Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-2s2w2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-12T00:24:45.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Richard Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Critical Moments in Classical Literature
Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses
, pp. 202 - 211
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfonsi, L. 1948. ‘Petronio e i teodorei’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 76: 46–53Google Scholar
Apthorp, M. J. 1980. The Manuscript Evidence for Interpolation in Homer, Heidelberg
Ashfield, A. and Bolla, P. 1996. The Sublime: a Reader in British Eighteenth-century Aesthetic Theory, Cambridge
Asmis, E. 1995. ‘Epicurean poetics’ in Obbink 1995: 15–34
Asper, M. 1997. Onomata allotria. Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos, Stuttgart
Aujac, G. 1992. Denys d'Halicarnasse. Opuscules Rhétoriques Tome V, Paris
Barchiesi, A. 1993. ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid's Heroides’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1994. ‘Immovable Delos: Aeneid 3.73–98 and the Hymns of Callimachus’, Classical Quarterly 44: 438–43Google Scholar
Battisti, D. 1988. ‘Osservazioni sul testo del Περὶ μιμήσεως di Dionigi di Alicarnasso’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 59: 101–14Google Scholar
Battisti, D. 1990. ‘Imitazione e gestazione umana (A proposito di Dion. Hal. De imit. VI p. 203, 1–6 Us.Rad.)’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 64: 65–8Google Scholar
Battisti, D. 1997. Dionigi di Alicarnasso. Sull'imitazione, Pisa and Rome
Belloni, L. 1999. ‘Un'icona di Apollo (Apoll. Rhod. Argon. 2.669–684)’, Prometheus 25: 231–42Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. 1974. ‘Das Bild der Komödie in der späten Republik’ in Reinhardt, U. and Sallmann, K. (eds.), Musa Iocosa (Hildesheim and New York) 141–57
Bolton, J. D. P. 1962. Aristeas of Proconnesus, Oxford
Bonner, S. F. 1939. The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Cambridge
Bowra, C. M. 1956. ‘A fragment of the Arimaspeia’, Classical Quarterly 6: 1–10Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) 2003. Metaphor, Allegory and the Classical Tradition, Oxford
Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. 1997. A Cultural History of Humour, Cambridge
Brink, C. O. 1963. Horace on Poetry. Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles, Cambridge
Brink, C. O. 1971. Horace on Poetry. The ‘Ars Poetica’, Cambridge
Brink, C. O. 1972. ‘Ennius and the Hellenistic worship of Homer’, American Journal of Philology 93: 547–67Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1982. Horace on Poetry. Epistles Book II: the Letters to Augustus and Florus, Cambridge
Brown, C. G. 1989. ‘Ares, Aphrodite, and the laughter of the gods’, Phoenix 43: 283–93Google Scholar
Buffière, F. 1956. Les mythes d'Homère et la pensée grecque, Paris
Bühler, W. 1964. Beiträge zur Erklärung der Schrift vom Erhabenen, Göttingen
Burke, E. 1958. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Boulton, J. T., London and New York
Cairns, F. 1982. ‘Cleon and Pericles: a suggestion’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 102: 203–4Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1950. ‘Les verbes grecs signifiant “lire” (ἀναγιγνώσκω, ἐπιλέγομαι, ἐντυγχάνω, ἀναλέγομαι)’, Annuaire de l'Institut de Philologie et d'Histoire orientales et slaves 10: 115–26Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 2004. ‘I precetti paterni e le lezioni dei filosofi: Demea, il padre di Orazio ed altri padri e figli’, Materiali e Discussioni 53: 9–63Google Scholar
Clay, D. 2004. Archilochos Heros. The Cult of Poets in the Greek Polis, Washington
Connors, C. 1998. Petronius the Poet, Cambridge
Conte, G. B. 1996. The Hidden Author, Berkeley
Cosci, P. 1978. ‘Per una ricostruzione della scena iniziale del Satyricon’, Materiali e Discussioni 1: 201–7Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 2001. A Companion to Petronius, Oxford
Cribiore, R. 2001. Gymnastics of the Mind, Princeton
Cucchiarelli, A. 2001. La satira e il poeta, Pisa
Cuypers, M. P. 1997. Apollonius Rhodius. Argonautica 2.1–310, dissertation Leiden
Davies, M. 1999. ‘Comic priamel and hyperbole in Euripides, Cyclops 1–10’, Classical Quarterly 49: 428–32Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2000. ‘Homer and Dionysus’, Eikasmos 11: 15–27Google Scholar
Dawson, D. 1992. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in ancient Alexandria, Berkeley
Jong, I. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers. The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, Amsterdam
Jong, I. 2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey, Cambridge
Jonge, C. C. 2008. Between Grammar and Rhetoric. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature, Leiden and Boston
Del Corno, D. 1985. Aristofane. Le Rane, Milan
Romilly, J. 1975. Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece, Cambridge, Mass.
Deufert, M. 2002. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum, Berlin and New York
Dickey, E. 2007. Ancient Greek Scholarship, Oxford
Doherty, L. 1995. Siren Songs. Gender, Audiences, and Narrators in the Odyssey, Ann Arbor
Dougherty, C. 2001. The Raft of Odysseus, Oxford
Dover, K. J. 1974. Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle, Oxford
Dover, K. J. 1993. Aristophanes, Frogs, Oxford
Dowden, K. 1998. ‘Cupid & Psyche. A question of the vision of Apuleius’ in Zimmerman, M., Hunink, V., McCreight, T. D.et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius' Golden Ass, volume II (Groningen) 1–22
Duckworth, G. E. 1952. The Nature of Roman Comedy, Princeton (2nd edn, London 1994)
Duff, T. 1999. Plutarch's Lives. Exploring Virtue and Vice, Oxford
Easterling, P. E. 1985. ‘Anachronism in Greek tragedy’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 1–10Google Scholar
Esposito, E. 2005. Il Fragmentum Grenfellianum (P. Dryton 50), Bologna
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic, Oxford
Feeney, D. C. 2002. ‘Una cum scriptore meo. Poetry, principate and the traditions of literary history in the Epistle to Augustus’ in Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace (Cambridge) 172–87
Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations, Berkeley
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism, Princeton
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.) 2001. Dicaearchus of Messana, New Brunswick
Franz, M.-L. 1943. Die aesthetischen Anschauungen der Iliasscholien, dissertation Zurich
Freis, R. 1983. ‘The catalogue of Pindaric genres in Horace Carm. 4.2’, Classical Antiquity 2: 27–36Google Scholar
Gargiulo, T. 1992. ‘L'immagine della bilancia in Callimaco, fr.1, 9–10 Pfeiffer’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 42: 123–8Google Scholar
Gargiulo, T. 1996. ‘Osservazioni sull'Odisseo della “Ciclopea” e del “Ciclope”’, Eikasmos 7: 13–20Google Scholar
Gelzer, T. 1979. ‘Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus’ in Flashar, H. (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux Iers siècles avant et après J.-C. (Vandoeuvres and Geneva) 1–55
Görler, W. 1979. ‘“ex verbis communibus κακοζηλία”. Die augusteischen “Klassiker” und die griechischen Theoretiker des Klassizismus’ in Flashar, H. (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux Iers siècles avant et après J.-C. (Vandoeuvres and Geneva) 175–211
Goldberg, S. M. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic, Cambridge
Goldhill, S. 2007. ‘What is ekphrasis for?’, Classical Philology 102: 1–19Google Scholar
Green, P. 1997. The Argonautika of Apollonios Rhodios, Berkeley
Griffith, M. 2002. ‘Slaves of Dionysos: satyrs, audience, and the end of the Oresteia’, Classical Antiquity 21: 195–258Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 2005. ‘Satyrs, citizens, and self-presentation’ in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.), Satyr Drama. Tragedy at Play (Swansea) 161–99
Gronewald, M. and Daniel, R. W. 2005. ‘Lyrischer Text (Sappho-Papyrus)’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 154: 7–12Google Scholar
Hall, E. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian, Oxford
Hall, E. 1998. ‘Ithyphallic males behaving badly; or, satyr drama as gendered tragic ending’ in Wyke, M. (ed.), Parchments of Gender (Oxford) 13–37
Hall, E. 2000. ‘Female figures and metapoetry in Old Comedy’ in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), The Rivals of Aristophanes (London) 407–18
Halliwell, S. 1986. Aristotle's Poetics, London
Halliwell, S. 1987. The Poetics of Aristotle, London
Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis, Princeton
Halliwell, S. 2003. ‘Fra estasi e verità: Longino e la psicologia del sublime’, Aevum Antiquum 3: 65–77Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. 1979. ‘Euripides’ Cyclopean symposium', Phoenix 33: 287–92Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1986. Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium, Oxford
Hardie, P. 2006. ‘Virgil's Ptolemaic relations’, Journal of Roman Studies 96: 25–41Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 2008. ‘Horace's sublime yearnings: Lucretian ironies’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 13: 119–72Google Scholar
Heath, M. 1999. ‘Longinus, On Sublimity’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 43–74Google Scholar
Heldmann, K. 1982. Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst, Munich
Hendrickson, G. L. 1900. ‘Horace, Serm. I 4: a protest and a programme’, American Journal of Philology 21: 121–42Google Scholar
Hertz, N. 1983. ‘A reading of Longinus’, Critical Inquiry 9: 579–96Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. 1993. ‘Deceitful Crete: Aeneid 3.84 and the Hymns of Callimachus’, Classical Quarterly 40: 255–7Google Scholar
Hidber, T. 1996. Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass, Stuttgart and Leipzig
Hills, P. D. 1999. ‘A Commentary on selected poems in Horace's Fourth Book of Odes’, unpublished dissertation, University of Cambridge 1999
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext, Cambridge
Holford-Strevens, L. 2003. Aulus Gellius. An Antonine Scholar and his Achievement, 2nd edn, Oxford
Hornblower, S. 2004. Thucydides and Pindar, Oxford
Horsfall, N. (ed.) 1995. A Companion to the Study of Virgil, Leiden
Hulme, P. 1986. Colonial Encounters, London
Hunter, R. 1983. Eubulus. The Fragments, Cambridge
Hunter, R. 1985a. The New Comedy of Greece & Rome, Cambridge
Hunter, R. 1985b. ‘Horace on friendship and free speech’, Hermes 113: 480–90Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1986. ‘Apollo and the Argonauts. Two notes on Ap. Rhod. 2, 669–719’, Museum Helveticum 43: 50–60 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 29–41)Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1993. The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies, Cambridge
Hunter, R. 1994. ‘History and historicity in the romance of Chariton’ in Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 34.2 (Berlin and New York) 1055–86 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 737–74)
Hunter, R. 1995. ‘Plautus and Herodas’ in Benz, L., Stark, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.), Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels (Tübingen) 155–69 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 212–28)
Hunter, R. 1996. Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry, Cambridge
Hunter, R. 1999. Theocritus. A Selection, Cambridge
Hunter, R. 2000. ‘The politics of Plutarch's Comparison of Aristophanes and Menander’ in Gödde, S. and Heinze, T. (eds.), Skenika. Beiträge zum antiken Theater und seiner Rezeption (Darmstadt) 267–76
Hunter, R. 2001a. ‘On coming after’ (Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge), available online at www.classics.cam.ac.uk/cms_misc/media/misc-docs/rlh.pdf (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 8–26)
Hunter, R. 2001b. ‘The poet unleaved: Simonides and Callimachus’ in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.), The New Simonides. Contexts of Praise and Desire (Oxford) 242–54 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 326–42)
Hunter, R. 2002. ‘“Acting down”: the ideology of Hellenistic performance’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.), Greek and Roman Actors (Cambridge) 189–206 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 643–62)
Hunter, R. 2003a. Theocritus, Encomium of Ptolemy Philadelphus, Berkeley
Hunter, R. 2003b. ‘Literature and its contexts’ in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World (Oxford) 477–93
Hunter, R. 2003c. ‘Reflecting on writing and culture. Theocritus and the style of cultural change’ in Yunis 2003: 213–34 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 434–56)
Hunter, R. 2004a. Plato's Symposium, Oxford and New York
Hunter, R. 2004b. ‘Homer and Greek literature’ in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer (Cambridge) 235–53
Hunter, R. 2005. ‘Showing and telling: notes from the boundary’, Eikasmos 16: 179–91 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 663–77)Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2006a. The Shadow of Callimachus, Cambridge
Hunter, R. 2006b. ‘The prologue of the Periodos to Nicomedes (‘Pseudo-Scymnus’) in Harder, M. A.et al. (eds.), Beyond the Canon (Groningen) 123–40 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 503–22)
Hunter, R. 2006c. ‘Sweet nothings – Callimachus fr. 1, 9–12 revisited’ in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), Callimaco: cent'anni di papiri (Florence) 119–31 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 523–36)
Hunter, R. 2007. ‘Sappho and Latin poetry’ in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), I papiri di Saffo e di Alceo (Florence) 213–25
Hunter, R. 2008a. ‘Hesiod, Callimachus, and the invention of morality’ in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), Esiodo: cent'anni di papiri (Florence) 153–64 (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 559–71)
Hunter, R. 2008b. On Coming After: Studies in Post-Classical Greek Literature and its Reception, Berlin and New York
Hunter, R. forthcoming. ‘The reputation of Callimachus’ in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R., Culture in Pieces (Oxford, forthcoming) (reprinted in Hunter 2008b: 537–58)
Hutchinson, G. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry, Oxford
Innes, D. 1995a. ‘Longinus: structure and unity’ in Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle (Amsterdam) 111–24
Innes, D. 1995b. ‘Longinus, sublimity, and the low emotions’ in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric (Oxford) 323–33
Jocelyn, H. D. 1995. ‘Horace and the reputation of Plautus in the late first century BC’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace (Oxford) 228–47
Kaimio, M.et al. 2001. ‘Metatheatricality in the Greek satyr-play’, Arctos 35: 35–78Google Scholar
Kaiser, E. 1964. ‘Odyssee-Szenen als Topoi’, Museum Helveticum 21: 109–36, 197–224Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2007. Critique of Judgement, ed. Meredith, J. C. and Walker, N., Oxford
Kassel, R. 1955. ‘Bemerkungen zum Kyklops des Euripides’, Rheinisches Museum 98: 279–86 (reprinted in Kleine Schriften, Berlin 1991, 191–8)Google Scholar
Kassel, R. 1994. ‘Zu den “Fröschen” des Aristophanes’, Rheinisches Museum 137: 33–53Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (ed.) 1989. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, volume I: Classical Criticism, Cambridge
Knight, V. 1995. The Renewal of Epic. Responses to Homer in the Argonautica of Apollonius, Leiden
Knöbl, R. 2005. ‘Euripides, Kyklops 1970–2000’, Lustrum 47: 23–54Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2004. ‘“The birth of the reader”: Plutarch as a literary critic’, Scholia 13: 3–27Google Scholar
Konstan, D., Clay, D., Glad, C. E., Thom, J. C. and Ware, J. 1998. Philodemus: On Frank Criticism, Atlanta
Koster, W. 1975. Scholia in Aristophanem, volume IA: Prolegomena de Comoedia, Groningen
Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N. and Seidensticker, B. (eds.), 1999. Das griechische Satyrspiel, Darmstadt
Lada-Richards, I. 1999. Initiating Dionysus, Oxford
Lamberton, R. 1989. Homer the Theologian, Berkeley
Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. (eds.) 1992. Homer's Ancient Readers, Princeton
Lane Fox, R. 2005. The Classical World, London
Leach, E. W. 1971. ‘Horace's pater optimus and Terence's Demea: autobiographical fiction and comedy in Sermo, I, 4’, American Journal of Philology 92: 616–32Google Scholar
Ledbetter, G. M. 2003. Poetics before Plato, Princeton
Leo, F. 1889. ‘Varro und die Satire’, Hermes 24: 66–84 (reprinted in Ausgewählte kleine Schriften (Rome 1960) 283–300)Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1961. ‘Göttliche und menschliche Motivation im homerischen Epos’, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaft, Phil.-hist. Kl., Heidelberg
Lissarrague, F. 1990. ‘Why satyrs are good to represent’ in Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? (Princeton) 228–36
Lohse, G. 1964. ‘Untersuchungen über Homerzitate bei Platon’, Helikon 4: 3–28Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1992. ‘Stoic readings of Homer’ in Lamberton and Keaney 1992: 41– 66
Ludwich, A. 1884. Aristarchs homerische Textkritik, volume I, Leipzig
Lundon, J. 2007. ‘Il nuovo testo lirico nel nuovo papiro di Saffo’ in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), I papiri di Saffo e di Alceo (Florence) 149–66
Luppe, W. 1973. ‘Textkritische Bemerkungen zu Plutarchs Vergleich von Aristophanes und Menander’, Philologus 117: 127–30Google Scholar
Luzzatto, M. T. 1981. ‘Pseudo Longino e Cecilio di Calatte: a proposito di un giudizio su Eschilo’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 53: 50–100Google Scholar
Luzzatto, M. T. 1983. Tragedia greca e cultura ellenistica: L'or. LII di Dione di Prusa, Bologna
Macintyre, S. 2004. A Concise History of Australia, 2nd edn, Cambridge
Maffei, S. 1986. ‘Le Imagines di Luciano: un “patchwork” di capolavori antichi. Il problema di un metodo combinatorio’, Studi Classici e Orientali 36: 147–64Google Scholar
Mastromarco, G. 1998. ‘La degradazione del mostro. La maschera del Ciclope nella commedia e nel dramma satiresco del quinto secolo a.C.’ in Belardinelli, A. M., Imperio, O., Mastromarco, G., Pellegrino, M. and Totaro, P. (eds.), Tessere. Frammenti della commedia greca: studi e commenti, Bari
McCarthy, K. 2000. Slaves, Masters and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy, Princeton
Meijering, R. 1987. Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia, Groningen
Montana, F. 2007. ‘Menandro (e Aristofane) ad Alessandria: qualche riflessione’ in Pretagostini, R. and Dettori, E. (eds.), La cultura letteraria ellenistica: persistenza, innovazione, trasmissione (Rome) 257–69
Morgan, T. 1998. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds, Cambridge
Most, G. 2003. ‘Il sublime oggi?’, Aevum Antiquum 3: 41–62Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. 2000. Euripides, Philoktet. Testimonien und Fragmente, Berlin and New York
Napolitano, M. 2000. ‘Odisseo simposiarca fraudolento e Polifemo simposiasta raggirato nel Ciclope di Euripide’ in Arrighetti, G. (ed.), Letteratura e riflessione sulla letteratura nella cultura classica (Pisa) 51–63
Napolitano, M. 2005. ‘Appunti sullo statuto letterario del Ciclope di Euripide’, Dioniso 4: 42–55Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius, Leeds
Nesselrath, H.-G. forthcoming. ‘Menander and his rivals: new light from the comic adespota on papyri?’ in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R., Culture in Pieces (Oxford, forthcoming)
Nicolai, R. 2005. ‘Omero, Tucidide e Platone sulla preistoria dell'umanità e sulla fondazione di città’, Seminari Romani di Cultura Greca 8: 237–61Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1905. ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’, Hermes 40: 481–528Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (ed.) 1995. Philodemus and Poetry, New York and Oxford
Obbink, D. 2004. ‘Vergil's De pietate: from Ehoiae to allegory in Vergil, Philodemus, and Ovid’ in Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. and Skinner, M. B.. (eds.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans (Austin) 175–209
Oberhelm, S. and Armstrong, D. 1995. ‘Satire as poetry and the impossibility of metathesis in Horace's Satires’ in Obbink 1995: 233–54
Olson, S. D. 1988. ‘Dionysus and the pirates in Euripides’ “Cyclops”', Hermes 116: 502–4Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, N. 1992. Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory, Stuttgart
O'Sullivan, P. 2005. ‘Of sophists, tyrants, and Polyphemos: the nature of the beast in Euripides’ Cyclops' in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.), Satyr Drama. Tragedy at Play (Swansea) 119–59
Paganelli, L. 1979. Echi storico-politici nell “Ciclope” euripideo, Padua
Panofsky, E. 1968. Idea. A Concept in Art Theory, New York
Perusino, F. 1989. Platonio. La commedia greca, Urbino
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship, Oxford
Pickard-Cambridge, A. 1962. Dithyramb Tragedy and Comedy, 2nd edn, rev. by Webster, T. B. L., Oxford
Pickard-Cambridge, A. 1968. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens, 2nd edn, rev. by Gould, J. and Lewis, D. M., Oxford
Plebe, A. 1952. La teoria del comico da Aristotele a Plutarco, Turin
Pontani, F. 2005. Eraclito. Questioni omeriche sulle allegorie di Omero in merito agli dèi, Pisa
