Black, London.Google Scholar

Hewitt, N. (1998). Seed size and shade-tolerance – A comparative analysis of North American temperate trees. Oecologia 114:432–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hodgson, J. G., Wilson, P. J., Hunt, R., Grime, J. P., and Thompson, K.. (1999). Allocating C-S-R plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. Oikos 85:282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holdridge, L. R. (1947). Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105:367–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. (2006). Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology 87:1387–1398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huisman, J., Thi, N. N. P., Karl, D. M., and Sommeijer, B.. (2006). Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in the oceanic deep chlorophyll maximum. Nature 439:322–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huisman, J., and Weissing, F. J.. (1999). Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 402:407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals?American Naturalist 53:145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. E. (1978). An Introduction to Population Ecology. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar

Jain, R., and Ramakumar, S.. (1999). Stochastic dynamics modeling of the protein sequence length distribution in genomes: implications for microbial evolution. Physica A 273:476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1957a). Information theory and statistical mechanics I. The Physical Review 106:620–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1957b). Information theory and statistical mechanics II. The Physical Review 108:171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1971). Violations of Boltzmann's H theorem in real gases. Physical Reviews A4:747–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (1983). Papers on Probability, Statistics, and Statistical Physics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. (2003). Probability Theory. The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, H. (1939). Theory of Probability. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kazakou, E., Vile, D., Shipley, B., Gallet, C., and Garnier, E.. (2006). Co-variations in litter decomposition, leaf traits and plant growth in species from a Mediterranean old-field succession. Functional Ecology 20:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (1982). Population ecology on an environmental gradient.: Cakile edentula on a sand dune. Oecologia 52:348–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keddy, P. A. (1984). Plant zonation on lakeshores in Nova Scotia: a test of the resource specialization hypthesis. Journal of Ecology 72:797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (1990). The use of functional as opposed to phylogenetic systematics: a first step in predictive community ecology. InKawano, S., editor. Biological Approaches and Evolutionary Trends in Plants. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, London, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (1992). Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keddy, P. A. (2001). Competition, second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keddy, P. A., and Shipley, B.. (1989). Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 54:234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenkel, N. C., Juhasz-Nagy, P., and Podani, J.. (1989). On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio 83:195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khurana, E., and Singh, J. S.. (2000). Influence of seed size on seedling growth of Albizia procera under different soil water levels. Annals of Botany 86:1185–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kikuzawa, K. (1991). A cost-benefit analysis of leaf habit and leaf longevity of trees and their geographical pattern. American Naturalist 138:1250–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kikuzawa, K. (1995). The basis for variation in leaf longevity of plants. Vegetatio 121:89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klebanoff, A., and Hastings, A.. (1994). Chaos in 3 species food-chains. Journal of Mathematical Biology 32:427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleyer, M. (1995). Biological Traits of Vascular Plants. A database. Albeitsberichte Inst. f. Landschaftsplanung u. Okologie. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Knevel, I. C., Bekker, R. M., Bakker, J. P., and Kleyer, M.. (2003). Life-history traits of the northwest European flora: The LEDA database. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, D. H. (1965). A gradient analysis of Wisconsin prairie vegetation on the basis of plant structure and function. Ecology 46:744–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolmogoroff, A. N. (1956). Foundations of the Theory of Probability, second edition. Chelsea, New York.Google Scholar

Kuhn, I., Durka, W., and Klotz, S.. (2004). BiolFlor – a new plant-trait database as a tool for plant invasion ecology. Diversity and Distributions 10:363–365.Google Scholar

Kullback, S. (1959). Information Theory and Statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Kullback, S., and Leibler, R. A.. (1951). On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22:79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambers, H., and Poorter, H.. (1992). Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advances in Ecological Research 23:187–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S., and Pons, T. L.. (1998). Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lande, R., and Arnold, S. J.. (1983). The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B., and Zeigler, H.. (1983). Physiological Plant Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larcher, W. (2001). Physiological Plant Ecology, fourth edition. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Larson, D. W. (2000). Cliff Ecology: Pattern and process in cliff ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavorel, S., and Garnier, E.. (2002). Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16:545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lechowicz, M. J., and Blais, P. A.. (1988). Assessing the contributions of multiple interacting traits to plant reproductive success: environmental dependence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1:255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legendre, P., and Anderson, M. J.. (1999). Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecological Monographs 69:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legendre, P., and Legendre, L.. (1998). Numerical Ecology, second edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Leps, J., and Smilauer, P.. (2003). Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 54:421–431.Google Scholar

