Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: June 2012

21 - The futures of European labour law: (2) the European Court's agenda and ordre communautaire social

from Section III - The futures of European labour law

Summary

Interventions by the European Court of Justice may have a critical impact on the future of European labour law. Thus, the decisions of the European Court of Justice in Viking and Laval were widely expected to be significant. In the event, they may precipitate a crisis for the European social model and for the EU itself.

The institutional architecture of the European social model looks to the autonomous trade union movement as the backbone of Social Europe. As elaborated in this book, European labour law's fundamental principles and rights at both collective and individual level look to collective bargaining and collective action by trade unions and employers' organisations as the collective framework for individual employment protection.

The European Union, a transnational European economy, like the national economies of the Member States, requires an economic balance of power between employers and workers. In the Member States, this balance is achieved, in part, through the collective action of trade unions and organisations of employers. The social partners at EU level have not achieved this balance of power.

EU law on free movement transforms the balance of economic power in the EU. The freedom of enterprises to move throughout the single European market has shifted the balance of economic power towards employers. This is particularly evident in the overwhelming economic power of multinational enterprises, the magnitude of transnational capital movements, the social dumping effects of global trade, delocalisation, unemployment and deskilling.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Bercusson, B., ‘The Trade Union Movement and the European Union: Judgment Day’, (2007) 13 European Law Journal (No. 3, May) 279–308
Bercusson, B., Collective Action and Economic Freedoms: Assessment of the Opinions of the Advocates-General in Laval and Viking and Six Alternative Solutions, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI-REHS), 2007 (57 pp.)
Anner, Mark, Greer, Ian, Hauptmeier, Marco, Lillie, Nathan and Winchester, Nik, ‘The Industrial Determinants of Transnational Solidarity: Global Interunion Politics in Three Sectors’, (2006) 12 European Journal of Industrial Relations7–27
Ahlberg, K., Bruun, N. and Malmberg, J., ‘The Vaxholm Case from a Swedish and European Perspective’, (2006) 12 Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research (No. 2, Summer 2006) 155–66
Eklund, Ronnie, ‘The Laval Case’, (2006) 35 Industrial Law Journal (No. 2, June) 202–8
Davies, A. C. L., ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? The Viking and Laval Cases in the ECJ’, (2006) 35 Industrial Law Journal (No. 1, March) 75–86
Jacobs, A., ‘Collective Self-Regulation’, Chapter 5 in Hepple, B. A. (ed.), The Making of Labour Law in Europe: A Comparative Study of Nine Countries up to 1945, London: Mansell, 1986, pp. 193–241
(Everson, M., ‘The Legacy of the Market Citizen’, in Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds.), New Legal Dynamics of European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961
Bercusson, B., Fair Wages Resolutions, London: Mansell, London, 1978
Stokke, Torgeir Aarvaag, ‘The Anatomy of Two-tier Bargaining Models’, (2008) 14 European Journal of Industrial Relations (No. 1) 7–24
Maduro, Miguel Poiares, ‘Striking the Elusive Balance Between Economic Freedom and Social Rights in the EU’, Chapter 13 in Alston, Philip (ed.), The EU and Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 449–472, at p. 455
Hirschman, Albert, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970
Maduro, stated in his earlier book, We The Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (Oxford: Hart, 1998), at pp. 138–9
Mortelmans, K., ‘Towards Convergence in the Application of the Rules on Free Movement and on Competition’, (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review613–49
Monti, G., ‘Article 81 EC and Public Policy’, (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 1057 at p. 1078
Weatherill, Stephen, Cases and Materials on EU Law, 6th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 526
Woolfson, Charles and Summers, Jeff, ‘Labour Mobility in Construction: European Implications of the Laval un Partneri Dispute with Swedish Labour’, (2006) 12 European Journal of Industrial Relations49–68, pp. 62, 63
Bercusson, B. and Bruun, N., European Industrial Relations Dictionary, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005, pp. 2–50, especially pp. 4–11
Bercusson, B. and Estlund, C., ‘Introduction’, in Bercusson, B. and Estlund, C. (eds.), Regulating Labour in the Wake of Globalization: New Challenges, New Institutions, Oxford: Hart, 2008, vol. II of the Columbia-London Series, pp. 1–18