Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: July 2010

6 - Sperm cryopreservation for a donor program

from Cryopreservation of sperm and testicular tissue

References

1. ShermanJK, BungeRG. Effect of glycerol and freezing on some staining reactions of human spermatozoa. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1953; 84: 179–800.
2. CritserJK. Current status for semen banking in the USA. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 55–67.
3. BotchanA, HauserR, GamzuR, et al. Results of 6139 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2298–2304.
4. CrhaI, VentrubaP, ZakovaJ, et al. Survival and infertility treatment in male cancer patients after sperm banking. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2344–2348.
5. FrithL, BlythE, FarrandA. UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1675–1680.
6. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2006 Guidelines for Gamete and Embryo Donation. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (Suppl 5): S38–S50.
7. World Health Organization. Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm–Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
8. JanssensPM. No reason for a reduction in the number of offspring per sperm donor because of possible transmission of autosomal dominant diseases. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 669–671.
9. ClarkeGN, Liu deY, BakerHW. Recovery of human sperm motility and ability to interact with the human zona pellucida after more than 28 years of storage in liquid nitrogen. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 721–722.
10. HuJH, LiQW, JiangZL, et al. Effects of different extenders on DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following freezing–thawing. Cryobiology 2008; 57: 257–262.
11. OzkavukcuS, ErdemliE, IsikA, et al. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm parameters and ultrastructural morphology of human spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008; 25: 403–411.
12. JinB, YamasakiC, YamadaN, et al. The mechanism by which mouse spermatozoa are injured during freezing. J Reprod Dev 2008; 54: 265–269.
13. IsachenkoV, IsachenkoE, KatkovII, et al. Cryoprotectant-free cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification and freezing in vapor: effect on motility, DNA integrity, and fertilization ability. Biol Reprod 2004; 71: 1167–1173.
14. DesaiNN, BlackmonH, GoldfarbJ. Single sperm cryopreservation on cryoloops: an alternative to hamster zona for freezing individual spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9: 47–53.
15. IsachenkoE, IsachenkoV, KatkovII, et al. DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 932–939.
16. CurryMR. Cryopreservation of mammalian semen. Methods Mol Biol 2007; 368: 303–311.
17. Hovav1Y, SibirskyO, PollackRN. Comparison between the first and the second electroejaculate qualities obtained from neurologically intact men suffering from anejaculation. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2620–2622.
18. DeForgeD, BlackmerJ, GarrittyC, et al. Fertility following spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 693–703.
19. KafetsoulisA, BrackettNL, IbrahimE, et al. Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 781–789.
20. ShiehJY, ChenSU, WangYH, et al. A protocol of electroejaculation and systematic assisted reproductive technology achieved high efficiency and efficacy for pregnancy for anejaculatory men with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 535–540.