References
Aquinas, T. (1981). The Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Christian Classics.
Arbuthnot, J. (1710). “An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observ’d in the Births of Both Sexes.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 27: 186–190.
Behe, M. (1996). Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. Free Press.
Behe, M. (2004). “Irreducible Complexity: Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution.” In Dembski, W. and Ruse, M. (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–370.
Behe, M. (2006). “Whether Intelligent Design Is Science: A Response to the Opinion of the Court in Kitzmiller vs Dover Area School District.” Discovery Institute Web Site. www.discovery.org/f/697. Buckland, W. (1836). Geology and Mineralogy Considered with Reference to Natural Theology Vol. 1. The Perfect Library, 2015.
Cairn-Smith, A. G. (1982). Genetic Takeover and the Mineral Origins of Life. Cambridge University Press.
Carter, B. (1974). “Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology.” In Longair, M. (ed.), Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data. Reidel, pp. 291–298.
Clutton-Brock, T. and Harvey, P. (1977). “Primate Ecology and Social Organization.” Journal of the Zoological Society of London 183: 1–39.
Collins, R. (2003). “Evidence for Fine-Tuning.” In Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. Routledge, pp. 178–199.
Collins, R. (2009). “The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Universe.” In Craig, W. and Moreland, J. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 202–281.
Colyvan, M., Garfield, J., and Priest, G. (2005). “Problems with the Argument from Fine Tuning.” Synthese 145: 325–338.
Crow, J. (1979). “Genes That Violate Mendel’s Rules.” Scientific American 240: 134–146.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. Harvard University Press, 1964.
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray.
Darwin, C. (1874). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, 2nd edition.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. Norton.
Dembski, W. (1998a). The Design Inference. Cambridge University Press.
Dembski, W. (1998b). “Intelligent Science and Design.” First Things 86: 21–27.
Doolittle, W. F. and Sapienza, C. (1980). “Selfish Genes, the Phenotype Paradigm and Genome Evolution.” Nature 284: 601–603.
Draper, P. (1989). “Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists.” Noûs 23: 331–350.
Duhem, P. (1914). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press, 1954.
Earman, J. (1987). “The SAP Also Rises: A Critical Examination of the Anthropic Principle.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24: 307–317.
Eddington, A. (1939). The Philosophy of Physical Science. Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, A. (1972). Likelihood. Cambridge University Press.
Everitt, N. (2003). The Non-Existence of God. Routledge.
Fisher, R. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press.
Fisher, R. (1956). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Oliver and Boyd.
Fitelson, B. (2011). “Favoring, Likelihoods, and Bayesianism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8: 666–672.
Fitelson, B., Stephens, C., and Sober, E. (1999). “How Not to Detect Design, a Review of William Dembski’s The Design Inference.” Philosophy of Science 66: 472–488.
Forrest, B. and Gross, P. (2004). Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press.
Forster, M. (2006). “Counterexamples to a Likelihood Theory of Evidence.” Minds and Machines 16: 319–338.
Forster, M. and Sober, E. (2004). “Why Likelihood?” In Taper, M. and Lee, S. (eds.), The Nature of Scientific Evidence. University of Chicago Press, pp. 153–165.
Gould, S. (1980). “The Panda’s Thumb.” In The Panda’s Thumb, Norton, pp. 19–26.
Hacking, I. (1965). The Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, I. (1987). “The Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy: The Argument from Design and the Anthropic Principle Applied to Wheeler Universes.” Mind 96: 331–340.
Horwich, P. (1982). Probability and Evidence. Cambridge University Press.
Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Open Court.
Hume, D. (1779). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Coleman, D. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Jantzen, B. (2014). An Introduction to Design Arguments. Cambridge University Press.
Jeffrey, R. (1965). The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition, 1983.
Johnson, P. (1991). Darwin on Trial. InterVarsity Press, 2nd edition, 1993.
Kingsolver, J. and Koehl, M. (1985). “Aerodynamics, Thermoregulation, and the Evolution of Insect Wings: Differential Scaling and Evolutionary Change.” Evolution 39: 488–504.
Kitcher, P. (1983). Abusing Science. MIT Press.
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1950). Foundations of the Theory of Probability. Chelsea.
Kotzen, M. (2012). “Selection Biases in Likelihood Arguments.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63: 825–839.
Krebs, J. and Davies, N. (1981). An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology. Sinauer.
Le Poidevin, R. (1996). Arguing for Atheism. Routledge.
Leslie, J. (1989). Universes. Routledge.
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge, 2nd edition.
McGrew, L. (2004). “Testability, Likelihoods, and Design.” Philo 7: 5–21.
McGrew, L. (2016). “Four (or so) New Fine-Tuning Arguments.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8: 85–106.
McGrew, T., McGrew, L., and Vestrup, E. (2001). “Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Sceptical View.” Mind 110: 1027–1037.
Meyer, S. (2009). Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design. Harper Collins.
Monton, B. (2006). “God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 405–424.
Morris, H. (1980). King of Creation. CLP Publishers.
Narveson, J. (2003). “God by Design?” in Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. Routledge, pp. 88–104.
Numbers, R. (2004). “Ironic Heresy: How Young-Earth Creationists Came to Embrace Rapid Microevolution by Means of Natural Selection.” In Lustig, A., Richards, R., and Ruse, M. (eds.), Darwinian Heresies. Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–104.
O’Connor, D. (2001). Hume on Religion. Routledge.
Oppy, G. (2002). “Paley’s Argument for Design.” Philo 5.2: 161–173.
Orgel, L. & Crick, F. (1980). “Selfish DNA: The Ultimate Parasite.” Nature 284: 604–607.
Orr, H. A. (1997). “Darwin v. Intelligent Design (Again).” Boston Review, December/January. pp. 41–54.