Porter, J. I. 1992. ‘Hermeneutic lines and circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the exegesis of Homer’ in Lamberton and Keaney 1992: 67–114
Porter, J. I. 2001. ‘Ideals and ruins: Pausanias, Longinus, and the Second Sophistic’ in Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J. F., and Elsner, J. (eds.), Pausanias. Travel and Memory in Roman Greece (Oxford) 63–92, 273–83
Porter, J. I. (ed.) 2006a. Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, Princeton
Porter, J. I. 2006b. ‘Feeling classical: classicism and ancient literary criticism’ in Porter 2006a: 301–52
Privitera, G. A. 1970. Dioniso in Omero e nella poesia greca arcaica, Rome
Quadlbauer, F. 1960. ‘Die Dichter der griechischen Komödie im literarischen Urteil der Antike’, Wiener Studien 73: 40–82Google Scholar
Rabe, H. 1931. Prolegomenon Sylloge, Leipzig
Reeve, M. D. 1989. ‘Conceptions’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 35: 81–112Google Scholar
Renehan, R. 1981. ‘The Greek anthropocentric view of man’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 239–59Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1974. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter, Oxford
Richardson, N. J. 1975. ‘Homeric professors in the age of the Sophists’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 21: 65–81Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1992. ‘Aristotle's reading of Homer and its background’ in Lamberton and Keaney 1992: 30–40
Riedweg, C. 1993. ‘Menander in Rom – Beobachtungen zu Caecilius Statius Plocium fr. 1’ in Slater, N.W. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Intertextualität in der griechisch-römischen Komödie (Drama 2, Stuttgart) 133–59
Rosen, R. M. 2006. ‘Aristophanes, fandom and the classicizing of Greek tragedy’ in Kozak, L. and Rich, J. (eds.), Playing around Aristophanes (Oxford) 27–47
Rosen, R. M. 2007. Making Mockery, Oxford
Rosokoki, A. 1995. Die Erigone des Eratosthenes, Heidelberg
Rossi, L. E. 1971. ‘Il Ciclope di Euripide come κῶμος “mancato”’, Maia 23: 10–38Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1964. ‘Longinus’ On the Sublime, Oxford
Russell, D. A. 1979. ‘De imitatione’ in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge) 1–16
Russell, D. A. 1981. ‘Longinus revisited’, Mnemosyne 34: 72–86Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1983. Greek Declamation, Cambridge
Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M. 1972. Ancient Literary Criticism, Oxford
Rutherford, I. 1998. Canons of Style in the Antonine Age, Oxford
Sandbach, F. H. 1970. ‘Menander's manipulation of language for dramatic purposes’ in Ménandre, Entretiens sur l'Antiquité classique XVI, (Vandoeuvres and Geneva) 111–136
Scarpat, G. 1964. Parrhesia: storia del termine e delle sue traduzioni in Latino, Brescia
Schenkeveld, D. 1982. ‘The structure of Plutarch's De Audiendis Poetis’, Mnemosyne 34: 60–71Google Scholar
Schlemm, A. 1893. De fontibus Plutarchi commentationum, De audiendis poetis et De fortuna, dissertation Göttingen
Schmid, W. 1952. ‘Terenz als Menander Latinus’, Rheinisches Museum 95: 229–72Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1979. ‘Hom. μῆλα und die antiken Erklärungen’, Glotta 57: 174–82Google Scholar
Schrader, H. 1880. Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum ad Iliadem pertinentium reliquiae, Leipzig
Seaford, R. 1981. ‘Dionysiac drama and the Dionysiac mysteries’, Classical Quarterly 31: 252–75Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 1988. Euripides, Cyclops, Oxford
Segal, C. 1959. ‘῞ ΥΨΟΣ and the problem of cultural decline in the De Sublimitate’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 64: 121–46Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B. 2003. ‘The chorus in Greek satyrplay’ in Csapo, E. and Miller, M. C. (eds.), Poetry, Theory, Praxis (Oxford) 100–21
Sens, A. 1997. Theocritus: Dioscuri (Idyll 22), Göttingen
Solmsen, F. 1932. ‘Drei Rekonstruktionen zur antiken Rhetorik und Poetik’, Hermes 67: 133–54Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 1996. Aristophanes, Frogs, Warminster, Wilts.
Sontag, S. 1967. Against Interpretation and Other Essays, London
Soverini, P. 1985. ‘Il problema delle teorie retoriche e poetiche di Petronio’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 32, 3 (Berlin and New York) 1706–79
Steinhart, M. and Slater, W. J. 1997. ‘Phineus as monoposiast’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 117: 203–10Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2004. Birth of the Symbol, Princeton
Taplin, O. 1972. ‘Aeschylean silences and silences in Aeschylus’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 76: 57–97Google Scholar
Taplin, O. 2002. ‘2002: a sleep Odyssey’, Ordia Prima 1: 147–51Google Scholar
Tavernini, N. 1953. Dal libro decimo dell'Institutio Oratoria alle fonti tecnico-metodologiche di Quintiliano, Turin
Too, Y. L. 1998. The Idea of Ancient Literary Criticism, Oxford
Totaro, P. 2006. ‘Eschilo in Aristofane (Rane 1026–1029, 1431a–1432)’, Lexis 24: 95–125Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. 2008. The Oral Palimpsest, Washington
Ussher, R. G. 1978. Euripides, Cyclops, Rome
Stockt, L. 1992. Twinkling and Twilight. Plutarch's Reflections on Literature, Brussels
Vogt-Spira, G. 2000. ‘Gellius, die römische Komödie und die Kategorie der Imitatio’ in Stark, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.), Dramatische Waldchen. Festschrift für Eckard Lefèvre zum 65. Geburtstag (Hildesheim) 683–98
Wallace, R. W. 1997. ‘Poet, public, and “theatrocracy”: audience performance in classical Athens’ in Edmunds, L. and Wallace, R. W. (eds.), Poet, Public, and Performance in Ancient Greece (Baltimore and London) 97–111
Walsh, G. B. 1984. The Varieties of Enchantment, Chapel Hill
Walsh, G. B. 1988. ‘Sublime method: Longinus on language and imitation’, Classical Antiquity 7: 252–69Google Scholar
Wedner, S. 1994. Tradition und Wandel im allegorischen Verständnis des Sirenenmythos, Frankfurt
Wehrli, F. 1946. ‘Der erhabene und der schlichte Stil in der poetisch-rhetorischen Theorie der Antike’ in Phyllobolia für Peter Von der Mühll (Basel) 9–34Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. 1927. ‘Die platonische Homerkritik und ihre Nachwirkung’, Philologus 82: 121–53Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1982. Greek Metre, Oxford
West, M. L. 1983. The Orphic Poems, Oxford
West, M. L. 2001. Studies in the Text and Transmission of the Iliad, Munich
Wetzel, W. 1965. De Euripidis fabula satyrica, quae Cyclops inscribitur, cum Homerico comparata exemplo, Wiesbaden
White, P. 1987. ‘Horace, Epistles 2.1.50–54’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 117: 227–34Google Scholar
Whitman, C. H. 1964. Aristophanes and the Comic Hero, Cambridge, Mass.
Whitmarsh, T. 2001. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire, Oxford
Willi, A. 2003. The Languages of Aristophanes, Oxford
Willi, A. 2008. Sikelismos. Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im griechischen Sizilien (8–5. Jh. v.Chr.), Basel
Wilson, P. 1999/2000. ‘Euripides’ tragic Muse', Illinois Classical Studies 24/25: 427–49Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. 1986. ‘The judgement of Dionysus: books, taste, and teaching in the Frogs’ in Cropp, M., Fantham, E. and Scully, E. E. (eds.), Greek Tragedy and its Legacy (Calgary) 241–57
Worman, N. 2002. The Cast of Character: Style in Greek Literature, Austin
Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: the Stylistic Unity of the Comoedia Palliata, Rome
Wright, M. 2006. ‘Cyclops and the Euripidean tetralogy’, The Cambridge Classical Journal (Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society) 52: 23–48Google Scholar
Wüst, E. 1950. ‘Epicharmos und die alte attische Komödie’, Rheinisches Museum 93: 337–64Google Scholar
Wüst, E. 1958. ‘Von den Anfängen des Problems der Willensfreiheit’, Rheinisches Museum 101: 75–91Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.) 2003. Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, Cambridge
Zanker, G. 1987. Realism in Alexandrian Poetry, London
Zeitlin, F. I. 2001. ‘Visions and revisions of Homer’ in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek under Rome (Cambridge) 195–266
Zwierlein, O. 1967. Review of Wetzel 1965, Gnomon 39: 449–54Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard Hunter, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Critical Moments in Classical Literature
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511729997.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard Hunter, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Critical Moments in Classical Literature
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511729997.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard Hunter, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Critical Moments in Classical Literature
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511729997.008
Available formats
×