Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: June 2012

5 - Relationship-Specific Intergenerational Family Ties: An Evolutionary Approach to the Structure of Cultural Transmission

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Cultural transmission encompasses those processes that transmit and modify beliefs, attitudes, and values in a population. To understand these processes, it might not be satisfactory merely to know how the existing structures of cultural transmission give rise to cultural change. Rather, we also need to understand why cultural transmission has the structures that it shows (Boyd & Richerson, 1985; Richerson & Boyd, 2003). Evolutionary theories of human behavior are indispensable for finding satisfactory answers to this “why” question. Such theories address the question of why the human mind (or that of other animals) holds the particular design features that it does, as opposed to other, nonexistent yet conceivable ones (Pinker, 1997; Tooby & Cosmides, 1992). Because culture is a product of the mind, mind features can explain cultural phenomena to some extent (Dawkins, 1982; Miller, 2000), including cultural transmission. Evolutionary theories may facilitate understanding by guiding us to see the relevant aspects of natural phenomena or, as Socrates suggested and Plato wrote, to “carve nature at its joints” (Gangestad & Snyder, 1985, p. 317). Such guidance may help to steer us away from suboptimal concepts like those inspired by changing zeitgeist or individual predilections. With it, we avoid becoming entangled in an overabundance of unconnected middle-level theories, a state that characterizes several disciplines of human behavior and impedes scientific progress.