Orzack, S. and Sober, E. (1994). “Optimality Models and the Test of Adaptationism.” American Naturalist 143: 361–380.
Paley, W. (1802). Natural Theology, or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Rivington.
Priest, G. (1981). “The Argument from Design.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59: 422–431.
Psillos, S. (2007). “The Fine Structure of Inference to the Best Explanation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 441–448.
Pyle, A. (2006). Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: A Reader’s Guide. Bloomsbury.
Roberts, J. (2012). “Fine-Tuning and the Infrared Bulls-Eye.” Philosophical Studies 160: 287–303.
Robson, J. (1990). “The Fiat and Finger of God: The Bridgewater Treatises”. In Helmstadter, R., Lightman, B., and Bernard, V. (eds.). Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth-Century Religious Belief. Stanford University Press
Royall, R. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Russell, R. (1912). “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13: 1–26.
Salmon, W. (1978). “Religion and Science: A New Look at Hume’s Dialogues.” Philosophical Studies 33: 143–176.
Sarkar, S. (2007). Doubting Darwin: Creationist Designs of Evolution. Blackwell.
Schupbach, J. (2005). “Paley’s Inductive Inference to Design.” Philosophia Christi 7: 2.
Sedley, D. (2007). Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. University of California Press.
Shanks, N. and Joplin, K. (1999). “Redundant Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry.” Philosophy of Science 66: 268–282.
Shimony, A. (1970). “Scientific Inference.” In Colodny, R. (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Shapiro, A. (2009). “William Paley’s ‘Lost’ Intelligent Design.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 31: 55–77.
Sober, E. (1984). The Nature of Selection. MIT Press.
Sober, E. (1986). “Explanatory Presupposition.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64: 143–149.
Sober, E. (1990). Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings. Macmillan.
Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of Biology. Westview Press.
Sober, E. (1999). “Testability.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73: 47–76.
Sober, E. (2002). “Intelligent Design and Probability Reasoning.” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 52: 65–80.
Sober, E. (2003). “The Argument from Design.” In Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. Routledge, pp. 25–53. Reprinted in W. Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Religion, 2004, pp. 117–147.
Sober, E. (2004). “Likelihood, Model Selection, and the Duhem-Quine Problem.” Journal of Philosophy 101: 1–22.
Sober, E. (2007a). “Intelligent Design Theory and the Supernatural: The ‘God or Extra-Terrestrials’ Reply.” Faith and Philosophy 24: 72–82.
Sober, E. (2007b). “What’s Wrong with Intelligent Design?” Quarterly Review of Biology 82: 1–8.
Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge University Press.
Sober, E. (2009). “Absence of Evidence and Evidence of Absence: Evidential Transitivity in Connection with Fossils, Fishing, Fine-Tuning, and Firing Squads.” Philosophical Studies 143: 63–90.
Sober, E. (2011). Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards? Prometheus Books.
Sober, E. (2012). “Coincidences and How to Think about Them.” In European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings 2009, Springer, pp. 355–374.
Sober, E. (2015). Ockham’s Razors: A User’s Manual. Cambridge University Press.
Sober, E. (forthcoming-a). “A Bayesian Double Negative: A Critique of Hume’s Treatment of the Design Argument in the Dialogues and of the Design Argument Itself.” In Williford, K. (ed.), Essays on Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Routledge.
Sober, E. (forthcoming-b). “Is Fine-Tuning Evidence for God’s Existence? No.” In Peterson, M. and VanArragon, R. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd edition.
Sober, E. and Orzack, J. (2003). “Common Ancestry and Natural Selection.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 423–437.
Sober, E. and Steel, M. (2002). “Testing the Hypothesis of Common Ancestry.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 218: 395–408.
Sober, E. and Steel, M. (2017). “Similarities as Evidence for Common Ancestry: A Likelihood Epistemology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68: 617–638.
Sober, E. & Wilson, D. (1998). Unto Others. Harvard University Press.
Swinburne, R. (1968). “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43: 199–212.
Swinburne, R. (1997). Simplicity As Evidence of Truth. Marquette University Press.
Swinburne, R. (2004). The Existence of God. Oxford University Press. 2nd edition, 2010.
Titelbaum, M. (2013). Quitting Certainties: A Bayesian Framework Modeling Degrees of Belief. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982a). “Evidential Impact of Base Rates.” In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–160.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982b). “Judgments of and by Representativeness.” In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–98.
van Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Clarendon Press.
Vassend, O, Sober, E., and Fitelson, B. (2017). “The Philosophical Significance of Stein’s Paradox.” European Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7: 411–433.
Venn, J. (1866). The Logic of Chance. Chelsea Publishing.
Weisberg, J. (2005). “Firing Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument.” British Society for the Philosophy of Science 56: 809–821.
Weisberg, J. (2010). “A Note on Design: What’s Fine-Tuning Got to Do with It?” Analysis 70.3: 431–438.
Wells, J. (2011). The Myth of Junk DNA. Discovery Institute Press.
Whewell, W. (1833). Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology. Kessinger Publishing, 2014.
White, R. (2000). “Fine-Tuning and Multiple Universes.” Nous 34: 260–276.
White, R. (2015). “The Argument from Cosmological Fine-Tuning.” In Rosen, G., Byrne, A., Cohen, J., and Shiffrin, S. (eds.), The Norton Introduction to Philosophy. Norton, pp. 45–50.
Zach, R. (1978). “Selection and Dropping of Whelks by Northwestern Crows.” Behaviour 67: 134–148.
Zhang, J. and Zhang, K. (2015). “Likelihood and Consilience: On Forster’s Counterexamples to the Likelihood Theory of Evidence.” Philosophy of Science 82: 930–940.