Li, W. (1996). Random texts exhibit Zipf's-law-like word frequency distribution. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 38:1842–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Limpert, E., Stahel, W. A., and Abbt, M.. (2001). Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. BioScience 51:341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lososova, Z., Chytry, M., Kuhn, I.et al. (2006). Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 8:69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lotka, A. J. (1925). Elements of Physical Biology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H. (1972). Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H., and Levins, R.. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist 101:377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLeod, J. (1894). Over de bevruchting der bloemen in het Kempisch gedeelte van Vlaanderen. Deel II. Botanische Jaarboek 6:119–511.Google Scholar

Mandelbrot, B. (1997). Fractals and Scaling in Finance. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manly, B. F. J. (1997). Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, second edition. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar

Marks, C. O., and Lechowicz, M. J.. (2006a). Alternative designs and the evolution of functional diversity. American Naturalist 167:55–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marks, C. O., and Lechowicz, M. J.. (2006b). A holistic tree seedling model for the investigation of functional trait diversity. Ecological Modelling 193:141–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marks, C. O., and Muller-Landau, H. C.. (2007). Comment on “From plant traits to plant communities: A statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity”. Science 316:1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, R. A. (1974). Biological populations with nonoverlapping generations: stable points, stable cycles, and chaos. Science 186:645–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

May, R. M. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261:459–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGill, B. J., Maurer, B. A., and Weiser, M. D.. (2006). Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 87:1411–1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGill, B. J., Etienne, R. S., Gray, J. S.et al. (2007). Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecology Letters 10:995–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meziane, D. (1998). Étude de la variation interspécifique de la vitesse spécifique de croissance et modélisation de l'effet des attributs morphologiques, physiologiques et d'allocation de biomasse. Ph.D. Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke.Google Scholar

Meziane, D., and Shipley, B.. (1999). Interacting determinants of specific leaf area in 22 herbaceous species: effects of irradiance and nutrient availability. Plant, Cell and Environment 22:447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, T. E., Burns, J. H., Munguia, P.et al. (2005). A critical review of twenty years' use of the resource-ratio theory. American Naturalist 165:439–448.Google ScholarPubMed

Minchin, P. R. (1987). An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitzenmacher, M. (2004). A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Mathematics 1:226–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moles, A. T., Ackerly, D. D., Webb, C. O.et al. (2005). Factors that shape seed mass evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:10 540–10 544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Monod, J. (1950). La technique de culture continue: théorie et applications. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur 79:390–410.Google Scholar

Monteith, J. L. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 281:277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mosekilde, E. (1996). Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics. Applications to physics, biology and economic systems. World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar

Motomura, I. (1932). A statistical treatment of associations [in Japanese]. Japanese Journal of Zoology 44:379–383.Google Scholar

Mulaik, S. A. (2001). The curve-fitting problem: An objectivist view. Philosophy of Science 68 :218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munakata, T. (1998). Fundamentals of the New Artificial Intelligence: Beyond traditional paradigms. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Nakajima, T., and Higurashi, A.. (1998). A use of two-channel radiances for an aeresol characterization from space. Geophysical Research Letters 25:3815–3818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nekola, J. C., and Brown, J. H.. (2007). The wealth of species: ecological communities, complex systems and the legacy of Frank Preston. Ecology Letters 10:188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Niinemets, U. (1999). Components of leaf dry mass per area – thickness and density – alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytologist 144:35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowak, M. A. (2006). Evolutionary Dynamics. Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Odenbaugh, J. (2005). Idealized, inaccurate but successful: A pragmatic approach to evaluating models in theoretical ecology. Biology and Philosophy 20:231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ozinga, W. A., Bekker, R. M., Schaminee, J. H. J., and Groenendael, J. M.. (2004). Dispersal potential in plant communities depends on environmental conditions. Journal of Ecology 92:767–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pachepsky, Y., and Rawls, W. J.. (2004). Development of Pedotransfer Functions in Soil Hydrology, 30. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Pearcy, R. W., Ehleringer, J., Mooney, H. A., and Rundel, P. W., editors. (1991). Plant Physiological Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.

