Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:50:35.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Prematurity and complications of labor and delivery

from Section 2 - Pregnancy, labor, and delivery complications causing brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

David K. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
William E. Benitz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Philip Sunshine
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Susan R. Hintz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Maurice L. Druzin
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Prematurity is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality in the USA and around the world. Preterm birth is officially defined as delivery occurring prior to 37 completed weeks from the first day of the last menstrual period. The term “low birthweight” is used to describe infants weighing less than 2500 g at birth. This includes neonates who are born after 37 weeks gestational age, of which approximately one-third are in the category of “growth restriction.” This group of neonates is distinct from the group of premature infants, and is the subject of another chapter (see Chapter 7). The discussion in this chapter will be confined to the preterm fetus, that which is delivered between viability (23–24 weeks) and 37 completed weeks of gestation.

Complications of labor and delivery in both preterm and term gestations have been implicated in adverse neonatal outcomes. Traditionally, cerebral palsy and “brain damage” have been linked to intrapartum events that resulted in “birth asphyxia” and subsequent neurologic damage. This association has continued to be proposed despite the fact that current evidence suggests that only about 10% of patients with cerebral palsy, about 1–2 per 10,000 births, experience serious birth asphyxia. Most studies in this field refer to the term fetus. The preterm neonate has its own unique complications and resultant sequelae.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,World Health Organization. Prevention of Perinatal Morbidity. Public Health Papers 42. Geneva: WHO, 1969.Google Scholar
Nelson, KB, Ellenberg, JH. Antecedents of cerebral palsy: multivariate analysis of risk. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2006; 55: 1–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Spong, CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 404–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooper, RK, Goldenberg, RL, Creasy, RK, et al. A multicenter study of preterm birth weight and gestational age specific mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, TB, Hoekstra, RE, Couser, RS, et al. Survival and follow-up of infants born at 23–26 weeks gestational age: effects of surfactant therapy. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson-Costello, D, Friedman, H, Minich, N, et al. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leviton, A, Paneth, N. White matter damage in preterm newborns: an epidemiologic perspective. Early Hum Dev 1990; 24: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, AJ, Quaedackers, JS, Guan, J, et al. The premature fetus: not as defenseless as we thought, but still paradoxically vulnerable?Dev Neurosci 2001; 23: 175–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, RD, Bennet, L, Davidson, J, et al. Destruction and reconstruction: hypoxia and the developing brain. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2007; 81: 163–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papiernik, E, Kaminski, M. Multifactorial study of the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 1974; 2: 30–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meis, PJ, MacErnest, J, Moore, ML. Causes of low birth weight births in public and private patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1165–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leigh, J, Garite, TJM. Amnionitis and the management of premature labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 500–6.Google Scholar
Gravett, MG, Hummel, D, Eschenbach, DA, et al. Preterm labor associated with subclinical amniotic infection and with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hameed, C, Teiane, N, Verma, UL, et al. Silent chorioamnionitis as a cause of preterm labor refractory to tocolytic therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 726–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duff, P, Kopelman, JN. Subclinical intraamniotic infection in asymptomatic patients with refractory preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 756–69.Google Scholar
Bobbitt, JR, Ledger, WJ. Unrecognized amnionitis and prematurity: a preliminary report. J Reprod Med 1977; 19: 8–12.Google Scholar
Bobbitt, JR, Ledger, WJ. Amniotic fluid analysis: its role in maternal and neonatal infection. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 51: 56–62.Google Scholar
Fedrick, J, Anderson, ABM. Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1976; 83: 342–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,US Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health, publication 0–487–637 (QL3). Vol. 6. Infant Mortality and Low Birth Weight. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1985.Google Scholar
Bakketeig, LS, Hoffman, HJ. Epidemiology of preterm birth: results from longitudinal study of births in Norway. In Elder, MG, Dendricks, CH, eds., Preterm Labour. London: Butterworths, 1981: 17–46.Google Scholar
Abrams, B, Newman, V, Key, T, et al. Maternal weight gain and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 577–83.Google ScholarPubMed
MacGregor, SW, Keith, LG, Chasnoff, IJ, et al. Cocaine use during pregnancy: adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 57: 686–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiono, PH, Klebanoff, MA, Rhoads, GG. Smoking and drinking during pregnancy. JAMA 1986; 255: 82–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keirse, M, Rush, R, Anderson, A, et al. Risk of pre-term delivery in patients with previous preterm delivery and/or abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 81–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linn, S, Schoenbaum, S, Monson, R, et al. The relationship between induced abortion and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 136–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, C, Smith, R, Steinhoff, P, et al. Induced abortion and spontaneous fetal loss in subsequent pregnancies. Am J Public Health 1982; 72: 548–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, JP. High order multiple gestations. Semin Perinatol 2005; 5: 305–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1982. Vol. 1. Natality. Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health, 1986.Google Scholar
Neilson, JP, Verkuyl, DAA, Crowther, CA, et al. Preterm labor in twin pregnancies: prediction by cervical assessment. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 719–23.Google ScholarPubMed
,Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit. Assisted Conception in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney: AIHW, 1992.Google Scholar
Williams, MA, Millendorf, R, Liererman, E, et al. Adverse infant outcomes associated with first trimester vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 14–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, G. Unclassified antepartum haemorrhage incidence and perinatal mortality in a community. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwlth 1970; 77: 492–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, AL, Hubby, MM, Blough, RR, et al. A comparison of pregnancy experiment in DES-exposed and DES-unexposed daughters. J Reprod Med 1980; 24: 62–9.Google Scholar
Kaufman, RH, Noller, K, Adam, E, et al. Upper genital tract abnormalities and pregnancy outcome in diethylstilbestrol-exposed progeny. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 148: 973–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harger, JH. Cervical cerclage: patient selection, morbidity and success rates. Clin Perinatol 1983; 10: 321–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zemlyn, S. The length of the uterine cervix and its significance. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 267–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, RLO. Incidence of preterm delivery in patients with previous preterm delivery and/or abortion. S Afr Med J 1979; 56: 1085–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Rust, OA, Atlas, RO, Jones, KJ, et al. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 830–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berghella, V, Odibo, AO, Tolosa, JE. Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1311–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
To, MS, Alfirevic, Z, Heath, VCF, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1849–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althuisius, SM, Dekker, GA, Hummel, P, et al. Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1106–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Althuisius, SM, Dekker, GA, Hummel, P, et al. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 907–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaltreider, DF, Kohl, S. Epidemiology of preterm delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Artal, JP, Sokol, RJ, Newman, M, et al. The mechanical properties of prematurely and non-prematurely ruptured membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125: 655–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavery, JP, Miller, CE, Knight, RD. The effect of labor on the rheologic response of chorioamniotic membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 87–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Lonky, NN, Hayashi, RH. A proposed mechanism for premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1988; 43: 22–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minkoff, H, Grunebaum, AN, Schwarz, RH, et al. Risk factors for prematurity and premature rupture of membranes; a prospective study of vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 965–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iams, JD, McGregor, JA. Cervicovaginal microflora and pregnancy outcome: results of a double blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythromycin treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1580–91.Google Scholar
Naeye, RL. Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 93–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J, Garite, TJ. Premature rupture of membranes before fetal viability. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 615–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Mead, PB. Management of the patient with premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Perinatol 1980; 7: 243–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, KA, Clark, SL. Premature rupture of the membranes: management controversies. Clin Perinatol 1992; 19: 385–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK, Linzy, EM, et al. Prospective randomized study of corticosteroids in the management of premature rupture of membranes and the premature gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 508–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, St Clair, PJ, et al. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from patients with clinical intra-amniotic infection at term. J Infect Dis 1982; 145: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, PR, Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, et al. A prospective controlled study of maternal and perinatal outcome after intra-amniotic infection at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 695–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garite, TJ. Premature rupture of the membranes. In Creasy, RK, Resnick, R, eds., Maternal–Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practices. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1994: 625–38.Google Scholar
Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK. Chorioamnionitis in the preterm gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 54: 539–45.Google Scholar
Gabbe, SG, Ettinger, BB, Freeman, RK, et al. Umbilical cord compression associated with amniotomy: laboratory observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 353–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, JC, Levy, DC, Wilds, PL. Premature rupture of membranes prior to term: consquences of non-intervention. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 601–6.Google Scholar
Moberg, LJ, Garite, TJ. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing in PROM. Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 1987.
Morretti, M, Sibai, BM. Maternal and perinatal outcome of expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in the mid-trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 390–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, CA, Kitzmiller, JL. Perinatal survival with expectant management of mid-trimester rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 838–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creasy, RK. Preterm labor and delivery. In Moberg LJ, Garite TJ, eds. Disorders of Parturition, Part III. 1985: 494–520.
Peaceman, AM, Andrews, WW, Thorp, JM, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, BM, Arheart, KL. Antimicrobial therapy in expectant management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Lancet 1995; 346: 1271–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, BM, Miodovnik, M, Thurnau, GR, et al. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278: 989–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usher, R. Changing mortality rates with perinatal intensive care and regionalization. Semin Perinatol 1977; 1: 309–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Gortmaker, S, Sobol, A, Clark, C, et al. The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, W, Ford, G, Orgill, A, et al. Outcome in infants with birth weight 500–999 grams: a regional study of 1979 and 1980 births. J Pediatr 1984; 104: 921–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Carpenter, RJ, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: the value of fetal length in addition to head and abdominal measurements. Radiology 1984; 152: 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeds, JW, Cefalo, RL, Bowes, WA. Femur lengths in the estimation of fetal weight less than 1500 grams. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 233–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, RH, Hon, EH. Clinical fetal monitoring. V. Effect on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 118: 529–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement. Effect of antenatal steroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes. NIH Consensus Statement 1994; 12 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
Myers, RE, Myers, SE. Use of sedative, analgesic and anesthetic drugs during labor and delivery: bane or boon. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olshan, AF, Shy, KK, Luthy, DA. Cesarean birth and neonatal mortality in very low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 267–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Yu, VYH, Bajak, B, Cutting, D, et al. Effect of mode of delivery on outcome of very low birthweight infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 633–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kithen, W, Ford, GW, Doyle, LW, et al. Cesarean section or vaginal delivery at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation: comparison of survival and neonatal and two year morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 149–57.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, RL, Davis, RO. In caul delivery of the very premature infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 645–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, DB, Miodovnik, MK, Lavin, JP Jr. Neonatal outcome among low birth weight infants delivered spontaneously or by low forceps. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 283–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriewall, TJ. Structural, mechanical, and material properties of fetal cranial bone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 707–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robilio, PA, Boe, NM, Danielsen, B, et al. Vaginal vs. cesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California. J Reprod Med 2007; 52: 473–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Richmond, JR, Morin, L, Benjamin, A. Extremely preterm vaginal breech delivery en caul. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 1025–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowes, WA, Taylor, ES, O'Brien, M, et al. Breech delivery: evaluation of the method of delivery on perinatal results and maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 965–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodmer, B, Benjamin, A, McLean, FH, et al. Has use of cesarean section reduced the risk of delivery in the preterm breech presentation?Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 244–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, G, Chick, L. The effect of delivery route on outcome in breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 909–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druzin, ML. Atraumatic delivery in cases of malpresentation of the very low birth weight fetus at cesarean section: the splint technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 941–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, TR, Isman, J, Giles, HR. Improved neonatal survival through maternal transport. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 294–300.Google ScholarPubMed
Paneth, N, Kiely, JL, Wallenstein, S, et al. The choice of place of delivery: effect of hospital level on mortality in all singleton births in New York City. Am J Dis Child 1987; 141: 60–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, JA, Gallbraith, RS, Muir, DW, et al. Factors associated with motor and cognitive deficits in children after intrapartum fetal hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 533–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowes, WA, Gabbe, S, Bowes, C. Fetal heart rate monitoring in premature infants weighing 1500 grams or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 791–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgren, LMR, Malcus, P, Sveningsen, NW. Intrauterine asphyxia and longterm outcome in preterm fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 512–16.Google Scholar
