Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: December 2011

Chapter 14 - Epidural and intrathecal opiates and outcome

Summary

The two most commonly used techniques in clinical use are the loss of resistance to air and to normal saline. The term loss of resistance refers to the subjective feel of a change in resistance while the epidural needle penetrates the interspinous ligament, the ligamentum flavum, and subsequently into the epidural space. This chapter evaluates whether, during the loss of resistance technique, air or saline used during epidural anesthesia influences either the efficacy of regional blockade or the incidence of complications such as accidental dural puncture rate and postdural puncture headache (PDPH). There are few prospective, controlled, randomized double-blind trials comparing the complications of air vs. saline in identifying the epidural space. Using saline as part of a loss of resistance technique to identify the epidural space is probably the most widely accepted practice worldwide among anesthesiologists.

References

1. WangJ K, NaussL A & ThomasJ E. Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man. Anesthesiology 1979; 50: 149–51.
2. LoperK A, ReadyL B, DowneyMet al. Epidural and intravenous fentanyl are clinically equivalent after knee surgery. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 72–5.
3. GuinardJ P, MavrocordatosP, ChioleroR. et al. A randomized comparison of intravenous versus lumbar and thoracic epidural fentanyl for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesthesiology 1992; 6: 1108–15.
4. D’AngeloR, GerancherJ C, EisenachJ C & RaphaelB L. Epidural fentanyl produces labour analgesia by a spinal mechanism. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 1519–23.
5. CohenS, PantuckC B, AmarD, et al. The primary action of epidural fentanyl after caesarean delivery is via a spinal mechanism. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 674–9.
6. JustinsD, FrancisD M, HoultonP G & ReynoldsF. A controlled trial of extradural fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 409–14.
7. CellenoD & CapognaG. Epidural fentanyl plus bupivacaine 0.125 percent for labour analgesia: analgesic effects. Can J Anesth 1988; 35: 375–8.
8. CohenS E, HalpernJ, SubakL L & BroseW G. Analgesia after cesarean delivery: patient evaluations and costs of five opioid techniques. Reg Anesth 1991; 16: 141–9.
9. CarvalhoB, RolandL M, ChuL Fet al. Single-dose, extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) compared to conventional epidural morphine for post-cesarean section pain. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 176–83.
10. HalpernS, ArellanoR, PrestonRet al. Epidural morphine vs hydromorphone in post-Caesarean section patients. Can J Anesth 1996; 43: 595–8.
11. WeeM Y K, BrownH & ReynoldsF. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for caesarean sections: implications for the anaesthetist. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14: 147–58.
12. RoyJ D, GirardM & DroletP. Intrathecal meperidine decreases shivering during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 230–4.
13. LuJ K, ManullangT R, StaplesM H, et al. Maternal respiratory arrests, severe hypotension, and fetal distress after administration of intrathecal sufentanil, and bupivacaine after intravenous fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 170–2.
14. BernardsC M. Understanding the physiology and pharmacology of epidural and intrathecal opioids. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2002; 16: 489–505.
15. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Respiratory Depression Associated with Neuraxial Opioid Administration. https://ecommerce.asahq.org/p-320-practice-guidelines-for-the-prevention-detection-and-management-of-respiratory-depression.aspx [Accessed July 2011]
16. NorrisM C, GriecoW M, BorkowskiMet al. Complications of labor analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal–epidural techniques. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 529–37.
17. AsokumarB, NewmanL M, McCarthyR Jet al. Intrathecal bupivacaine reduces pruritus and prolongs duration of fentanyl analgesia during labor: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1309–15.
18. RawalN, MolleforsK, AxelssonKet al. An experimental study of urodynamic effects of epidural morphine and of naloxone reversal. Anesth Analg 1983; 62: 641–7.
19. ValleyM A, BourkeD L & McKenzieA M. Recurrence of thoracic and labial herpes simplex virus infection in a patient receiving fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 1056–7.
20. PorterJ, BonelloE & ReynoldsF. Effect of epidural fentanyl on neonatal respiration. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 79–85.
21. LoftusJ R, HillH & CohenS E. Placental transfer and neonatal effects of epidural sufentanil and fentanyl administered with bupivacaine during labour. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 300–8.
22. ReynoldsF, SharmaS K & SeedP T. Analgesia in labour and fetal acid-base balance: a meta-analysis comparing epidural with systemic opioid analgesia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109: 1344–53.
23. ClarkeV T, SmileyR M & FinsterM. Uterine hyperactivity after intrethecal injection of fentanyl for analgesia during labour: a cause of fetal bradycardia? Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1083.
24. Van de VeldeM, TeunkensA, HanssensM, et al. Intrathecal sufentanil and fetal heart rate abnormalities: a double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial comparing two forms of combined spinal-epidural analgesia with epidural analgesia in labor. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1153–9.
25. BirnbachD J, MatutJ, SteinD Jet al. The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 410–3.