DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO EQUALITY IN LAW

EQUALITY AS A QUESTION OF JUSTICE – FIRST APPROACH

When thinking about “equality”, one almost inevitably falls into the footsteps of Aristotle, who distinguished between similarity – related to a quality – and equality, related to a quantity. Equality, in turn, was a central concept for his doctrine of justice, especially for his conception of an arithmetical equality in the iustitia commutativa.

However, I am more interested here in equality of status, which, following Aristotle ‘ s systematics, should rather be placed with iustitia distributiva, if not with justice in the general sense. However, Aristotle did not accept equality of status.

1.2. A HOPEFUL ENCOUNTER – SECOND APPROACH

Th e greatest conceivable legal inequality manifests itself in slavery. Th ere, the legal personhood of individuals, or a group of people, is simply denied and the person is degraded to a mere thing: the human being is legally degenerated to the status of a thing. The problem of justice that lies therein concerns the unequal treatment of members of the human species who are actually equally qualified. In antiquity, especially in Christianity, people were already sensitive to this, without, of course, drawing any legal conclusions from it. The letter of the apostle Paul to Philemon speaks of Onesimus, a (perhaps runaway) house slave. Paul sends him back to his master, the addressee of the letter. But Onesimus comes back to Philemon as a brother because of baptism, Paul writes: