Aaslestad, K. B. and Joor, J. (eds.). Revisiting Napoleon’s Continental System: Local, Regional and European Experiences. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Ahlström, C. Demilitarised and Neutralised Territories in Europe. Mariehamn, Finland: Åland Islands Peace Institute, 2004.Google Scholar

Allen-Ebrahimian, B. ‘64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup’, Foreign Policy. 20 June 2017. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/20/64-years-later-cia-finally-releases-details-of-iranian-coup-iran-tehran-oil/.Google Scholar

Angell, N. The Great Illusion. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1910.Google Scholar

Anthony, I., Klimenko, E. and Su, F. A Strategic Triangle in the Arctic? Implications of China–Russia–United States Power Dynamics for Regional Security. SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security 2021/3. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, March 2021. www.sipri.org/publications/2021/sipri-insights-peace-and-security/strategic-triangle-arctic-implications-china-russia-united-states-power-dynamics-regional-security.Google Scholar

Arechaga, E. J. ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’ in Recueil des Cours, vol. I (1978).Google Scholar

Arechaga, E. J. Voting and the Handling of Disputes in the Security Council. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1950.Google Scholar

Arms Control Association (2022). Press Release. ‘NPT Review Outcome Highlights Deficit in Disarmament, Diplomacy, Divisions between Nuclear Rivals’. Washington, DC: Arms Control Association, 26 August 2022. www.armscontrol.org/aca-press-releases/2022-08/npt-review-outcome-highlights-deficit-disarmament-diplomacyGoogle Scholar

Bailey, S. Prohibitions and Restraints in War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Bascomb, N. The Winter Fortress: The Epic Mission to Sabotage Hitler’s Atomic Bomb. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2016.Google Scholar

Beckman, O. Armed Intervention. Lund: Lund University, 2005.Google Scholar

Bercovitch, J. and Rubin, J. Z. (eds). Mediation in International Relations. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bergman, R. Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israeli Targeted Assassinations. New York: Random House, 2018.Google Scholar

Berner, Ö. Krig eller Fred. Stockholm: Carlssons, 2020.Google Scholar

Bildt, C. Den nya oredans tid. Stockholm: Bonniers, 2019.Google Scholar

Bildt, C. Mina Krig. Stockholm: Bonniers, 2022.Google Scholar

Blair, T. A Journey. New York: Random House, 2010.Google Scholar

Blix, H. Treaty-Making Power. New York: Praeger, 1960.Google Scholar

Blix, H. ‘The Helsinki Declaration on Principles Guiding Relations between States in Europe’. Egyptian Journal of International Law, vol. 31 (1975).Google Scholar

Blix, H. ‘Area Bombardment: Rules and Reasons’. British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 49, no. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978, pp. 31–69.Google Scholar

Blix, H. ‘Iraq 2003: What the Leaders Say, and What They Leave Out’. Inside Story. 21 March 2011. https://insidestory.org.au/iraq-2003-what-the-leaders-say-and-what-they-leave-out/.Google Scholar

Blockmans, W. and Hoppenbrouwers, P. Introduction to Medieval Europe 300–1550. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar

Bowett, D. The Law of International Institutions. London: Stevens, 1963.Google Scholar

Braut-Hegghammer, M. ‘Revisiting Osirak’. International Security, vol. 36 (2011), pp. 101–132.Google Scholar

Bridge, F. R. and Bullen, R. The Great Powers and the European States System 1814–1914. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Brierly, J. L. The Outlook for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1944.Google Scholar

Bring, O. Nedrustningens Folkrätt. Stockholm: Norstedts, 1987.Google Scholar

Bring, O. FN-stadgans folkrätt. Stockholm: Norstedts, 1992.Google Scholar

Bring, O. ‘The Westphalia Peace Tradition in International Law’. International Law Studies, vol. 75 (2000), pp. 57–80. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1435&context=ilsGoogle Scholar

