Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

5 - Individual Differences That Affect the Quality of Learning in Doctoral Candidates

from Part A - Dispositions Toward Quality of Learning

References

Arbuckle, J. (2008). Amos 17.0.0. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.
Basseches, M. A. (1984). Dialectical thinking and adult development. New York: Ablex.
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1989). Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment using the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33, 151–163.
Bourke, S., & Holbrook, A. (2010). How examiners identify quality of research theses. Paper accepted in a symposium ‘Exploring and managing uncertainty throughout the doctoral process’, to be presented at the Australian Association for Educational Research Annual Conference, Melbourne, 28 November–2 December.
Bourke, S., Holbrook, A., Lovat, T., & Farley, P. (2004). Attrition, completion and completion times of PhD candidates. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, 28 November–2 December. Published at http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/bou04849.pdf
Bromme, R, Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 7–26.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
Cantwell, R. (2004). Positioning the bar: Outcomes associated with successful completion of an enabling course. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 44, 354–389.
Cantwell, R. (2007). What have I got myself into? About learning and being at university. In J. Scevak & R. Cantwell (Eds.), Stepping stones: A guide for mature-aged students at university (pp. 28–35). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Cantwell, R. (2010). The nature of academic learning. In R. Cantwell & J. Scevak (Eds.), An academic life: A handbook for new academics (pp. 25–34). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Cantwell, R., Archer, J., & Bourke, S. (2001). A comparison of the academic experiences and achievement of university students entering by traditional and non-traditional means. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 21–34.
Cantwell, R., Scevak, J., Bourke, S., & Holbrook, A. (2012 in press). Identifying individual differences among doctoral candidates: A framework for understanding problematic candidature. International Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1016/ j.ijer.2012.02.001
Cartwright, K., Galupo, M., Tyree, S., & Jennings, J. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Complex Postformal Thought Questionnaire: Assessing adults’ cognitive development. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 183–189.
Colebatch, H. K. (2002). Through a glass darkly: Policy development on higher degree completions in Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(1), 27–35.
Denicolo, P. (2003). Assessing the PhD: A constructive view of criteria. Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 84–91.
DEEWR (2010). Selected Higher Education Statistics. Downloaded from http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Publications/HEStatistics/Publications/Pages/Students.aspx.
Greenglass, E., Schwartzer, R., Jacubiec, D., Fiksenbaum, L., & Tauber, S. (1999). The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of the Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR), Cracow, Poland, July 12–14. Available online at http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/poland.htm/
Holbrook, A. (2007). Levels of success in the use of the literature in a doctorate. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21, 1020–1041.
Holbrook, A., & Bourke, S. (2010). Modelling and validating an approach to maximise consistency in research thesis examination. Manuscript in preparation.
Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., & Lovat, T. (2007). Examiner comment on the literature review in PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 337–356.
Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Lovat, T., & Dally, K. (2004). Investigating PhD thesis examination reports. International Journal of Educational Research, 52, 35–47.
Kleuver, R. C., & Green, K. E. (1998). The Responsibility Scale: A research note on dissertation completion. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 520–531.
Kramer, D. A. (1989). Development of an awareness of contradiction across the life span and the question of postformal operations. In M. L. Commons, J. D. Sinnott, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.). Adult development: Comparisons and applications of developmental models (pp. 133–159). New York: Praeger.
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Epistemic metacognition in context: Evaluating and learning online information. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 67–90.
McCann, E. J., & Garcia, T. (1999). Maintaining motivation and regulating emotion: Measuring individual differences in academic volitional strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 259–279.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Muis, K., & Franco, G. (2010). Epistemic profiles and metacognition: Support for the consistency hypothesis. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 27–45.
Muszynski, S. Y., & Akamatsu, T. J. (1991). Delay in completion of doctoral dissertations in clinical psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 119–123.
Powell, S., & Green, H. (2003). Research degree examining: Quality issues of principle and practice. Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 55–63.
Powell, S., & McCauley, C. (2002). Research degree examining – common principles and divergent practices. Quality Assurance in Education, 10, 104–115.
PASW Statistics (2009). PASW 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Richter, T., & Schmidt, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 47–65.
Scevak, J., Budd, J., & Cantwell, R. (2010) ‘I never thought to ask the student what they think a PhD is.’ Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Melbourne, 29 November–3 December.
Scevak, J., Cantwell, C., Bourke, S., & Reid, A. (2007). A metacognitive profile of doctoral students. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary, 28 August 28–1 September.
Schommer, M. A. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance amongst secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406–411.
Schraw, G., & Denison, R. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
ten Cate, O., Snell, L., Mann, K., & Vermunt, J. (2004). Orienting teaching toward the learning process. Academic Medicine, 72, 219–228.
Tennant, M. (2000). Adult learning for self-development and change. In A. L. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 87–100). New York: Wiley.
Tennant, M., & Pogson, P. (1995). Learning and change in the adult years: A developmental perspective. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Veenman, M., Van Hout-Wolters, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
Vermunt, J. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 359–384.