Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- 1 Introduction: virtue and morality
- 2 Pre-Platonic ethics
- 3 Platonic ethics
- 4 Aristotle on nature and value
- 5 Some issues in Aristotle's moral psychology
- 6 The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics
- 7 Socratic paradox and Stoic theory
- 8 Doing without objective values: ancient and modern strategies
- 9 Moral responsibility: Aristotle and after
- Bibliography
- Index of names
- Index of passages discussed
- Index of subjects
7 - Socratic paradox and Stoic theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- 1 Introduction: virtue and morality
- 2 Pre-Platonic ethics
- 3 Platonic ethics
- 4 Aristotle on nature and value
- 5 Some issues in Aristotle's moral psychology
- 6 The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics
- 7 Socratic paradox and Stoic theory
- 8 Doing without objective values: ancient and modern strategies
- 9 Moral responsibility: Aristotle and after
- Bibliography
- Index of names
- Index of passages discussed
- Index of subjects
Summary
Reactions to Stoic ethics
Stoic ethical doctrines provoke severe criticism from both ancient and modern readers. The criticism, however, expresses two sharply opposed views of the character and implications of Stoicism. These opposed views appear already in Cicero's comments on Stoicism, and they have affected interpretation and criticism of the Stoic position ever since.
Some critics attack the apparently extravagant, indeed outrageous, character of the Stoic conclusions. In the view of these critics, someone who actually accepted and practised Stoic doctrines would be so alien to us that he would be inhuman. Critics normally rest the charge of inhumanity on two features of Stoicism: (1) Since all reputed goods and evils except virtue and vice are indifferents, the sage sees no reason to be strongly concerned about anything other than virtue and vice. (2) The sage is free of all emotions, and so has no non-rational motive for being strongly concerned about anything.
When Cicero defends Lucius Murena in court, he seeks to undermine the effects of Cato's damaging and credible testimony against Murena, by ridiculing Cato's well-known Stoicism:
For there was a man of outstanding intellect, Zeno, the followers of whose doctrines are called Stoics. His opinions and precepts are of the following sort. The sage is never moved by favour; he never forgives anyone's offence; no one except a foolish and trivial person is merciful; a real man is never moved or mollified by pleas; only sages are wise; only they are handsome, however disfigured; only they are rich, however sunk in beggary; only they are kings, however sunk in slavery. […]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ethics , pp. 151 - 192Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1998
- 2
- Cited by