Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:48:24.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Mark Osiel
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The End of Reciprocity
Terror, Torture, and the Law of War
, pp. 405 - 652
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schmitt, Eric, “Senior Qaeda Commander Is Killed by U.S. Missile,” New York Times, Feb. 1, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Reuters, , “Missile Kills 13 in Pakistan,” New York Times, Feb. 28, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Myers, Steven, “Bush Praises Pakistan Just Hours after U.S. Strike,” New York Times, July 29, 2008 at A6Google Scholar
Erlanger, Steven, “Israeli Strike Kills Three Militants,” New York Times, Dec. 19, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek, “September 11 and the Law of War,” 28 Yale J. Int'l L.1, 20 (2003)Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, “The Legal Situation of Unlawful/Unprivileged Combatants,” 85 Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel, “U.S. Counter-terrorism Options: A Taxonomy,” 49 Survival121 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortright, David & Lopez, George, “Strategic Counter-Terrorism,” inUniting against Terror: Cooperative Nonmilitary Responses to the Global Terrorist Threat, Cortright, David & Lopez, George, eds. 1 (2007)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, “State-Sponsored Assassination in International and Domestic Law,” 17 Yale J. Int'l L.609 (1992)Google Scholar
Moore, Martha, “Guantánamo Bay Puzzles Candidates,” U.S.A. Today, June 22, 2007, at 8AGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David & Risen, James, “Secret U.S. Endorsement of Severe Interrogations,” New York Times, Oct 4, 1007, at A1Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, “Slavery and the Phenomenology of Torture,” 74 Social Research149, 158 (2007)Google Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark & Shane, Scott, “After Sharp Words on C.I.A., Obama Faces a Delicate Task,” New York Times, Dec. 3, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Delahunty, Robert & Yoo, John, “Rewriting the Laws of War for a New Enemy: The Geneva Convention Isn't the Last Word,” Los Angeles Times, Feb. 1, 2005, at B11Google Scholar
Hertzberg, Hendrick, “Sparring Partners,” New Yorker, Aug. 20, 2007, at 23–24Google Scholar
Londras, Fiona, “The Right to Challenge the Lawfulness of Detention: An International Perspective on U.S. Detention of Suspected Terrorists,” 12 J. J. Conflict & Security L.223, 238–47 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinks, Derek observes in “The Declining Significance of POW Status,” 45 Harv. Int'l L.J.367, 402 (2004)Google Scholar
Parisi, Francesco & Ghei, Nita, “The Role of Reciprocity in International Law,” 36 Cornell Int'l L.J.93, 119, 122 (2003)Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, “Reciprocity,” 7 Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 400, 400 (1985)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, “The U.S. and the Use of Force: Double-Edged Hegemony and the Management of Global Emergencies,” 15 Euro. J. Int'l L.677, 695 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneeberger, Ernst, “Reciprocity as a Maxim of International Law,” 37 Geo. L. J.29 (1948)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, “The Limits of the Operation of the Law of War,” 30 Brit. Yearbook. of Int'l L.206, 212 (1953)Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, “The War on Terrorism and International Humanitarian Law,” 14 Mich. St. J. Int'l L.19, 22 (2006)Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “La Technique du Droit International de L'organisation de la Paix,” 15 R.D.I.L.C.16 (1934)Google Scholar
Berman, Nathaniel, “Privileging Combat? Contemporary Conflict and the Legal Construction of War,” 43 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.1, 17 (2004)Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H., “Review of David Wippman & Matthew Evangelista, New Wars, New Laws? Applying the Laws of War in 21st Century Conflicts,” 100 A.J.I.L.495, 497 (2006)Google Scholar
Taft, IV William H., “A View from the Top: American Perspectives on International Law after the Cold War,” 31 Yale J. Int'l L.503, 509 (2006)Google Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark, “New Generation of Qaeda Chiefs Is Seen on Rise,” New York Times, April 2, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
,Associated Press, “Chertoff Warns of Higher Risks of Terrorism,” New York Times, July 11, 2007, at A16Google Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark & Rohde, David, “Amid Policy Disputes, Qaeda Grows in Pakistan,” New York Times, June 30, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Myers, Steven Lee, “Bush Uses Veto on C.I.A. Tactics to Affirm Legacy,” New York Times, March 9, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Reynolds, Maj. Jefferson, “Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield,” 56 Air Force L. Rev.1, 79 (2005)Google Scholar
Baker, Tom, “On the Genealogy of Moral Hazard,” 75 Tex. L. Rev.237 (1996)Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, “Predator and Prey: Seizing and Killing Suspected Terrorists Abroad,” 15 J. Polit. Phil.251, 274 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Barbara, “Ex Ante/Ex Post,” 13 J. Contemp. Legal Issues123, 125 (2003)Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “Reciprocity in International Relations,” 40 Int'l Org.1, 4 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald & Keilbach, Patricia, “Situation Structure and Institutional Design: Reciprocity, Coercion and Exchange,” 55 Int'l Org.891 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, Alan, “‘Fairness’ and ‘Reciprocity’ in International Trade Section 301 and The Rule of Law,” 16 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L.37, 38, 43–45 (1999)Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert, “Is Equality Passé? Homo Reciprocans and the Future of Egalitarian Politics,” Boston Rev.4, 8 (Jan. 1999)Google Scholar
Yu, Peter, “Currents and Crosscurrents in the International Intellectual Property Regime,” 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev.323, 339–340 (2004)Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, “International Standards for Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving beyond the Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide,” 33 Yale J. Int'l L.369, 407 (2008)Google Scholar
Sulmasy, Glenn, “The Law of Armed Conflict in the Global War on Terror: International Lawyers Fighting the Last War,” 19 Notre Dame J. L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y309, 314 (2005)Google Scholar
Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich, “War Everywhere: Rights, National Security Law, and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Age of Terror,” 153 U. Penn. L. Rev.675, 761 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Associated Press, “Pentagon Lawyers Warn against Evidence Limits,” New York Times, Sept. 7, 2006, at A27Google Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark & Lewis, Neil A., “Military Lawyers Caught in Middle on Tribunals,” New York Times, Sept. 16, 2006, at A1Google Scholar
Editorial, , “A Dangerous New Order,” New York Times, Oct. 19, 2006, at A26Google Scholar
Rieckhoff, Paul, “Do Unto Your Enemy…,” New York Times, Sept. 25, 2006, A25Google Scholar
Zernike, Kate, “Rebuff for Bush on How To Treat Terror Suspects,” New York Times, Sept. 15, 2006, at A1Google Scholar
Santora, Marc, “McCain Finds Sympathy on Torture Issue,” New York Times, Nov. 16, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Turner, Robert, “Constitutional and International Law Implications of Executive Order 13440 Interpreting Common Art. 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions,” Testimony, Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. Senate, Sept. 25, 2007, at 40Google Scholar
Kirk, Alan, “‘Love Your Enemies,’ the Golden Rule, and Ancient Reciprocity,” 122 J. Biblical Lit.667, 669 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, “The Golden Rule: Exegetical and Theological Perspectives,” 36 New Test. Stud.392, 392, 396 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A., “Terrorism and the Laws of War,” 5 Chi. J. Int'l Law423 (2005)Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew, “Does One Illegality Merit Another? The Law of Belligerent Reprisals in International Law,” 170 Mil. L. Rev.155, 171–72 (2001)Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah W., “Exchange and Reciprocity in International Negotiations,” 3 Int'l Negotiation121, 127 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Jonathan, “Dealing with a ‘Rogue State’: The Libya Precedent,” 101 A.J.I.L.553, 553 (2007)Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch, “The Psychology of Reciprocity in International Relations,” 4 Negotiation J.281, 282–83 (July 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, R. P., “Role of the ‘New’ Asian-African Countries in the Present International Legal Order,” 56 Proc. Amer. Soc. Int'l L.383, 386–87 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Gregory, “Fidelity to Pre-existing Law and the Legitimacy of Legal Decision,” 69 Notre Dame L. Rev.1, 46 (1993)Google Scholar
Glazier, David, “Ignorance is Not Bliss: The Law of Belligerent Occupation and the U.S. Invasion of Iraq,” 58 Rutgers L. Rev.121, 151 (2005)Google Scholar
Albrecht, A.R., “War Reprisals in the War Crimes Trials and in the Geneva Conventions of 1949,” 47 A.J.I.L.590, 593 (1953)Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, “On Some Merits of the Israeli Judgment on Targeted Killings,” 5 J. Int'l Crim. Justice339 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, “The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide All the Answers?88 Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross881, 894 (Dec. 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detter, Ingrid, “The Law of War and Illegal Combatants,” 75 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.1049, 1098–99 (2007)Google Scholar
Kontorovich, Eugene, The Piracy Analogy: Modern Universal Jurisdiction's Hollow Foundation, 45 Harv. Int'l L. J.183, 190 (2004)Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard R., “So-Called ‘Unprivileged Belligerency’: Spies, Guerrillas, and Saboteurs,” 28 B.Y. Int'l L.1951 321, 328 (1952)Google Scholar
Mayer, Jane, “The Black Sites,” New Yorker, Aug. 13, 2007, at 46, 50Google ScholarPubMed
Yoo, John C. & Ho, James C., “The Status of Terrorists,” 44 Va. J. Int'l L.207, 222 (2003)Google Scholar
Roth, Kenneth, “The Law of War in the War on Terror,” Foreign Affairs (Jan./Feb. 2004) at 2, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Noah, “Choices of Law, Choices of War,” 25 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y457, 457–58 (2002)Google Scholar
Luban, David, “The War on Terrorism and the End of Human Rights,” 22 Phil. & Publ. Pol'y Quart.9 (Summer 2002)Google Scholar
Delahunty, Robert & Yoo, John, “Statehood and the Third Geneva Convention,” 46 Va. J. Int'l L.131 (2005)Google Scholar
Yoo, John, “The Status of Soldiers and Terrorists under the Geneva Conventions,” 3 Chin. J. Int'l L.135 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, “Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology,” 36 J. Legal Ed.518 (1986)Google Scholar
Reynolds, Jefferson, “Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield: Enemy Exploitation of the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Struggle for a Moral High Ground,” 56 Air Force. L. Rev.1 (Winter 2005)Google Scholar
Wheaton, Col. Kelly, “Strategic Lawyering: Realizing the Potential of Military Lawyers at the Strategic Level,” Army Lawyer1, 5-7 (Sept. 2006)Google Scholar
Clark, Kathleen, “Ethical Issues Raised by the OLC Torture Memorandum,” 1 J. Nat. Security L. & Policy455 (2005)Google Scholar
Bialke, Lt. Col. Joseph P., “Al-Qaeda & Taliban Unlawful Combatant Detainees, Unlawful Belligerency, and the International Laws of Armed Conflict,” 55 A.F. L. Rev.1, 29–34 (2004)Google Scholar
Aldrich, George, “The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the Determination of Illegal Combatants,” 96 A.J.I.L.891, 895–96 (2002)Google Scholar
Yoo, John, “Terrorists Have No Geneva Rights,” Wall St. J., May 26, 2004, at A16Google Scholar
Stromseth, Jane, “Law and Force after Iraq: A Transitional Moment,” 97 A.J.I.L.628, 634 (2003)Google Scholar