Pearson, K. (1903). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A203:1–66.Google Scholar

Perline, R. (1996). Zipf's law, the central limit theorem, and the random division of the unit interval. Physical Review E 54:220–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peters, R. H. (1991). A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pinheiro, J. C., and Bates, D. M.. (2000). Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poorter, H., and Remkes, C.. (1990). Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83:553–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Popper, K. (1980). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, tenth edition. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1948). The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29:254–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1950). Gas laws and wealth laws. The Scientific Monthly 71:309–311.Google Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1962). The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43:185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, F. W. (1981). Pseudo-lognormal distributions. Ecology 62:355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pueyo, S., He, F., and Zillio, T.. (2007). The maximum entropy formalism and the idiosyncratic theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 10:1017–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pywell, R. F., Bullock, J. M., Roy, D. B.et al. (2003). Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography, Being the Collected Papers of C. Raunkiaer. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., and Ellsworth, D. S.. (1992). Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 62:365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., and Ellsworth, D. S.. (1997). From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:13 730–13 734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., Ellsworth, D. S.et al. (1998). Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia 114:471–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ribichich, A. M. (2005). From null community to non-randomly structured actual plant assemblages: parsimony analysis of species co-occurrences. Ecography 28:88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rissanen, J. (1983). A universal prior for integers and estimation by minimum description length. Annals of Statistics 11:416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roche, P., Diaz-Burlinson, N., and Gachet, S.. (2004). Congruency analysis of species ranking based on leaf traits: which traits are more reliable?Plant Ecology 174:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roxburgh, S. H., and Mokany, K.. (2007). Comment on “From plant traits to plant communities: A statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity”. Science 316:1425b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roxburgh, S. H., and Wilson, J. B.. (2000a). Stability and coexistence in a lawn community: experimental assessment of the stability of the actual community. Oikos 88:409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roxburgh, S. H., and Wilson, J. B.. (2000b). Stability and coexistence in a lawn community: mathematical prediction of stability using a community matrix with parameters derived from competition experiments. Oikos 88:395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffers, A. P., and Sykora, K. V.. (2000). Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. Journal of Vegetation Science 11:225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W.. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar

Shipley, B. (1987a). The relationship between dynamic game theory and the Lotka–Volterra competition equations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 125:121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, J. W. (1987b). Pattern and mechanism in the emergent macrophyte communities along the Ottawa River (Canada). Ph.D. University of Ottawa, Ottawa.Google Scholar

Shipley, B. (1993). A null model for competitive hierarchies in competition matrices. Ecology 74:1693–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B. (2000a). Cause and Correlation in Biology: A user's guide to path analysis, structural equations, and causal inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B. (2000b). Plasticity in relative growth rate and its components following a change in irradiance. Plant, Cell and Environment 23:1207–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B. (2006). Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta-analysis. Functional Ecology 20:565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B. (2007). Comparative plant ecology as a tool for integrating across scales. Annals of Botany 99:965–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B. (2009). Limitations of entropy maximization in ecology: a reply to Haegeman and Loreau. Oikos 118:152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., and Dion, J.. (1992). The allometry of seed production in herbaceous angiosperms. American Naturalist 139:467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., and Hunt, R.. (1996). Regression smoothers for estimating parameters of growth analyses. Annals of Botany 76:569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., and Keddy, P. A.. (1987). The individualistic and community-unit concepts as falsifiable hypotheses. Vegetatio 69:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., Keddy, P. A., Moore, D. R. J., and Lemky, K.. (1989). Regeneration and establishment strategies of emergent macrophytes. Journal of Ecology 77:1093–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., Keddy, P. A., and Lefkovitch, L. P.. (1991). Mechanisms producing plant zonation along a water depth gradient – a comparison with the exposure gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:1420–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., and Peters, R. H.. (1990). A test of the Tilman model of plant strategies: relative growth rate and biomass partitioning. American Naturalist 136:139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., and Peters, R. H.. (1991). The Seduction by Mechanism – a Reply to Tilman. American Naturalist 138:1276–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, B., Lechowicz, M. J., Wright, I., and Reich, P. B.. (2006a). Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Ecology 87:535–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shipley, B., Vile, D., and Garnier, E.. (2006b). From plant traits to plant communities: A statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity. Science 314:812–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shipley, B., Vile, D., and Garnier, E.. (2007). Response to comments on “From plant traits to plant communities: A statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity”. Science 316:1425d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sole, D., Alonso, D., and McKane, A.. (1987). Connectivity and scaling in S-species model ecosystems. Physica A 286:337–344.Google Scholar

Southwood, T. R. E. (1977). Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies. Journal of Animal Ecology 46:337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiger, T. L. (1930). Structure of prairie vegetation. Ecology 11:170–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugihara, G. (1980). Minimal community structure: An explanation of species abundance distributions. American Naturalist 116:770–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tansley, A. G. (1920). The classification of vegetation and the concept of development. Journal of Ecology 8:118–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor Pegg Jr, E. (1994). A complete list of fair dice. MSc. University of Colorado, Colorado Springs.Google Scholar