Luthy, DA, Kirkwood, KS, Belle, G, et al. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 637–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Nageotte, MP, Freeman, RK, Garite, TJ, et al. Prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 557–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, JA, Killen, H, Derrick, J. The prediction of asphyxia in preterm pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 186: 279–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, JA, Killen, H, Derrick, J. Antepartum fetal asphyxia in the preterm pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 188: 461–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, JA. Determining the contribution of asphyxia to brain damage in the neonate. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004; 30: 276–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, WJ. On the influence of abnormal parturition, difficult labors, premature birth, and asphyxia neonatorum on the mental and physical condition of the child, especially in relation to deformities. Trans Obstet Soc Lond 1862; 2: 293–344.Google Scholar
Freud, S. Die infantile Cerebrallähmung. Vienna: Hölder, 1897.Google Scholar
Blair, E, Stanley, FJ. Intrapartum asphyxia: a rare cause of cerebral palsy. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 515–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Committee on Obstetrics, Maternal and Fetal Medicine. Fetal and Neonatal Neurologic Injury. ACOG Technical Bulletin 163. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1992.Google Scholar
Naeye, RL, Peters, EC, Bartholomew, M, et al. Origins of cerebral palsy. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 1154–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Stanley, FJ, Blair, E. Why have we failed to reduce the frequency of cerebral palsy?Med J Aust 1991; 154: 623–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, RL, Huddlestone, JF, Nelson, KG. Apgar scores and umbilical arterial pH in preterm newborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 651–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Fetal Heart Rate Patterns: Monitoring, Interpretation, and Management. ACOG Technical Bulletin 207. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1995.Google Scholar
Low, JA, Boston, RW, Pancham, FR. Fetal asphyxia during the intrapartum period in intrauterine growth retarded infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113: 351–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgran, LMR, Malcus, P, Svenningsen, NW. Intrauterine asphyxia and longterm outcome in preterm fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 512–16.Google Scholar
Myers, RE, Mueller-Huebach, E, Adamson, K. Predictability of the state of fetal oxygenation from quantitative analysis of the components of late decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 115: 1083–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watasuki, A, Murata, Y, Ninomiya, Y, et al. Autonomic nervous system regulation of baseline heart rate in the fetal lamb. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 519–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, F. Intrauterine resuscitation with terbutaline: a method for the management of acute intrapartum fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 131: 139–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reece, EA, Chervenak, FA, Romero, R, et al. Magnesium sulfate in the management of acute intrapartum fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 104–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, ET, Flanagan, B, Cohen, SE, et al. Intravenous nitroglycerin: a potent uterine relaxant for emergency obstetric procedures. Review of the literature and report of three cases. Int J Obstet Anesth 1996; 5: 264–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, SL, Gimovsky, ML, Miller, FC. Fetal heart rate response to scalp blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 44: 706–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejani, N, Verma, U, Hameed, C, et al. Method and route of delivery in the low birth weight vertex presentation correlated with early periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 1–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Riskin, A, Riskin-Mashiah, S, Lusky, A, et al. The relationship between delivery mode and mortality in very low birthweight singleton vertex-presenting infants. BJOG 2004; 111: 1365–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, H, Paneth, N, Lorenz, JM, et al. Labor and delivery factors in brain damage, disabling cerebral palsy, and neonatal death in low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1143–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A, Glazener, CM. Elective caesarean section versus expectant management for delivery of the small baby. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 2: CD000078.Google Scholar
Lee, HC, Gould, JB. Survival advantage associated with cesarean delivery in very low birth weight vertex neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HC, Gould, JB. Survival rates and mode of delivery for vertex preterm neonates according to small- or appropriate-for-gestational-age status. Pediatrics 2007; 1118: e1836–44.Google Scholar
Mercer, JS, Vohr, BR, McGrath, MM, et al. Delayed cord clamping in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and late-onset sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1235–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouse, D, Hirtz, DG, Thom, E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 895–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×