Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:41:36.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Synthesis: Cooperative breeding in the twenty-first century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

By
Walter D. Koenig ,
Janis L. Dickinson  and
Stephen T. Emlen
Edited by
Walter D. Koenig  and
Janis L. Dickinson
Walter D. Koenig
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Janis L. Dickinson
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates
Studies of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior
 , pp. 353 - 373
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 5, 325–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, K. E. and Owens, I. P. F. (1998). Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 265, 739–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, K. E. and Owens, I. P. F. (1999). Cooperative breeding in birds: the role of ecology. Behav. Ecol., 10, 465–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, J. J. (2009). Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 364, 3191–3207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouwer, L., van de Pol, M., and Cockburn, A. (2014). The role of social environment on parental care: offspring benefit more from the presence of female than male helpers. J. Anim. Ecol., 83, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. L. (1987). Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds: Ecology and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. L. and Brown, E. R. (1984). Parental facilitation: parent-offspring relations in communally breeding birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 14, 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2002). Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 296, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockburn, A. (2004). Mating systems and sexual conflict. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A. (2014). Behavioral ecology as big science: 25 years of asking the same questions. Behav. Ecol., 25, 1283–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, A. and Russell, A. F. (2011) Cooperative breeding: a question of climate? Curr. Biol., 21, R195–R197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwallis, C. K., West, S. A., Davis, K. E., and Griffin, A. S. (2010). Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature, 466, 969–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covas, R. and Griesser, M. (2007). Life history and the evolution of family living in birds. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 274, 1349–1357.Google ScholarPubMed
Covas, R., Du Plessis, M. A., and Doutrelant, C. (2008) Helpers in colonial cooperatively breeding sociable weavers Philetairus socius contribute to buffer the effects of adverse breeding conditions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 63, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. L. and Jamieson, I. G. (1990). Pukeko: different approaches and some different answers. In: Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Behavior, ed. Stacey, P. B. and Koenig, W. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J. L. and Hatchwell, B. J. (2004). Fitness consequences of helping. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J. L., Koenig, W. D., and Pitelka, F. A. (1996). Fitness consequences of helping behavior in the western bluebird. Behav. Ecol., 7, 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerr, E. D. and Doerr, V. A. J. (2006). Comparative demography of treecreepers: evaluating hypotheses for the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding. Anim. Behav., 72, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. V. and Naeem, S. (1993). The phylogenetic component of cooperative breeding in perching birds. Am. Nat., 141, 754–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, J., Dickinson, J. L., Hatchwell, B. J., and Griesser, M. (2004). Delayed dispersal. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekstrom, J. M. M., Burke, T., Randrianaina, L., and Birkhead, T. R. (2007). Unusual sex roles in a highly promiscuous parrot: the greater vasa parrot Caracopsis vasa. Ibis, 149, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S. T. (1982). The evolution of helping I. An ecological constraints model. Am. Nat., 119, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S. T. (1990). White-fronted bee-eaters: helping in a colonially nesting species. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 487–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S. T. (1995). An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 92, 8092–8099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emlen, S. T. (1996). Reproductive sharing in different types of kin associations. Am. Nat., 148, 756–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S. T. (1997). Predicting family dynamics in social vertebrates. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 4th ed., ed. Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 228–253.Google Scholar
Emlen, S. T. and Wrege, P. H. (1991). Breeding biology of white-fronted bee-eaters at Nakuru: the influence of helpers on breeder fitness. J. Anim. Ecol., 60, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessl, B., Kleindorfer, S., Hoi, H., and Lorenz, K. (1996). Extra male parental behaviour: evidence for an alternative mating strategy in the moustached warbler Acrocephalus melanopogon. J. Avian Biol., 27, 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchwell, B. J. and Komdeur, J. (2000). Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Anim. Behav., 59, 1079–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinsohn, R. G. (1991). Kidnapping and reciprocity in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Anim. Behav., 41, 1097–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinsohn, R. G. (2004). Parental care, load-lightening, and costs. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinsohn, R. G. and Cockburn, A. (1994). Helping is costly to young birds in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 256, 293–298.Google Scholar
Jetz, W. and Rubenstein, D. R. (2011). Environmental uncertainty and the global biogeography of cooperative breeding in birds. Curr. Biol., 21, 72–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, L. and Reeve, H. K. (1994). Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends Ecol. Evol., 9, 98–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingma, S. A., Santema, P., Taborsky, M., and Komdeur, J. (2014). Group augmentation and the evolution of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol., 29, 476–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, W. D. (1981). Reproductive success, group size, and the evolution of cooperative breeding in the acorn woodpecker. Am. Nat., 117, 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W. D. and Haydock, J. (2004). Incest and incest avoidance. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W. D. and Mumme, R. L. (1987). Population Ecology of the Cooperatively Breeding Acorn Woodpecker. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, W. D. and Pitelka, F. A. (1981). Ecological factors and kin selection in the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. In: Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory, ed. R. D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle. Concord, MA: Chiron press, pp. 261–280.Google Scholar
Koenig, W. D. and Walters, E. L. (2015). Temporal variability and cooperative breeding: testing the bet-hedging hypothesis in the acorn woodpecker. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 282, 20151742.Google Scholar
Koenig, W. D., Pitelka, F. A., Carmen, W. J., Mumme, R. L., and Stanback, M. T. (1992). The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. Q. Rev. Biol., 67, 111–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, W. D., Van Vuren, D., and Hooge, P. N. (1996). Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol., 12, 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W. D., Haydock, J., and Stanback, M. T. (1998). Reproductive roles in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker: incest avoidance versus reproductive competition. Am. Nat., 151, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, W. D., Walters, E. L., and Haydock, J. (2011). Variable helpers effects, ecological conditions, and the evolution of cooperative breeding in the acorn woodpecker. Am. Nat., 178, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kokko, H. and Ekman, J. (2002). Delayed dispersal as a route to breeding: territorial inheritance, safe havens, and ecological constraints. Am. Nat., 160, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kokko, H., Johnstone, R. A., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2001). The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 268, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, K. L. and Russell, A. F. (2014). Kin-selected cooperation without lifetime monogamy: human insights and animal implications. Trends Ecol. Evol., 29, 600–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukas, D. and Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2012). Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 279, 2151–2156.Google ScholarPubMed
Magrath, R. D. (2001). Group breeding dramatically increases reproductive success of yearling but not older female scrubwrens: a model for cooperatively breeding birds? J. Anim. Ecol., 70, 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magrath, R. D. and Whittingham, L. A. (1997). Subordinate males are more likely to help if unrelated to the breeding female in cooperatively breeding white-browed scrubwrens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 41, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magrath, R. D., Johnstone, R. A., and Heinsohn, R. G. (2004). Reproductive skew. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J., Nam, K.-B., Beckerman, A. P., and Hatchwell, B. J. (2010). Consequences of “load-lightening” for future indirect fitness gains by helpers in a cooperatively breeding bird. J. Anim. Ecol., 79, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, R. A. and Langmore, N. E. (1993). Dominant males punish helpers for temporary defection in superb fairy-wrens. Anim. Behav., 45, 830–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonacs, P. and Hager, R. (2011). The past, present and future of reproductive skew theory and experiments. Biol. Rev., 86, 271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruett-Jones, S. G. and Lewis, M. J. (1990). Sex ratio and habitat limitation promote delayed dispersal in superb fairy-wrens. Nature, 348, 541–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raihani, N. J., Thornton, A., and Bshary, R. (2012). Punishment and cooperation in nature. Trends Ecol. Evol., 27, 288–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeve, H. K., Westneat, D. F., Noon, W. A., Sherman, P. W., and Aquadro, C. F. (1990). DNA "fingerprinting" reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 87, 2496–2500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyer, H.-U. (1980). Investment and relatedness: a cost/benefit analysis of breeding and helping in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis). Anim. Behav., 32,1163–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyer, H.-U. (1990). Pied kingfishers: ecological causes and reproductive consequences of cooperative breeding. In: Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Behavior, ed. Stacey, P. B. and Koenig, W. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 527–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riehl, C. (2013). Evolutionary routes to non-kin cooperative breeding in birds. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 280, 20132245.Google ScholarPubMed
Rowley, I. and Russell, E. (1990). Splendid fairy-wrens: demonstrating the importance of longevity. In: Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Behavior, ed. Stacey, P. B. and Koenig, W. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2–30.Google Scholar
Rowley, I., Russell, E., and Brooker, M. (1993). Inbreeding in birds. In: The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding, ed. Thornhill, N. W.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 304–328.Google Scholar
Royle, N. J., Russell, A. F., and Wilson, A. J. (2014). The evolution of flexible parenting. Science, 345, 776–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubenstein, D. R. (2011). Spatiotemporal environmental variation, risk aversion and the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 108, 10816–10822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, D. R. and Lovette, I. J. (2007). Temporal environmental variability drives the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Curr. Biol., 17, 1414–1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, A. F., Langmore, N. E., Cockburn, A., Astheimer, L. B., and Kilner, R. M. (2007). Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds. Science, 317, 941–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoech, S. J., Reynolds, S. J., and Boughton, R. K. (2004). Endocrinology. In: Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, ed. Koenig, W. D. and Dickinson, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, S.-F. and Reeve, H. K. (2010). Reproductive skew theory unified: the general bordered tug-of-war model. J. Theor. Biol., 263, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. N. M. (1990). Summary. In: Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Behavior, ed. Stacey, P. B. and Koenig, W. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, P. B. and Koenig, W. D. (eds.) (1990). Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, P. B. and Ligon, J. D. (1987). Territory quality and dispersal options in the acorn woodpecker, and a challenge to the habitat-saturation model of cooperative breeding. Am. Nat., 130, 654–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, P. B. and Ligon, J. D. (1991). The benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis for the evolution of cooperative breeding: variation in territory quality and group size effects. Am. Nat., 137, 831–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starrfelt, J. and Kokko, H. (2012). Bet-hedging – a triple trade-off between means, variances and correlations. Biol. Rev., 87, 742–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, C. A. (2012). Cooperation and competition in kin associations. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Webster, M. S., Pruett-Jones, S., Westneat, D. F., and Arnold, S. J. (1995). Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution, 49, 1147–1157.Google ScholarPubMed
Whittingham, L. A., Dunn, P. O., and Magrath, R. D. (1997). Relatedness, polyandry and extra-group paternity in the cooperatively-breeding white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 40, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×