Bring, O. Neutralitetens uppgång och fall. Stockholm: Atlantis, 2008.Google Scholar

Britannica (2021). ‘The Continental System and the blockade, 1807–11’. www.britannica.com/event/Napoleonic-Wars/The-Continental-System-and-the-blockade-1807-11. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Brownlie, I. International Law and the Use of Force by States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Bunde, T. and Franke, B. (eds.). The Art of Diplomacy: 75+ Views Behind the Scenes of World Politics. Berlin: Econ, 2022, ISBN: 9783430210775.Google Scholar

Bush, G. W. ‘US National Security Strategy’. Washington, DC: The White House, 1 June 2002. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ei/wh/15425.htm.Google Scholar

Carlsson, S. and Rosén, J. Svensk Historia. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget, 1961.Google Scholar

Carpenter, T. G. ‘Why Russia Likes to Play Aerial “Chicken” with America’. The National Interest. 8 August 2020. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-russia-likes-play-aerial-‘chicken’-america-166450. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Cassese, A. (ed), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force. Boston: Nijhoff Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar

Chapman, T. The Congress of Vienna. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Ciment, J. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Conflicts since World War II. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. and Totani, Y. The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal: Law, History and Jurisprudence. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Crisis Group. ‘Turkey-Greece: From Maritime Brinksmanship to Dialogue’. Crisis Group. 31 May 2021. www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/western-europemediterranean/263-turkey-greece-maritime-brinkmanship-dialogue. Accessed: 4 January 2022.Google Scholar

Dalay, G. ‘Turkey, Europe, and the Eastern Mediterranean: Charting a way out of the current deadlock’. Brookings Institution Report. 28 January 2021. www.brookings.edu/research/turkey-europe-and-the-eastern-mediterranean-charting-a-way-out-of-the-current-deadlock/.Google Scholar

Damrosch, L. F. ‘Use of Force and Constitutionalism’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 36 (1997), pp. 449–472.Google Scholar

Davis, I (ed.). ‘Armed Conflict and Peace Processes in South Asia’. SIPRI Yearbook 2021: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021a, pp. 95–109.Google Scholar

Davis, I (ed.). ‘The Interstate Armed Conflict Between Armenia and Azerbaijan’. SIPRI Yearbook 2021: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021b, pp. 127–132.Google Scholar

Deller, N. Makhijani, A. and Burroughs, J. Rule of Power or Rule of Law. New York: The Apex Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Detter, I. The Laws of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Devere, H., Mark, S. and Verbitsky, J. ‘A History of the Language of Friendship in International Treaties’. International Politics, vol. 48, no. 1 (January 2011), pp. 46–70.Google Scholar

Dhanapala, J. Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT: An Insider’s Account. Geneva: UNIDIR, 2005.Google Scholar

Dobson, H. The Group of 7/8. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Donner, R. ‘Public International Law and King Magnus Eriksson’s Law of the Realm’. Journal of the History of International Law, vol. 4 (2002), pp. 114–134.Google Scholar

Dower, J. W. The Violent American Century. War on Terror since World War II. Chicago: Haymarket, 2017.Google Scholar

Duarte, S. ‘Moral Leadership and Nuclear Weapons’. Lecture at Yale Divinity School on 19 September 2008. New York: United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (2008). https://unoda-web.s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/assets/HomePage/HR/docs/2008/2008Sept19_Yale_Divinity.pdfGoogle Scholar

Duelfer, C. ‘Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD, with Addendums’ (Duelfer Report), Revised Edition, 25 April 2005, www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GPO-DUELFERREPORT.Google Scholar

ElBaradei, M. The Age of Deception. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2011.Google Scholar

Ellsberg, D. The Doomsday Machine. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.Google Scholar

Engdahl, O. and Wrange, P. (ed). Law at War: The Law as it Was and the Law as it Should Be. Leiden: Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar

Erästö, T. ‘Implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on Iran’s Nuclear Programme’. In Davis, Ian (ed.). SIPRI Yearbook 2021: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 426–433.Google Scholar

Ertman, T. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Council. ‘EU restrictive measures in response to the crisis in Ukraine’. www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/ukraine-crisis/. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Evans, G. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington, DC: Brookings, 2008.Google Scholar

Evans, G. and Kawaguchi, T. (co-chairs) Eliminating Nuclear Threats, Report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (2009)Google Scholar

Falk, R. ‘Viet Nam and international law’. Yale Law Journal, vol. 75 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, M. The Purpose of Intervention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Franck, T. M. Recourse to Force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Franck, T. M. ‘The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Disequilibrium’. American Journal of International Law, vol. 100 (2006), pp. 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, L. ‘The Chicago Speech and Criteria for the Use of Force’. International Relations, vol. 31 no. 2 (2017), pp. 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, F. ‘Soviet Threats to Intervene in the Middle East 1956–1973’, RAND Report N-1577-FF. June 1980. www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2005/N1577.pdf. Accessed: 1 January 2022.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fulbright, J. W. The Arrogance of Power [originally published 1966]. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Gat, A. War in Human Civilization. 2006. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gbadanosi, N. ‘What’s in Store for Africa in 2022’, Foreign Policy. 29 December 2021. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/12/29/africa-2022-conflict-ethiopia-sudan-somalia/. Accessed: 1 January 2022.Google Scholar

Gihl, T. Om freden och säkerheten – nationalism och internationalism. Stockholm: Norstedt, 1962.Google Scholar

Goertz, G., Diehl, Paul F. and Balas, A. The Puzzle of Peace: The Evolution of Peace in the International System. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Goldblat, J. Arms Control: The New Guide to Negotiations and Agreements. Revised and updated second edition. London: Sage, 2002 [earlier edition, 1994].Google Scholar

Goldstein, J. S. Winning the War on War. The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. New York: Penguin, 2011.Google Scholar

Goodrich, L. M. and Hambro, E. Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents. Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1947.Google Scholar

Gómez, J. M. et al. ‘The Phylogenetic Roots of Human Lethal Violence’. Nature, vol. 538 (13 October 2016), pp. 233–237.Google Scholar

Gottemoeller, R. ‘What’s Eating Putin?’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 3 March 2022. https://thebulletin.org/2022/03/whats-eating-putin/.Google Scholar

Gray, A. ‘Russia bans top EU officials in retaliation for sanctions’. Politico. 30 April 2021. www.politico.eu/article/russia-bans-top-eu-officials-in-retaliation-for-sanctions/. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Gray, C. International Law and the Use of Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4th ed., 2018.Google Scholar

Green, J. A., Henderson, C. and Ruys, T. ‘Russia’s attack on Ukraine and the jus ad bellum’. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law. DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803.Google Scholar

Hafkin, G. ‘The Russo-Georgian war of 2008. Developing the Law of Unauthorized Humanitarian Intervention after Kosovo’. Boston University International Law Journal, vol. 28. (2010), p. 219. www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/international/volume28n1/documents/219-240.pdf.Google Scholar

Harari, Y. N. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: Harper, 2015.Google Scholar

Harrer, G. Dismantling the Iraqi Nuclear Programme: The Inspections of the International Atomic Energy Agency. 1991–1998. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Hedges, C. War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning. New York: Public Affairs, 2002.Google Scholar

Henderson, C. The Use of Force and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Henkin, L. How Nations Behave. New York: Praeger, 1968.Google Scholar

Hinsley, F. H. Power and the Pursuit of Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Baltimore: Penguin Books (English Edition), 1968.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, S. ‘Rousseau on War and Peace’. New York: Cambridge University Press. American Political Science Review, vol. 57 no. 2 (1963–06), pp. 317–333.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.Google Scholar

Imsen, S., Senmedeltiden. Europas historia 1300–1550. Stockholm: Dialogos, 2011.Google Scholar

