Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 17
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2018
Print publication year:
2018
Online ISBN:
9781108675604

Book description

The Element discusses the structure, content, and evaluation of cosmological arguments. The introductory section investigates features essential to cosmological arguments. Traditionally, cosmological arguments are distinguished by their appeal to change, causation, contingency or objective becoming in the world. But none of these is in fact essential to the formulation of cosmological arguments. Sections 1-3 present a critical discussion of traditional Thomistic, Kalam, and Leibnizian cosmological arguments, noting various advantages and disadvantages of these approaches. Section 4 offers an entirely new approach to the cosmological argument - the approach of theistic modal realism. The proper explananda of cosmological arguments on this approach is not change, causation, contingency or objective becoming in the world. The proper explananda is the totality of metaphysical reality - all actualia and all possibilia. The result is the most compelling and least objectionable version of the cosmological argument.

References

Adams, Robert M. (1974) “Theories of Actuality,” Noûs 8: 211231.
Adams, Robert M. (1981) “Actualism and Thisness,” Synthese 49: 341.
Alexander, H. G. (1956) The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence. Oxford: University of Manchester Press.
Al-Ghazali, (1962) Kitab al-Iqtisad fi ’l-Iqtiqad. Ankara: University of Ankara Press.
Al-Ghazali, (1963) Tahafut al-Falasifah. Lahore: Pakistan Philosophical Congress.
Almeida, Michael (2008) The Metaphysics of Perfect Beings. London: Routledge.
Almeida, Michael (2010) “O’Connor’s Permissive Multiverse,” Philosophia Christi 12: 297308.
Almeida, Michael (2011) “Theistic Modal Realism?,” in Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 115.
Almeida, Michael (2017a) “Theistic Modal Realism I: The Challenge of Actualist Realism,” Philosophy Compass 12 (2017): 114.
Almeida, Michael (2017b) “Theistic Modal Realism II: Theoretical Benefits,” Philosophy Compass 12 (2017): 117.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1974) “‘Whatever Has a Beginning of Existence Must Have a Cause’: Hume’s Argument Exposed,” Analysis 34 (5): 145151.
Aquinas, St. Thomas (1263a) Summa Contra Gentiles Book I: God, Pegis, Anton C., F.R.S.C. (trans.). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979.
Aquinas, St. Thomas (1263b) Summa Contra Gentiles Book II: Creation, Anderson, James F. (trans.). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979.
Aquinas, St. Thomas (1271) “On the Eternity of the World,” in McInerny, Ralph (ed.), Thomas Aquinas: Selected Writings. London: Penguin Books, 1998. 710717.
Aquinas, St. Thomas (1273) Summa Theologica. Volume I. Scotts Valley, CA: Nov Antique Publishers, 2008.
Benacerraf, Paul (1962) “Tasks, Super-Tasks and the Modern Eleatics,” Journal of Philosophy LIX (24): 765768.
Benardete, José (1964) Infinity: An Essay in Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bennett, Jonathan (1984) A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Bird, Alexander (2005) “The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws,” Foundations of Science 10: 353370.
Bird, Alexander (2007) Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonaventure, ca. 1250, Commentary on the Sentences: Philosophy of God. Works of St. Bonaventure, vol. XVI, Houser, R. E. and Noone, Timothy B. (eds.), St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Press, 2014.
Burrill, Donald R. (1967) The Cosmological Argument. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Cantor, Georg (1915) Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, Jourdain, P. E. B. (trans.). New York, NY: Dover Publishers.
Chalmers, David (2000) “Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?,” in Gendler, Tamar S. and Hawthorne, John (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145200.
Chisholm, Roderick (1976) Persons and Objects. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.
Clarke, Samuel (1998) A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, Vailati, Ezio (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohoe, Caleb (2013) “There Must Be a First: Why Thomas Aquinas Rejects Infinite, Essentially Ordered, Causal Series,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (5): 838856.
Contessa, Gabriele (2010) “Modal Truthmakers and Two Varieties of Actualism,” Synthese 174: 341353.
Corry, Richard (2011) “Can Dispositionalist Essences Ground the Laws of Nature?,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2): 263275.
Coughlan, M. J. (1987) “Must God Create Only the Best Possible World?,” Sophia 26: 1519.
Craig, William Lane (1979) The Kalām Cosmological Argument. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Craig, William Lane (1984) “Professor Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument,” Religious Studies 20 (3): 367375.
Craig, William Lane (1998) “The Kalām Cosmological Argument,” in Pojman, Louis (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.2441.
Craig, William Lane (2001) The Cosmological Argument: From Plato to Leibniz, Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Craig, William Lane (2016) Reasonable Faith. www.reasonablefaith.org/Free-Will.
Craig, William Lane and Moreland, J. P. (2015) “The Kalam Cosmological Argument,” in Rea, Michael and Pojman, Louis (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology. Stamford, CA: Cengage Publishers.
Craig, William Lane and Sinclair, James D. (2012) “The Kalam Cosmological Argument,” in Craig, William Lane and Moreland, J. P. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Oxford: Blackwell. 101201.
Craig, William Lane and Smith, Quentin (1993) Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dasgupta, Shamik (2016) “Metaphysical Rationalism,” Noûs 50 (2): 379418.
Dawkins, Richard (1996) The Blind Watchmaker. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Deasy, Daniel (2015) “The Moving Spotlight Theory,” Philosophical Studies 172 (8). 20732089.
Della Rocca, Michael (2010) “PSR,” Philosophers Imprint 10 (7): 113.
Divers, John (1999) “A Genuine Realist Theory of Advanced Modalizing,” Mind 108: 217239.
Divers, John (2007) “The Modal Metaphysics of Alvin Plantinga,” in Baker, Deane-Peter (ed.), Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7192.
Dorr, Cian. “Diamonds Are Forever” (unpublished manuscript).
Draper, Paul (2004) “Cosmic Fine-Tuning and Terrestrial Suffering: Parallel Problems for Naturalism and Theism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 41: 311321.
Edwards, Jonathan (2003) “On the Freedom of the Will,” in Alexander, Patrick (ed.), The Works of Jonathan Edwards. Volume 1. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.
Edwards, Paul (1967) “The Cosmological Argument,” in Burrill, Donald R. (ed.), The Cosmological Arguments: A Spectrum of Opinion. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books. 101124.
Eells, Ellery (1988) “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past,” Philosophy of Science 55 (3): 453455.
Feit, Neil (1998) “More on Brute Facts,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (4): 625630.
Forrest, Peter (1981) “The Problem of Evil: Two Neglected Defenses,” Sophia 20: 4954.
Forrest, Peter (1996) God without the Supernatural. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Francken, P. and Geirsson, H. (1999) “Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments,” Journal of Philosophical Research 24: 285304.
Gamow, George (1946) One, Two, Three, Infinity. London: Macmillan.
Griffin, Michael V. (2013) Leibniz, God, and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldschmidt, Tyron (ed.) (2013) The Puzzle of Existence: Why Is There Something Rather than Nothing? New York, NY: Routledge.
Grünbaum, Adolf (1991) “Creation as a Pseudo-Explanation in Current Physical Cosmology,” Erkenntnis 35 (1–3): 233254.
Hackett, Stuart (1957) The Resurrection of Theism. Chicago, IL: Moody Press.
Hawthorne, John (2000) “Before-Effect and Zeno Causality,” Noûs 34 (4): 622633.
Hawthorne, John (2006) “Chance and Counterfactuals,” in his Metaphysical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 225264.
Hilbert, David (1964) “On the Infinite,” in Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H. (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Publishers. 183201.
Hoefer, Carl (2016) “Causal Determinism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/determinism-causal/.
Hudson, Hud (1997) “Brute Facts,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (1): 7782.
Hudson, Hud (2006) The Metaphysics of Hyperspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M. J. (1998) A New Introduction to Modal Logic. London: Routledge.
