Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - Deposit-taking and payments


‘How do I know it will be safe?’


Deposits and payments go to the heart of the role of money as a medium for denoting exchange and transactions. Financial citizens deal with money every day. Australians have traditionally kept their savings in banks, building societies and credit unions. Savings have been used for further lending, particularly for home lending. The prime regulatory issue for deposit-taking institutions is deposit protection. Australia, unlike many countries, does not have a formal deposit insurance scheme, although from time to time this is mooted. Both the RBA and APRA have a role in the protection of depositors. Neither normally guarantees deposits and it is still theoretically possible for a bank to fail and for depositors to lose their savings.

Banks, building societies and credit unions were regulated separately prior to FSR. Since FSR, the concept of the ADI, as the product-neutral descriptor, has replaced the individual names to describe slightly different institutions which take deposits. Business and individuals also have an interest in the safety and stability of the payments system, particularly as there has been rapid change in the instruments and technology for electronic payments used in the retail payments system. This chapter will focus on both deposit-taking and payments as part of the financial services system.

The Wallis Report placed the performance of financial promises at the core of its approach to financial regulation but recognised that overall financial safety of the system does not require that all financial promises are kept.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Ralston, D and Beale, TFinancial Sector Reforms and Implications for Mutual DTIs in Australia’, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, vol. 13, 2002, p. 87
Wilson, TBe Careful What You Ask For: What Role Now For Credit Unions in Addressing Financial Exclusion in Australia?’, Griffith Law Review, vol. 15, 2006, p. 370
Black, JManaging Regulatory Risks and Defining the Parameters of Blame: A Focus on the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority’, Law & Policy, vol. 28, no.1, 2006, p. 1
Gegenheimer, GBank Supervisors and Mixed-Activity Groups: A Comparison of the European and Australian Approaches and Lessons for Transition Economies’, Banking & Finance Law Review, vol. 22, no. 2, 2007, p. 239
Wentworth, EDirect Debits, Consumer Protection and Payments System Regulation – Issues of Policy and Reform’, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, vol. 13, 2002, p. 77
Bollen, RThe Development and Legal Nature of Payment Facilities’, Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, vol. 11, no. 1, 2004, p. 19
Beatty, A, Aubrey, M and Bollen, RE-Payments and Australian Regulation’, University New South Wales Law Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, 1998, pp. 489–583
Tyree, A, ‘[i]t is clear from the judgment that the court considered that practices might change …’: Banking Law in Australia (5th edn), LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005, p. 195
Tyree, A and Beatty, AThe Law of Payment Systems, Butterworths, Sydney, 2000, p. 71
Sneddon, MA Review of the Electronic Funds Transfer Code of Conduct’, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, vol. 6, 1995, p. 29
Kreltzheim, DThe Legal Nature of “Electronic Money”’ Part 1, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, vol. 8, 2003, p. 161
Bollen, RThe Regulation of Internet Banking’, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, vol. 12, 2001, pp. 6–17