Hoffman, Michael, “Rescuing the Law of War: A Way Forward in an Era of Global Terrorism,” 34 Parameters18, 126 (2005)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House,” 105 Colum. L. Rev.1681, 1694 (2005)Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, “The War on Terrorism and International Humanitarian Law,” 14 Mich. St. J. Int'l L.19, 21 (2006)Google Scholar
Bernstein, Anita, “Reciprocity, Utility, and the Law of Aggression,” 54 Vand. L. Rev.1, 26 (2001)Google Scholar
Sanfey, Alan, Rilling, James et al., “The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game,” 300 Science1755, 1756 (2003)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, Martin & Roch, SebastienUpstream Reciprocity and the Evolution of Gratitude,” 274 Proc. R. Soc. B.605, 605 (2007)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanni, Adriaan, “The Laws of War in Ancient Greece,” 26 L. & Hist. Rev.469, 473 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwelb, Egon, “The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and International Law,” 58 A.J.I.L.642, 664–68 (1964)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., “Targeting and Humanitarian Law: Current Issues,” 34 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights59, 89 (2004)Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law,” 94 A. J. I. L.239, 250 (2000)Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane, “The Evolution of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals,” 175 Mil. L. Rev.184, 209 (2003)Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, “The Twilight of Belligerent Reprisals,” Neth. Y.B. Int'l L.35, 53–54 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahlik, S.E., “Belligerent Reprisals as Seen in the Light of the Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarain Law, Geneva, 1974–1977,” 42 L. & Contemp. Prob.3, 56–57 (1978)Google Scholar
Lefeber, René, “The Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project and the Law of State Responsibillity,” 11 Leiden J. Int'l L.609, 611 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, “Constitutional Norms in a State of Permanent Emergency,” 40 Ga. L. Rev.699 (2006)Google Scholar
Kohn, Margaret, “Bare Life and the Limits of the Law,” 9 Theory & Event2 (2006)Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark, “Dialogue with Dictators: Judicial Resistance in Argentina and Brazil,” 20 Law & Soc. Inquiry481 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabkin, Jeremy, “After Guantánamo: The War over the Geneva Convention,” The National Interest, Summer 2002, at 15, 23Google Scholar
Bergen, Peter & Cruickshank, Paul, “The Unraveling: Al Qaeda's Revolt Against bin Laden,” New Republic, June 11, 2008, at 16, 18Google Scholar
Wright, Lawrence, “The Rebellion Within: An Al Qaeda Mastermind Questions Terrorism,” New Yorker, June 2, 2008, at 37, 44Google Scholar
Kutz, Christopher, “Torture, Necessity and Existential Politics,” 95 Cal. L. Rev.235, 266 (2007)Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, “The Emergency Constitution,” 113 Yale L.J.1029 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, “Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War,” 97 A.J.I.L.82, 89 (2002)Google Scholar
Hoffman, Lt. Col. Michael H., “Rescuing the Law of War: A Way Forward in an Era of Global Terrorism,” 35 Parameters18, 22 (Summer 2005)Google Scholar
Black, Donald, “The Geometry of Terrorism,” 22 Sociological Theory14 (March 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Laura A., “Public Law Values in a Privatized World,” 31 Yale. J. Int'l L.383, 400–01 (2006)Google Scholar
Dickinson, Laura, “Filartiga's Legacy in an Era of Military Privatization,” 37 Rutgers L.J.703, 703 (2006)Google Scholar
Shane, Scott, “Inside a 9/11 Mastermind's Interrogation,” New York Times, June 21, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Cover, Robert, “Nomos and Narrative,” 97 Harv. L. Rev.4, 40, 46, 48 (1983)Google Scholar
Berman, Nathaniel, “Privileging Combat? Contemporary Conflict and the Legal Construction of War,” 43 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.1 (2004)Google Scholar
Asad, Talal, “On Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment,” 63 Soc. Research1084, 1096 (1996)Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek, “September 11 and the Laws of War,” 28 Yale J. Int'l L.1, 31–38 (2003)Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, “International Standards for Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving beyond the Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide,” 33 Yale J. Int'l L.369, 376–77 (2008)Google Scholar
McNair, A.D., “The Legal Meaning of War and the Relations of War to Reprisals,” 11 Trans. Grotius Soc.45 (1925)Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, “The Concept of War in Modern International Law,” 36 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.283, 302 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan & Jinks, Derek, Extended Book Prospectus – Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law 8-11, Oxford University Press, 2008, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Stanley, “Crime and Politics: Spot the Difference,” 47 Brit. J. Soc.1, 13 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneeberger, Ernst, “Reciprocity as a Maxim of International Law,” 37 Geo. L. J.29, 31 (1948)Google Scholar
Burns, John, “Terror Bill Passes Narrowly in Britain,” New York Times, June 12, 2008, at A6Google Scholar
Eichensehr, Kristen, “On Target? The Israeli Supreme Court and the Expansion of Targeted Killings,” 116 Yale L. J.1873 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Julian E., “Army Manual to Skip Geneva Rule,” L.A. Times, June 5, 2006, at A1Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?101 Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev.559, 562–633 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiel, Mark, “Modes of Participation in Mass Atrocity,” 38 Cornell J. Intl'l L.793, 818 (2005)Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Théories du Droit International Coutumier,” Rev. Int'l de la Théorie du Droit248, 253 (1939)Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Paul, “Les Principes de Droit International Public,” 80 Recueil des Cours36, 70–72 (1952)Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, “Predator and Prey: Seizing and Killing Suspected Terrorists Abroad,” 15 J. Polit. Phil.251, 267 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmer, Noted in David, “Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extrajudicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defense?16 Euro. J. Int'l L.171, 173 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Ted L., “The Approach of the Different Drummer: The Principle of the Persistent Objector in International Law,” 26 Harv. Int'l L.J.457, 457 (1985)Google Scholar
Estreicher, Susan, “Rethinking the Binding Effect of Customary International Law,” 44 Va. J. Int'l L.5 (2003)Google Scholar
Kontorovich, Eugene, “Inefficient Customs in International Law,” 48 William & Mary L.R.859 (2006)Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack & Posner, Eric, “A Theory of Customary International Law,” 66 U. Chi. L. Rev.1113 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, & Posner, , “Understanding the Resemblance between Modern and Traditional Customary International Law,” 40 Va. J. Int'l L.639 (2000)Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed, “Two World Orders,” 27 Wilson Q.22 (Autumn 2003)Google Scholar
Dodge, William, “Customary International Law and the Question of Legitimacy,” 120 Harv. L. Rev.19 (2007)Google Scholar
Mazetti, Mark, “Letters Give C.I.A. Tactics a Legal Rationale,” New York Times, April 27, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Berman, Nathaniel, “Privileging Combat: Contemporary Conflict and the Legal Construction of War,” 42 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.1, 32–33 (2004)Google Scholar
Archibold, Randal, “Diverging View of Californian at Terror Trial,” New York Times, Feb. 17, 2006, at A14Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark, “The Banality of Good: Aligning Incentives Against Mass Atrocity,” 105 Colum. L. Rev.1751, 1783–1805 (2005)Google Scholar
Carey, Benedict, “Close Doesn't Always Count in Winning Games,” New York Times, March 7, 2005, at A1Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark, “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited,” 1 Sociological Theory201 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, Michael, “In Algeria, Insurgency Gains a Lifeline From Al Qaeda,” New York Times, July 1, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Killion, William, “Franchisor Vicarious Liability – The Proverbial Assault on the Citadel,” 24 Franchise L.J.162, 166–67 (Winter 2005)Google Scholar
Bowett, D. W., “Reprisals Involving Recourse to Armed Force,” 66 A.J.I.L.1, 3 (1972)Google Scholar
Seymour, Philip, “The Legitimacy of Peacetime Reprisal as a Tool against State-Sponsored Terrorism,” 39 Naval L. Rev.221 (1990)Google Scholar
O'Brien, William, “Reprisals, Deterrence and Self-Defense in Counter-Terror Operations,” 30 Va. J. Int'l L.421 (1990)Google Scholar
Kelley, Michael, “Time Warp to 1945 – Resurrection of the Reprisal and Anticipatory Self-Defense Doctrines in International Law,” 13 J. Transnat'l L. & Policy1, 2, 21 (2003)Google Scholar
Aleni, Lucia, “Distinguishing Terrorism from Wars of National Liberation in the Light of International Law: A View from Italian Courts,” 6 J. Int'l Crim. Just.525 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Curtis & Goldsmith, Jack, “Rejoinder: The War on Terrorism,” 118 Harv. L. Rev.2683, 2687–90 (2005)Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert & Tittemore, Brian, “Unprivileged Combatants and the Hostilities in Afghanistan: Their Status and Rights under International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law,” Amer. Soc. Int'l L. Task Force on Terrorism, 20–21 (Dec. 2002)Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan & Jinks, Derek, “International Law, U.S. War Powers, and the Global War on Terrorism,” 118 Harv. L. Rev.2653, 2655–58 (2005)Google Scholar
Solf, Waldemar, “A Response to Douglas J. Feither's Law in the Service of Terror – The Strange Case of the Additional Protocol,” 20 Akron L. Rev.261, 269–71 (1987)Google Scholar
Schneeberger, Ernst, “Reciprocity as a Maxim of International Law,” 37 Geo. L. J.29, 32 (1948)Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law,” 94 A.J.I.L.239, 250 (2000)Google Scholar
Johnson, Thomas & Mason, M. Chris, “No Sign until the Burst of Fire: Understanding the Pakistan-Afghanistan Frontier,” 32 Int'l Security41, 41 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solis, Gary, The Law of Armed Conflict, (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2009)Google Scholar
Burns, John, “Britain Joins Draft Treaty on Cluster Munitions,” New York Times, May 29, 2008, A13Google Scholar
Aldrich, George, “The Laws of War on Land,” 94 A.J.I.L.42, 46–48 (2000)Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “The Time Has Come for the U.S. to Ratify Geneva Protocol I,” 88 A.J.I.L.678, 682–84 (1994)Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “Reciprocity in International Relations,” 40 Int'l Org.1, 4 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A., “Terrorism and the Laws of War,” 5 Chi. J. Int'l Law423, 433 (2005)Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst & Gaechter, Simon, “Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity,” 14 J. Econ. Perspectives159, 165 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya, “Rights and Agency,” 11 Phil. & Pub. Affairs3, 15–19 (1982)Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, “Reflections on Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and its Background in General International Law,” 20 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht5, 20–21 (1970)Google Scholar
Ozersky, Josh, “Food Hackers,” American Way, April 1, 2007, at 56Google Scholar
Schlögel, Anton, “Civil War,” 108 Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross123, 127 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, John & Trachman, Will, “Less than Bargained For: The Use of Force and the Declining Relevance of the United Nations,” 5 Chi. J. Int'l L.379, 394 (2005)Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank, “The Supreme Court, 1983 Term-Foreword: The Court and the Economic System,” 98 Harv. L. Rev.4, 15 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence, “Constitutional Analogies in the International Legal System,” 37 Loyola L.A. L. Rev.193, 213–14 (2003)Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “The Continuing Role of Custom in the Formation of International Humanitarian Law,” 90 A.J.I.L.238, 245 (1949)Google Scholar