References
Alcock, J. (1998). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach (6th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., Lam, D., & Lancaster, J. B. (1999). Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers I: Reports by Xhosa high school students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 433–451.
Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., & Lancaster, J. B. (1999a). Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers I: Reports from Albuquerque men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 405–431.
Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., & Lancaster, J. B. (1999b). Paternity confidence and fitness outcomes: Abortion, divorce, and paternal investment. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior Evolution Society, June 2–6, Salt Lake City, UT.
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition. Copulation, masturbation and infidelity. London, England: Chapman & Hall.
Barrett, L., Dunbar, R., & Lycett, J. (2002). Human evolutionary psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berger, C., & Schiefenhoevel, W. (1994, October). Adoption in Tauwema, Tobriand-Inseln. Poster presented at the Congress “Anthropologie Heute” of the Gesellschaft für Anthropologie. Humboldt-University at Berlin und University of Potsdam, Germany.
Birkhead, T. (2000). Promiscuity: An evolutionary history of sperm competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bossong, B. (2001). Gender and age differences in inheritance patterns: Why men leave more to their spouses and women more to their children. An experimental analysis. Human Nature, 12, 107–122.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brédart, S., & French, R. M. (1999). Do babies resemble their fathers more than their mothers? A failure to replicate Christenfeld and Hill (1995). Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 129–135.
Bressan, P. (2002). Why babies look like their daddies: Paternity uncertainty and the evolution of self-deception in evaluating family resemblance. Acta Ethologica, 4, 113–118.
Bressan, P., & Grassi, M. (2004). Parental resemblance in one-year-olds and the Gaussian curve. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 133–141.
Bridgeman, B. (2003). Psychology and evolution: The origins of mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of mind (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Cartwright, J. (2000). Evolution and human behavior: Darwinian perspectives on human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christenfeld, N. J. S., & Hill, E. A. (1995). Whose baby are you? Nature, 378, 669.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. J. C. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60.
Daly, M., Salmon, C., & Wilson, M. (1997). Kinship: The conceptual hole in psychological studies of social cognition and close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Kenrick, D. T. (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 265–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1980). Discriminative parental solicitude: A biological perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 277–288.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1982). Whom are newborn babies said to resemble. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 69–78.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
DeKay, W. T. (1995, July). Grandparent investment and the uncertainty of kinship. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Santa Barbara, CA.
Duvall, E. M. (1954). In-laws: Pro & con. New York: Association Press.
Eisenberg, A. R. (1988). Grandchildrens' perspectives on relationships with grandparents: The influence of gender across generations. Sex Roles, 19, 205–217.
Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., & Rohde, P. A. (2001). Relationship-specific closeness of intergenerational family ties: Findings from evolutionary psychology and implications for models of cultural transmission. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 163–174.
Euler, H. A., & Weitzel, B. (1996). Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategy. Human Nature, 7, 39–59.
Fischer, L. R. (1983). Transition to grandmotherhood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 16, 67–78.
Gangestad, S., & Snyder, M. (1985). “To carve nature at its joints”: On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317–349.
Gaulin, S. J. C., & McBurney, D. H. (2001). Psychology: An evolutionary approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Gaulin, S. J. C., McBurney, D. H., & Brakeman-Wartell, S. L. (1997). Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles. Human Nature, 8, 139–151.
Gaulin, S. J. C., & Schlegel, A. (1980). Paternal confidence and paternal investment: A cross-cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 301–309.
Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.
Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: The Free Press.
Hartshorne, T. S., & Manaster, G. L. (1982). The relationship with grandparents: Contact, importance, role conceptions. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 15, 233–245.
Hawkes, K. (1991). Showing off: Tests of another hypothesis about men's foraging goals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 29–54.
Hoffman, E. (1978/1979). Young adults' relations with their grandparents: An exploratory study. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 10, 299–310.
Hoier, S., Euler, H. A., & Hänze, M. (2000). Diskriminative verwandtschaftliche Fürsorge von Onkeln und Tanten: Eine evolutionspsychologische Analyse [Discriminative solicitude of aunts and uncles: An evolutionary analysis]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 206–215.
Hood, R. W., Spilka, B., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. (1996). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: Natural selection and the female of the species. London, England: Chatto & Windus.
Judge, D. S. (1995). American legacies and the variable life histories of women and men. Human Nature, 6, 291–323.
Kahana, B., & Kahana, E. (1970). Grandparenthood from the perspective of the developing grandchild. Developmental Psychology 3, 98–105.
Kennedy, G. E. (1989). Middleborns' perception of family relationships. Psychological Reports, 64, 755–760.
Kennedy, G. E. (1990). College students' expectations of grandparent and grandchild role behaviors. The Gerontologist, 30, 43–48.
Kidwell, J. S. (1981). Number of siblings, sibling spacing, sex, and birth order: Their effects on perceived parent–adolescent relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 315–332.
Littlefield, C. H., & Rushton, J. P. (1986). When a child dies: The sociobiology of bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 797–802.
Marlowe, F. (1999). Showoffs or providers? The parenting effort of Hadza men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 391–404.
Matthews, S. H., & Sprey, J. (1985). Adolescents' relationships with grandparents: An empirical contribution to conceptual clarification. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 621–626.
McBurney, D., Simon, J., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Geliebter, A. (2001). Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles: Replication in a population presumed to have high paternity certainty. Human Nature, 13, 391–402.
McLain, D. K., Setters, D., Moulton, M. P., & Pratt, A. E. (2000). Ascription of resemblance of newborns by parents and nonrelatives. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 11–23.
Mealey, L. (2000). Sex differences: Development and evolutionary strategies. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.
Pashos, A. (2000). Does paternal uncertainty explain discriminative grandparental solicitude? A cross-cultural study in Greece and Germany. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 97–109.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin Putnam, Inc.
Plomin, R., Ashbury, K., & Dunn, J. (2001). Why are children in the same family so different? Nonshared environment a decade later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 225–233.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & Rutter, M. (1997). Behavioral genetics (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Porter, R. (1987). Kin recognition: Functions and mediating mechanisms. In Crawford, C. B., Smith, M. S., & Krebs, D. (Eds.), Sociobiology and psychology: Ideas, issues and applications (pp. 175–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Regalski, J. M., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (1993). Whom are Mexican infants said to resemble? Monitoring and fostering paternal confidence in the Yucatan. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 97–113.
Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2003). The nature of cultures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rohde, P. A., Atzwanger, K., Butovskaya, M., Lampert, A., Mysterud, I., Sanchez-Andres, A., et al. (2003). Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: The effects of birth order and sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 261–276.
Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent–child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Rowe, D. C. (1994). The limits of family influence. New York: Guilford Press.
Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1987). Estimating paternity confidence. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 215–220.
Salmon, C. A. (1999). On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature, 10, 183–197.
Salmon, C. A., & Daly, M. (1996). On the importance of kin relations to Canadian women and men. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 289–297.
Salmon, C. A., & Daly, M. (1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: Middleborns are different. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 299–312.
Schönpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of values: The role of transmission belts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 174–185.
Smith, M. S. (1988). Research in developmental sociobiology: Parenting and family behavior. In MacDonald, K. B. (Ed.), Sociobiological perspectives on human development (pp. 271–292). New York: Springer.
Smith, M. S., Kish, B. J., & Crawford, C. B. (1987). Inheritance of wealth as human kin investment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 171–181.
Steinbach, I., & Henke, W. (1998). Grosselterninvestment: Eine empirische interkulturelle Vergleichsstudie [Grandparental investment: An empirical cross-cultural comparative study]. Anthropologie, 36, 293–301.
Sulloway, F. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.
Sulloway, F. (2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. In Holcomb, H. R. III (Ed.), Conceptual challenges in evolutionary psychology: Innovative research strategies (Vol. 27, pp. 39–83). Dodrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Szydlik, M. (1995). Die Enge der Beziehung zwischen erwachsenen Kindern und ihren Eltern – und umgekehrt [The closeness of relationship between adult children and their parents – and vice versa]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 24, 75–94.
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Tesser, A. (1993). The importance of heritability in psychological research: The case of attitudes. Psychological Review, 93, 129–143.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent–offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.