Braak, C. J. F., and Prentice, I. C.. (1988). A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18:271–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, K. (1987). Seeds and seed banks. New Phytologist 106:23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G., Grime, J. P., et al. (1993a). Ellenberg numbers revisited. Phytocoenologia 23:277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, K., Band, S. R., and Hodgson, J. G.. (1993b). Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil. Functional Ecology 7:236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, K., Bakker, J. P., Bekker, R. M., and Hodgson, J. G.. (1998). Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. Journal of Ecology 86:163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google ScholarPubMed

Tilman, D. (1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar

Tilman, D. (2007). Resource competition and plant traits: a response to Craine et al. 2005. Journal of Ecology 95:231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valk, A. G. (1981). Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valk, A. G. (1988). From community ecology to vegetation management: providing a scientific basis for management. Pages 463–470 in Transactions of the 53rd North American Wildlife & Natural Resource Conference.

Hulst, R. (1992). From population dynamics to community dynamics: modelling succession as a species replacement process. InGlenn-Lewin, D. C., Peet, R. K., Veblen, T. T., editors. Plant Succession. Theory and Prediction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 188–214.Google Scholar

Vandermeer, J. H. (1969). The competitive structure of communities: an experimental approach with Protozoa. Ecology 50:362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vendramini, F., Diaz, S., Gurvich, D. E.et al. (2002). Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species. New Phytologist 154:147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vile, D. (2005). Significations fonctionnelle et écologique des traits des espèces végétales: exemple dans une successions post-culturale méditerranéenne et généralisations. Ph.D. Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke.Google Scholar

Vile, D., Shipley, B., and Garnier, E.. (2006a). Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance. Ecology Letters 9:1061–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vile, D., Shipley, B., and Garnier, E.. (2006b). A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. Ecology 87:504–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Violle, C., Lecoeur, J., and Navas, M. L.. (2007a). How relevant are instantaneous measurements for assessing resource depletion under plant cover? A test on light and soil water availability in 18 herbaceous communities. Functional Ecology 21:185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Violle, C., Navas, M. L., Vile, D.et al. (2007b). Let the concept of trait be functional!Oikos 116:882–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., Hubbell, S. P., and Maritan, A.. (2003). Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424:1035–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., He, F. L., Hubbell, S. P., and Maritan, A.. (2005). Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests. Nature 438:658–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Volterra, V. (1926). Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. R. Acad. dei Lincei (Ser. 6) 2:31–113.Google Scholar

Mises, R. (1957). Probability, Statistics and Truth, second edition. Constable, London.Google Scholar

Warming, E., and Vahl, M.. (1909). Oecology of Plants – an Introduction to the Study of Plant Communities. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Weiher, E., and Keddy, P. A.. (1995). Assembly rules, null models and trait dispersion. Oikos 74:159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiher, E., Clarke, G. D. P., and Keddy, P. A.. (1998). Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of species. Oikos 81:309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiher, E., Werf, A., Thompson, K.et al. (1999). Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiher, E., Forbes, S., Schauwecker, T., and Grace, J. B.. (2004). Multivariate control of plant species richness and community biomass in blackland prairie. Oikos 106:151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westoby, M. (1998). A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant & Soil 199:213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheatland, M. S., and Sturrock, P. A.. (1996). Avalanche models of solar flares and the distribution of active regions. The Astrophysical Journal 471:1044–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittaker, R. H. (1951). A criticism of the plant association and climatic climax concepts. Northwest Science 25:17–31.Google Scholar

Whittaker, R. H. (1956). Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittaker, R. H. (1965). Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147:250–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whittaker, R. H. (1967). Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 49:207–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittaker, R. H. (1970). Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar

Woodward, F. I. (1987). Climate and Plant Distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodward, F. I. (1990a). Global change: translating plant ecophysiological responses to ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5:308–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, F. I. (1990b). The impact of low temperatures in controlling the geographical distribution of plants. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society London B 326:585–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, F. I., and Diament, A. D.. (1991). Functional approaches to predicting the ecological effects of global change. Functional Ecology 5:202–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, I. J., and Westoby, M.. (2001). Understanding seedling growth relationships through specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration: generalisations across growth forms and growth irradiance. Oecologia 127:21–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., and Westoby, M.. (2001). Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology 15:423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M.et al. (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wright, S. J. (1967). Comments of the preliminary working papers of Eden and Waddington. InMoorhead, P. S., and Kaplan, M. M., editors. Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution. Wistar Institute Symposium Monograph 5. Wistar Institute Press, Philadelphia, pp. 117–120.Google Scholar

Yee, T. W., and Mitchell, N. D.. (1991). Generalized additive models in plant ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zillio, T., and Condit, R.. (2007). The impact of neutrality, niche differentiation and species input on diversity and abundance distributions. Oikos 116:931–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar