Akam, M. (1998). Hox genes, homeosis and the evolution of segment identity: No need for hopeless monsters. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 42, 445–451Google ScholarPubMed

Allen, G. E. (1978). Life Science in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Allen, G. E. (1986). T. H. Morgan and the split between embryology and genetics, 1910–35. In A History of Embryology, ed. T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, and C. C. Wylie, pp. 113–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Amundson, R. (1989). The trials and tribulations of selectionist explanations. In Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, ed. K. Hahlweg and C. A. Hooker, pp. 413–432. Albany: State University of New York Press

Amundson, R. (1994). Two conceptions of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philosophy of Science, 61, 556–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amundson, R. (2001). Adaptation and development: On the lack of common ground. In Adaptationism and Optimality, ed. S. H. Orzack and E. Sober, pp. 303–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Amundson, R. (5 January 2003). Changing the spin: An evo devo retelling of the birth of evolutionary biology. Paper presented at the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Annual Meeting, Toronto

Apter, M. J., and Wolpert, L. (1965). Cybernetics and development, I: Information theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 8, 244–257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aristotle (1953). On the Generation of Animals, trans. A. L. Peck. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Arnold, S. J., Alberch, P., Csányi, V., Dawkins, R. C., Emerson, S. B., Fritzsch, B., Horder, T. J., Maynard Smith, J., Starck, M., Wagner, G. P., and Wake, D. B. (1989). How do complex organisms evolve? In Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates, ed. D. B. Wake and G. Roth, pp. 403–433. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons

Arthur, W. (1997). The Origin of Animal Body Plans: A Study in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Arthur, W. (2000). The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms. Evolution & Development, 2, 49–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arthur, W. (2002). The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature, 415, 757–764CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atchley, W. R., and Hall, B. K. (1991). A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 66, 101–157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bains, W. (2001). The parts list of life. Nature Biotechnology, 19, 401–402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bateson, W. (1894). Materials for the Study of Variation Treated With Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. London: Macmillan & Co.

Bechtel, W. (1986). The nature of scientific integration. In Integrating Scientific Disciplines, ed. W. Bechtel, pp. 3–52. Dordrecht: Martinus NijhoffCrossRef

Bechtel, W. (1993). Integrating disciplines by creating new disciplines: The case of cell biology. Biology and Philosophy, 8, 277–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berrill, N. J. (1941). Spatial and temporal growth patterns in colonial organisms. Growth (Suppl.), 5, 89–111Google Scholar

Bidell, T. R., and Fischer, K. W. (1997). Between nature and nurture: The role of human agency in the epigenesis of intelligence. In Intelligence, Heredity, and Environment, ed. R. J. Sternberg and E. Grigorenko, pp. 193–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Bolker, J. A., (1995). Model systems in developmental biology. BioEssays, 17, 451–455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolker, J. A. (2000). Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. American Zoologist, 40, 770–776Google Scholar

Bolker, J. A., and Raff, R. A. (1997). Beyond worms, flies and mice: It's time to widen the scope of developmental biology. Journal of NIH Research, 9, 35–39Google Scholar

Brakefield, P. M. (1998). The evolution-development interface and advances with the eyespot patterns of Bicyclus butterflies. Heredity, 80, 265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brakefield, P. M. (2001). Structure of a character and the evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 93–104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brakefield, P. M., and French, V. (1999). Butterfly wings: The evolution and development of colour patterns. BioEssays, 21, 391–4013.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brakefield, P. M., Gates, J., Keys, D., Kesbeke, F., Wijngaarden, P. J., Monteiro, A., French, V., and Carroll, S. B. (1996). Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature, 384, 236–242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brakefield, P. M., and Kesbeke, F. (1997). Genotype-environment interactions for insect growth in constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 264, 717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brakefield, P. M., Kesbeke, F., and Koch, P. B. (1998). The regulation of phenotypic plasticity of eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. American Naturalist, 152, 853–860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brenner, S. (1974). New directions in molecular biology. Nature, 248, 785–787CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brylski, P., and Hall, B. K. (1988a). Ontogeny of a macroevolutionary phenotype: The external cheek pouches of geomyoid rodents. Evolution, 42, 391–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brylski, P., and Hall, B. K. (1988b). Epithelial behaviors and threshold effects in the development and evolution of internal and external cheek pouches in rodents. Zeitschrift fur zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 26, 144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budd, G. (1999). Does evolution in body patterning drive morphological change – or vice versa? BioEssays, 21, 326–3323.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burian, R. (1997). On conflicts between genetic and developmental viewpoints – and their attempted resolution in molecular biology. In Structures and Norms in Science, ed. M. L. Dalla Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici, and J. van Benthem, pp. 243–264. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Burke, A. C. (1989). Critical features in chelonian development: The ontogeny and phylogeny of a unique tetrapod bauplan. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Burke, A. C. (1991). The development and evolution of the turtle body plan: Inferring intrinsic aspects of the evolutionary process from experimental embryology. American Zoologist, 31, 616–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. B., Grenier, J. K., and Weatherbee, S. D. (2001). From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science

Chen, L., Krause, M., Draper, B., Weintraub, H., and Fire, A. (1992). Body-wall muscle formation in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos that lack the MyoD homolog hlh-1. Science, 256, 240–243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Danchin, A. (1996). On genomes and cosmologies. In Integrative Approaches to Molecular Biology, ed. J. Collado-Vides, B. Magasanik and T. F. Smith, pp. 91–111. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Darden, L., and Maull, N. (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 44, 43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray

Darwin, C. (1881). The Formation of Vegetable Mold Through the Action of Worms With Observations on Their Habits. London: John Murray

Dassow, G., and Munro, E. (1999). Modularity in animal development and evolution: Elements of a conceptual framework for evodevo. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 285, 307–3253.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. London: Longman

Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Touchstone/Simon and Schuster

Dover, G. (2000). How genomic and developmental dynamics affect evolutionary processes. BioEssays, 22, 1153–11593.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunn, L. C. (1917). Nucleus and cytoplasm as vehicles of heredity. American Naturalist, 51, 286–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Models in Paleobiology, ed. T. J. M. Schopf, pp. 82–115. San Francisco: Freeman

Falk, R. (1991). The dominance of traits in genetic analysis. Journal of the History of Biology, 24, 457–484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fraser, A. (1970). An epigenetic system. In Towards a Theoretical Biology, ed. C. H. Waddington, pp. 57–62. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company

Fusco, G. (2001). How many processes are responsible for phenotypic evolution? Evolution & Development, 3, 279–286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gaertner, K. (1990). A third component causing random variability beside environment and genotype: A reason for the limited success of a 30 year long effort to standardize laboratory animals? Laboratory Animals, 24, 71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gannett, L. (1999). What's in a cause? The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 349–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garstang, W. (1922). The theory of recapitulation: A critical restatement of the Biogenetic Law. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), 35, 81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasser, S. M., Paro, R., Stewart, F., and Aasland, R. (1998). The genetics of epigenetics. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 54, 1–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gerhart, J., and Kirschner, M. (1997). Cells, Embryos and Evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science

Gehring, W. J. (1985). The homeo box: A key to the understanding of development? Cell, 40, 3–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gehring, W. J. (1998). Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution: The Homeobox Story. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Gehring, W. J., Halder, G., and Callaerts, P. (1995). Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the Eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science, 267, 1788–1792Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., and the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Gilbert, S. F. (1988). Cellular politics: Just, Goldschmidt, and the attempts to reconcile embryology and genetics. In The American Development of Biology, ed. R. Rainger, K. Benson, and J. Maienschein, pp. 311–346. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

Gilbert, S. F. (1991a). Epigenetic landscaping: Waddington's use of cell fate bifurcation diagrams. Biology & Philosophy, 6, 135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. (1991b). Induction and the origins of developmental genetics. In A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology, ed. S. F. Gilbert, pp. 181–206. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Gilbert, S. F. (1994). Dobzhansky, Waddington, and Schmalhausen: Embryology and the Modern Synthesis. In The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky: Essays on His Life and Thought in Russia and America, ed. M. B. Adams, pp. 143–154. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressCrossRef

Gilbert, S. F. (2000a). Developmental Biology, 6th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc

Gilbert, S. F. (2000b). Diachronic biology meets evo-devo: C. H. Waddington's approach to evolutionary developmental biology. American Zoologist, 40, 729–737Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F. (2001). Ecological developmental biology: Developmental biology meets the real world. Developmental Biology, 233, 1–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, S. F. (2003). Evo-devo, devo-evo, and devgen-popgen. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, S. F., and Bolker, J. A. (2001). Homologies of process and modular elements of embryonic construction. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 1–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, S. F., and Faber, M. (1996). Looking at embryos: The visual and conceptual aesthetics of emerging form. In The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science, ed. A. I. Tauber, pp. 125–151. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Gilbert, S. F., and Jorgensen, E. M. (1998). Wormholes: A commentary on K. F. Schaffner's ‘Genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism’. Philosophy of Science, 65, 259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, S. F., Loredo, G. A., Brukman, A., and Burke, A. C. (2001). Morphogenesis of the turtle shell: The development of a novel structure in tetrapod evolution. Evolution & Development, 3, 47–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M., and Raff, R. A. (1996). Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology, 173, 357–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, S. F., and Sarkar, S. (2000). Embracing complexity: Organicism for the 21st century. Developmental Dynamics, 219, 1–93.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2000). Explanatory symmetries, preformation, and developmental systems theory. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings), 67, S322–S331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, H. H., Gottesman, I. I., and Lemery, K. S. (1997). Epigenetic approaches to developmental psychopathology. Development & Psychopathology, 9, 365–387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottlieb, G. (1971). Development of Species Identification in Birds: An Inquiry into the Prenatal Determinants of Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual Development and Evolution: The Genesis of Novel Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Gottlieb, G. (1995). Some conceptual deficiencies in ‘developmental’ behavior genetics. Human Development, 38, 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing Nature-Nurture: Prenatal Roots of Instinctive Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From Central Dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792–802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottlieb, G. (2002). On the epigenetic evolution of species-specific perception: The developmental manifold concept. Cognitive Development, 17, 1287–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Gould, S. J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 205, 581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, R. (1992). Death of the gene: Developmental systems strikes back. In Trees of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, ed. P. E. Griffiths, pp. 165–209. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Gray, R. (2001). Selfish genes or developmental systems? In Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives, ed. R. S. Singh, C. B. Krimbas, D. B. Paul, and J. Beatty, pp. 184–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Griesemer, J. (1998). Turning back to go forward. Biology & Philosophy, 13, 103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griesemer, J. (2000). Reproduction and the reduction of genetics. In The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution, ed. P. J. Beurton, R. Falk, and H.-J. Rheinberger, pp. 240–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Griffiths, P. E., and Gray, R. (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 91, 277–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, P. E., and Gray, R. (1997). Replicator 2 – Judgement Day. Biology & Philosophy, 12, 471–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, P. E., and Gray, R. (2001). Darwinism and developmental systems. In Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, ed. S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, and R. Gray, pp. 195–218. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Griffiths, P. E., and Knight, R. D. (1998). What is the developmentalist challenge? Philosophy of Science, 65, 253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, P. E., and Neumann-Held, E. M. (1999). The many faces of the gene. BioScience, 49, 656–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Hall, B. K. (1992a). Waddington's legacy in development and evolution. American Zoologist, 32, 113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B. K. (1992b). Evolutionary Developmental Biology. London: Chapman and Hall

Hall, B. K. (1998). Epigenetics: Regulation not replication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B. K. (1999). Evolutionary Developmental Biology, 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Hall, B. K. (2000a). Evo-devo or devo-evo – Does it matter? Evolution & Development, 2, 177–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B. K. (2000b). Balfour, Garstang and de Beer: The first century of evolutionary embryology. American Zoologist, 40, 718–728Google Scholar

Hall, B. K. (2003). Opening the black box between genotype and phenotype: Cells and cell condensations as fundamental units of evolutionary developmental biology. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 219–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, B. K., and Miyake, T. (1992). The membranous skeleton: The role of cell condensations in vertebrate skeletogenesis. Anatomy and Embryology, 186, 107–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, B. K., and Miyake, T. (1995). Divide, accumulate, differentiate: Cell condensation in skeletal development revisited. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 39, 881–893Google ScholarPubMed

Hall, B. K., and Miyake, T. (2000). All for one and one for all: Condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. BioEssays, 22, 138–1473.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, B. K., and Olson, W. M., eds. (2003). Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Hamburger, V. (1980). Embryology and the Modern Synthesis in evolutionary theory. In The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, ed. E. Mayr and W. B. Provine, pp. 97–112. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRef

Hamer, D. (2002). Rethinking behavior genetics. Science, 298, 71–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamer, D., and Copeland, P. (1998). Living with Our Genes: The Groundbreaking Book about the Science of Personality, Behavior, and Genetic Destiny. New York: Anchor/Doubleday

Harrison, R. G. (1918). Experiments on the development of the fore limb of Amblystoma, a self-differentiating equipotential system. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 25, 413–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, R. G. (1937). Embryology and its relations. Science, 85, 369–374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henikoff, S., and Matzke, M. A. (1997). Exploring and explaining epigenetic effects. Trends in Genetics, 13, 293–295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heyningen, V. (2000). Gene games of the future. Nature, 408, 769–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoagland, S. L. (1988). Lesbian Ethics. Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Lesbian Studies

Holliday, R. (1987). The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science, 238, 163–170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holliday, R. (1994). Epigenetics: An overview. Developmental Genetics, 15, 453–457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hull, D. L. (1998). A clash of paradigms or the sound of one hand clapping. Biology & Philosophy, 13, 587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphreys, P. (1996). Aspects of emergence. Philosophical Topics, 24, 53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingram, D. (2000). Group Rights: Reconciling Equality and Difference. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas

International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 409, 860–921CrossRef

Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. J. (1995). Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. J. (1998). Epigenetic inheritance in evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 159–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. J. (2002). Creating bridges or rifts? Developmental systems theory and evolutionary developmental biology. BioEssays, 24, 290–291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacob, F. (1973). The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity, trans. B. E. Spillmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Jeffery, W. R. (2001). Cavefish as a model system in evolutionary developmental biology. Developmental Biology, 231, 1–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnston, T. D., (1987). The persistence of dichotomies in the study of behavioral development. Developmental Review, 7, 149–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, T. D., and Edwards, L. (2002). Genes, interactions, and the development of behaviour. Psychological Review, 109, 26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, T. D., and Gottlieb, G. (1990). Neophenogenesis: A developmental theory of phenotypic evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 147, 471–495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keller, E. F. (1994). Master molecules. In Are Genes Us? The Social Consequences of the New Genetics, ed. C. F. Cranor, pp. 89–98. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press

Keller, E. F. (1995). Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press

Keller, E. F. (1998). Structures of heredity. Biology & Philosophy, 13, 113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, E. F. (1999). Understanding development. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, E. F. (2000). The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Keller, E. F. (2001). Beyond the gene but beneath the skin. In Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, ed. S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, and R. Gray, pp. 299–312. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Keller, E. F. (2002). Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Keller, L., and Ross, K. G. (1993). Phenotypic plasticity and ‘cultural transmission’ of alternative social organisations in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behavioural Ecology & Sociobiology, 33, 121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keys, D. N., Lewis, D. L., Selegue, J. E., Pearson, B. J., Goodrich, L. V., Johnson, R. L., Gates, J., Scott, M. P., and Carroll, S. B. (1999). Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science, 283, 532–534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirschner, M., and Gerhart, J. (1998). Evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 95, 8420–8427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitcher, P. (2001). Battling the undead: How (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives, ed. R. S. Singh, C. B. Krimbas, D. B. Paul, and J. Beatty, pp. 396–414. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Krimsky, S. (2000). Hormonal Chaos: The Scientific and Social Origins of the Environmental Endocrine Hypothesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., and Feldman, M. W. (1999). Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 96, 10242–10247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, F. J., and Feldman, M. W. (2001). Niche construction, ecological inheritance, and cycles of contingency in evolution. In Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, ed. S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, and R. Gray, pp. 117–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Laubichler, M. D., and Wagner, G. P. (2001). How molecular is molecular developmental biology? A reply to Alex Rosenberg's ‘Reductionism redux: Computing the embryo’. Biology & Philosophy, 16, 53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehrman, D. S. (1965). Interaction between internal and external environments in the regulation of the reproductive cycle of the ring dove. In Sex and Behavior, ed. F. A. Beach, pp. 335–369, 378–380. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Lehrman, D. S. (1970). Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature-nurture problem. In Development and Evolution of Behavior, ed. L. R. Aronson, D. S. Lehrman, E. Tobach, and J. S. Rosenblatt, pp. 17–52. San Francisco: Freeman

Levins, R., and Lewontin, R. C. (1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Lewin, B. (1997). Genes VI. New York: Oxford University Press

Lewin, B. (1998). The mystique of epigenetics. Cell, 93, 301–303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, E. B. (1978). A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature, 276, 565–570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, E. B. (1994). Homeosis: The first 100 years. Trends in Genetics, 10, 341–343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26, 400–411Google ScholarPubMed

Lewontin, R. C. (1978). Adaptation. Scientific American, 239, 156–169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewontin, R. C. (1983). Gene, organism, and environment. In Evolution from Molecules to Men, ed. D. S. Bendall, pp. 273–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lickliter, R. (2000). An ecological approach to behavioral development: Insights from comparative psychology. Ecological Psychology, 12, 319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The burden of proof. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 211–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, A. C. (2003). Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 309–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

L⊘vtrup, S. (1974). Epigenetics: A Treatise on Theoretical Biology. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons

L⊘vtrup, S. (1988). Epigenetics. In Ontogeny and Systematics, ed. C. J. Humphries, pp. 189–227. New York: Columbia University Press

Mahner, M. and Bunge, M. (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Maienschein, J. (1986). Preformation or new formation – or neither or both? In A History of Embryology, ed. T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, and C. C. Wylie, pp. 73–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Maienschein, J. (1991a). Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Maienschein, J. (1991b). The origins of Entwicklungsmechanik. In A Conceptual History of Embryology, ed. S. F. Gilbert, pp. 43–61. New York: Plenum Press

Marshall, E. (2000). Rival genome sequencers celebrate a milestone together. Science, 288, 2294–2295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, Maynard J. (1990). Models of a dual inheritance system. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 143, 41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Maynard J. (2000a). The concept of information in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Maynard J. (2000b). Reply to commentaries. Philosophy of Science, 67, 214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayr, E. (1960). The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In Evolution After Darwin, Volume 1: The Evolution of Life, its Origin, History and Future, ed. S. Tax, pp. 349–380. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Mayr, E. (1997). This is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Mazzeo, J. A., ed. (1977). Introduction. In O. Hertwig, The Biological Problem of To-day: Preformation or Epigenesis? The Basis of a Theory of Organic Development. Oceanside, NJ: Dabor Science Publications

McCain, R. A. (1980). Critical reflections on sociobiology. Review of Social Economy, 38, 123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClendon, J. F. (1910). The development of isolated blastomeres of the frog's egg. American Journal of Anatomy, 10, 425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinnis, W., Levine, M. S., Hafen, E., Kuroiwa, A., and Gehring, W. J. (1984). A conserved DNA sequence in homeotic genes of the Drosophila antennapedia and Bithorax complex. Nature, 308, 428–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medawar, P. S., and Medawar, J. S. (1977). The Life Science. New York: Harper and Row

Medawar, P. S., and Medawar, J. S. (1983). From Aristotle to Zoos: A Philosophical Dictionary of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Molenaar, P. C. M., Boomsma, D. I., and Dolan, C. V. (1993). A third source of developmental differences. Behavior Genetics, 23, 519–524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Monod, J. (1971). Chance and Necessity, trans. A. Wainhouse. New York: Knopf

Moore, J. A. (1993). Science as a Way of Knowing: The Foundations of Modern Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Morgan, T. H. (1907). Sex-determining factors in animals. Science, 25, 382–384Google Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1909). What are ‘factors’ in Mendelian explanations? American Breeders’ Association, 5, 365–368Google Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1919). The Physical Basis of Heredity. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co.

Morgan, T. H. (1926). The Theory of the Gene. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Morgan, T. H. (1932a). The rise of genetics, I. Science, 76, 261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1932b). The rise of genetics, II. Science, 76, 285–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. H. (1934). Embryology and Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press

Moss, L. (1992). A kernel of truth? On the reality of the genetic program. PSA 1992: Philosophy of Science Association (Proceedings), vol. 1, pp. 335–348CrossRef

Moss, M. L. (1981). Genetics, epigenetics, and causation. American Journal of Orthodontics, 80, 366–375CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Müller, W. A. (1996). From the Aristotelian soul to genetic and epigenetic information: The evolution of the modern concepts in developmental biology at the turn of the century. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 40, 21–26Google ScholarPubMed

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World

Needham, J. (1959). A History of Embryology, 2nd ed. New York: Abelard-Schuman

Neumann-Held, E. M. (1999). The gene is dead – Long live the gene! Conceptualizing genes the constructionist way. In Sociobiology and Bioeconomics: The Theory of Evolution in Biological and Economic Theory, ed. P. Koslowski, pp. 105–137. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRef

Newman, S. A., and Müller, G. B. (2000). Epigenetic mechanisms of character origination. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 288, 304–3173.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nijhout, H. F. (1990). Metaphors and the role of genes in development. BioEssays, 12, 441–446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nijhout, H. F. (1991). The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press

Nijhout, H. F. (1996). Focus on butterfly eyespot development. Nature, 384, 209–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. (1996). Niche construction. American Naturalist, 147, 641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oosterhout, C., and Brakefield, P. M. (1999). Quantitative genetic variation in Bicyclus anynana metapopulation. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 49, 67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oyama, S. (1985). The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Oyama, S. (1999). Locating development: Locating developmental systems. In Conceptual Development: Piaget's Legacy, ed. E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman, and P. H. Miller, pp. 185–208. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Oyama, S. (2000a). Evolution's Eye: A Systems View of the Biology-Culture Divide. Durham, NC: Duke University Press

