Abdullah, Carolyne, Karpowitz, Christopher F. and Raphael, Chad. 2016. Affinity Groups, Enclave Deliberation, and Equity. Journal of Public Deliberation 12 (2): 1–40.Google Scholar

Abou-Chadi, Tarik. 2016. Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts: How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact. British Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People, Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce and Fishkin, James S.. 2002. Deliberation Day. Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, Christian, Hurka, Steffen, Knill, Christoph and Steinebach, Yves. 2019. Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswick, Elise, Levinson, Daniel J. and Sanford, R. Nevitt. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Aird, Michael J., Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Swire, Briony, Berinski, Adam J. and Lewandowski, Stephan. 2018. Does Truth Matter to Voters? The Effects of Correcting Political Misinformation in an Australian Sample. Royal Society Open Science 5 (12): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, Danielle and Light, Jennifer S. (eds.). 2015. Understanding Citizenship in a Digital Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Allen, Jennifer, Howland, Baird, Mobius, Markus and Watts, Duncan J.. 2020. Evaluating the Fake News Problem at the Scale of the Information Ecosystem. Science Advances 6 (14). www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aay3539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alnemr, Nardine. 2021. Citizens and Intelligent Machines: Algorithms in Deliberative Democracy. PhD Thesis, University of Canberra.Google Scholar

Anderson, Ashley A., Brossard, Dominique, Scheufele, Dietram A., Xenos, Michael A. and Ladwig, Peter. 2014. The “Nasty Effect”: Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3): 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arechar, Antonio A., Allen, Jennifer, Berinsky, Adam J., et al. 2023. Understanding and Combatting Misinformation across 16 Countries on Six Continents. Nature Human Behavior 7: 1502–1513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Austen-Smith, David. 1992. Strategic Models of Talk in Political Decision Making. International Political Science Review 13 (1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avritzer, Leonardo. 2017. The Two Faces of Institutional Innovation: Promises and Limits of Democratic Participation in Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baccini, Leonardo and Sattler, Thomas. 2023. Austerity, Economic Vulnerability, and Populism. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3766022Google Scholar

Bächtiger, André and Beste, Simon. 2017. Deliberative Citizens, (Non)Deliberative Politicians: A Rejoinder. Daedalus 146 (3): 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E.. 2018. Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 1–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bächtiger, André and Hangartner, Dominik. 2010. When Deliberative Theory Meets Political Science: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in the Study of a Philosophical Ideal. Political Studies 58: 609–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bächtiger, André and Lindell, Marina. 2016. “Benchmarking” Deliberative Quality across Sites. http://politicalcommunication.org/article/benchmarking-deliberative-quality-across-sites/Google Scholar

Bächtiger, André and Parkinson, John. 2019. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagg, Samuel. 2021. Sortition as Anti-corruption: Popular Oversight against Elite Capture. American Journal of Political Science. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajps.12704Google Scholar

Bago, Bence, Rand, David G. and Pennycook, Gordon. 2020. Fake News, Fast and Slow: Deliberation Reduces Belief in False (But Not True) News Headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149 (8): 1608–1613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bahador, Babak. 2020. Classifying and Identifying the Intensity of Hate Speech. https://items.ssrc.org/disinformation-democracy-and-conflict-prevention/classifying-and-identifying-the-intensity-of-hate-speech/Google Scholar

Bail, Christopher. 2021. Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bail, Christopher, Argyle, Lisa, Brown, Tylor, et al. 2018. Exposure to Opposing Views Can Increase Political Polarization: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment on Social Media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (37): 9216–9221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon and Adamic, Lada A.. 2015. Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science 348 (6239): 1130–1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barberà, Oscar and Rodríguez-Teruel, Juan. 2020. The PSOE’s Deliberation and Democratic Innovations in Turbulent Times for the Social Democracy. European Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-019-00236-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barberá, Pablo. 2020. Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization. In Persily, Nathaniel and Tucker, Joshua A. (eds.), Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform, pp. 34–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry. 2023. Democracy Erodes from the Top: Leaders, Citizens, and the Challenge of Populism in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Barvosa, Edwina. 2018. Deliberative Democracy Now: LGBT Equality and the Emergence of Large-Scale Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benkler, Yochai, Faris, Robert and Roberts, Hal. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoît, Jean-Pierre and Dubra, Juan. 2014. A Theory of Rational Attitude Polarization. Social Science Research Network. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2529494CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, Robert E. 2023. The Rhetoric of “Constitutional Hardball”. PhD Dissertation, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar

Berger, J.M. 2018. Extremism. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernaerts, Kamil, Blanckaert, Benjamin and Caluwaerts, Didier. 2023. Institutional Design and Polarization: Do Consensus Democracies Fare Better in Fighting Polarization Than Majoritarian Democracies? Democratization 30 (2): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernhard, Laurent, Kriesi, Hanspeter and Weber, Edward. 2015. The Populist Discourse of the Swiss People’s Party. In Kriesi, Hanspeter and Pappas, Takis S. (eds.), European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, pp. 125–140. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Basil. 1973. Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bliuc, Anna-Maria, McCarty, Craig, Thomas, Emma F., et al. 2015. Public Division about Climate Change Rooted in Conflicting Socio-Political Identities. Nature Climate Change 5: 226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bossetta, Michael. 2017. Fighting Fire with Fire: Mainstream Adoption of the Populist Political Style in the 2014 Europe Debates between Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (4): 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulianne, Shelly. 2019. Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy. Political Studies 67 (1): 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boxell, Levi, Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2022. Cross Country Trends in Affective Polarization. Review of Economics and Statistics. in press.Google Scholar

Boykoff, Maxwell. 2019. Creative (Climate) Communications Productive Pathways for Science, Policy and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boykoff, Maxwell T. and Boykoff, Jules M.. 2004. Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press. Global Environmental Change 14: 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (8): 1191–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruns, Axel. 2019. Filter Bubble. Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruns, Axel and Highfield, Tim. 2016. Is Habermas on Twitter? Social Media and the Public Sphere. In Bruns, Axel, Enli, Gunn, Skogerbo, Eli, Olof Larsson, Anders and Christensen, Christian (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, pp. 56–73. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bruns, Axel, Harrington, Stephen and Hurcombe, Edward. 2021. Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories: Tracing Misinformation Trajectories from the Fringes to the Mainstream. In Lewis, Monique, Govender, Eliza and Holland, Kate (eds.), Communicating COVID-19: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 229–249. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruns, Axel, Hurcombe, Edward and Harrington, Stephen. 2022. Covering Conspiracy: Approaches to Reporting the COVID/5G Conspiracy Theory. Digital Journalism 10 (6): 930–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1968921CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bua, Adrian. 2022. Bring Political Economy Back In: A Marxist Perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Montreal.Google Scholar

Buchstein, Hubertus. 2019. Democracy and Lottery: Revisited. Constellations 26: 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, George W. 2002. Opening Statement. In National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: The White House.Google Scholar

Caiani, Manuela and della Porta, Donatella. 2011. The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right: A Frame Analysis of Extreme Right-Wing Discourses in Italy and Germany. Acta Politica 46 (2): 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caluwaerts, Didier. 2012. Confrontation and Communication: Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas and Lupu, Noam. 2021. The White Working Class and the 2016 Election. Perspectives on Politics 19 (1): 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castro, Laia, Nir, Lilach and Skovsgaard, Morten. 2018. Bridging Gaps in Cross-Cutting Media Exposure: The Role of Public Service Broadcasting. Political Communication, 35(4): 542–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. 2009. Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy? Political Theory 37: 323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. 2018. Human Life is Group Life: Deliberative Democracy for Realists. Critical Review 30 (1–2): 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. 2021. Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy: Is Fake News Destroying the Public Sphere? Political Studies 69 (1): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. 2023. Deliberative Democracy and the Digital Public Sphere: Asymmetrical Fragmentation as a Political Not a Technological Problem. Constellations 30: 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, Man-pui Sally and Albarracín, Dolores. 2023. A Meta-Analysis of Correction Effects in Science-Relevant Misinformation. Nature Human Behavior 7: 1514–1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chen, M. Keith and Rohla, Ryne. 2018. The Effect of Partisanship and Political Advertising on Close Family Ties. Science 360 (6392): 1020–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chenoweth, Erica and Stephan, Maria J.. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Cho, Jaeho, Ahmed, Saifuddin, Hilbert, Martin, Liu, Billy and Luu, Jonathan. 2020. Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 64 (2): 150–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, Henrik Serup and von Schoultz, Åsa. 2017. Ideology and Deliberation: An Analysis of Public Support for Deliberative Practices in Finland. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 31: 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chwalisz, Claudia. 2022. Another Democratic Future Is Possible. Das Progressive Zentrum. www.progressives-zentrum.org/en/another-democratic-future-is-possible/Google Scholar

Coe, Kevin, Kenski, Kate and Rains, Stephen A.. 2014. Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments. Journal of Communication 64 (4): 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua and Fung, Archon. 2023. Democratic Responsibility in the Digital Public Sphere. Constellations 30: 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colombo, Céline. 2018. Justifications and Citizen Competence in Direct Democracy: A Multilevel Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 787–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conover, Johnston Pamela and Searing, Donald D.. 2005. Studying “Everyday Political Talk” in the Deliberative System. Acta Politica 40, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conover, Johnston Pamela, Searing, Donald D. and Crewe, Ivor M.. 2001. The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion. British Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 21–62.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, et al. 2011. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach. Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppock, Alexander. 2022. Persuasion in Parallel: How Information Changes Minds About Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costanza, William C. 2015. Adjusting Our Gaze: An Alternative Approach to Understanding Youth Radicalization. Journal of Strategic Security 8 (1–2): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curato, Nicole. 2021. Interruptive Protests in Dysfunctional Deliberative Systems. Politics 41(3): 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curato, Nicole. 2023. Is Disinformation the Problem, or the Inequality of Power? Ask the People. People Powered. www.peoplepowered.org/news-content/disinformation-fake-newsGoogle Scholar

Curato, Nicole and Fossati, Diego. 2020. Authoritarian Innovations: Crafting Support for a Less Democratic Southeast Asia. Democratization 27 (6): 1006–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curato, Nicole, Hammond, Marit and Min, John. 2018. Power in Deliberative Democracy: Norms, Forums, Systems. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Daggett, Cara. 2018. Petro-Masculinity: Fossil Fuels and Authoritarian Desire. Millennium 47 (1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

della Porta, Donatella. 2005. Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberation in Social Movements. Acta Politica 40: 336–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella and Doerr, Nicole. 2018. Deliberation in Protests and Social Movements. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Mark, E. Warren (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 392–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deveaux, Monique. 2015. The Global Poor as Agents of Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (2): 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian. 2013. A Reason-Based Theory of Rational Choice. Noûs 47 (1): 104–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Disch, Lisa Jane. 2011. Toward a Mobilization Conception of Political Representation. American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Disch, Lisa Jane. 2021. Making Constituencies: Representation as Mobilization in Mass Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doerr, Nicole. 2018. Political Translation: How Social Movement Democracies Survive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N. 2012. The Politics of Motivation. Critical Review 24 (2): 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N. 2014. Pathologies of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and Democratic Responsiveness. Political Communication 31 (3): 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N., Levendusky, Matthew S. and McLain, Audrey. 2018. No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussion. American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N. and McGrath, Mary C.. 2019. The Evidence for Motivated Reasoning in Climate Change Preference Formation. Nature Climate Change 9: 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation. American Political Science Review 107: 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James, Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levendusky, Matthew and Ryan, John Barry. 2021. Affective Polarization, Local Contexts and Public Opinion in America. Nature Human Behavior 5: 28–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Drutman, Lee. 2020. Breaking the Two-party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drutman, Lee. 2022. Moderation, Realignment, or Transformation? Evaluating Three Approaches to America’s Crisis of Democracy. Annals – American Academy of Political and Social Science 699: 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 1996. Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, Struggles. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2005a. Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation. Acta Politica 40: 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2005b. Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory 33: 218–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2010. Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation. Political Theory 38: 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. and Holmes, Leslie T.. 2002. Post-communist Democratization: Political Discourses Across Thirteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. and Lo, Alex Y.. 2015. Reason and Rhetoric in Climate Communication. Environmental Politics 24: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. and Niemeyer, Simon. 2006. Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals. American Journal of Political Science 50: 634–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. and Niemeyer, Simon. 2008. Discursive Representation. American Political Science Review 102: 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunlap, Riley E. and McCright, Aaron M.. 2011. Organized Climate Change Denial. In Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Richard B. and Schlosberg, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, pp. 144–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dunt, Ian. 2023. How Westminster Works… and Why It Doesn’t. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, ed. 1986. The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ercan, Selen A. 2014. Same Problem, Different Solutions: The Case of “Honour Killing” in Germany and Britain. In Gill, Aisha K., Strange, Carolyn and Roberts, Karl (eds.), “Honour” Killing and Violence: Theory, Policy and Practice, pp. 199–217. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ercan, Selen A. 2017. Engaging with Extremism in a Multicultural Society: A Deliberative Democratic Approach. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development 12 (2): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ercan, Selen, Hendriks, Carolyn M. and Dryzek, John S.. 2019. Public Deliberation in an Era of Communicative Plenty. Policy and Politics 47 (1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esau, Katharina, Friess, Dennis and Eilders, Christiane. 2017. Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms. Policy and Internet 9 (3): 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esser, Frank and Pfetsch, Barbara. 2020. Political Communication. In Daniele, Caramani (ed.), Comparative Politics, 5th ed., pp. 336–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esterling, Kevin M., Fung, Archon and Lee, Taeku. 2021. When Deliberation Produces Persuasion Rather Than Polarization: Measuring and Modeling Small Group Dynamics in a Field Experiment. British Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 666–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esterling, Kevin M., Neblo, Michael A. and Lazer, David. M. J.. 2011. Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed About Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents. Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrar, Cynthia, Green, Donald P., Green, Jennifer E., Nickerson, David W. and Shewfelt, Steven. 2009. Does Discussion Group Composition Affect Policy Preferences? Results from Three Randomized Experiments. Political Psychology 30 (4): 615–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, Henry, Mercier, Hugo and Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2022. Analytical Democratic Theory: A Microfoundational Approach. American Political Science Review 117 (2): 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Jessica. 2018. Strange Speech: Structures of Listening in Nuit Debout, Occupy, and 15M. International Journal of Communication 12: 1840–1863.Google Scholar

Felicetti, Andrea and Holdo, Markus. 2023. Reflective Inclusion: Learning from Activists What Taking a Deliberative Stance Means. Political Studies. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00323217221150867CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennema, Meindert and Maussen, Marcel. 2000. Dealing with Extremists in Public Discussion: Front National and “Republican Front” in France. Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (3): 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris. 2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, Frank. 2021. Truth and Post-truth in Public Policy: Interpreting the Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishkin, James, Siu, Alice, Diamond, Larry and Bradburn, Norman. 2021. Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room”. American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1464–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleuss, Dannica and Helbig, Karoline. 2021. Measuring Nation States’ Deliberativeness: Systematic Challenges, Methodological Pitfalls, and Strategies for Upscaling the Measurement of Deliberation. Political Studies 69 (2): 307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flinders, Matthew. 2015. The Problem with Democracy. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (2): 451–463.Google Scholar

Fowler, Geoffrey A. 2016. What If Facebook Gave Us an Opposing-Viewpoints Button? Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2016. www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-facebook-gave-us-an-opposing-viewpoints-button-14635731Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text 25/26: 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. 2017. The End of Progressive Neoliberalism. Dissent, January 22.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. The End of History. National Interest (summer): 3–18.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon and Lessig, Lawrence. 2023. How AI Could Take Over Elections – and Undermine Democracy. The Conversation, June 2. https://theconversation.com/how-ai-could-take-over-elections-and-undermine-democracy-206051Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Wright, Erik O.. 2018. Legislature by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Gerber, Marlène. 2015. Equal Partners in Dialogue? Participation Equality In a Trans- national Deliberative Poll (Europolis). Political Studies 63 (1): 110–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Marlène, Bächtiger, André, Shikano, Susumu, Reber, Simon and Rohr, Samuel. 2018. Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis). British Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 1093–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerth, Hans H. and Wright Mills, C. (eds. and trans.). 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gethin, Amory, Martínez-Toledano, Clara and Piketty, Thomas. 2022. Brahmin Left versus Merchant Right: Changing Political Cleavages in 21 Western Democracies, 1948–2020. Quarterly Journal of Economics 137 (1): 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gherghina, Sergiu, Soare, Sorina and Jacquet, Vincent. 2023. Political Parties and Deliberation: From Challenges to Opportunities. Acta Politica 58: 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Saskia and Bächtiger, André. 2022. Catching the “Deliberative Wave”? How (Disaffected) Citizens Assess Deliberative Citizen Forums. British Journal of Political Science 53 (1):239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Saskia, Lindell, Marina and Bächtiger, André. 2023. Empowered Mini-publics for Democratic Renewal? Evidence from Three Conjoint Experiments in the United States, Ireland and Finland.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Saskia, Wyss, Dominik and Bächtiger, André. 2019. Deliberating or Thinking (Twice) about Democratic Preferences: What German Citizens Want from Democracy. Political Studies 68 (2), 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gooch, Andrew. 2018. Ripping Yarns: Experiments on Storytelling by Partisan Elites. Political Communication 35 (2): 220–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 2000. Democratic Deliberation Within. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1): 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. and Spiekermann, Kai. 2018. An Epistemic Theory of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goovaerts, Ine and Marien, Sofie. 2020. Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation: Decreasing Political Trust, Increasing Persuasive Power? Political Communication 37 (6): 768–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graeber, David and Wengrow, David. 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Graham, Matthew H. and Svolik, Milan W.. 2020. Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review 114 (2): 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grayling, A. C. 2017. Democracy and Its Crisis. London: Oneworld.Google Scholar

Groenendyk, Eric and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2021. What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal-Dependent Political Evaluation. American Journal of Political Science 65 (1): 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grönlund, Kimmo, Herne, Kaisa and Setälä, Maija. 2015. Does Enclave Deliberation Polarize Opinions? Political Behavior 37: 995–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grönlund, Kimmo, Setälä, Maija and Herne, Kaisa. 2010. Deliberation and Civic Virtue: Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation Experiment. European Political Science Review 2 (1): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guerrero, Alexander A. 2014. Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative. Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2): 135–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guess, Andrew and Coppock, Alexander. 2020. Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments. British Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 1497–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guriev, Sergei and Treisman, Daniel. 2022. Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2018. Interview with Jürgen Habermas. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 871–882. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2022. Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere. Theory, Culture and Society 39 (4): 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, Ulrike and Oaksford, Mike. 2006. A Normative Theory of Argument Strength. Informal Logic 26: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, Heejin. 2014. Policy Deliberation as a Goal: The Case of Chinese ENGO Activism. Journal of Chinese Political Science 19 (2): 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harré, Rom and Gillett, Grant. 1994. The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

He, Baogang and Wagenaar, Hendrik. 2018. Authoritarian Deliberation Revisited. Japanese Journal of Political Science 19: 622–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

He, Baogang and Warren, Mark E.. 2011. Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development. Perspectives on Politics 9: 269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellmeier, Sebastian and Bernhard, Michael. 2023. Regime Transformation from Below: Mobilization for Democracy and Autocracy from 1900 to 2021. Comparative Political Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2017. Citizen-Led Democratic Reform: Innovations from Indi. Australian Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 481–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendriks, Carolyn M. and Carson, Lyn. 2008. Can the Market Help the Forum? Negotiating the Commercialization of Deliberative Democracy. Policy Sciences 41 (4): 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennig, Bratt. 2017. The End of Politicians: Time for a Real Democracy. Atlanta: Unbound.Google Scholar

Herzog, Lisa. 2023. Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John, Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Hibbing, Matthew V. and Fortunato, David. 2023. Who Do the People Want to Govern? Party Politics 29 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Seth J. and Tausanovitch, Chris. 2015. A Disconnect in Representation? Comparison of Trends in Congressional and Public Polarization. Journal of Politics 77 (4): 1058–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himmelroos, Staffan and Rapeli, Lauri. 2020. Can Deliberation Reduce Political Misperceptions? Findings from a Deliberative Experiment on Immigration. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16: 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinck, Robert S., Hawthorne, Hayley and Hawthorne, Joshua. 2018. Authoritarians Don’t Deliberate: Cultivating Deliberation and Resisting Authoritarian Tools in an Age of Global Nationalism. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 14 (2): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, Kersty and Niemeyer, Simon. 2013. What do Climate Sceptics Believe? Discourses of Scepticism and their Response to Deliberation. Public Understanding of Science 22 (4): 396–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hogan, Tom. 2022. New Poll: One Year After Jan. 6th, Disturbing Support for Authoritarianism. The Bulwark, January 6. www.thebulwark.com/new-poll-one-year-after-jan-6th-disturbing-support-for-authoritarianism/Google Scholar

Holzinger, Katharina. 2004. Bargaining by Arguing: An Empirical Analysis Based on Speech Act Theory. Political Communication 21 (2): 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbeth and Marks, Gary. 2018. Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooghe, Marc. 1999. The Rebuke of Thersites: Deliberative Democracy under Conditions of Inequality. Acta Politica 34: 287–301.Google Scholar

Ignazi, Piero. 2021. The Failure of Mainstream Parties and the Impact of New Challenger Parties in France, Italy and Spain. Italian Political Science Review 51 (1): 100–116.Google Scholar

Isenberg, Daniel J. 1986. Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (6): 1141–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yptack, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil and Westwood, Sean. 2019. The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Kristof. 2023. Populists and Citizens’ Assemblies: Caught between Strategy and Principles? In Reuchamps, Min, Vrydagh, Julien and Welp, Yanina (eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, pp. 325–336. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R., Cook, Fay Lomax and Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jagers, Jan and Walgrave, Stefan. 2007. Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakob, Julia, Dobbrick, Timo and Wessler, Hartmut. 2021. The Integrative Complexity of Online User Comments across Different Types of Democracy and Discussion Arenas. International Journal of Press/Politics. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/19401612211044018Google Scholar

Jaramillo, Maria Clara and Steiner, Jürg. 2014. Deliberative Transformative Moments: A New Concept as Amendment to the Discourse Quality Index. Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (2): 1–22.Google Scholar

Jennstål, Julia. 2012. Traits and Talks: Lessons about Personality and Deliberation from the Negotiations between Nelson Mandela and F. W. De Klerk. PhD Dissertation, University of Uppsala.Google Scholar

Jörke, Dirk and Selk, Veith. 2015. Der hilflose Antipopulismus. Leviathan 43 (4): 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jungherr, Andreas and Schroeder, Ralph. 2021. Disinformation and the Structural Transformations of the Public Arena: Addressing the Actual Challenges to Democracy. Social Media + Society 7 (1). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2056305121988928CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Junius, Nino, Caluwaerts, Didier, Matthieu, Joke and Erzeel, Silvia. 2021. Hacking the Representative System through Deliberation? The Organization of the Agora Party in Brussel. Acta Politica. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-021-00226-3Google Scholar

Junius, Nino. and Matthieu, Joke. 2022. Who Rules the Deliberative Party? Examining the Agora Case in Belgium. Party Politics. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13540688221114404Google Scholar

Kadivar, Mohammad A. 2018. Mass Mobilization and the Durability of New Democracies. American Sociological Review 83 (2): 390–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, Dan M. 2007. The Cognitively Illiberal State. Stanford Law Review 60 (1): 115–154.Google Scholar

Kahan, Dan M. 2013. Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection. Judgment and Decision Making 8 (4): 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Wittlin, Maggie, et al. 2012. The Polarizing Impact of Scientific Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks. Nature Climate Change 2: 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, Dan M., Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Braman, Donald. 2011. Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kanra, Bora. 2009. Islam, Democracy and Dialogue in Turkey: Deliberating in Divided Societies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, Christopher and Mendelberg, Tali. 2018. The Political Psychology of Deliberation. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 535–555. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, Christopher, Raphael, Chad and Hammond, Allen S., IV. 2009. Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation Among the Disempowered. Politics and Society 37 (4): 576–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, Stuart J. 2001. Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keane, John. 2013. Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keane, John. 2017. When Trees Fall, Monkeys Scatter: Rethinking Democracy in China. London: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keane, John. 2020. The New Despotism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, Seongchol. 2017. The Populism of the Alternative for Germany: An Extended Essex School Perspective. Palgrave Communications 3: article 5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0008-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2017. How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument. American Political Science Review 111 (3): 484–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirshner, Alexander S. 2014. A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Korolev, Alexander. 2014. Deliberative Democracy Nationwide? Evaluating Deliberativeness of Healthcare Reform in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 19 (2): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2020. Is There a Crisis of Democracy in Europe? Politische Vierteljahresschrift 61: 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, et al. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krishnarajan, Suthan. 2022. Rationalizing Democracy: The Perceptual Bias and (Un)Democratic Behavior. American Political Science Review. www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/rationalizing-democracy-the-perceptual-bias-and-undemocratic-behavior/C78EB8AE1CC777B4392EE73727F4F25CGoogle Scholar

Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuyper, Jonathan W. 2012. Deliberative Democracy and the Neglected Dimension of Leadership. Journal of Public Deliberation 8 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Kuyper, Jonathan W. 2018. The Instrumental Value of Deliberative Democracy: Or, Do We Have Good Reasons to be Deliberative Democrats? Journal of Public Deliberation 14: 1–33.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2015. Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-Publics Shape Public Policy? Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (1): 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2017. Can Democracy Be Deliberative and Participatory? The Democratic Case for Political Uses of Mini-Publics. Daedalus 146 (3): 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2020. Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2022. Deliberative Mini-Publics and the Populist Conception of Representation as Embodiment. In Landwehr, Claudia, Saalfeld, Thomas and Schäfer, Armin (eds.), Contested Representation: Challenges, Shortcomings and Reforms, pp. 32–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2023. Which Decision-Making Authority for Citizens’ Assemblies? In Reuchamps, Min, Vrydagh, Julien and Welp, Yanina (eds.), De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, pp. 47–57. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landa, Dimitri and Pevnick, Ryan. 2021. Is Random Selection a Cure for the Ills of Electoral Representation? Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (1): 46–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landemore, Hélène. 2020. Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Landwehr, Claudia. 2015. Democratic Meta-Deliberation: Towards Reflective Institutional Design. Political Studies 63: 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landwehr, Claudia. 2020. Backlash against the Procedural Consensus. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22 (4): 598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landwehr, Claudia and Steiner, Nils D.. 2017. Where Democrats Disagree: Citizens’ Normative Conceptions of Democracy. Political Studies 65: 786–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazer, David M., Sokhey, Anand E., Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M. and Kennedy, Ryan. 2015. Expanding the Conversation: Multiplier Effects from a Deliberative Field Experiment. Political Communication 32: 552–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazer, David M. J. Baum, Matthew A., Benkler, Yochai, et al. 2018. The Science of Fake News. Science 359 (6380): 1094–1096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, Caroline W. 2015. Do-It-Yourself Democracy: The Rise of the Public Engagement Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leeper, Thomas J and Slothuus, Rune. 2018. Can Citizens Be Framed? How Information More than Emphasis Changes Opinions. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Lepoutre, Maxime. 2021. Democratic Speech in Divided Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, Peter. 2018. Habermas with a Whiff of Tear Gas: Nonviolent Campaigns and Deliberation in an Era of Authoritarianism. Journal of Public Deliberation 14 (2): 1–21.Google Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew S. and Stecula, Dominik A.. 2021. We Need to Talk: How Cross-Party Dialogue Reduces Affective Polarization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Levy, Neil. 2019. Due Deference to Denialism: Explaining Ordinary People’s Rejection of Established Scientific Findings. Synthese 196: 313–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lijphart, Arend. 1969. Consociational Democracy. World Politics 21: 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 2019. Deliberation and Consociation: Joint Pathways to Peace in Divided Societies. Journal of Public Deliberation 15 (3). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.348Google Scholar

Lindell, Marina, Bächtiger, André, Grönlund, Kimmo, et al. 2017. What Drives the Polarization and Moderation of Opinions? Evidence from a Finnish Citizen Deliberation Experiment on Immigration. European Journal of Political Research 56 (1): 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1961. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Logde, Milton and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Karl. 1937. Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights. American Political Science Review 31 (3): 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubarda, Balša. 2020. Beyond Ecofascism? Far-Right Ecologism (FRE) as a Framework for Future Inquiries. Environmental Values 29 (6): 713–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luther, Kurt R. 2015. The Primacy of Politics: Austria in the Not-So-Great Recession. In Kriesi, Hanspeter and Pappas, Takis S. (eds.), European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, pp. 140–159. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, Michael. 2022. Future Publics: Democracy, Deliberation, and Future-Regarding Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, Michael K. and Warren, Mark E.. 2012. Two Trust-Based Uses of Mini-Publics in Democratic Systems. In Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane (eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, pp. 95–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maerz, Seraphine F., Lührmann, Anna, Hellmeier, Sebastian, Grahn, Sandra and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2020. State of the World 2019: Autocratization Surges – Resistance Grows. Democratization 27 (6): 909–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maia, Rousiley C. M. 2018. Deliberative Media. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 348–364. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maier, Franziska and Bächtiger, André. 2023. Reflecting on the Boundaries of the Demos: A Virtual Deliberative Experiment with German Citizens. European Journal of Political Research. in press.Google Scholar

Malm, Andreas. 2021. White Skin, Black Fuel: On the Danger of Fossil Fascism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Manhire, Toby. 2019. Jacinda Ardern: Very Little of What I Have Done Has Been Deliberate. It’s Intuitive. The Guardian, April 6. www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/06/jacinda-ardern-intuitive-courage-new-zealandGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard. 2017. Political Deliberation and the Adversarial Principle. Daedalus 146: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, et al. 2010. The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane and Macedo, Stephen. 2019. Populism and Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, et al. 2012. A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane (eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at Large Scale, pp. 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Már, Kristinn and Gastil, John. 2020. Tracing the Boundaries of Motivated Reasoning: How Deliberative Mini-Publics Can Improve Voter Knowledge. Political Psychology 41 (1): 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martherus, James L., Martinez, Andres G., Piff, Paul P. and Theodoridis, Alexander G.. 2021. Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization. Political Behavior 43 (2): 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathew, Binny, Kumar, Navish, Goyal, Pawan and Mukherjee, Animesh. 2018. Analyzing the Hate and Counter Speech Accounts on Twitter. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02712Google Scholar

May, Andrea. 2005. Deliberation, eine Frage von Persönlichkeit? Kognitive Handlungstheorien und Perspektiven von Handlungstypen. Master’s Thesis, University of Bern.Google Scholar

McCright, Aaron M. and Dunlap, Riley E.. 2011. The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier, Hugo. 2015. The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (9): 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan. 2011. Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1): 57–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan. 2017. The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Michels, Roberto. 1915. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Political Parties. New York: Hearst’s International Library Co.Google Scholar

Minozzi, William, Song, Hyunjin, Lazer, David M. J., Neblo, Michael A. and Ognyanova, Katherine. 2020. The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why? American Journal of Political Science 64: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moffit, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mohrenberg, Steffen, Huber, Robert A. and Freyburg, Tina. 2021. Love at First Sight? Populist Attitudes and Support for Direct Democracy. Party Politics 27 (3): 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenbesser, Lee. 2020. The Menu of Autocratic Innovation. Democratization 27 (6): 1053–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moser, Susanne C. and Berzonsky, Carol L.. 2015. There Must Be More: Communication to Close the Cultural Divide. In O’Brien, Karen and Silboe, Elin (eds.), The Adaptive Challenge of Climate Change, pp. 287–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? Social Research 66 (3): 745–758.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristobal Roviro (eds.). 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat of Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muhlberger, Peter. 2018. Stealth Democracy: Authoritarianism and Democratic Deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation 14 (2): 1–38.Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. and Mondak, Jeffery J.. 2006. The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse. The Journal of Politics 68 (1): 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. 2008. Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory? Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. and Reeves, Byron. 2005. The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nabatchi, Tina, Gastil, John, Weiksner, G. Michael and Leighninger, Matt (eds.). 2012. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, Michael. 2015. Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, Michael, Esterling, Kevin M., Kennedy, Ryan P., Lazer, David M. J. and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2010. Who Wants to Deliberate – And Why? American Political Science Review 104: 566–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, Michael, Esterling, Kevin M. and Lazer, David M. J.. 2018. Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. and Schrøder, Kim Christian. 2014. The Relative Importance of Social Media for Accessing, Finding, and Engaging with News: An Eight-Country Cross-Media Comparison. Digital Journalism 2 (4): 472–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niemeyer, Simon. 2014. Scaling Up Deliberation to Mass Publics: Harnessing Mini-Publics in a Deliberative System. In Grönlund, Kimmo, Bächtiger, André and Setälä, Maija (eds.), Deliberative Mini-Publics: Practices, Promises, Pitfalls, pp. 177–201. UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Niemeyer, Simon, Veri, Francesco, Dryzek, John S. and Bächtiger, André. 2023. How Deliberation Happens: Enabling Deliberative Reasoning. American Political Science Review. www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/how-deliberation-happens-enabling-deliberative-reason/6558F69855ADA8B15BF2EC2E5D403E71Google Scholar

Norgaard, Kari. 2019. Making Sense of the Spectrum of Climate Denial. Critical Policy Studies 13 (4): 437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa and Inglehart, Ronald. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nyhan, Brendan. 2021. Why the Backfire Effect Does Not Explain the Durability of Political Misperceptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (15): 1–7. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1912440117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2020. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Oesch, Daniel and Rennwald, Line. 2018. Electoral Competition in Europe’s New Tripolar Political Space: Class Voting for the Left, Centre-Right, and Radical Right. European Journal of Political Research 57 (4): 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Flynn, Ian. 2007. Divided Societies and Deliberative Democracy. British Journal of Political Science 37: 731–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Flynn, Ian and Caluwaerts, Didier. 2018. Deliberation in Deeply Divided Societies. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 742–754. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ong, Jonathan C., Tapsell, Ross and Curato, Nicole. 2019. Digital Disinformation in the 2019 Philippine Midterm Election. New Mandala.Google Scholar

Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M.. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, Ioannis. 1997. Les processus de décision fédéraux en Suisse. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Parkinson, John. 2006. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennycook, Gordon and Rand, David G.. 2019a. Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning. Cognition 188: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennycook, Gordon and Rand, David G.. 2019b. Fighting Misinformation on Social Media Using Crowdsourced Judgments of News Source Quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (7): 2521–2526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennycook, Gordon and Rand, David G.. 2021. The Psychology of Fake News. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25 (5): 388–402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pincione, Guido and Teson, Fernando R.. 2006. Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation: A Theory of Discourse Failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pirro, Andrea L. P. 2023. Far Right: The Significance of an Umbrella Concept. Nations and Nationalism 29 (1): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polletta, Francesca and Gardner, Beth Gharrity. 2018. The Forms of Deliberative Communication. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E.. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 70–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Post, Jerrold M. and Berko, Anat. 2009. Talking with Terrorists. Democracy and Security 5 (2): 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Progrebinschi, Thamy and Chaves, Iná. 2021. Neue Präsenz durch neue Medien In Brasilien macht Digitalisierung vorher Unterrepräsentierte sichtbar. WZB Mitteilungen 171: 18.21.Google Scholar

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. 2021. What Is Cultural Cognition and Why Does It Matter? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 17: 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rae, Heather. 2002. State Identities and the Homogenisation of Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy. American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reilly, Benjamin. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhoads, James C. 2001. Researching Authoritarian Personality with Q Methodology Part I: Revisiting Traditional Analysis. Operant Subjectivity 24 (2): 68–85.Google Scholar

Richards, Imogen. 2019. A Dialectical Approach to Online Propaganda: Australia’s United Patriots Front, Right-Wing Politics, and Islamic State. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 42 (1–2): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richards, Robert C., Jr. 2018. Deliberative Mini-Publics as a Partial Antidote to Authoritarian Information Strategies. Journal of Public Deliberation 14: 1–32.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas. 2001. “Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rooduijn, Matthijs, van der Brug, Wouter and De Lange, Sarah L.. 2016. Expressing or Fuelling Discontent? The Relationship between Populist Voting and Political Discontent. Electoral Studies 43: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rooney, Phyllis. 2010. Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason. Informal Logic 30: 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Shawn. 2014. Citizen Competence and the Psychology of Deliberation. In Elstub, Stephen and McLaverty, Peter (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases, pp. 98–117. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Shawn. 2022. Democracy Devouring Itself: The Rise of the Incompetent Citizen and the Appeal of Right Wing Populism. California Digital Library: 1–29. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8806z01mGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Shawn W. 2007. Types of Discourse and the Democracy of Deliberation. In Rosenberg, Shawn W. (ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? pp. 130–158. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenblum, Nancy L. and Muirhead, Russell. 2019. A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rummens, Stefan. 2016. Legitimacy without Visibility? On the Role of Mini-Publics in the Democratic System. In Reuchamps, Min and Suiter, Jane (eds.), Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, pp. 129–146. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Rummens, Stefan and Abts, Koen 2010. Defending Democracy: The Concentric Containment of Political Extremism. Political Studies 58 (4): 649–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runciman, David. 2018. How Democracy Ends. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Sanders, Lynn. 1997. Against Deliberation. Political Theory 25: 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanyal, Paromita and Rao, Vijayendra. 2018. Oral Democracy: Deliberation in Indian Village Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Sass, Jensen and Dryzek, John S.. 2014. Deliberative Cultures. Political Theory 42 (1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schäfer, Armin. 2010. Die Folgen sozialer Ungleichheit für die Demokratie in Westeuropa. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 4: 131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schieb, Carla and Preuss, Mike. 2016. Governing Hate Speech by Means of Counterspeech on Facebook. Paper Presented at the 66th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association: Communicating with Power, June 9–13, Fukuoka, Japan.Google Scholar

Schlosberg, David. 1999. Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmid, Philipp, Macdonald, Nonie E., Habersaat, Katrine and Butler, Robb. 2018. Commentary to: How to Respond to Vocal Vaccine Deniers in Public. Vaccine 36 (2): 196–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger and Neumann, Manuel. 2023. Do People Like to Discuss Politics? A Study of Citizens’ Political Talk Culture. European Political Science Review First View.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. [1943] 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 5th ed. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Vanessa and Bächtiger, André. 2023. “Stick to the Status Quo”? A Conjoint Experiment with German Adolescents on Preferences for Democratic Designs and Decision-Making. In press.Google Scholar

Schweiger, David M., Sandberg, William R. and Ragan, James W.. 1986. Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil’s Advocacy, and Consensus. The Academy of Management Journal 29: 51–71.Google Scholar

Scrivens, Ryan, Venkatesh, Vivek, Bérubé, Maxime and Gaudett, Tiana. 2022. Combating Violent Extremism: Voices of Former Right-Wing Extremists. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 45 (8): 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scudder, Mary F. 2020. Beyond Empathy and Inclusion: The Challenge of Listening in Democratic Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scudder, Mary F. and White, Stephen K.. 2023. The Two Faces of Democracy: Decentering Agonism and Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 2003. Democracy and its Global Roots. New Republic 229 (14): 28–35.Google Scholar

Sengul, Kurt. 2021. “It’s OK to Be White”: The Discursive Construction of Victimhood, “Anti-white Racism” and Calculated Ambivalence in Australia. Critical Discourse Studies. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17405904.2021.1921818Google Scholar

Setälä, Maija. 2022. Possible Functions and Deliberative Impacts of Mini-Publics in Democratic Systems. Paper Presented at the Workshop “Systemic Approaches to Democracy,” September 2022, Montreal, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Ian. 2017. Collusion in Restraint of Democracy: Against Political Deliberation. Daedalus 146 (3): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, Alexandra A. 2020. Online Hate Speech. In Persily, Nathaniel and Tucker, Joshua A. (eds.), Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform, pp. 56–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Lisa and Kunda, Ziva. 2000. Motivated Stereotyping of Women: She’s Fine If She Praised Me but Incompetent If She Criticized Me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 1329–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sindermann, Cornel, Elhai, Jon D., Moshagen, Morten and Montag, Christian. 2020. Age, Gender, Personality, Ideological Attitudes and Individual Differences in a Person’s News Spectrum: How Many and Who Might Be Prone to “Filter Bubbles” and “Echo Chambers” Online? Helion 6: 1–10.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves. 2023. The Government of Chance: Sortition and Democracy from Athens to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorensen, Ashley. 2021. Representation Matters: Women and Working-Class Representation in Congress. The Gender Policy Report, October 19. https://genderpolicyreport.umn.edu/working-class-diversity-in-congress/Google Scholar

Spiekermann, Kai. 2020. Why Populists Do Well on Social Media. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (2): 50–71.Google Scholar

Spiekermann, Kai and Goodin, Robert E.. 2012. Courts of Many Minds. British Journal of Political Science 42: 555–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spruyt, Bram, Keppens, Gil and Van Droogenbroeck, Filip. 2016. Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It? Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, Birgit and Stegmann, Daniel, with Magin, Melanie and Jürgens, Pascal. 2020. Are Algorithms a Threat to Democracy? The Rise of Intermediaries: A Challenge for Public Discourse. Algorithm Watch. https://algorithmwatch.org/de/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Governing-Platforms-communications-study-Stark-May-2020-AlgorithmWatch.pdfGoogle Scholar

Steenbergen, Marco R., Bächtiger, André, Spöndli, Markus and Steiner, Jürg. 2013. Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index. Comparative European Politics 1 (1): 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Jürg, Bächtiger, André, Spörndli, Markus and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steiner, Jürg, Jaramillo, Maria Clara, Maia, Rousiley C. M. and Mameli, Simona. 2017. Deliberation Across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoiciu, Victoria and Gherghina, Sergiu. 2020. Intra-Party Deliberation, Under-Represented Groups, and Candidate Selection: The Case of Demos in Romania. Political Studies Review 19(2): 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stojanovic, Nenad. 2019. A Non-populist Theory of Direct Democracy. Project proposal.Google Scholar

Strandberg, Kim and Berg, Janne. 2013. Online Newspapers’ Readers’ Comments – Democratic Conversation. Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes? Comunicação e Sociedade 23: 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strandberg, Kim and Berg, Janne. 2015. Impact of Temporality and Identifiability in Online Deliberations on Discussion Quality: An Experimental Study. Javnost – The Public 22 (2): 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strandberg, Kim, Himmelroos, Staffan and Grönlund, Kimmo. 2017. Do Discussions in Like-Minded Groups Necessarily Lead to More Extreme Opinions? Deliberative Democracy and Group Polarization. International Political Science Review 40 (1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suiter, Jane. 2018. Deliberation in Action – Ireland’s Abortion Referendum. Political Insight 9 (3): 30–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2000. Deliberative Trouble: Why Groups Go to Extremes. Yale Law Journal 110 (1): 71–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. The Law of Group Polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2): 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Susskind, Lawrence. 2006. Can Public Policy Dispute Resolution Meet the Challenges Set by Deliberative Democracy? Dispute Resolution Magazine (winter): 5–6.Google Scholar

Swire, Briony, Berinski, Adam J., Lewandowski, Stephan and Ecker, Ullrich K. H.. 2017. Processing Political Misinformation: Comprehending the Trump Phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science 4 (3): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Taber, Charles S. and Lodge, Milton. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanasoca, Ana. 2019. Against Bot Democracy: The Dangers of Epistemic Double Counting. Perspectives on Politics 17 (4): 988–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanasoca, Ana. 2020. Deliberation Naturalized: Improving Really Existing Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanasoca, Ana. 2023. Informal Networked Deliberation: How Mass Deliberative Democracy Really Works. Analyse & Kritik 45 (1): 23–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanasoca, Ana and Sass, Jensen. 2019. Ritual Deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (2): 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tang, Beibei, Tamura, Tetsuki and He, Baogang. 2018. Deliberative Democracy in East Asia: Japan and China. In Bächtiger, André, Dryzek, John S., Mansbridge, Jane and Warren, Mark E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, pp. 791–804. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1998. The Argument Culture: Stopping America’s War of Words. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Tappin, Ben M., Berinsky, Adam J. and Rand, David G.. 2023. Partisans’ Receptivity to Persuasive Messaging Is Undiminished by Countervailing Party Leader Cues. Nature Human Behavior 7: 568–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tappin, Ben. M., Pennycook, Gordon and Rand, David G.. 2021. Rethinking the Link between Cognitive Sophistication and Politically Motivated Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 150 (6): 1095–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thaa, Winfried. 2013. “Stuttgart 21” – Krise oder Repolitisierung der repräsentativen. Demokratie? Politische Vierteljahresschrift 54: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trüdinger, Eva-Maria and Bächtiger, André. 2023. Attitudes vs Actions? Direct-Democratic Preferences and Participation of Populist Citizens. West European Politics 46 (1): 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trüdinger, Eva-Maria, Bächtiger, André, Druckman, James N. and Warren, Mark E.. 2023. Good News for Democracy. Process preferences of American and German Citizens. MIMEO.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. 2000. Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation. Political Theory 28 (6): 758–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urman, Aleksandra. 2020. Political Polarisation on Social Media in Different National Contexts. PhD Thesis, University of Bern.Google Scholar

Van Does, Ramon. 2023. Homo, Hunter-Gatherer, Habermas: An Inquiry into Deliberation and Human Nature. PhD Thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar

Van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob, Francisca, Arnolda and Henkemans, Snoeck. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Reybrouck, David. 2016. Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar

V-Dem. 2022. V-Dem Democracy Report 2022: Autocratization Changing Nature? Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Vodová, Petra and Voda, Petr. 2020. The Effects of Deliberation in Czech Pirate Party: The Case of Coalition Formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science 19 (2): 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vosoughi, Soroush, Roy, Deb and Aral, Sinan. 2018. The Spread of True and False News Online. Science 359 (6380): 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vromen, Ariadne, Loader, Brian D., Xenos, Michael A. and Bailo, Francesco. 2016. Everyday Making through Facebook Engagement: Young Citizens’ Political Interactions in Australia, The United Kingdom, and the United States. Political Studies 64 (3): 523–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walgrave, Stefan, Jansen, Arno, Sevenans, Julie, et al. 2023. Inaccurate Politicians: Elected Representatives’ Estimations of Public Opinion in Four Countries. Journal of Politics 85: 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, Geoff and Hepworth, Mark. 2011. A Longitudinal Study of Changes in Learners’ Cognitive States during and Following an Information Literacy Teaching Intervention. Journal of Documentation 67 (3): 449–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ward, Albert. 2022. Parliament and Government Have a Class Problem. LSE British Politics and Policy Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/parliament-and-government-have-a-class-problem/Google Scholar

Warren, Mark. 1996. Deliberative Democracy and Authority. American Political Science Review 90 (1): 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, Mark E. and Gastil, John. 2015. Can Deliberative Mini-Publics Address the Cognitive Challenges of Democratic Citizenship? Journal of Politics 77 (2): 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, Paul. 2013. Who Is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52: 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1997. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Welzel, Christian and Dalton, Russell J. 2015. From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. In Dalton, Russell J. and Welzer, Christian (eds.), The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens, pp. 282–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werner, Hannah and Jacobs, Kristof. 2022. Are Populists Sore Losers? Explaining Populist Citizens’ Preferences for and Reactions to Referendums. British Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 1409–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Jonathan and Ypi, Lea. 2011. On Partisan Political Justification. American Political Science Review 105 (2): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wibisono, Susilo, Louis, Winnifred R. and Jetten, Jolanda. 2019. A Multidimensional Analysis of Religious Extremism. Frontiers in Psychology 18: 1–12.Google Scholar

Wike, Richard, Simmons, Katie, Stokes, Bruce and Fetterolf, Janell. 2017. Globally, Broad Support for Representative and Direct Democracy; But Many Also Endorse Nondemocratic Alternatives. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Anna Wiederhold. 2018. Dialogue and Deliberation as Agonistic Resistance: Designing Interactional Processes to Reconstitute Collective Identities. Journal of Public Deliberation 14 (2): 1–14.Google Scholar

Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2016. A Deliberative Model of Intra-Party Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (3): 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Graham. 2022. Persuasion or Co-Creation? Social Identity Threat and Mechanisms of Deliberative Transformation. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 18 (2): 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Scott. 2012. From “Third Place” to “Third Space”: Everyday Political Talk in Non-Political Online Spaces. Javnost-The Public 19 (3): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wuttke, Alexander, Gavras, Konstantin and Schoen, Harald. 2022. Have Europeans Grown Tired of Democracy? New Evidence from Eighteen Consolidated Democracies, 1981–2018. British Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wyss, Dominik, Beste, Simon and Bächtiger, André. 2015. A Decline in the Quality of Debate? The Evolution of Cognitive Complexity in Swiss Parliamentary Debates on Immigration (1968–2014). Swiss Political Science Review 21: 636–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. 1996. Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy. In Benhabib, Seyla (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, pp. 120–134. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. 2001. Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory 29 (5): 670–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaslove, Andrej, Geurkink, Bram, Jacobs, Kristof and Akkerman, Agnes. 2021. Power to the People? Populism, Democracy, and Political Participation: A Citizen’s Perspective. West European Politics 44 (4): 727–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Xiang, Chan, Yuen-Ying and Peng, Zhenmei. 2008. Deliberativeness of Online Political Discussion: A Content Analysis of the Guangzhou Daily Website. Journalism Studies 9 (5): 759–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 2023. Die regulative Idee der Wahrheit und demokratische Regression. Leviathan. in press.Google Scholar