International Court of Justice. ‘Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons’. Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996. I.C.J. Reports 1996, 2006. p. 226. www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdfGoogle Scholar

International Criminal Court. ‘The states parties to the Rome Statute’. 2021. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/pages/the%20states%20parties%20to%20the%20rome%20statute.aspx. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

International Criminal Court. ‘List of All Cases-’ International Court of Justice. 2022. www.icj-cij.org/en/list-of-all-cases. Accessed: 4 January 2022.Google Scholar

Intoccia, G. F. ‘American Bombing of Libya: An International Legal Analysis’. Case Western Reserve Journal, vol. 19, no. 2 (1987), pp. 177–213.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. H. Sovereignty, the WTO, and Change Fundamentals of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/Dip/PaW/index.html#foreword. Accessed: 16 May 2023.Google Scholar

Joyner, D. H. ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Nonproliferation, Counterproliferation, and International Law’. Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 30 (2005), p. 507 ff.Google Scholar

Joyner, D. H. International Law and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Joyner, D. H. ‘United Nations Counter-Proliferation Sanctions and International Law’. Working Paper. Alabama Law Scholarly Commons. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama. 22 March 2016. https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1554&context=fac_working_papers.Google Scholar

Kaldor, M. ‘From Just War to Just Peace’. In den Boer, Monica and Wilde, Jaap de (eds.) The Viability of Human Security. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2008, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar

Kane, A. The New Zealand Lectures on Disarmament. Occasional Paper Number 26. New York: United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, June 2014, pp. 11–16. https://disarmament.unoda.org/publications/occasionalpapers/no-26/Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. F. Thirteen Days. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1969.Google Scholar

Killelea, S. Peace in the Age of Chaos. Melbourne: Hardic Grant Books, 2020.Google Scholar

Kissinger, H. Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994.Google Scholar

Kissinger, H. World Order. London: Penguin, 2016.Google Scholar

Klare, M. ‘Cyber Battles, Nuclear Outcomes?’ Arms Control Today, November 2019. www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-11/features/cyber-battles-nuclear-outcomes-dangerous-new-pathways-escalation.Google Scholar

Kornbluh, P. (ed.) ‘Extreme Option: Overthrow Allende’. Washington, DC: National Security Archive, 15 September 2020. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/chile/2020-09-15/extreme-option-overthrow-allende.Google Scholar

Krepong, M. Winning and Losing the Nuclear Peace, The Rise, Demise, and Revival of Arms Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Kress, B. The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Kress, C. The Ukraine War and the Prohibition of the Use of Force in International Law. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2022.Google Scholar

Lacina, B. and Gleditsch, N. P. ‘Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths’. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, vol. 21, no. 2–3 (June 2005), pp. 145–166.Google Scholar

LeGrande, W. and Kornblum, P. Back Channel to Cuba. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Lehmköster, J. et al. ‘The Arctic and Antarctic – Extreme, Climatically Crucial and in Crisis’. World Ocean Review, no. 6. (2019), Hamburg: Maribus. https://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-6/.Google Scholar

Leitenberg, M. Deaths in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Peace studies program, Occasional paper. July 2003. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/69395/29-Leitenberg-Deaths-in-Wars-3ed.pdf.Google Scholar

Leitenberg, M. The Hazards of Operations Involving Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Lesaffer, R. ‘Peace through Law: The Hague Peace Conferences and the Rise of the Ius Contra Bellum’. In Abbenhuis, Maartje, Barber, Christopher Ernest, and Higgins, Annalise R. (eds.) War, Peace and International Order? The Legacies of the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 31–51.Google Scholar

Mack, R. E. The Code of Hammurabi. Baghdad: Ministry of Culture and Information, 1979.Google Scholar

Mahmoudi, S. ‘Self-Defense and “Unwilling or Unable States” in Recueil des Cours of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 422 (2021).Google Scholar

Malkasian, C. The American War in Afghanistan: A History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Mandel, R. ‘Sources of International River Disputes’, Conflict Quarterly, Fall 1992. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/JCS/article/download/15069/16138/0.Google Scholar

Marten, K. ‘Russia’s Use of the Semi-State Security Forces: The Case of the Wagner Group’. Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 35, no. 3 (2019), pp. 181–204, DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2019.1591142. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Mazower, M. Governing the World. New York: Penguin Books, 2012.Google Scholar

McNair, A. D. ‘The Stimson Doctrine of Non-Recognition’. British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 14 (1933), p. 65.Google Scholar

Menon, R. The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Moberg, E. Towards a Science of States: Their Evolution and Properties. Lövestad: Moberg Publications, 2014.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H. Politics among Nations. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2006.Google Scholar

Morris, I. War! What Is It Good For? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014.Google Scholar

Müller, H. and Wunderlich, C. Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myrdal, A. The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race. New York: Pantheon, 1982.Google Scholar

Neff, S. War and the Law of Nations: A General History. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Neff, S. Justice among Nations: A History of International Law. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Neumann, T. ‘Norway and Russia Agree on Maritime Boundary in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean’. American Society of International Law. Insights. 10 December 2010. www.asil.org/insights/volume/14/issue/34/norway-and-russia-agree-maritime-boundary-barents-sea-and-arctic-ocean. Accessed: 4 January 2022.Google Scholar

Nichol, J. ‘Russia-Georgia Conflict in August 2008: Context and Implications for US Interests’. US Congressional Research Service, Report RL34618, 3 March 2009. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL34618.pdf.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, A. A Concise History of the Law of Nations. Revised edition. New York: MacMillan, 1954.Google Scholar

Obama, B. Remarks at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial, 27 May 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/05/27/remarks-president-obama-and-prime-minister-abe-japan-hiroshima-peace. Accessed: 3 January 2022.Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, C. ‘Rewriting the Just War Tradition: Just War in Classical Greek Political Thought and Practice’. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 1 (March 2015), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Office of the Historian. ‘Oil Embargo, 1973–1974’. US Department of State. 2021. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/oil-embargo. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Ohlsson, E. Armbrytning med Ondskan. Staffan de Mistura: Ett Liv med Krig och Konfliktlösning. Stockholm: Ordfront, 2022.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. The Future of International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1921, p. 1.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. International Law. 7th ed. by H. Lauterpacht. London: Longmans, Green, 1948.Google Scholar

Osiander, A. ‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth’. International Organization, vol. 55 no 2 (Spring, 2001), pp. 251–287.Google Scholar

Ouimet, M. The Rise and Fall of the Brezhnev Doctrine in Soviet Foreign Policy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Paulus, A. ‘Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation’. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2011). https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1482.Google Scholar

Perry, W. My Journey at the Nuclear Brink. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Pettersson, T. et al. ‘Organized Violence 1989–2020, with a Special Emphasis on Syria’. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 58, no. 4 (July 2021), pp. 593–610.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. The Better Angels of our Nature. New York: Viking, 2011.Google Scholar

Pirrone, P. ‘The Use of Force in the Framework of the O.A.S’. In Cassese, A (ed.). The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force’. Dordrecht: Netherlands, 1986, pp. 223–240.Google Scholar

Porter, G. Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Porter, G. Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare. New York: Just World Books, 2014.Google Scholar

Rifkind, G. and Picco, G. The Fog of Peace, The Human Face of Conflict Resolution. London: I.B. Tauris, 2014.Google Scholar

Roehrlich, E. Inspectors for Peace. A History of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Rostow, N. ‘Law and the Use of Force by States: The Brezhnev Doctrine’. Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 7 no. 2, (1981), pp. 209–243. https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/6783/14_7YaleJWorldPubOrd209_1980_1981_.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. The Social Contract [originally published 1762]. London: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. The Plan for Perpetual Peace, on the Government of Poland, and Other Writings on History and Politics [originally published 1756]. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Rudd, K. ‘Why the QUAD alarms China’ in Foreign Affairs. 6 August 2021.Google Scholar

Rydell, R. ‘Disarmament without Agreements?’ International Negotiations, vol. 10 (2005), pp. 363–380.Google Scholar

Sands, P. Lawless World. London: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar

Savage, C. ‘How 4 Federal Lawyers Paved the Way to Kill Osama bin Laden’. The New York Times. 28 October 2015. www.nytimes.com/2015/10/29/us/politics/obama-legal-authorization-osama-bin-laden-raid.html. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Scahill, J. Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. New York: Nation Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Schachter, O. ‘Dag Hammarskjöld and the Relation of Law to Politics’. American Journal of International Law, vol. 56, no. 1 (Jan. 1962), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Schindler, D. and Toman, J. The Laws of Armed Conflicts. 2nd ed. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1981.Google Scholar

Schulte, C. Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwebel, S. M. ‘Aggression, Intervention and Self-Defence in Modern International Law’ in Recueil des Cours 1972, vol. II, p. 451.Google Scholar

Schwebel, S. M. ‘International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht. Vol. 5: Disputes, War and Neutrality: Parts IX-XIV by Elihu Lauterpacht’. American Journal of International Law, vol. 99, no. 3 (July 2005), pp. 726–729.Google Scholar

Simma, B. et al. The Charter of the United Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. ‘The War in Iraq and International Law’. Melbourne Journal of International Law, vol. 6, (2005), pp. 167–188. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1681149/Simpson.pdf.Google Scholar

SIPRI. SIPRI Yearbook 2021. https://sipri.org/yearbook/2021/08. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Sjöberg, T. From Korea and Suez to Iraq. Lund: Sekel, 2006.Google Scholar

Solingen, E. Nuclear Logics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Spiers, E. M. Agents of War: A History of Chemical and Biological Weapons, Second Expanded Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Stone, J. Legal Controls of International Conflict. New York: Reinhart, 1954.Google Scholar

Stürchler, N. The Threat of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Tägli, S. ‘Alfred Nobel’s Thoughts about War and Peace’. Nobel Prize Outreach AB. www.nobelprize.org/alfred-nobel/alfred-nobels-thoughts-about-war-and-peace/. 20 November 1998. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Tannenwald, N. The Nuclear Taboo. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Taylor, Emily. ‘A Breakthrough for UN Governance of Cyberspace’. World Politics Review. 16 March 2021, www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/29496/a-breakthrough-for-global-cyber-governance.Google Scholar

Thakur, R. ‘Review Article: The Responsibility to Protect at 15’. International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 2 (2016). www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/ia/inta92-2-10-thakur_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Thurer, D. International Humanitarian Law. Leiden: Nijhoff Publishers, 2011.Google Scholar

Tilly, C. Coercion, Capital and European States. AD 990–1992. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Tolstrup, J. Russia vs. The EU: The Competition for Influence in Post-Soviet States. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2013.Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, M. ‘The United States and the NATO Non-extension Assurances of 1990: New Light on an Old Problem?’ International Security, Winter 2020/2021, pp. 162–203.Google Scholar

‘Treaty of Tordesillas’. 7 June 1494. Indigenous Values Initiative, Doctrine of Discovery Project, 23 July 2018. https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/treaty-of-tordesillas/.Google Scholar

Tuerk, H. ‘20 years of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): An Overview’. Revue Belge de Droit International 49 (2), (2016), pp. 449–486.Google Scholar

United Kingdom Ministry of Defense. Global Strategic Trends: The Future Starts Today (2018).Google Scholar

United States Department of State. ‘Japanese Conquest of Manchuria 1931–1932’. In U.S., Department of State, Publication 1983, Peace and War: United States Foreign Policy, 1931–1941. Washington, DC: U.S., Government Printing Office, 1943, pp. 3–8. www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/Dip/PaW/index.html#foreword. Accessed: 16 May 2023.Google Scholar