Oyama, S. (2000b). The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution, rev. ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press

Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., and Gray, R., eds. (2001). Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., and Gray, R. (2001). Introduction: What is developmental systems theory? In Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, ed. S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, and R. Gray, pp. 1–11. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressCrossRef

Patel, N. H. (1994). Developmental evolution: Insights from studies of insect segmentation. Science, 266, 581–590CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennisi, E. (2000). Embryonic lens prompts eye development. Science, 289, 522–523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peterson, K., and Sapienza, C. (1993). Imprinting the genome: Imprinted genes, imprinting genes, and a hypothesis for their interaction. Annual Review of Genetics, 27, 7–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petronis, A. (2001). Human morbid genetics revisited: Relevance of epigenetics. Trends in Genetics, 17, 142–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pigliucci, M. (2001). Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Pigliucci, M., and Schlichting, C. D. (1997). On the limits of quantitative genetics for the study of phenotypic evolution. Acta Biotheoretica, 45, 143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinto-Correia, C. (1997). The Ovary of Eve: Egg and Sperm and Preformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Pinto-Correia, C. (1999). Strange tales of small men: Homunculi in reproduction. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 42, 225–244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plotkin, H. (1994). Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge. Toronto: Penguin Press

Poerksen, U. (1995). Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language, trans. J. Mason and D. Cayley. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press

Raff, R. A. (1996). The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Rehmann-Sutter, C. (1996). Frankensteinian knowledge? The Monist, 79, 264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riedl, R. (1977). A systems-analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 351–370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rieppel, O. (2001). Turtles as hopeful monsters. BioEssays, 23, 987–991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Riggs, A. D., and Porter, T. N. (1996). Overview of epigenetic mechanisms. In Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation, ed. V. E. A. Russo, R. A. Martienssen, and A. D. Riggs, pp. 29–45. Plainview, TX: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Robert, J. S. (2000a). Schizophrenia epigenesis? Theoretical Medicine & Bioethics, 21, 191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2000b). Wild ontology: Elaborating environmental pragmatism. Ethics & the Environment, 5, 191–209Google Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2000c). Fastidious, foundational heresies. Biology & Philosophy, 15, 133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2000d). Synthetic biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31, 599–614Google Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2001a). Interpreting the homeobox: Metaphors of gene action and activation in development and evolution. Evolution & Development, 3, 287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2001b). Genomes, hormones and health. Literary Review of Canada, 9.4, 18–21Google Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2002). How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology?Biology & Philosophy, 17, 591–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2003). Developmental systems and animal behaviour. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robert, J. S. (in preparation a). Healthy Genomes, Healthy Folks?

Robert, J. S. (in preparation b). Integrating biological disciplines

Robert, J. S., Hall, B. K., and Olson, W. M. (2001). Bridging the gap between developmental systems theory and evolutionary developmental biology. BioEssays, 23, 954–962CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roll-Hansen, N. (1984). E. S. Russell and J. H. Woodger: The failure of two twentieth-century opponents of mechanistic biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 17, 399–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, S. (1997). Lifelines: Biology Beyond Determinism. New York: Oxford University Press

Rosenberg, A. (1997). Reductionism redux: Computing the embryo. Biology & Philosophy, 12, 445–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roskam, J. C., and Brakefield, P. M. (1999). Seasonal polyphenism in Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) butterflies: Different climates need different cues. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 66, 345–356Google Scholar

Roux, W. (1894). The problems, methods, and scope of developmental mechanics, trans. W. M. Wheeler. In Wood's Holl Biological Lectures for 1894, pp. 149–190. Boston: Ginn & Company. Original edition, 1895

Ruse, M. (1975). Woodger on genetics: A critical evaluation. Acta Biotheoretica, 24, 1–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Russell, E. S. (1916). Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology. London: John Murray

Russell, E. S. (1930). The Interpretation of Development and Heredity. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Russell, E. S. (1933). The limitations of analysis in biology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 33, 147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, V. E. A., Martienssen, R. A., and Riggs, A. D., eds. (1996). Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation. Cold Spring Harbour, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Sander, K. (1986). The role of genes in ontogenesis – evolving concepts from 1883 to 1983 as perceived by an insect embryologist. In A History of Embryology, ed. T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, and C. C. Wylie, pp. 363–395. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sapp, J. (1987). Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Sapp, J. (1991). Concepts of organization: The leverage of ciliate protozoa. In A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology, ed. S. F. Gilbert, pp. 229–258. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRef

Sarkar, S. (1996a). Biological information: A skeptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology. In The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives, ed. S. Sarkar, pp. 187–231. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Sarkar, S. (1996b). Decoding ‘coding’ – information and DNA. BioScience, 46, 857–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarkar, S. (1998). Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sarkar, S. (1999). From the Reaktionsnorm to the adaptive norm: The norm of reaction, 1909–1960. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarkar, S., and Robert, J. S. (2003). Editors' introduction [to a special issue on evolution and development]. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffner, K. F. (1998). Genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism: One process, indivisible? Philosophy of Science, 65, 209–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schank, J. C., and Wimsatt, W. C. (1986). Generative entrenchment and evolution. PSA-1986: Philosophy of Science Association (Proceedings), Vol. 2, 33–60CrossRef

Schank, J. C., and Wimsatt, W. C. (2001). Evolvability, adaptation, and modularity. In Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives, ed. R. S. Singh, C. B. Krimbas, D. B. Paul, and J. Beatty, pp. 322–335. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schlichting, C. D., and Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc

Schrödinger, E. (1944). What Is Life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schwartz, J. H. (1999). Sudden Origins: Fossils, Genes, and the Emergence of Species. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons

Scriver, C. R., and Waters, P. J. (1999). Monogenic traits are not simple: Lessons from phenylketonuria. Trends in Genetics, 15, 267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shishkin, M. A. (1992). Evolution as a maintenance of ontogenetic stability. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 191, 37–42Google Scholar

Smith, K. C. (1992). The new problem of genetics: A response to Gifford. Biology & Philosophy, 7, 431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. C. (1993). Neo-Rationalism vs. Neo-Darwinism: Integrating development and evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 7, 431–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. K., and Schneider, R. A. (1998). Have gene knockouts caused evolutionary reversals in the mammalian first arch? BioEssays, 20, 245–2553.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sober, E. (2000). Appendix I: The meaning of genetic causation. In A. Buchanan, D. W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, pp. 347–370. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Solé, R. V., Salazar-Ciudad, I., and Newman, S. A. (2000). Gene network dynamics and the evolution of development. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 479–480CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spencer-Smith, R. (1994–1995). Reductionism and emergent properties. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95, 113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterelny, K. (2000a). The ‘genetic program’ program: A commentary on Maynard Smith on information in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterelny, K. (2000b). Development, evolution, and adaptation. Philosophy of Science, 67 (Supplement: Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association; Part ↑: Symposia Papers), S369–S387

Sterelny, K. (2001). Niche construction, developmental systems, and the extended replicator. In Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, ed. S. Oyama, P. Griffiths, and R. Gray, pp. 333–349. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Sterelny, K., and Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Sterelny, K., and Kitcher, P. (1988). The return of the gene. Journal of Philosophy, 85, 339–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterelny, K., Smith, K. C. and Dickison, M. (1996). The extended replicator. Biology & Philosophy, 11, 377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. L. (2000). Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation. Evolution, 54, 1079–1091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Strohman, R. C. (1993). Ancient genomes, wise bodies, unhealthy people: Limits of a genetic paradigm in biology and medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 37, 112–145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Strohman, R. C. (1997). Profit margins and epistemology. Nature Biotechnology, 15, 1224–1226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Szathmáry, E. (1999). When the means do not justify the end. Nature, 399, 745CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thom, R. (1989). An inventory of Waddingtonian concepts. In Theoretical Biology: Epigenetic and Evolutionary Order from Complex Systems, ed. B. Goodwin and P. Saunders, pp. 1–7. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., and Myers, E. W. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291, 1304–1351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vinci, T., and Robert, J. S. (in preparation). Aristotle and modern genetics

Vogel, G. (2000). A mile-high view of development. Science, 288, 2119–2120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waddington, C. H. (1952). The Epigenetics of Birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Waddington, C. H. (1961). Genetic assimilation. Advances in Genetics, 10, 257–293Google ScholarPubMed

Waddington, C. H. (1975). The Evolution of an Evolutionist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Wade, N. (2002). Scientist reveals genome secret: It's his. New York Times (27 April), available online at <http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/27/science/27GENO.html>

