Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part One Introduction
- Part Two Representational theories of culture
- 2 Culture as Lay Personal Beliefs
- 3 Culture as Intersubjective Representations of Values
- 4 Culture as Norm Representations: The Case of Collective Responsibility Attribution
- Part Three Psychological functions of culture
- Part Four Manifestations of cultural processes
- Part Five Transcultural processes
- Index
- References
4 - Culture as Norm Representations: The Case of Collective Responsibility Attribution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part One Introduction
- Part Two Representational theories of culture
- 2 Culture as Lay Personal Beliefs
- 3 Culture as Intersubjective Representations of Values
- 4 Culture as Norm Representations: The Case of Collective Responsibility Attribution
- Part Three Psychological functions of culture
- Part Four Manifestations of cultural processes
- Part Five Transcultural processes
- Index
- References
Summary
Norms, spoken or implicit, regulate much of our social life. They are social control devices evolved to coordinate human activities in collective living (Fiske, 2000; Heylighen & Campbell, 1995). In this chapter, focusing on the social regulatory functions of cultural norms and using collective responsibility attribution as an example, we will discuss the role of norms, which are major components of knowledge tradition, in cultural processes.
Culture as shared representations
Similar to other forms of knowledge representations (such as lay theories, see Chapter 2, this volume; and intersubjective values, see Chapter 3, this volume), social norms are knowledge representations that are shared among individuals within a collective. They provide premises in normative social inferences (e.g., inferences about whether a certain action should be carried out) and define the normative standards of behavior (e.g., determine whether a certain behavior is punishable or forgivable in the eyes of the public).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cultural ProcessesA Social Psychological Perspective, pp. 65 - 78Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
1989 The intuitive politician and the assignment of blame in organizationsImpression management in the organization105Hillsdale, NJLawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
2007 Fashioning a new psychology of the Chinese people: Insights from developments in cross-cultural psychologyInterpersonal perspectives on Chinese communication. Intercultural research, Vol. 1233Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Foreign Language Education PressGoogle Scholar
2008 Personal and collective culpability judgment: A functional analysis of East Asian-North American differencesJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 39 730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992 The effects of intentionality and validation on individual and collective responsibility attribution among Hong Kong ChineseThe Journal of Psychology 126 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000 Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closureJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2006 The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibilityGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations 9 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981 Intervening causation and the mitigation of responsibility for harmBritish Journal of Social Psychology 20 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000 Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complementsPersonality and Social Psychology Review 4 76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1995 Selection of organization at the societal level: Obstacles and facilitators of metasystem transitionsWorld Futures: The Journal of General Evolution 45 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996 Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salienceSocial psychology: Handbook of basic principles195New YorkThe Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
2000 Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognitionAmerican Psychologist 55 709CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1997 Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteemJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 1038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1993 Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theoryPsychological Bulletin 114 395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2001 I know what you know: Assumptions about others’ knowledge and their effects on message constructionSocial Cognition 19 587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003 57
1999 Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositionsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981 Judgments of causation, responsibility, and punishment in case of harm-doingCanadian Journal of Behavioral Science 13 238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002 Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutorsPsychological Review 109 451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2005 Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the Prisoner's DilemmaPsychological Science 16 429Google ScholarPubMed
2006 Responses to organizational harm: Mechanism of blaming managers as proxies for a culpable organizationAsian Journal of Social Psychology 9 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006 Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency culturesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 101 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984 Preliminary research on the characteristics of the feudal judicial system of ChinaTheses of Law of China 1 245Google Scholar