Hume, David (1779) Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Edinburgh: Blackwood and Sons, 1907.
Hume, David (1738) Treatise of Human Nature, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Hume, David (1748) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. London. Reprinted Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1993.
Jager, Thomas (1982), “An Actualist Semantics for Quantified Modal Logic,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (3): 335349.
Kaplan, David (1979) “On the Logic of Demonstratives,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1): 8198.
Kenny, Anthony (1969) The Five Ways. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
Koons, Robert (1997) “A New Look at the Cosmological Argument,” American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2): 193211.
Koons, Robert (2008) “Epistemological Foundations for the Cosmological Argument,” in Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (ed.), Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.105133.
Koons, Robert (2014) “A New Kalam Argument: Revenge of the Grim Reaper,” Noûs 48 (2): 256267.
Kraay, Klaas (2010) “Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse,” Philosophical Studies 47 (3): 355368.
Kraay, Klaas (2011) “Theism and Modal Collapse,” American Philosophical Quarterly 48: 361–72
Kretzmann, Norman (2001a) The Metaphysics of Creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kretzmann, Norman (2001b) The Metaphysics of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, Saul (1980) Naming and Necessity. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria and Hawthorne, John (2010) “Knowledge and Objective Chance,” in Greenough, Patrick and Pritchard, Duncan (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 92108.
Leibniz, Gottfried (1697) On the Ultimate Origination of Things, in Ariew, R. and Garber, D. (eds.), G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1989a. 149154.
Leibniz, Gottfried (1710) Theodicy. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press, 1996.
Leibniz, Gottfried (1714) Monadology, in Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.), Leibniz: Philosophical Writings. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1973.
Leibniz, Gottfried (1714) Principles of Nature and Grace, Based on Reason, in Ariew, R. and Garber, D. (eds.), G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1989b. 206212.
Levey, Samuel (2016) “The Paradox of Sufficient Reason,” Philosophical Review 125 (3): 397430.
Lewis, David (1973) Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, David (1976) “The Paradoxes of Time Travel,” American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (2)145152.
Lewis, David (1979) “Scorekeeping in a Language Game,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (3): 339359.
Lewis, David (1983a) Philosophical Papers I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, David (1983b) “Postscripts to Anselm and Actuality,” in his Philosophical Papers I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, David (1986a) On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, David (1986b) Philosophical Papers II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, David (2015) “A Reply to Dana Scott: ‘Is There Life on Possible Worlds?’” in Loewer, Barry and Schaffer, Jonathan (eds.), A Companion to David Lewis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 1822.
Linsky, Bernard and Zalta, Edward (1994) “In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic,” Tomberlin, James (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Press. 431448.
Look, Brandon C. (2017) “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/leibniz/.
Mackie, John L. (1955) “Evil and Omnipotence,” Mind 64: 200212.
Mackie, John L. (1983) The Miracle of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McHarry, D. (1978) “A Theodicy,” Analysis, 38: 132134.
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1927) The Nature of Existence, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Menzel, Christopher (1990) “Actualism, Ontological Commitment, and Possible Worlds Semantics,” Synthese 85: 355389.
Menzel, Christopher (1991) “The True Modal Logic,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 20: 331374.
Morris, Thomas (1987) “Properties, Modalities, and God,” in his Anselmian Explorations. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mumford, Stephen (2003) Dispositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Munitz, M. K. (1951) “One Universe or Many?” Journal of the History of Ideas 12: 231255.
O’Connor, Timothy (2012) Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Oppy, Graham (2006) Arguing about Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, Graham (2014) Describing Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newlands, Samuel (2013) “Spinoza’s Modal Metaphysics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/spinoza-modal/.
Philoponus, John (1987) Against Aristotle, on the Eternity of the World. London: Duckworth.
Philoponus, John and Simplicius, (1987) Place, Void, and Eternity. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Plantinga, Alvin (1967) God and Other Minds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Plantinga, Alvin (1974a) God, Freedom, and Evil. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Plantinga, Alvin (1974b) The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, Alvin (1976) “Actualism and Possible Worlds,” Theoria 42: 139160.