Wagner, G. P. (2000). What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part I: Why is developmental biology necessary to explain evolutionary innovations? Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 288, 95–983.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wagner, G. P. (2001). What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part II: A causal explanation of evolutionary innovations may be impossible. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 305–309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wagner, G. P., Laubichler, M., and Chiu, C.-H. (2000). Developmental evolution as a mechanistic science: The inference from developmental mechanisms to evolutionary processes. American Zoologist, 40, 819–831Google Scholar

Wahlsten, D., (1990). Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 109–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wahlsten, D., and Gottlieb, G. (1997). The invalid separation of effects of nature and nurture: Lessons from animal experimentation. In Intelligence, Heredity, and Environment, ed. R. J. Sternberg and E. Grigorenko, pp. 163–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wallace, B. (1986). Can embryologists contribute to an understanding of evolutionary mechanisms? In Integrating Scientific Disciplines, ed. W. Bechtel, pp. 149–163. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff

van der Weele, C. (1999). Images of Development: Environmental Causes in Ontogeny. Albany: State University of New York Press

Weismann, A. (1893). The Germ Plasm, trans. W. Newton Parker and H. Rönnfeldt. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons

Weiss, K. M., and Fullerton, S. M. (2000). Phenogenetic drift and the evolution of genotype-phenotype relationships. Theoretical Population Biology, 57, 187–195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

West, M. J., and King, A. P. (1987). Settling nature and nurture into an ontogenetic niche. Developmental Psychobiology, 20, 549–562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

West-Eberhard, M.-J. (1998). Evolution in the light of developmental and cell biology, and vice versa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 95, 8417–8419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whitman, C. O. (1894). Evolution and epigenesis. In Wood's Holl Biological Lectures for 1894, pp. 205–224. Boston: Ginn & Company

Williams, G. C. (1992). Natural Selection: Domains, Levels and Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wilson, E. B. (1925). The Cell in Development and Inheritance, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan & Co.

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Wimsatt, W. C. (1980). Reductionistic research strategies and their biases in the units of selection controversy. In Scientific Discovery, Vol. 2: Case Studies, ed. T. Nickles, pp. 213–259. Dordrecht: D. ReidelCrossRef

Wimsatt, W. C. (1986a). Forms of aggregativity. In Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, ed. A. Donagan, N. Perovich, and M. Wedin, pp. 259–293. Dordrecht: D. Reidel

Wimsatt, W. C. (1986b). Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment, and the innate-acquired distinction. In Integrating Scientific Disciplines, ed. W. Bechtel, pp. 185–208. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff

Wimsatt, W. C. (1986c). Heuristics and the study of human behavior. In Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralisms and Subjectivities, ed. D. W. Fiske and R. A. Shweder, pp. 293–314. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Wimsatt, W. C. (1987). False models as means to truer theories. In Neutral Models in Biology, ed. M. H. Nitecki and A. Hoffman, pp. 23–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wimsatt, W. C. (1997). Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science, 64 (Supplement: Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association; Part II: Symposia Papers), S372–S384CrossRef

Wimsatt, W. C. (1999). Genes, memes and cultural heredity. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 279–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wimsatt, W. C. (2001). Generative entrenchment and the developmental systems approach to evolutionary processes. In Cycles of Contingency, ed. S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, and R. Gray, pp. 219–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Wimsatt, W. C., and Schank, J. C., (1988). Two constraints on the evolution of complex adaptations and the means for their avoidance. In Evolutionary Progress, ed. M. Nitecki, pp. 231–273. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Winther, R. G. (2001). Varieties of modules: kinds, levels, origins and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 116–129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolf, U. (1995). The genetic contribution to the phenotype. Human Genetics, 95, 127–148CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolffe, A. P. (1998). Introduction. Epigenetics: Novartis Foundation Symposium, 214, 1–5Google ScholarPubMed

Wolpert, L. (1991). The Triumph of the Embryo. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wolpert, L. (1994). Do we understand development? Science, 266, 571–572CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolpert, L. (1995). Development: Is the egg computable, or could we generate an angel or a dinosaur? In What Is Life? The Next Fifty Years: Speculations on the Future of Biology, ed. M. P. Murphy and L. A. J. O'Neill, pp. 57–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Woodger, J. H. (1952). Biology and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Woodger, J. H. (1959). Studies in the foundation of genetics. In The Axiomatic Method with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics, ed. L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski, pp. 408–428. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.CrossRef

Yamamoto, Y., and Jeffery, W. R. (2000). Central role for the lens in cave fish eye degeneration. Science, 289, 631–633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed