Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: June 2012

19 - Value Transmission and Zeitgeist Revisited

Summary

INTRODUCTION: ZEITGEIST AND INTRAFAMILIAL TRANSMISSION PROCESSES

In a family, similarity between parent and offspring values can originate from three sources: (1) direct and mediated value-transmission effects of parents' values on the values of their children; (2) processes of adaptation of the parents to values and attitudes of their children; and (3) parents and children being affected similarly by the context within which they live (Boehnke, 2001; Knafo, 2003; Kohn, 1983; Urban & Singelmann, 1998). Intrafamilial processes of value transmission do not take place in an isolated family-only environment but rather in a specific societal context. All members of the family are in permanent contact with this context through peers, mass media, schooling, or work groups. As such, context effects can proceed from the educational system, the socioeconomic situation, or the societal value climate.

There are a growing number of studies dealing with context effects on intergenerational transmission. Urban and Singelmann (1998) define the context implicitly as the amount of variance of the child's values that is not explained by the father's and the mother's values. Other studies deal with context more explicitly. Knafo (2003) analyzes how parents' attitudes – in interplay with the school environment – influence children's values. His findings suggest that a stronger value transmission pertains in high-fit contexts – that is, when parents share the values of the children's school environment. Knafo explains this as follows: A high fit between the educational ideology of parents and the school environment leads to less value conflict within the family.

References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Science Editions.
,Akademie der pädagogischen Wissenschaften, Abt. Bildungssoziologie (1989). Berufslaufbahnen, Lebenspläne und Wertorientierungen [Professional careers, life plans, and value orientations]. Berlin: Akademie der Pädagogischen Wissenschaften der DDR, Research Report.
Baier, D., & Hadjar, A. (2004). Wie wird Leistungsorientierung von den Eltern auf die Kinder übertragen? Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittstudie [How is achievement orientation transmitted from parents to children? Results of a panel study]. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 15, 156–177.
Boehnke, K. (1988). Prosoziale Motivation, Selbstkonzept und politische Orientierung: Entwicklungsbedingungen und Veränderungen im Jugendalter [Prosocial motivation, self-concept, and political orientation: Development and change in adolescence]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Boehnke, K. (2001). Parent–offspring value transmission in a societal context: Suggestions for a utopian research design – with empirical underpinnings. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 241–255.
Boehnke, K. (2004). Do our children become as we are? Intergenerational value transmission and societal value change – two unlinked concepts in social research. In Hardt, F. (Ed.), Mapping the world (pp. 99–118). Tübingen: Francke.
Boehnke, K., & Hadjar, A. (2004). Authoritarianism. In Spielberger, C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology (pp. 251–255). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Boehnke, K., Ittel, A., & Baier, D. (2002). Value transmission and zeitgeist: An under-researched relationship. Sociale Wetenschappen, 45, 28–43.
Boehnke, K., Merkens, H., & Claßen, G. (1998). Dominanzideologie, Geschlechtsrollen und Delinquenz bei Jugendlichen in Toronto und Berlin [Dominance ideologies, gender roles, and delinquency among adolescents in Toronto and Berlin]. Chemnitz/Berlin: Proposal to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Goodnow, J. J. (1997). Parenting and the “transmission” and “internalization” of values: From social-cultural perspectives to within-family analyses. In Grusec, J. E. & Kuczynski, L. (Eds.), Handbook of parenting and the transmission of values (pp. 333–361). New York: Wiley.
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19.
Hadjar, A. (2004). Ellenbogenmentalität und Fremdenfeindlichkeit bei Jugendlichen: Die Rolle des Hierarchischen Selbstinteresses [Elbow mentality and xenophobia among adolescents: The role of hierarchic self-interest]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Hadjar, A., & Baier, D. (2003). Familiale Vererbung von Dominanzideologien in verschiedenen sozio-ökonomischen Kontexten [Familial heredity of dominance ideologies in different socioeconomic contexts]. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 10, 303–320.
Hadjar, A., Baier, D., & Boehnke, K. (2003). Geschlechtsspezifische Jugenddelinquenz: Eine Beurteilung der Power-Control Theory [Gender-specific juvenile delinquency: An evaluation of power-control theory]. In Mansel, J., Griese, H., & Scherr, A. (Eds.), Theoriedefizite der Jugendforschung (pp. 174–193). Weinheim: Juventa.
Hagan, J., Gillis, A. R., & Simpson, J. (1979). The sexual stratification of social control: A gender-based perspective on crime and delinquency. British Journal of Sociology, 30, 25–38.
Hagan, J., Hefler, G., Claßen, G., Boehnke, K., & Merkens, H. (1998). Subterranean sources of subcultural delinquency beyond the American dream. Criminology, 36, 309–342.
Hagan, J., Rippl, S., Boehnke, K., & Merkens, H. (1999). Interest in evil: Hierarchic self-interest and right-wing extremism among East and West German youth. Social Science Research, 28, 162–183.
Henning, H. J., & Six, B. (1977). Konstruktion einer Machiavellismus-Skala [Construction of a Machiavellism scale]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 8, 185–198.
Hirsch, F. (1977). Social limits to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jerusalem, M. (1984). Selbstbezogene Kognitionen in schulischen Bezugsgruppen [Self-related cognitions in school-based peer groups]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1967). Social norms and authoritarianism: A comparison of Turkish and American adolescents. Berkeley: University of California, doctoral dissertation.
Knafo, A. (2003). Contexts, relationship quality, and family value socialization: The case of parent–school ideological fit in Israel. Personal Relationships, 10, 371–388.
Kohn, M. L. (1983). On the transmission of values in the family: A preliminary formulation. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 4, 3–12.
Kohn, M. L., Slomczynski, K. M., & Schoenbach, C. (1986). Social stratification and the transmission of values in the family: A cross-national assessment. Sociological Forum, 1, 73–102.
Küpper, B., & Heitmeyer, W. (2004). Feindselige Frauen: Zwischen Angst, Zugehörigkeit und Durchsetzungsideologie [Hostile women: Between anxiety, affiliation, and dominance ideology]. In Heitmeyer, W. (Ed.), Deutsche Zustände, Folge 3 (pp. 108–128). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Lederer, G. (1983). Jugend und Autorität [Youth and authority]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Machiavelli, N. (1984/1532). The prince (Il principe). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacPherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: From Hobbes to Locke. London: Oxford University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sagy, S., & Antonovsky, A. (1992). The family sense of coherence and the retirement transition. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 983–993.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.
Simmel, G. (1978/1900). The Philosophy of Money. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Troll, L., & Bengtson, V. (1979). Generations and the family. In Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, Vol. 1 (pp. 127–161). New York: The Free Press.
Urban, D., & Singelmann, J. (1998). Eltern-Kind-Transmissionen von ausländer-ablehnenden Einstellungen: Eine regionale Längsschnitt-Studie zur intra- und intergenerativen Herausbildung eines sozialen Orientierungsmusters [Parent–child transmission of xenophobic attitudes: A regional panel study on genesis of social orientation patterns within and across generations]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 27, 276–296.
Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Unwin/Hyman.
Wegener, B. (1988). Kritik des Prestiges [Critique of prestige]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Zetterberg, H. L. (1992). The sociology of values: The Swedish value space. Paper presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 20–24, Pittsburgh, PA.
Zetterberg, H. L. (1997). The study of values. In Swedberg, R. & Uddhammar, E. (Eds.), Sociological endeavor: Selected writings (pp. 191–219). Stockholm: City University Press.
Zetterberg, H. L. (1998). Cultural values in market and opinion research. In Mc-Donald, C. & Vangelder, P. (Eds.), Handbook of marketing and opinion research (pp. 995–1013). Amsterdam: ESOMAR.