Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: February 2016

15 - Creativity and Reason: Friends or Foes?

from SECTION THREE - CREATIVITY AND REASON: INTERACTIONS AND RELATED CONSTRUCTS

Summary

We here explore possible links between reasoning and creativity. Creativity has sometimes been described as a blind search with retention of fortuitous “good” ideas, as a “freewheeling” mental activity, as “thinking outside the box” and as the result of “primary processes” that are intuitive. Creativity is often contrasted with adaptive step-by-step processing, controlled thought, logic and prototypical “reasoning” behavior. However, is this dichotomy a reasonable picture of the way things work, or rather a caricature that hides some deep links between reasoning and creativity? First, the relationship between the development of logical thought and creative thinking in children is examined. Then connections between creativity and formal and postformal reasoning, in particular dialectical thinking, are studied. Finally, implications and conclusions are drawn.

In this chapter, we consider reasoning, in general, as the act of thinking based on inductive and deductive processes. It is often associated, more specifically, with the process of developing and supporting assertions, claims, proposals or conclusions from facts or premises, based on a set of arguments (Reber, 1995). Reasoning, in many cases, provides the basis for action or decisions. The development of reasoning is often viewed as an important educational goal.

Creativity, in contrast, can be defined as the capacity to produce novel, original work that fits with task constraints (Lubart, 1994). Work refers to all types of ideas and productions. This work must be novel in the sense that it goes beyond a replication or copy of that which exists. The extent to which the work produced is novel can vary from being original only for the person who completed the work (this is the notion of reinventing ideas known already in the larger social context) to being original for a limited social group, to being original for all of humanity. The second component in the definition concerns the fit with constraints. We distinguish creative ideas from bizarre ideas, which are also novel, because creative ideas take into account the parameters of a situation, the constraints. Novel productions that are in some way “useful”, or “worthwhile”, in a given context are, thus, creative.

In the following sections the links between reasoning and creativity are examined.

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. Oxford: Basic Books.
Arlin, P. K. (1990). Wisdom: The art of problem finding. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 230–243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Basseches, M. (1984). Dialectical thinking and adult development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Beckerman, M. B. (1990). Leos Janacek and “the late style” in music. The Gerontologist, 30, 632–635.
Benack, S., Basseches, M., & Swan, T. (1989). Perspectives on individual differences. In Ronning, R. R. & Glover, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 199–208). New York: Plenum Press.
Chi, M. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 209–234). Washington, DC: APA Press.
Cloutier, R., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1976) Individual differences in the development of formal reasoning. Child Development, 47, 1097–1102.
Cohen-Shalev, A. (1986). Artistic creativity across the adult life span: An alternative approach. Interchange, 17(4), 1–16.
Cohen-Shalev, A. (1989). Old age style: Developmental changes in creative production from a life-span perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 3(1), 21–37.
Cummins, D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O, & Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory and Cognition, 19, 274–282.
Dudek, S. Z., & Coté, R. (1994). Problem finding revisited. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5).
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H., Phelps, E., & Wolf, D. P. (1990). The roots of adult creativity in children's symbolic products. In Langern, E. J., Alexander, C. N. (Ed.), Higher stages of human development: Perspective on adult growth (pp. 79–96). London: Oxford University Press.
Gauffroy, C., & Barrouillet, P. (2011). The primacy of thinking about possibilities in the development of reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1000–1011.
Georgsdottir, A. S., Ameel, E., & Lubart, T. I. (2002). Cognitive flexibility and logical reasoning in school aged children. Paper presented at the 17th Biennial Meeting of the International Society of Behavior Development (ISSBD), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? Argumentation?Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 10–18.
Guignard, J. H. & Lubart, T. I. (2007). A comparative study of creative potential in intellectual giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 22 (1), 10–15.
Jaarsveld, S., Lachmann, T., Hamel, R., & van Leeuwen, C. (2010). Solving and creating Raven Progressive Matrices: Reasoning in well- and ill-defined problem spaces. Creativity Research Journal, 22 (3), 304–319.
Jaarsveld, S., Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012). Creative reasoning across developmental levels: Convergence and divergence in problem creation. Intelligence, 40, 172–188.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). How we reason?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1994). Precis of beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(4), 693–745.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. Oxford, England: Macmillan.
Kramer, D. A. (1983). Post-formal operations? A need for further conceptulization. Human Development, 26, 91–105.
Kramer, D. A. (1990). Conceptualizing wisdom: The primacy of affect-cognition relations. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 279–313). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Labouvie-Vief, G. (1985). Intelligence and cognition. In Schaie, K. W. & Birren, J. E. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Light, P., Blaye, A., Gilly, M., & Girotto, V. (1989). Pragmatic schemas and logical reasoning in 6- to 8-years-old children. Cognitive Development, 4(1), 49–64.
Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 289–332). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lubart, T. I., & Lautrey, J. (1996). Development of creativity in 9- to 10-year old children. Paper presented at the Growing Mind Congress, Genève, Suisse.
Lubart, T. I., Mouchiroud, C., Torjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité (Second Edition) (Psychology of creativity). Paris: Armand Colin.
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Life span creativity: An investment theory approach. In Adam-Price, C. (Ed.), Creativity and successful aging: Theoretical and empirical approach (pp. 21–41). New York: Springer.
Lubart, T., Besançon, M., & Barbot, B. (2011). EPoC: Evaluation du Potentiel Créatif (Evaluation of Creative Potential). Paris: Hogrefe.
Maker, C. J. (2001). DISCOVER: Assessing and developing problem solving. Gifted Education International, 15(3), 232–251.
Maker, C. J. (2005). The DISCOVER Project: Improving assessment and curriculum for diverse gifted learners. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Markovits, H., & Brunet, M-L. (2012). Priming divergent thinking promotes logical reasoning in 6- to 8-year olds: But more for high than low SES students. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 991–1001.
Orwoll, L., & Perlmutter, M. (1990). The study of wise persons: Integrating a personality perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 160–177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pascual-Leone, J. (1990). An essay on wisdom: Toward organismic processes that make it possible. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 244–278). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Piaget, J. (1981). Le possible et le nécessaire, Tome 1: l’évolution des possibles chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Piaget, J. (1987). Possibility and necessity: The role of possibility in cognitive development (Feider, H., Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Reber, A. S. (1995). The Penguin dictionary of psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Penguin Books.
Ribot, T. (1926). Essai sur l'imagination créatrice (Essay on creative imagination). Paris: Alcan.
Rieben, L. (1982). Processus secondaire et créativité: Partie émergée de l'iceberg? In Nicolaïdis, N. & Schmid-Kitsikis, E. (Eds.), Créativité et/ou symptôme (pp. 97–111). Paris: Clancier-Guenand.
Riegel, K. F. (1975). Toward a dialectic theory of development. Human Development, 18(1–2), 50–64.
Rosenblatt, E., & Winner, E. (1988). The art of children's drawing. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22(1), 3–15.
Ross, R. J. (1976). The development of formal thinking and creativity in adolescence. Adolescence, 11(44), 609–617.
Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science and other fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rothenberg, A. (2011). Janusian, homospatial and sepconic articulation processes. In Runco, M. A & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of creativity,2nd ed. (Vol. 2, pp. 1–9). New York: Elsevier.
Simonton, D. K. (1975). Interdisciplinary creativity over historical time: A correlational analysis of generational fluctuation. Social Behavior and Personality, 3(2), 181–188.
Simonton, D. K. (1989). The swan-song phenomenon: Last-works effects for 172 classical composers. Psychology and Aging, 4, 42–47.
Smilansky, J. (1984). Problem solving and the quality of invention: An empirical question. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 377–386.
Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth-grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quartely, 12, 195–199.
Urban, K K., & Jellan, H. G. (1995). The test of creative thinking- drawing production. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets.
Wu, P-L., & Chiou, W-B. (2008). Postformal thinking and creativity among late adolescents: A post-Piagetian approach. Adolescence, 43(170), 237–251.
Wyatt-Brown, A. M. (1998). Late style in the novels of Barbara Pym and Penelope Mortimer. The Gerontologist, 28, 835–839.
Yang, C-C., Wan, C-S., & Chiou, W-B. (2010). Dialectical thinking and creativity among young adults: A postformal operations perspective. Psychological Reports, 106(1), 79–92.