Bugnion, Francois, “The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Development of International Humanitarian Law,” 5 Chi. J. Int'l L.191, 200 (2004)Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek, “The Applicability of the Geneva Conventions to the ‘Global War on Terrorism,’46 Va. J. Int'l L.165, 192 (2005)Google Scholar
Bialke, J.P.Al-Qaeda and Taliban Unlawful Combatant Detainees, Unlawful Belligerency, and the International Laws of Armed Conflict,” 55 A.F.L. Rev.16, 29–34 (2004)Google Scholar
Yoo, John C. & Ho, James C., “The Status of Terrorists,” 44 Va. J. Int'l L.207, 221–22 (2003)Google Scholar
Schneeberger, Ernst, “Reciprocity as a Maxim of International Law,” 37 Geo. L. J.29, 31, 35 (1948)Google Scholar
Cress, Ronda, “Automatic Rights or Permissive Ones: The Status of Article 4 and 5 of the Third Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War,” 74 U. Cinn. L. Rev.191, 193 (2005)Google Scholar
Yin, Tung, “Enemies of the State: Rational Classification in the War on Terrorism11 Lewis and Clark L.R.903, 916 (2007)Google Scholar
Weisburg, A. Mark, “American Judges and International Law,” 36 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.1475, 1488–1528 (2003)Google Scholar
Sofaer, Abraham, “The Rationale for the United States Decisions,” 82 A.J.I.L.784, 785 (1988)Google Scholar
Draper, Gerald, “Humanitarian Law and Internal Armed Conflicts,” 13 Georgia J. Int'l & Comp. L.253, 254 (1983)Google Scholar
Glaberson, William, “New Roadblocks Delay Tribunals at Guantánamo,” New York Times, April 10, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Oppel, Richard, “Foreign Fighters in Iraq Are Tied to Allies of U.S.,” New York Times, Nov. 22, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Burns, John & Sciolino, Elaine, “No One Convicted of Terror Plot to Bomb Planes,” New York Times, Sept. 9, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Dershowitz, Alan, “Worshippers of Death,” Wall St. J., March 3, 2008, editorial, at A17Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, “A Critique of the Public/Private Distinction,” 10 Euro. J. Int'l L.387 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton, “The History of the Public/Private Distinction,” 130 U. Penn. L. Rev.1423 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, “The Stages of the Decline of the Public/Private Distinction,” 130 U. Penn. L. Rev.1349 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pildes, Richard, “Conflicts between American and European Views of Law: The Dark Side of Legalism,” 44 Va. J. Int'l L.145, 162 (2003)Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane, “The Evolution of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals,” 175 Mil. L. Rev.184, 218 (2003)Google Scholar
Nahlik, Stanislaw-Edward, “Belligerent Reprisals as Seen in the Light of the Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law, Geneva, 1974–1977,” 42 L. & Contemp. Prob.3, 63–64 (1978)Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny, “Antislavery Courts and the Dawn of International Human Rights Law,” 117 Yale L.J.552 (2007)Google Scholar
Lelyveld, Joseph, “No Exit,” 54 N.Y. Rev. of Books, Feb. 15, 2007, at 12, 16Google Scholar
Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich, “War Everywhere: Rights, National Security Law, and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Age of Terror,” 153 U. Penn. L. Rev.675, 761 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, Steven, “Predator and Prey: Seizing and Killing Suspected Terrorists Abroad,” 15 J. Polit. Phil.251, 256 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Lt. Col. Thomas, “‘Six Floors’ of Detainee Operations in the Post–9/11 World,” 35 Parameters33, 38 (Autumn 2005)Google Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark, “C.I.A. Awaits Rules on Terrorism Interrogations,” New York Times, March 25, 2007, at A14Google Scholar
Norton-Taylor, Richard & Dyer, Clare, “Defense Secretary Calls for Geneva Conventions to be Redrawn: International Law Hinders U.K. Troops – Reid,” The Guardian, April 4, 2006, at 1Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, “International Standards for Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving beyond the Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide,” 33 Yale J. Int'l L.369, 407–08 (2008)Google Scholar
Ignatius, David, “A Way Out of Guantánamo Bay,” Wash. Post, July 7, 2006, at A17Google Scholar
Beard, Jack M., “The Geneva Boomerang: The Military Commissions Act of 2006 and U.S. Counter-terror Operations,” 101 A.J.I.L.56, 60 (2007)Google Scholar
Yin, Tung, “Ending the War on Terrorism One Terrorist at a Time: A Noncriminal Detention Model for Holding and Releasing Guantanamo Detainees,” 29 Harv. J.L. & Pub Pol'y149, 206 (2005)Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack & Katyal, Neal, “The Terrorists' Court,” New York Times, July 11, 2007, at A19Google Scholar
Guillory, Michael E., “Civilianizing the Force: Is the U.S. Crossing the Rubicon?,” 51 A.F.L. Rev.111, 116–20 (2001)Google Scholar
Turner, Lisa L. & Norton, Lynn G., “Civilians at the Tip of the Spear,” 51 A.F.L. Rev.1, 28 (2001)Google Scholar
Bowett, D.W., “Reprisals Involving Recourse to Armed Force,” 66 A.J.I.L.1, 3 (1972)Google Scholar
Seymour, Maj. Philip, “The Legitimacy of Peacetime Reprisal as a Tool against State-Sponsored Terrorism,” 39 Naval L. Rev.221 (1990)Google Scholar
O'Brien, William, “Reprisals, Deterrence and Self-Defense in Counter-Terror Operations,” 30 Va. J. Int'l L.421 (1990)Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, “Developments in Customary International Humanitarian Law,” 3 Swiss Rev. Int'l & Euro. L.471, 482 (2005)Google Scholar
Kershner, Isabel, “Israel Approves Home Building in West Bank,” New York Times, March 10, 2008, at A3Google Scholar
Kifner, John, “Death on the Campus: Hamas Says It Regrets American Toll in Attack, But Hails Bombing as a Success,” New York Times, Aug. 2, 2002, at A10Google Scholar
Ronzitti, Natalino, “The Expanding Law of Self-Defense,” 11 J. Conflict & Sec. L.343, 348–52 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House,” 105 Colum. L. Rev.1681, 1694 (2005)Google Scholar
Colby, Col. Edbridge, “How to Fight Savage Tribes,” 21 A.J.I.L.279 (1927)Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett, “Civilization and Savagery in the Crucible of War,” 19 Global Change, Peace & Security9 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin, “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,” 25 Amer. Sociol. Rev.161 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, Detlev, “The Hague Conventions and Arms Control,” 94 A.J.I.L.31, 38 (2000)Google Scholar
Moore, John Norton, “Ratification of the Geneva Protocol on Gas and Bacteriological Warfare: A Legal and Political Analysis,” 58 Va. L. Rev.419, 453 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, “Reciprocity,” 7 Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 400, 403 (1985)Google Scholar
Yee, Sienho, “The Tu Quoque Argument as a Defense to International Crimes, Prosecution, or Punishment,” 3 Chinese J. Int'l L.87, 98 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell, Alan, “German Ruling Absolves Spies of Former East,” New York Times. May 24, 1995, A1Google Scholar
Fudenberge, Drew & Maskin, Eric, “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information,” 54 Econometrica389 (1986)Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, Meir, “Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law,” 97 Harv. L. Rev.625, 630 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koplow, David, “Back to the Future and Up to the Sky: Legal Implications of ‘Open Skies’ Inspection for Arms Control,” 79 Cal. L. Rev.421, 433, 441 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira, “The Critical Legal Studies Movement,” 96 Harv. L. Rev.561, 571 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication,” 89 Harv. L. Rev.1685, 1766 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Don, “As Many as Six Impossible Thing before Breakfast,” 75 Cal. L. Rev.609, 610 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuntz, William, “Local Policing After the Terror,” 111 Yale. L. J.2137, 2138–39 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, David, “The Poverty of Posner's Pragmatism: Balancing away Liberty after 9/11,” 59 Stan. L. Rev.1735, 1745–46 (2007)Google Scholar
Proulx, Vincent-Joël, “If the Hat Fits, Wear It, If the Turban Fits, Run For Your Life: Reflections on the Indefinite Detention and Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists,” 56 Hastings. L.J.801, 894–98 (2005)Google Scholar
Kamm, Frances M., “Terrorism and Several Moral Distinctions,” 12 Legal Theory19, 30, 42, 52, 55 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, , “Making War (and its Continuation) Unjust,” 9 Euro. J. Phil.328 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prud'homme, Nancie, “Lex Specialis: Oversimplifying a More Complex and Multifaceted Relationship?40 Israel L. Rev.355, 390–93 (2007)Google Scholar
Dennis, Michael, “Application of Human Rights Treaties Extraterritorially in Times of Armed conflict and Military Occupation,” 99 A. J. I. L.119, 139, 141 (2005)Google Scholar
Imseis, Ardi, “Critical Reflections on the International Humanitarian Law Aspects of the ICJ Wall Advisory Opinion,” 99 A.J.I.L.102, 110 (2005)Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, “The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law,” 80 Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross409, 411–16 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prud'homme, Nancie, “Lex Specialis: Oversimplifying a More Complex and Multifaceted Relationship?,” 40 Israel L. Rev.355, 363 (2007)Google Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen, “The Criteria of Armed Conflict,” Int'l L. Assoc., Study Committee on the Meaning of War, Spring 2007, at 25Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience,” 94 A.J.I.L.78, 80 (2000)Google Scholar
Ruthven, Malise, “The Rise of the Muslim Terrorists,” N.Y. Rev. of Book, May 29, 2008, at 33, 33Google Scholar
Sageman, Marc, “Does Osama Still Call the Shots? Debating the Containment of al Qaeda's Leadership,” Foreign Affairs, July/Aug. 2008, at 165, 165Google Scholar
O'Connell, , “The Legal Case Against the War on Terror,” 37 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L.349, 357 (2005)Google Scholar
Hampson, François, “Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law: Two Coins or Two Sides of the Same Coin,” 91 Bull. Human Rights46, 49 (1992)Google Scholar
Watkin, Kenneth, “Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict,” 98 A.J.I.L.1, 34 (2004)Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, “International Standards for Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving beyond the Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide,” 33 Yale J. Int'l L.369, 379 (2008)Google Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen, “The Legal Case against the Global War on Terror,” 36 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L.349, 350 (2004)Google Scholar
Paust, Jordan J., “Anti-terrorism Military Commissions: Courting Illegality,” 23 Mich. J. Int'l L.1, 8 (2001)Google Scholar
Shanker, Thom & Sanger, David E., “New to Job, Gates Argued for Closing Guantánamo,” New York Times, Mar. 23, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Cowell, Alan, “Briton Wants Guantánamo Closed,” New York Times, May 11, 2006, at A24Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, “Predator and Prey: Seizing and Killing Suspected Terrorists Abroad,” 15 J. of Polit. Phil.251, 273 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Eric & Mazetti, Mark, “Bush Said to Give Orders Allowing Raids in Pakistan,” New York Times, Sept. 11, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan, “The Evolution of U.S. Involvement in the International Rendition of Fugitive Criminals,” 25 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol.813, 858–81 (1993)Google Scholar
Continetti, Matthew, “The Gitmo Nightmare: What the Supreme Court Has Wrought,” Weekly Standard, June 23, 2008, at 5Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, “Challenges in Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict,” 87 Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross737, 745 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Lt. Col. Michael, “Rescuing the Law of War: A Way Forward in an Era of Global Terrorism,” 34 Parameters18, 18, 26 (2005)Google Scholar