Prior, Arthur (1956) “Modality and Quantification in S5,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 21: 6062.
Prior, Arthur (1957) Time and Modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, Arthur (1962) “Limited Indeterminism,” Review of Metaphysics 16 (1): 5561.
Prior, Arthur (1977) Worlds, Times, and Selves. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Pruss, Alexander (2006) The Principle of Sufficient Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pruss, Alexander (2009a) “From Grim Reaper to the Kalaam,” http://alexanderpruss.blogspot.com/2009/10/from-grim-reaper-paradox-to-kalaam.html.
Pruss, Alexander (2009b) “Leibnizian Cosmological Arguments,” in Craig, W. L and Moreland, J. P. (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Oxford: Blackwell. 24100.
Rasmussen, Josh (2012) “Presentists May Say Goodbye to A-Properties,” Analysis 72: 270276.
Reichenbach, Bruce, (2017) “Cosmological Argument,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/cosmological-argument.
Rescher, Nicholas (2013) On Leibniz. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Ross, James (1969) Philosophical Theology. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Rowe, William L. (1988) The Cosmological Argument. Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press.
Rowe, William L. (2007) Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction, 4th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Rowe, William L. (2015) “An Examination of the Cosmological Argument,” in Rea, Michael and Pojman, Louis (eds.), Philosophy of Religion : An Anthology, 7th edn. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. 167176.
Russell, Bertrand (1905) “On Denoting,” Mind 14: 479493.
Salmon, Nathan (1987) “Existence,” in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 1. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Press. 49108.
Schnieder, Benjamin and Steinberg, Alex (2016) “Without Reason?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97: 523541.
Sider, Ted (1997) “Four Dimensionalism,” Philosophical Review 106: 197231.
Sider, Ted (2001) Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skow, Bradford (2015) Objective Becoming. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skyrms, Bryan (1976) “Possible Worlds, Physics and Metaphysics,” Philosophical Studies 30 (5): 323332.
Smith, Quentin (1995) “A Defense of a Principle of Sufficient Reason,” Metaphilosophy 26 (½): 97106.
Smith, Quentin (2008) “A Cosmological Argument for a Self-Caused Universe” https://infidels.org/library/modern/quentin_smith/self-caused.html.
Sorensen, Roy (2003) A Brief History of the Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spinoza, Benedict de (1949) Ethics, Gutmann, James (ed.). New York, NY: Hafner Press.
Stalnaker, Robert (1976) “Possible Worlds,” Noûs 10 (1): 6575.
Stump, Eleonore (2003) Aquinas. London: Routledge.
Swinburne, Richard (1993) The Coherence of Theism, revised edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swinburne, Richard (2004) The Existence of God, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomson, J. F. (1954) “Tasks and Super-Tasks,” Analysis 15 (1): 113.
Turner, Donald (2003) “The Many-Universes Solution to the Problem of Evil,” in Gale, Richard and Pruss, Alexander (eds.), The Existence of God. United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishers.
Turner, Donald (2014) “Revisiting the Many-Universes Solution to the Problem of Evil,” in Kraay, Klaas (ed.), God and the Multiverse. New York, NY: Routledge.
Vallicella, William F. (1997) “On an Insufficient Argument against Sufficient Reason,” Ratio 10 (1): 7681.
van Inwagen, Peter (1983) An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
van Inwagen, Peter (1986), “Two Concepts of Possible Worlds,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XI, French, P., Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H. (eds.) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 185213.
van Inwagen, Peter (2009) Metaphysics, 3rd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Williams, Robert (2008) “Chances, Counterfactuals, and Similarity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77: 385420.
Williamson, Timothy (2002) “Necessary Existents,” in O’Hear, A. (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 269287.
Williamson, Timothy (2013) Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wolfson, H. A. (1966) “Patristic Arguments against the Eternity of the World,” Harvard Theological Review 59: 354367.
Wolfson, H. A. (1976) The Philosophy of the Kalam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.