UN. ‘Antarctic Treaty’. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. 1959. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/antarctic. Accessed: 4 January 2022.Google Scholar

UN. General Assembly, ‘Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations’. A/RES/25/2625. 24 October 1970. 1970. http://un-documents.net/a25r2625.htm. Accessed: 3 January 2022.Google Scholar

UN. ‘Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention and Interference in the Internal Affairs of States’. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly. A/Res/36/103, 9 December 1981. 1981. www.un-documents.net/a36r103.htm#:~:text=A%2FRES%2F36%2F103%20-%20Declaration%20on%20the%20Inadmissibility%20of%20Intervention,and%20non-violence%20for%20the%20children%20of%20the%20world. Accessed: 3 January 2022.Google Scholar

UN. ‘Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations [Brahimi Report]’. New York: United Nations, 2000. www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/brahimi%20report%20peacekeeping.pdf. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

UN. A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. New York: United Nations, 2004. www.un.org/peacebuilding/sites/www.un.org.peacebuilding/files/documents/hlp_more_secure_world.pdf.Google Scholar

UN. ‘General Assembly Adopts Resolution Calling upon States Not to Recognize Changes in Status of Crimea Region’. GA/11493 (press release on A/RES/68/262). 27 March 2014. www.un.org/press/en/2014/ga11493.doc.htm. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

UN. Security Council, S/RES/2231, 20 July 2015, on Iran Nuclear Issue. 2015. www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/2231/background. Accessed: 1 January 2022.Google Scholar

UN. United Nations Treaty Series. ‘Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Government of the Republic of Lithuania regarding the junction point of the boundaries of the Exclusive Economic Zones and continental shelf in the Baltic sea’. 30 November 2005. 2016. www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/Sweden-Lithuania-Russia%20treaty.pdf. Accessed: 7 June 2022.Google Scholar

UN. ‘General Assembly Adopts 5 Resolutions on Middle East, including Text Urging States Not to Recognize Changes on Status of Jerusalem, Pre-1967 Borders’. 2019. www.un.org/press/en/2019/ga12220.doc.htm. Accessed: 31 December 2021.Google Scholar

Uppsala Conflict Data. 2014. http://ucdp.uu.se. Accessed: 1 January 2022.Google Scholar

Vargo, M. E. The Mossad Intelligence 1960–1990. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2015.Google Scholar

Vervey, W. D. ‘Humanitarian Intervention’ in Cassese. The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force, 1986.Google Scholar

Walsh, D. and Dahir, A. L. ‘Why Is Ethiopia at War with Itself?’. New York Times. 14 December 2021. www.nytimes.com/article/ethiopia-tigray-conflict-explained.html.Google Scholar

Walters, F. P. A History of the League of Nations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Waslekar, S. A World Without War. New Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers India, 2022.Google Scholar

Watkins, N. J. ‘Disputed Sovereignty in the Falkland Islands: The Argentina-Great Britain Conflict of 1982’. Florida State University Law Review, Fall 1983. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2142&context=lr. Accessed: 4 January 2022.Google Scholar

Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission. Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms (Report). Stockholm: WMD Commission, 2006. https://ycsg.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/weapons_of_terror.pdf.Google Scholar

Williams, P. and Wallace, D. Unit 731. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1989.Google Scholar

Wolf, A. T. ‘Shared Waters: Conflict and Cooperation’. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 32, no. 1 (1 November 2007), pp. 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041006.101434.Google Scholar

Woolf, A. F. ‘Russia’s Nuclear Weapons: Doctrine, Forces, and Modernization’, report R45861. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 21 April 2022. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45861/15.Google Scholar

Wright, T. All measures Short of War: The Contest for the 21st Century & The Future of American Power. Washington, DC: Brookings, 2017.Google Scholar