Guellali, Amna, “Lex Specialis, Droit International Humanitaire et Droit de L'Homme: Leur Interaction Dans Les Nouveaux Conflits Armes,” 111 Revue Générale de Droit International Public539 (2007)Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno & Pulkowski, Dirk, “Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law,” 17 Euro. J. Int'l L.483, 485, 493 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory: Opinion and Reaction,” 11 J. Conflict & Security L.119, 125 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff, “Global Legal Pluralism,” 80 USC L. Rev.1155, 1155 (2007)Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence, “Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking,” 29 Yale J. Int'l L.1 (2004)Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas & Teubner, Gunther, “Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” 25 Mich. J. Int'l L.999, 1004 (2004)Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, “The Disenchantment of Logically Formal Legal Rationality, or Max Weber's Sociology in the Genealogy of the Contemporary Mode of Western Legal Thought,” 55 Hastings L.J.1031, 1075 (2004)Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek, “The Declining Significance of POW Status,” 45 Harv. Int'l L. J.367, 389–90 (2004)Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, “The Problem of Global Justice,” 33 Phil. & Pub. Aff.113, 114 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: A Case of Fragmentation,” N.Y.U. Int'l L. & Justice Colloquium, Feb. 26, 2007, at 13Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike, “A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study,” 11 J. Conflict & Security L.265, 270 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, Michael, “Application of Human Rights Extraterritorially in Times of Armed Conflict and Military Occupation,” 119 A.J.I.L.119 (2005)Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry, “Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the Severely Disabled,” 10 J. Polit. Phil.419, 435–30 (2006)Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, “Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice,” 19 Phil. & Pub. Aff.227, 252 (1990)Google Scholar
Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich, “War Everywhere: Rights, National Security Law, and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Age of Terror,” 153 U. Penn. L. Rev.675, 720 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, “This is Not a War,” 113 Yale L. J.1871, 1872–73 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieff, David, “Policing Terrorism,” New York Times, July 22, 2007, at A13Google Scholar
Gross, Aeyal M., “Human Proportions: Are Human Rights the Emperor's New Clothes of the International Law of Occupation?,” 18 Eur. J. Int'l L.1, 4–5 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, H.P., “International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Joint Venture or Mutual Exclusions?45 German Yearbook of International Law149 (2002)Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, “The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide All the Answers?88 Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross881, 895–96 (Dec. 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmer, DavidTargeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence?16 Eur. J. Int'l L.171, 200 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, F.F., “Using International Human Rights Law for Establishing a Unified Use of Force Rule in the Law of Armed Conflict,” 64 Saskatchewan L. R.347, 373 (2001)Google Scholar
Cole, Wade, “Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999,” 70 Amer. Sociol. Rev.472, 474, 492 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner, Allison, “When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War,” 59 Vand. L. Rev.1, 61 (2006)Google Scholar
Clark, Gen. Wesley K. & Raustiala, Kal, “Why Terrorists Aren't Soldiers,” New York Times, Aug. 8, 2007, at A19Google Scholar
Butler, Richard, “Modern War, Modern Law, and Army Doctrine: Are We in Step For the 21st Century?,” 32 Parameters45 (2002)Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, “Public Sociology vs. The Market,” 5 Socio-Economic Rev.356, 362–63 (2006)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Security and Liberty: The Image of Balance,” 11 J. Polit. Phil.191, 198–99 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pildes, Richard, “Why Rights are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms, and Constitutionalism,” 27 J. Leg. Stud.725, 733–36 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddock, Philip, “Australia's Legislative Response to the Ongoing Threat of Terrorism,” 27 U. New S. Wales L.J.254, 254 (2004)Google Scholar
Stiles, Kendall W., “The Power of Procedure and the Procedures of the Powerful: Anti-Terror Law in the United Nations,” 43 J. Peace Res.37, 45–48 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szasz, Paul, “The Security Council Starts Legislating,” 96 A.J.I.L.901 (2002)Google Scholar
Fleck, Dieter, “International Accountability for Violations of the Ius in Bello: The Impact of the ICRC Study on Customary International Law,” 11 J. Conflict & Security L.179, 192 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Brad, “Retrieving Marx for the Human Rights Project,” 17 Leiden J. Int'l L.31, 46 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard, “The Dangers of Natural Rights,” 20 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y683, 684 (1997)Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “Do Values Conflict? A Hedgehog's Approach,” 43 Ariz. L. Rev.251 (2001)Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip & Zeckhauser, Richard J., “Recollection Bias and the Combat of Terrorism,” 34 J. Legal Studies27 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William, “Punishment of Non-State Actors in Non-International Armed Conflict,” 26 Fordham Int'l L. J.907, 923 (2003)Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, “Minimalism about Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For,” 12 J. Pol. Phil.190 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights,” 13 Oxford J. Leg. Stud.18, 27 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Alexander B., “Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: The Causes of Civilian Victimization in War,” 30 Int'l Security152, 152 (Spring 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Kristine & Hultman, Lisa, “One-Sided Violence against Civilians in War,” 44 J. Peace Res.233 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochnick, Chris & Normand, Roger, “The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Law of War,” 35 Harv. Int'l L.J.49 (1994)Google Scholar
Canestaro, Nathan, “Legal and Policy Constraints on the Conduct of Aerial Precision Warfare,” 37 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.431 (2003)Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian, “Classical Realism,” 11 Philosophical Issues 244, 258 (2001)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House,” 105 Colum. L. Rev.1681, 1725 (2005)Google Scholar
Keating, Gregory, “Fidelity to Pre-existing Law and the Legitimacy of Legal Decision,” 69 Notre Dame L. Rev.1, 44–48 (1993)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “What Would Hannah Say?54 N.Y. Rev. of Books, March 15, 2007, at 8Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass & Vermeule, Adrian, “The Ethics and Empirics of Capital Punishment: Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions, and Life-Life Trade-Offs,” 58 Stan. L. Rev.703 (2005)Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies,” 61 Amer. J. Sociol. 420 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Daniel, “What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?63 U. Chi. L. Rev.591 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belluck, Pam, “Forget Prisons, Americans Cry Out for the Pillory,” New York Times, Oct. 4, 1998, at A5Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,” 5 Cognitive Psych.207 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence, “Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash against Human Rights Regimes,” 102 Colum. L. Rev.1832 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, David, “The Micro-Structure of Nonlethal Force: Baseline Data from an Observational Study,” 20 Crim. Justice Rev.169 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pate, Anthony & Fridell, Lorie, “Toward the Uniform Reporting of Police Use of Force: Results of a National Survey,” 20 Crim. Justice Rev.123 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo, Richard, “Inside the Interrogation Room,” 86 J. Crim. L. & Criminology266, 270, 282–84 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, “Legal Effectiveness and Social Studies of Law: On the Unfortunate Persistence of a Research Tradition,” 9 Legal Studies Forum23, 28 (1985)Google Scholar
Allen, Mike, “A Stain on Our Country's Honor and Our Country's Reputation,” Wash. Post, May 7, 2004, at A1Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark, “Dialogue with Dictators: Judicial Resistance in Argentina and Brazil,” 20 Law & Soc. Inquiry481, 506–10 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radsan, A. John, “The Collision between Common Article Three and the Central Intelligence Agency,” 56 Cath. U.L. Rev.959, 962, 994–95 (2007)Google Scholar
Menon, Jaykumar, “Guantánamo Torture Litigation,” 6 J. Int'l Crim. Justice323 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark, “'03 Memo Approved Harsh Interrogations,” New York Times, April 2, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., “Targeting and Humanitarian Law: Current Issues,” 34 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights59, 93 (2004)Google Scholar
Shue, Henry, “Torture,” 7 Phil. & Pub. Aff.124, 129 (1978)Google Scholar
Bartholomees, J. Boone, “Theory of Victory,” 38 Parameters25 (Summer 2008)Google Scholar
Clancy, James & Crossett, Chuck, “Measuring Effectiveness in Irregular Warfare,” 37 Parameters88, 91 (Summer 2007)Google Scholar
Baker, Jim, “Systems Thinking and Counterinsurgencies,” 36 Parameters26, 38–42 (Winter 2006–07)Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert, “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism,” 46 Quart. Rev. Biology35 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert, “Is Equality Passé? Homo Reciprocans and the Future of Egalitarian Politics,” Boston Rev. 1, 14 (Jan. 1999)Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, “Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice,” 19 Phil. & Pub. Aff.227, 230 (1990)Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry, “Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the Severely Disabled,” 10 J. of Polit. Phil.419, 435–30 (2006)Google Scholar
Keating, Gregory, “Reasonableness and Rationality in Negligence Theory,” 48 Stan. L. Rev.311, 319 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narotzky, Susana & Moreno, Paz, “Reciprocity's Dark Side: Negative Reciprocity, Morality and Social Reproduction,” 2 Anthropological Theory281, 285 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean, “Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?77 J. of Phil.315 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, Robert, “Paper Charter: and the Failure of the United Nations Collective Security System,” 56 Cath. U. L. Rev.871, 903–08 (2007)Google Scholar
Smith, Matthew N., “Terrorism, Shared Rules, and Trust,” 16 J. of Polit. Phil.201, 215–16 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, David, “International Distributive Justice,” 24 Nomos275 (1982)Google Scholar
Julius, A.J., “Nagel's Justice,” 34 Phil. & Pub. Aff.176, 190 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, Andrew F., “Islamic Foundations for a Social Contract in non-Muslim Liberal Democracies,” 101 Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev.235, 242 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “Incompletely Theorized Agreements,” 108 Harv. L. Rev.1773 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimock, Susan, “Retribution and Trust,” 16 Law & Phil.37 (1997)Google Scholar
Smith, Matthew N., “Terrorism, Shared Rules, and Trust,” 16 J. of Polit. Phil.201 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrey, “Marxism and Retribution,” 2 Phil. & Pub. Aff.217, 228 (1993)Google Scholar
Shue, Henry, “Torture,” 7 Phil. & Pub. Aff.124, 136, 141 (1978)Google Scholar
Sussman, David, “What's Wrong with Torture?,” 33 Phil. & Pub. Aff.1, 18 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George, “Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory,” 85 Harv. L. Rev.537 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falls, M. Margaret, “Retribution, Reciprocity, and Respect for Persons,” 6 Law & Phil.25, 32–38 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Gregory, “The Idea of Fairness in the Law of Enterprise Liability,” 95 Mich. L. Rev.1266, 1310 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David, “Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb,” 91 Va. L. Rev.1425 (2005)Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane, “Hypothetical Torture in the ‘War on Terrorism,’1 J. National Sec. L. & Pol'cy285 (2005)Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul, “The Paradox of Riskless Warfare,” 22 Phil. & Pub. Pol'cy Quart.2, 3 (2002)Google Scholar
Carlino, Michael, “The Moral Limits of Strategic Attack,” 32 Parameters15, 16 (Spring 2002)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Are There Any Natural Rights?64 Philosophical Rev.175, 191 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Chris, “‘Targeted Killings’ in an Age of Terror: The Legality of the Yemen Strike,” 9 J. Conflict & Security L.277, 291 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, “The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide All the Answers?88 Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross890, 903 (Dec. 2006)Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, “The War on Terrorism and International Humanitarian Law,” 14 Mich. St. J. Int'l L.19, 21–22 (2006)Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, “The Self-Defeating International Criminal Court,” 70 U. Chi. L. Rev.89, 91–95 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyver, Johan D., “International Justice and the International Criminal Court: Beyond Sovereignty and the Rule of Law,” 18 Emory Int'l L. Rev.133, 139 (2004)Google Scholar
Lietzau, William, “The U.S. and the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Law after Rome,” 64 L. & Contemp. Prob.119, 129 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, “Form and Substance in International Agreements,” 99 A.J.I.L.581–614 (2005)Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara et al., “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” 55 Int'l Org.761 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George, et al., “The Transformational Model of International Regime Design: Triumph of Hope or Experience?38 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.465 (2000)Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., “Compliance and International Soft Law: Why Do Countries Implement the Basel Accord?5 J. Int'l Econ. L.647 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?111 Yale L.J.1935, 1951–52 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, “Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice,” 19 Phil. & Pub. Aff.227, 231–35 (1990)Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul, “The Paradoxes of Riskless Warfare,” 22 Phil. & Public Pol'cy Q.2 (2002)Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul, “Lessons for International Law from the Gulf War,” 45 Stan. L. Rev.425, 436–37 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karber, Phillip, “Re-constructing Global Aviation in an Era of the Civil Aircraft as Weapon of Destruction,” 25 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'cy781 (2003)Google Scholar
Downes, Alexander B., “Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: The Causes of Civilian Victimization in War,” 30 Int'l Security152, 152, 155 (Spring 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin, Huth, Paul, & Croco, Sarah, “Covenants without the Sword: International Law and the Protection of Civilians in Times of War,” 58 World Politics339, 354 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, “The Choice between Restitution and Compensation in International Law,” 10 Eur. J. Int'l L.413 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, Jenny, “Antislavery Courts and the Dawn of International Human Rights Law,” 117 Yale L.J.552 (2007)Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “Why a World State is Inevitable,” 9 Eur. J. Int'l Relations491 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest, “Corrective Justice in a Nutshell,” 52 Univ. Toronto L. J.349 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parijs, Philippe, “Reciprocity and the Justification of an Unconditional Basic Income,” XLV Polit. Studies327, 327 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Stephen K., “Liberal Equality, Exploitation and the Case for an Unconditional Basic Income,” 45 Polit. Studies312 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, Gregory, “The Costs of Crimes: Coleman Amended,” 104 Ethics582, 585–89 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, , “A World Drowning in Guns,” 71 Fordham L. Rev.2333 (2003)Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, “Security and Terror,” 5 Theory & Event4 (2002)Google Scholar
Fletcher, George, “Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory,” 85 Harv. L. Rev.537, 572 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Deborah W., “Exchange and Reciprocity in International Negotiations,” 3 Int'l Negotiation121, 127 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, Bruce Bueno & Smith, Alastair, “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions,” 51 J. Conflict Resol.251, 281 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, D.W., “Exchange and Reciprocity in International Negotiations,” 3 Int'l Negotiation121, 121 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duran, “Reciprocity as a Generating Process in Social Relations,” 3 J. Quantitative Anthro.251 (1991)Google Scholar
Luban, David, “Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb,” 91 Val. L. Rev.1425, 1431 (2005)Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark, “Constructing Subversion in Argentina's Dirty War,” 75 Representations119 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Jane, “The Black Sites,” New Yorker, Aug. 13, 2007, at 46, 51Google ScholarPubMed
Scheffler, Samuel, “Is Terrorism Morally Distinctive?14 J. Polit. Phil.1, 16 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest, “Corrective Justice,” 77 Iowa L. Rev.403, 421 (1992)Google Scholar
Kress, Ken, “Introduction: Corrective Justice and Formalism,” 77 Iowa L. Rev.i, ii (1992)Google Scholar
Wright, Richard, “Substantive Corrective Justice,” 77 Iowa L. Rev.625, 709 (1992)Google Scholar
Held, Virginia, “Terrorism and War,” 8 J. of Ethics59, 79–80 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Is This Torture Necessary?,” book review of Cole, David & Lobel, Jules, 54 N.Y. Rev. of Books, Oct. 25, 2007, at 40, 44Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “The Idea of European International Law,” 17 Euro. J. Int'l L.315, 323–27 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladino, Paolo, “On the Political Animal and the Return of Just War,” 8 Theory & Event2 (2005)Google Scholar
Smith, Matthew N., “Terrorism, Shared Rules, and Trust,” 16 J. Polit. Phil.201, 215–16 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, “Tradition and Modernity Reconsidered,” 9 Comp. Stud. Soc. & Hist.292 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan, “The Laws of War in Ancient Greece,” 26 L. & Hist. Rev.469, 485–86 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treanor, William, “Fame, the Founding, and the Power to Declare War,” 82 Cornell L. Rev.695 (1997)Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony, “Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law,” 40 Harv. Int'l L.J.1, 22–80 (1999)Google Scholar
Gonzales, Roberto, “Toward Mercenary Anthropology? The New U.S. Army Counterinsurgency Manual FM 3–24 and the Military-Anthropology Complex,” 23 Anthro. Today14 (June 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearin, Christopher, “Special Operations Forces a Strategic Resource: Public and Private Divides,” 36 Parameters58 (2007)Google Scholar
Finlan, Alastair, “Warfare by Other Means: Special Forces, Terrorism and Grand Strategy,” 14 Small Wars and Insurgencies92 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Jefferson, “Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield,” 56 Air Force L. Rev.1, 107 (2005)Google Scholar
DiMarco, Lou, “Losing the Moral Compass: Torture and Guerre Revolutionnaire in the Algerian War,” 36 Parameters63 (2006)Google Scholar
Fogarty, Gerard, “Is Guantánamo Bay Undermining the Global War on Terror?35 Parameters54 (2005)Google Scholar
Ahmad, Syed, “The Unconstitutional Prosecution of the Taliban Under the Military Commissions Act,” 55 Naval. L. Rev.1 (2008)Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon, “Skulls and Scientific Collecting in the Victorian Military: Keeping the Enemy Dead in British Frontier Warfare,” 50 Comp. Stud. in Soc. & Hist.285, 300 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Record, Jeffrey, “Why the Strong Lose,” 35 Parameters19 (Winter 2005)Google Scholar
Lambakis, Steven J., “Reconsidering Asymmetric Warfare,” 36 Joint Forces Quar.21 (Feb. 2, 2005)Google Scholar
Cassidy, Robert, “The Long Small War: Indigenous Forces for Counterinsurgency,” 36 Parameters47, 50 (2006)Google Scholar
Linn, Brian McAllister, “The Philippines: Nation-Building and Pacification,” 85 Military Rev.46, 52 (March–April, 2005)Google Scholar
Deady, Timothy, “Lessons from a Successful Counterinsurgency: The Philippines, 1899–1902,” 35 Parameters53 (Spring 2005)Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, “Human Rights and Asian Values,” 217 New Republic, July 14, 1997, at 33Google Scholar
Dillon, Michael, “Governing Terror: The State of Emergency of Biopolitical Emergence,” 1 Int'l Polit. Sociol.7, 8 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haqqani, Husain, “Pakistan and the Islamists,” Current Hist.147, 147 (April 2007)Google Scholar
Wright, Lawrence, “The Rebellion Within: An Al Qaeda Mastermind Questions Terrorism,” New Yorker, June 2, 2008, at 37, 44Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip, “Can the War on Terror Be Won?86 Foreign Affairs53, Nov./Dec. 2007Google Scholar
Ruthven, Malise, “The Rise of the Muslim Terrorists,” N.Y. Rev. of Books, May 29, 2008, at 33, 34Google Scholar
Kusserow, Adrie, “De-Homogenizing American Individualism: Socializing ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ Individualism in Manhattan and Queens,” 27 Ethos210 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, “An Astonishing Sixty Years: The Legacy of Hiroshima,” 96 Amer. Econ. Rev.929 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, Ahmed, “Jihadi Suicide Bombers: The New Wave,” N.Y. Rev. of Books, June 12, 2008, at 17, 17Google Scholar
Burke, Anthony, “Aporias of Security,” 27 Alternatives1, 7 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan & Jinks, Derek, “Toward an Institutional Theory of Sovereignty,” 55 Stanford L. Rev.1749 (2003)Google Scholar
Clastres, Pierre, “On Ethnocide,” Art and Text 53, 53 (1988)Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan, “Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought,” 49 The Historical J.281, 285–87 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, “From the Depths of Despair: Performance, Counterperformance, and ‘September 11,’22 Sociological Theory88, 103 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Julian, The Biopolitics of the War on Terror: Life Struggles, Liberal Modernity, and the Defense of Logistical Societies62–81 (2006)Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj, Welcome to the Desert of the Real!Five Essays on September 11 and Related Dates 131 (2002)Google Scholar
Blair, Tony, Prime Minister's Address to the Labour Party Conference, cited in Mikkel Rasmussen, The Risk Society at War: Terror, Technology and Strategy in the Twenty-First Century 169 (2006)Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff, “Précis: The Morality and Law of War,” 40 Israel L. Rev.670, 670 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, Thomas, “Proportionality in the Morality of War,” 33 Phil. & Pub. Aff.34, 44 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, “The Concept of War in Modern International Law,” 36 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.283, 288 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul, “Who's Afraid of Tariq Ramadan?,” 236 New Republic, June 4, 2007, at 37Google Scholar
Brophy-Baermann, Bryan & Conybeare, John, “Retaliating against Terrorism: Rational Expectations and the Optimality of Rules vs. Discretion,” 38 Amer. J. Polit. Sci.196, 209 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telhami, Shibley, “America in Arab Eyes,” 49 Survival107, 119 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Peter & Cruickshank, Paul, “The Unraveling: Al Qaeda's Revolt against bin Laden,” New Republic, June 11, 2008, at 16, 18Google Scholar
Wright, Lawrence, “The Rebellion Within: An Al Qaeda Mastermind Questions Terrorism,” New Yorker, June 2, 2008, at 37, 44Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan, “Outline of a Theory of Human Rights,” 27 Sociology489, 507 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiering, Norman, “Irresistible Compassion: An Aspect of 18th-Century Sympathy and Humanitarianism,” 37 J. Hist. Ideas195 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doebbler, Curtis, “A Human Rights Approach to Statelessness in the Middle East,” 15 Leiden J. Int'l L.527 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julius, A.J., “Nagel's Atlas,” 34 Phil. & Pub. Aff.176, 178 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L., “Capitalism and the Origins of Humanitarian Sensibility – Part I,” 90 Amer. Hist. Rev.339, 353–361 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, “The Arc of the Moral Universe,” 26 Phil. & Pub. Aff.91 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Brown, Emilie & Ron, James, “Human Rights Institutions: Rhetoric and Reality,” 44 J. of Peace Res.379 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie & Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, “Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law to Matter Where Needed Most,” 44 J. of Peace Res.407 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, “50 Years after Hiroshima,” Dissent323, 325 (Summer 1995)Google Scholar
Wiktorowicz, Quintan & Kaltner, John, “Killing in the Name of Islam: Al-Qaeda's Justification for September 11,” 10 Middle East Policy84 (2002)Google Scholar
Freamon, Bernard, “Martyrdom, Suicide, and the Islamic Law of War,” 27 Fordham Int'l L. J.299 (2003)Google Scholar
Ali, Shaheen S. & Rehman, Javaid, “The Concept of Jihad in Islamic International Law,” 10 J. Conflict & Security L.321 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul, “Who's Afraid of Tariq Ramadan?,” 236 New Republic, June 4, 2007, at 37, 54–55 (quoting Ramadan)Google Scholar
Peters, Ralph, “Constant Conflict,” 27 Parameters4, 9 Summer 1997Google Scholar
Derian, James, “The War of Networks,” 5 Theory & Event4 (2002)Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, “Security and Terror,” 5 Theory & Event4 (2002)Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin, Huth, Paul, and Balch-Lindsay, Dylan, ‘“Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare,” 58 Int'l Org.375 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin, Huth, Paul, & Croco, Sarah, “Covenants without the Sword: International Law and the Protection of Civilians in Times of War,” 58 World Politics339, 354, 371 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarquhar, Neil, “Gay Muslims Find Freedom, of a Sort, in the U.S.,” New York Times, Nov. 7, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Kelley, H.H., “Attribution Theory in Social Psychology,” inLevine, D., ed., 15 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation192, 222–25 (1967)Google Scholar
Toope, Stephen, “Powerful but Unpersuasive: The Role of the U.S. in the Evolution of Customary International Law,” inU.S. Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Byers, Michael & Nolte, Georg, eds. 287, 302–18 (2003)Google Scholar
Posner, Richard, “Torture, Terrorism, and Interrogation,” inTorture: A Collection, Levinson, Sanford, ed. 291, 294 (2004)Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “Terrorism and Probability Neglect,” 26 J. Risk & Uncertainty121 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Jonathan H., “9/11+3/11+7/7=? What Counts in Counter-terrorism,” 37 Colum. H.R. L. Rev.559, 567 (2006)Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S. et al., “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field Experiment,” 14 Psychol. Sci.144, 146 (2003)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Jr. Raymond H., “Facing the Terror of Nuclear Terrorism,” 72 Occupational Health & Safety44 (2003)Google ScholarPubMed
Kateb, George, “A Life of Fear,” 71 Soc. Res. (2004)Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, “On the Obsolescence of the Concept of Honour,” 11 Eur. J. of Sociol.339, 342–43 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A., “A Theory of the Laws of War,” 70 U. Chi. L. Rev.297, 309 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart, “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 Amer. Sociol. Rev.1 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Lisa, “Opting out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry,” 21 J. Leg. Stud.115 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard, “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms,” 96 Mich. L. Rev.338 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, Paul R., North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry, “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs,” 2 Econ. & Politics1 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, Afner, “Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders Coalition,” 83 Amer. Econ. Rev.525 (1993)Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, “Form and Substance in International Agreements,” 99 A.J.I.L.581, 606 (2005)Google Scholar
Downs, George W., et. al, “Is The Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?50 Int'l Org.379, 383 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Jana, “Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance,” 99 Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.611 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, Alan, “International Law,” inHandbook of Law and Economics, Polinsky, Mitchell & Shavell, Steven, eds. 757, 816 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., “Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes,” 67 J. of Politics669, 687 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan & Jinks, Derek, “Toward an Institutional Theory of Sovereignty,” 55 Stan. L. Rev.1749, 1757, 1786 (2005)Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., “The Laws of War, Common Conjectures, and Legal Systems in International Politics,” 31 J. Legal. Stud.41 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics,” 38 Harv. Int'l L. J.487, 497 (1997)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, “The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law,” 19 Mich. J. Int'l L.345, 352 (1998)Google Scholar
Downes, Alexander B., “Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: The Causes of Civilian Victimization in War,” 30 Int'l Security152, 163, 171 (Spring 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin, Huth, Paul, & Croco, Sarah, “Covenants without the Sword: International Law and the Protection of Civilians in Times of War,” 58 World Politics339, 354, 371 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, H.W., “The Strategic Air Offensive against Germany,” 34 Historical J.134 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Niall, “Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat,” 11 War in History148 (2004)Google Scholar
Dollery, Brian & Parsons, Craig, “Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing: A Comment on Ferguson's Political Economy Approach,” 14 War in History499 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert, “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” 42 Int'l Org.427 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, W. Hays, “Means and Methods of Warfare,” 38 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 511, 520–31 (2006)Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., “Terrorism and the Laws of War,” 5 Chi. J. Int'l Law423, 429 (2005)Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, “The Political Economy of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff.” 12 Research in Economic History1 (1989)Google Scholar
Kohler, Wilhelm, “The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Battlefield or Cooperation?4 J. Ind, Comp. & Trade317 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajmaira, Sheen & Ward, Michael, “Evolving Foreign Policy Norms: Reciprocity in the Superpower Triad,” 34 Int'l Stud. Quart.457, 460, 473 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, W.J., “Reciprocity in U.S.-Soviet Relations: Multiple Symmetry or Issue Linkage?30 Amer. J. Polit. Sci.421 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patchen, Martin & Bogumil, David, “Comparative Reciprocity during the Cold War,” 3 Peace & Conflict 37, 54–55 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Patrick et al., “The Most Dangerous Game: Superpower Rivalry in International Crises, 1948–1985,” 54 J. Politics25, 33, 50 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielbauer, Paul, “At Marines' Hearing, Testament to Violence,” New York Times, Sept. 1, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Levitt, Matthew, “Untangling the Terror Web: Identifying and Counteracting the Phenomenon of Crossover between Terrorist Groups,” 24 SAIS Rev.33, 42 (Winter/Spring 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen, “The Legal Case against the Global War on Terror,” 36 Case West. Res. J. Int'l L.349, 352 (2004)Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?101 Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 559, 562–633 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, “A Follow-Up: Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures and Opinio Necessitatis,” 10 Euro. J. Int'l L.791 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, Robert, “Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law,” Netherlands Int'l L. Rev. 119, 121–22, 138 (2003)Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. & Jo, Hyeran, “Compliance with the Laws of War: Dataset and Coding Rules,” 23 Conflict Management & Peace Science91 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavrodes, George, “Conventions and the Morality of War,” 4 Phil. & Pub. Aff.117, 130 (1975)Google Scholar
Morrow, James, “The Institutional Features of Prisoner of War Treaties,” 55 Int'l Org.971, 977 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krammer, Arnold, “American Treatment of German Generals during World War II,” 54 J. Military History 27, 28–31, 37–46 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard, “A Crazed Methodology? On the Limits of Macro-Quantitative Social Science Research,” 21 Int'l Sociology647 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law,” 94 A.J.I.L.239, 251 (2000)Google Scholar
Parks, Maj. W. Hays, “Air War and the Law of War,” 32 A.F.L. Rev. 1, 57–59 (1990)Google Scholar
Sulmasy, Glenn & Yoo, John, “Civilian Control of the Military: A Rational Choice Approach to the War on Terror,” 54 UCLA L. Rev.1815, 1836 (2007)Google Scholar
Wheaton, Col. Kelly, “Strategic Lawyering: Realizing the Potential of Military Lawyers at the Strategic Level,” 1/998 Army Lawyer 1, 5–7 (Sept. 2006)Google Scholar
Zielbauer, Paul, “Web Sites Rally Support for G.I.'s in Legal Trouble,” New York Times, July 22, 2007, A4Google Scholar
Rudesill, Dakota, “Precision War and Responsibility: Transformational Military Technology and the Duty of Care under the Laws of War,” 32 Yale J. Int'l L. 517, 423–29 (2007)Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip, “Can the War on Terror Be Won? How to Fight the Right War,” 86 Foreign Affairs53, 54 (Nov./Dec. 2007)Google Scholar
Mellow, David, “Counterfactuals and the Proportionality Criterion,” 20 Ethics & Int'l Affairs439 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, Thomas, “Proportionality in the Morality of War,” 33 Phil. & Pub. Affairs34 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich, “War Everywhere: Rights, National Security Law, and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Age of Terror,” 153 U. Penn. L. Rev.675, 756 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Sean, “Terrorism and the Concept of ‘Armed Attack’ in Article 51 of the UN Charter,” 43 Harv. Int'l L. J.41 (2002)Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, “On Some Merits of the Israeli Judgment on Targeted Killings,” 5 J. Int'l Crim. Justice339, 341 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, “Slavery and the Phenomenology of Torture,” 74 Soc. Res.149, 161 (2007)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: A Case of Fragmentation,” N.Y.U. Int'l L. & Justice Colloquium, Feb. 26, 2007, at 5Google Scholar
Cole, David, “The Man Behind the Torture,” 54 N.Y. Rev. of Books, Dec. 6, 2007Google Scholar
Arreguín-Toft, Ivan, “How the Weak Win Wars,” 26 Int'l Security93 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Record, Jeffrey, “Why the Strong Lose,” 35 Parameters16 (Winter 2005–06)Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, “International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts,” 93 A.J.I.L.361, 369 (1999)Google Scholar
Schiff, Ze'ev, “Israel's War with Iran,” 85 Foreign Affairs23, 24 (Nov./Dec. 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Jane, “The Black Sites,” New Yorker (Aug. 13, 2007), at 46, 48Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, Chae-Han, “Reciprocity in Asymmetry: When Does Reciprocity Work?31 Int'l Interactions1, 12 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, Daniel, “The Social Psychology of Arms Control and Reciprocation,” 11 J. Polit. Psychol. 553, 561–63 (1990)Google Scholar
Patchen, Martin, “Strategies for Eliciting Cooperation from an Adversary,” 31 J. Conflict. Resol.164 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, Jonathan, “The Microfoundations of Economic Sanctions,” 6 Security Studies32 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Jonathan, “Dealing with a ‘Rogue State’: The Libya Precedent,” 101 A. J. I. L.553 (2007)Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark, “The Banality of Good: Aligning Incentives against Mass Atrocity,” 105 Colum. L. Rev. 175, 1773–1804 (2005)Google Scholar
Salaymeh, Lena, “Early Islamic Legal-Historical Precedents: Prisoners of War,” 26 L. & Hist. Rev.521, 544 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brimley, Shawn, “Tentacles of Jihad: Targeting Transnational Support Networks,” 36 Parameters30, 40 (2006)Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?111 Yale L.J.1935, 2019 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?51 J. Conflict Resol.588 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs,” 12 Phil. & & Pub. Affairs 205, 213–17 (1983)Google Scholar
Brachman, Jarret & McCants, William, “Stealing Al-Qaeda's Playbook,” 29 Studies in Conflict & Terrorism309–11 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Lawrence, “The Master Plan,” New Yorker, Sept. 22, 2006 at 48, 53Google Scholar
Delahunty, Robert & Yoo, John, “Statehood and the Third Geneva Convention,” 46 Va. J. Int'l L.131, 163 (2005)Google Scholar
Parks, W. Hays, “Special Forces' Wear of Non-Standard Uniforms,” 4 Chi. J. Int'l L.493, 508 (2003)Google Scholar
Stevens, Susan L., “Commanding International Judicial Respect: Reciprocity and the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments,” 26 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.115, 115 (2002)Google Scholar
Wurmnest, Wolfgang, “Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Money Judgments in Germany,” 28 Berk. J. Int'l L. 175, 186–88 (2005)Google Scholar
Paul, Joel, “Comity in International Law,” 32 Harv. Int'l L.J.1, 49 (1992)Google Scholar
Weinberg, Louise, “Against Comity,” 80 Geo. L. J.53, 54 (1991)Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry, “More Notes on Methods and Objectives in the Conflict of Laws,” 24 Cornell Int'l L.J.245 (1991)Google Scholar
Asad, Talal, “On Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment,” 63 Soc. Research 1084, 1102–04 (1996)Google Scholar
Rashid, Ahmed, “Jihadi Suicide Bombers: The New Wave,” N.Y. Rev. of Books, June 12, 2008, at 17, 17Google Scholar
Reimer, Jeffrey, “Durkheim's ‘Heroic Suicide’ in Military Combat,” 25 Armed Forces & Soc.113 (1998)Google Scholar
Packer, George, “Knowing the Enemy: Can Social Scientists Redefine the ‘War on Terror’?82 New Yorker, Dec. 18, 2006, at 60, 62Google Scholar
Bettelheim, Bruno, “Individual and Mass Behavior in Extreme Situations,” 38 J. Abnormal & Soc. Psych. 417, 425–26 (1943)Google Scholar
Punamäki, Raija-Leena, “Can Ideological Commitment Protect Children's Psychosocial Well-Being in Situations of Political Violence?67 Child Development55 (1996)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Lt. Col. George Mastroianni, “Occupations, Cultures, and Leadership in the Army and Air Force,” 35 Parameters76, 83 (Winter 2005–06)Google Scholar
Klinger, Janeen, “The Social Science of Carl von Clausewitz,” 36 Parameters79 (Spring 2006)Google Scholar
Mahnken, Thomas & Fitzsimonds, James, “Tread-Heads or Technophiles: Army Officer Attitudes toward Transformation,” 34 Parameters57, 71 (Summer 2004)Google Scholar
Whitlock, Craig, “Terror Suspects Beating Charges Filed in Europe,” Wash. Post, May 31, 2004, at A1Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “Administrative Law Goes to War,” 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2663, 2663–64 (2005)Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “Incompletely Theorized Agreements,” 108 Harv. L. Rev.1773 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Laureate Gary, “Why War with Iraq Is Not about the Oil,” Bus. Week, March 17, 2003, at 22Google Scholar
Stokes, Doug, “Blood for Oil? Global Capital, Counter-Insurgency and the Dual Logic of American Energy Security,” 33 Rev. Int'l Stud.245 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George & Jones, Michael, “Reputation, Compliance, and International Law,” 31 J. Leg. Stud.S95 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolford, Scott, “The Turnover Trap: New Leaders, Reputation, and International Conflict,” 51 Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev.772 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielbauer, Paul, “Military Cites ‘Negligence’ in Aftermath of Iraq Killings,” New York Times, April 22, 2007, at 18Google Scholar
Kahl, Colin, “In the Crossfire or the Crosshairs?: Norms, Civilian Casualties, and U.S. Conduct in Iraq,” 32 Int'l Security7 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, Craig, “Death Squad Killings of Basques: Was Spain's Government the Mastermind?New York Times, Feb. 12, 1997, at A10Google Scholar
Morrow, James, “The Institutional Features of Prisoner of War Treaties,” 55 Int'l Org.971, 990 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David, “C.I.A. Tells of Bush's Directive on the Handling of Detainees,” New York Times, Nov. 15, 2006, at A14Google Scholar
Smith, R. Jeffrey & Eggen, Dan, “Gonzales Helped Set the Course for Detainees,” Wash. Post, Jan 5, 2005, at A1Google Scholar
Thomas, Evan & Hirsch, Michelle, “The Debate over Torture,” Newsweek, Nov. 21, 2005, at 26Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of Conflict,” 88 Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Melissa, “Treaty Dialogue in Sanchez-Llamas: Is Chief Justice Roberts a Transnationalist, After All?11 Lewis & Clark L. Rev.89 (2007)Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel & Wright, Thomas, “What's at Stake in the American Empire Debate?101 Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.253 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Carla A. & Seib, Gerald, “Divided at the Polls, Americans Move Closer on Role in World,” Wall St. J., Nov. 2, 2004 at A1, A6Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, “Rationalism and Revisionism in International Law,” 119 Harv. L. Rev. 1404, 1422–36 (2006)Google Scholar
Thompson, Nicholas, “A War Best Served Cold,” New York Times, July 31, 2007, at A19Google Scholar
Packer, George, “Knowing the Enemy: Can Social Scientists Redefine the ‘War on Terror’?82 New Yorker, Dec.18, 2006, at 67Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip, “Can the War on Terror Be Won?86 Foreign Affairs53, Nov./Dec. 2007Google Scholar
Brooks, David, “The Iraq Syndrome, R.I.P.,” New York Times, Feb. 1, 2007, at A23Google Scholar
Waxman, Matthew, “Detention as Targeting: Standards of Certainty and Detention of Suspected Terrorists,” 108 Colum. L. Rev.1365, 1394 (2008)Google Scholar
McMahon, Jeff, “On the Moral Equality of Combatants,” 14 J. Polit. Phil.377 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, John, et al., “The Reputational Penalties for Environmental Violations: Empirical Evidence,” 68 J. L. & Econ. 653, 665–68 (Oct. 2005)Google Scholar
Liberman, Nira & Trope, Yaacov, “The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory,” 75 J. Personality and Soc. Psychol.5–18, 5 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufwenberg, Martin & Kirchsteiger, Georg, “A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity,” 47 Games & Econ. Behavior268 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E., “Understanding Reciprocity,” 50 J. Econ. Behavior & Org.1 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Gary & Ockenfels, Axel, “A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition,” 100 Amer. Econ. Rev.166 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Michael, “Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets,” 92 Amer. Econ. Rev.434 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Eric & Bird, Rebecca, “Turtle Hunting and Tombstone Opening: Public Generosity as Costly Signaling,” 21 Evolution & Human Behavior245 (2000)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosman, Abraham & Rubel, Paula, “The Potlach: A Structural Analysis,” 74 Amer. Anthro.658 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Annette, “Reproduction: A Replacement for Reciprocity,” 7 Amer. Ethnol. 71, 76–77 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, Mary, “Aquinas and the Challenge of Aristotelian Magnanimity,” 1 Hist. Pol. Thought37 (2003)Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Daniel, “Campaign Contributions and Corruption,” U. Chi. Legal F.163, 164 (1995)Google Scholar
Strauss, David A., “What is the Goal of Campaign Finance Reform?,” U. Chi. Legal. F.141 (1995)Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., “Moralism and Realism in Campaign Finance Reform,” U. Chi. Legal F.111 (1995)Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch, “Exchange and Reciprocity in International Negotiations,” 3 Int'l Negotiations121, 132 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haqqani, Husain, “Pakistan and the Islamists,” Current Hist. 147, 147–52 (April 2007)Google Scholar
Lai, Brian & Morey, Daniel, “Impact of Regime Type on the Influence of U.S. Foreign Aid,” 2 Foreign Policy Analysis385 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, Bruce Bueno & Smith, Alastair, “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions,” 51 J. Conflict Resol.251 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skidelsky, Robert, “Drawing a Dog in Iraq,” 53 N.Y. Rev. of Books, Oct. 6, 2006Google Scholar
Larson, D.W., “Exchange and Reciprocity in International Negotiations,” 3 Int'l Negotiation121, 121 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, James & Komorita, S.S., “Reciprocity and Concession Making in Bargaining,” 31 J. Personality & Soc. Psychology864 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Lloyd., “Negotiating Strategic Arms Control, 1969–1979,” 28 J. Conflict Resol.535, 536 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, Richard & McAndrew, William, “Negotiating Strategic Arms Control, 1969–1979,” 30 J. Conflict Resol.315, 325 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Allan, “Friendship in Commercial Society: 18th Century Social Theory and Modern Sociology,” 95 Amer. J. Sociol.1474 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milm, Linda et al., “The Value of Reciprocity,” 70 Soc. Psych. Q.199 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Joel, “Comity in International Law,” 32 Harv. Int'l L.J.1 (1991)Google Scholar
Bellinger, John B., “Remarks on the Military Commissions Act,” 48 Harv. Int'l L.J. Online1, 9 (2007)Google Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark, “'03 Memo Approved Harsh Interrogations,” New York Times, April 2, 2008, at A1Google Scholar
Swift, Lt. Cmdr. Charles, “The American Way of Justice,” 147 Esquire192, 194–95 (March 2007)Google Scholar
Luban, David, “Stevens's Professionalism and Ours,” 38 W. & Mary L. Rev.297 (1996)Google Scholar
Atkinson, Robert, “How the Butler Was Made to Do It: The Perverted Professionalism of The Remains of the Day,” 105 Yale L.J.177 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, Maj. Mark S., “Rules of Engagement for Land Forces: A Matter of Training, Not Lawyering,” 143 Mil. L. Rev.1, 20–21, 82–85 (1994)Google Scholar
Kahl, Colin, “In the Crossfire or the Crosshairs? Norms, Civilian Casualties, and U.S. Conduct in Iraq,” 32 Int'l Sec.7, 8 (Summer 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiel, Mark, “Lawyers as Monopolists, Aristocrats, and Entrepreneurs,” 103 Harv. L. Rev.2009, 2054–61 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, Robert, “Law and Unified Social Theory,” 22 J. L. & Society50, 61 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiel, Jr. John Loran, “When Soldiers Speak Out: A Survey of Provisions Limiting Freedom of Speech in the Military,” 37 Parameters69 (Autumn 2007)Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “The Law of Group Polarization,” 10 J. Polit. Phil.175, 176–81 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matray, James, “Truman's Plan for Victory: National Self-Determination and the Thirty-Eighth Parallel Decision in Korea,” 66 J. Amer. Hist.314 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulmasy, Glenn & Yoo, John, “Civilian Control of the Military: A Rational Choice Approach to the War on Terror,” 54 UCLA L. Rev.1815, 1824 (2007)Google Scholar
Hajjar, Lisa, “An Army of Lawyers,” The Nation, Dec. 26, 2008, at 23Google Scholar
Dezalay, Sara, “Trend Report: Crimes de Guerre et Politiques Impériales: L'espace Académique Américain entre Droit et Politique,” 173 Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Socialies44 (June 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, Col. Kenneth, “Canada/United States Military Interoperability and Humanitarian Law Issues: Land Mines, Terrorism, Military Objectives and Targeted Killings,” 15 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L.281 (2005)Google Scholar
Jacobs, Maj. Christopher, “Taking the Next Step: An Analysis of the Effects the Ottawa Convention May Have on the Interoperability of U.S. Forces with the Armed Forces of Australia, Great Britain, and Canada,” 180 Mil. L. Rev49 (2004)Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, “The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law,” 43 Va. J. Int'l L.1, 9, 28, 91 (2002)Google Scholar
Solis, Gary, The Law of Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2009)Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara & Ehrenreich, John, “The Professional-Managerial Class,” 11 Radical America7 (1977)Google Scholar
Abel, Richard, “The Decline of Professionalism?49 Mod. L. Rev.1, 41CrossRef
Gordon, Robert, “The Independence of Lawyers,” 68 B.U. L. Rev.1 (1988)Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas, “The New Aristocracy,” 44 N.Y. Rev. of Books, Dec. 4, 1997, at 47Google Scholar
,Associated Press, “Doctors Decry Guantanamo Treatment,” New York Times, Sept. 7, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Parks, W. Hays, “Special Forces' Wear of Non-Standard Uniforms,” 4 Chi. J. Int'l L.493, 513 (2003)Google Scholar
Kutz, Christopher, “Torture, Necessity and Existential Politics,” 95 Cal. L. Rev.235. 266 (2007)Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven & Rhodes, Kevin, “The Structural Constitution: Unitary Executive, Plural Judiciary,” 105 Harv. L. Rev.1165 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “The Myth of the Unitary Executive,” 7 Am. U. Admin. L. J.299 (1993)Google Scholar
Percival, Robert, “Presidential Management of the Administrative State: The Not-So-Unitary Executive,” 51 Duke L. J.963 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, Benjamin & Storey, Jenna Silber, “No Substitute for Virtue: Why Conservatives Should be Open to John McCain,” Weekly Standard, Jan. 24, 2008, at 18Google Scholar
Garland, David, “Concepts of Culture in the Sociology of Punishment,” 10 Theoretical Criminology419, 431 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark, “C.I.A. Destroyed Tapes of Interrogations,” New York Times, Dec. 6, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain, “Conclusions and Extensions: Toward Mid-Range Theorizing and Beyond Europe,” 59 Int'l Org.1013, 1014, 1040–41 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” 52 Int'l Org.887, 888 (1998)Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan, “After Legal Consciousness,” 1 Ann. Rev. L. & Soc. Sci.231 (2005)Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg, “The Persistence of Social Groups,” 3 Amer. J. Sociol.662, 681 (1897)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Matthew, “Incommensurability and Cost-Benefit Analysis,” 146 U. Penn. L. Rev.1169, 1175–76 (1998)Google Scholar
Viscusi, Kip, “The Generational Divide in Support for Climate Change Policies: European Evidence,” 77 Climate Change121 (2006)Google Scholar
Tetlock, Herbert, “Thinking the Unthinkable: Sacred Values and Taboo Cognitions,” 7 Trends in Cognitive Sciences320 (2003)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeule, Adrian, “Libertarian Panics,” 36 Rutgers L.J.871 (2005)Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua & Pevehouse, Jon, “Reciprocity, Bullying, and International Cooperation: Time-series Analysis of the Bosnia Conflict,” 91 Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev.515, 528 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traub, James, “Persuading Them,” New York Times, Nov. 25, 2008,at A13Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek, “The Applicability of the Geneva Conventions to the ‘Global War on Terrorism,”46 Va. J. Int'l L.165, 191 (2005)Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “Reciprocity in International Relations,” 40 Int'l Org.1, 4 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan, “The Logic of Reciprocity: Trust, Collective Action, and the Law,” 102 Mich. L. Rev.71 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan, “Signaling or Reciprocating? A Response to Eric Posner's Law and Social Norms,” 36 U. Richmond L. Rev.367, 368–69 (2002)Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert, “Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions,” 94 Econ. J.772, 775–76 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan & Jinks, Derek, “Colloquy – How to Influence States: International Law and State Socialization,” 54 Duke L. J.983, 984 (2005)Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “Reflections on the Prosecution of War Crimes by International Tribunals,” 100 A. J. I. L.551, 566 (2006)Google Scholar
Pearlstein, Deborah N., “Finding Effective Constraints on Executive Power: Interrogation, Detention, and Torture,” 81 Ind. L.J.1255, 1257 (2005)Google Scholar
Zaring, David, “Networking Goes International: An Update,” 2 Ann. Rev. L. & Soc. Sci.211 (2006)Google Scholar
Thomas, G. W., “Military Parental Effects and Career Orientation under the AVF,” 10 Armed Forces & Society293 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, J. H., “The All Volunteer Force: Recruitment from Military Families,” 7 Armed Forces & Society545 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Michel, “Like Father, like Son: Career Succession among the Saint-Cyrients,” 7 Armed Forces & Society561 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, John, “If You Won't, We Won't: Honour and the Decencies of Battle,” 24 Times Lit. Supp. 11, Nov. 1995Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn & Walling, Carrie B., “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America,” 44 J. Peace Res.427 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Brown, Emilie & Tsutsui, Kiyo, “Human Rights Practices in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises,” 110 Amer. J. Sociol.1373 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Brown, Emilie & Ron, James, “Human Rights Institutions: Rhetoric and Reality,” 44 J. Peace Res.379 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric, “Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?49 J. Conflict Resol.922 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagourney, Adam & Santora, Marc, “G.O.P. Hopefuls Differ on Response to Terror Attack,” New York Times, May 16, 2007, at A17Google Scholar
Janofsky, Michael, “Saudis Aiding in Cutting off Terrorism Funds, Panel Is Told,” New York Times, (March 25, 2004), at A5Google Scholar
Dwyer, D., “Closed Evidence, Reasonable Suspicion, and Torture,” 9 Int'l J. Evidence & Proof126, 131 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellinger, John B., “Remarks on the Military Commissions Act,” 48 Harv. Int'l L. J. Online1, 9 (2007)Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., “Defiance, Deviance, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction,” 30 J. Research in Crime & Delinquency445 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Solomon, “DNA Exoneration Brings Change in Legal System,” New York Times, Oct. 1, 2007, at A1Google Scholar
Cole, David, “The Priority of Morality: The Emergency Constitution's Blind Spot,” 113 Yale L. J.1753, 1781 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinzerling, Lisa, “The Rights of Statistical People,” 24 Harv. Env. L. Rev.189, 189 (2000)Google Scholar
Whitaker, Barbara, “Ready for Anything (That's Their Job),” New York Times, Sept. 9, 2007, at A17Google Scholar
Noll, Roger G. & Krier, James E., “Some Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Risk Regulation,” 19 J. Legal Stud.747, 777 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David, “Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb,” 91 Va. L. Rev.1425, 1437 (2005)Google Scholar
Rumney, Philip, “The Effectiveness of Coercive Interrogation: Scholarly and Judicial Responses,” 44 Crime, Law & Soc. Change465 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo, Richard A., “Miranda's Revenge: Police Interrogation as a Confidence Game,” 30 L. & Soc. Rev.259, 260–61 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, David, “Center First Gives Way to Center Last,” New York Times, Sept. 4, 2007, A23Google Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen, “Affirming the Ban on Harsh Interrogation,” 66 Ohio St. L. J.1231, 1263 (2005)Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, “Slightly Guilty,” U. Chi. Leg. F.83, 88–92 (1993)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., “Targeting and Humanitarian Law: Current Issues,” 34 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights59, 84 (2004)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House,” 105 Colum. L. Rev.1681 (2005)Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, “The Prohibition against Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment and Punishment: Can the Absolute Be Relativized under Existing International Law?56 Cath. U. L. Rev.837, 868 (2007)Google Scholar
Brandstatter, Eduard, Gigerenzer, Gaer & Hertwig, Ralph, “The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices without Trade-Offs,” 113 Psychological Rev.409 (2006)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreimer, Seth F., “Too Close to the Rack and the Screw: Constitutional Constraints on Torture in the War on Terror,” 6 U. Penn. J. Const. L.278, 306 (2003)Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan, “Risk and Reflexivity: What Socio-Legal Studies Add to the Study of Risk and the Law,” 57 Ala. L. Rev.119, 138 (2006)Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, “The Dangers of Natural Rights,” 20 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y683, 692 (1997)Google Scholar
Mayer, Jane, “The Black Sites,” 83 New Yorker, Aug. 13, 2007, at 46, 48Google Scholar
Pincus, Walter, “Waterboarding Historically Controversial,” Wash. Post, Oct. 5, 2006, at A17Google Scholar
Betts, Richard, “Intelligence Warning: Old Problems, New Agendas,” 28 Parameters26, 30 (Spring 1998)Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff, “Seeing beyond the Limits of International Law,” 84 Tex. L. Rev.1265, 1267 (2006)Google Scholar
Molm, Linda et al, “Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity,” 113 Amer. J. Sociol.205 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert, “Kant's Virtue Ethics,” 61 Philosophy473, 485 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, George & Trachtman, Joel, “The Customary International Law Game,” 99 A.J.I.L.541 (2005)Google Scholar
Arrigo, Jean Maria, “A Utilitarian Argument against Torture Interrogation of Terrorists,” 10 Science & Engineering Ethics543 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Stephen P., “America and Pakistan: Is the Worst Case Avoidable?104 Current Hist.131 (2005)Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas H., “International Law, International Relations Theory, and Preemptive War: The Vitality of Sovereign Equality Today,” 67 L. & Contemp. Prob.147, 154–57 (2004)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Notes
  • Mark Osiel, University of Iowa
  • Book: The End of Reciprocity
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817571.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Notes
  • Mark Osiel, University of Iowa
  • Book: The End of Reciprocity
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817571.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Notes
  • Mark Osiel, University of Iowa
  • Book: The End of Reciprocity
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817571.016
Available formats
×