Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T23:27:34.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Closeness, Recipient Response, and Interaction Effectiveness: An Application of the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model in Mental Health Disclosures

from Part II - Information Management in Health and Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Jennifer A. Theiss
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Kathryn Greene
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdullah, T., & Brown, T. L. (2011). Mental illness stigma and ethnocultural beliefs, values, and norms: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 934948. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.05.003Google Scholar
Afifi, T., & Steuber, K. (2009). The revelation risk model (RRM): Factors that predict the revelation of secrets and the strategies used to reveal them. Communication Monographs, 76, 144176. doi: 10.1080/03637750902828412Google Scholar
Ahrens, C. E., & Campbell, R. (2000). Assisting rape victims as they recover from rape: The impact on friends. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 959986. doi: 10.1177/088626000015009004Google Scholar
Ahrens, C. E., Campbell, R., Ternier‐Thames, N. K., Wasco, S. M., & Sefl, T. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of rape survivors’ first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 3849. doi: 10.1111/j.1471–6402.2007.00329.xGoogle Scholar
American College Health Association. (2012). American college health association national college health assessment II: Reference group executive summary Spring 2012. Retrieved from: www.acha-ncha.org/docs/ACHA-NCHA-II_UNDERGRAD_ReferenceGroup_ExecutiveSummary_Spring2012Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2015). What is mental illness? Retrieved from: www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/what-is-mental-illnessGoogle Scholar
Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., Walsh, W. A., Cohn, E. S., & Ward, S. (2010). Friends of survivors: The community impact of unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 242256. doi: 10.1177/0886260509334407Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588606. doi: doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.88.3.588Google Scholar
Brohan, E., Henderson, C., Wheat, K., Malcolm, E., Clement, S., Barley, E. A., … Thronicroft, G. (2012). Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace. BMC Psychiatry, 2, 1124. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12–11Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Buchanan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62, 10081029. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8624.1991.tb01586.xGoogle Scholar
Bute, J. J. (2013). The discursive dynamics of disclosure and avoidance: Evidence from a study of infertility. Western Journal of Communication, 77, 164185. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2012.695425Google Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., Afifi, W. A., Carpenter‐Theune, K. E., & Miller, L. E. (2005). Reasons for, and consequences of, revealing personal secrets in close relationships: A longitudinal study. Personal Relationships, 12, 4359. doi: 10.1111/j.1350–4126.2005.00101.xGoogle Scholar
Chaudoir, S. R., & Fisher, J. D. (2010). The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision-making and post-disclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 236256. doi: 10.1037/a0018193Google Scholar
Chaudoir, S. R., & Quinn, D. M. (2010). Revealing concealable stigmatized identities: The impact of disclosure motivations and positive first-disclosure experiences on fear of disclosure and well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 570584. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–4560.2010.01663.xGoogle Scholar
Checton, M. G., Magsamen-Conrad, K., Venetis, M. K., & Greene, K. (2015). A dyadic approach: Applying the developmental-conceptual model to couples coping with chronic illness. Health Education & Behavior, 42, 257267. doi: 10.1177/1090198114557121Google Scholar
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101109. doi: 10.1080/01650250444000405Google Scholar
Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., Greene, K., Serovich, J., & Elwood, W. N. (2004). Reasons for HIV disclosure/nondisclosure in close relationships: Testing a model of HIV-disclosure decision making. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 23, 747767. doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.6.747.54804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinos, S., Stevens, S., Serfaty, M., Weich, S., & King, M. (2004). Stigma: The feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 176181. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.2.176Google Scholar
Dunn, P. C., Vail-Smith, K., & Knight, S. M. (1999). What date/acquaintance rape victims tell others: A study of college student recipients of disclosure. Journal of American College Health, 47, 213219. doi: 10.1080/07448489909595650Google Scholar
Goldsmith, D. J., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Health Communication Research, 26, 234263. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2958.2000.tb00757.xGoogle Scholar
Greene, K. (2009). An integrated model of health disclosure decision-making. In Afifi, T. D. & Afifi, W. A. (Eds.), Uncertainty and information regulation in interpersonal contexts: Theories and applications (pp. 226253). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greene, K., Derlega, V. L., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409428). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, K., Magsamen-Conrad, K., Venetis, M. K., Checton, M. G., Bagdasarov, Z., & Banerjee, S. C. (2012). Assessing health diagnosis disclosure decisions in relationships: Testing the disclosure decision-making model. Health Communication, 27, 356368. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.586988Google Scholar
Henderson, C., Evans-Lacko, S., & Thornicroft, G. (2013). Mental illness stigma, help seeking, and public health programs. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 777780. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301056Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 155. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118Google Scholar
Iarovici, D. (2014). Mental health issues and the university student. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Walters, E. E., & Forthofer, M. S. (1998). The social consequences of psychiatric disorders, III: Probability of marital stability. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 10921096. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.8.1092Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83104. doi: org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83Google Scholar
Magsamen-Conrad, K. (2014). Dimensions of anticipated reaction in information management: Anticipating responses and outcomes. Review of Communication, 14, 314333. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2014.986514Google Scholar
Magsamen-Conrad, K., Checton, M. G., Venetis, M. K., & Greene, K. (2015). Communication efficacy and couples’ cancer management: Applying a dyadic appraisal model. Communication Monographs, 82, 179200. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.971415Google Scholar
Mathews, A., Derlega, V. J., & Morrow, J. (2006). What is highly personal information and how is it related to self-disclosure decision-making? The perspective of college students. Communication Research Reports, 23, 8592. doi: 10.1080/08824090600668915Google Scholar
National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2012). College students speak: Survey report on mental health. Retrieved from: www.nami.org/collegereport.Google Scholar
Oehlert, G. W. (1992). A note on the delta method. The American Statistician, 46, 2729. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1992.10475842Google Scholar
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Shields, A. (2017). Eating disorder disclosure/nondisclosure in close relationships: Applying the Disclosure Decision-Making Model. Unpublished master’s thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
Vangelisti, A., Caughlin, J., & Timmerman, L. (2001). Criteria for revealing family secrets. Communication Monographs, 68, 127. doi: 10.1080/03637750128052Google Scholar
Venetis, M. K., Chernichky, S., & Gettings, P. (2015, November). Predicting mental health disclosure strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Venetis, M. K., Chernichky-Karcher, S., & Gettings, P. E. (2018). Disclosing mental illness information to a friend: Exploring how the Disclosure Decision-Making Model informs strategy selection. Health Communication, 33, 653663. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1294231Google Scholar
Venetis, M. K., Greene, K., Checton, M. G., & Magsamen-Conrad, K. (2015). Decision making in cancer-related topic avoidance. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 306313. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.965364Google Scholar
Venetis, M. K., Magsamen-Conrad, K., Checton, M. G., & Greene, K. (2017, May). Ongoing disclosure in cancer communication: The role of perceived response. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Williams, S. L., & Mickelson, K. D. (2008). A paradox of support seeking and rejection among the stigmatized. Personal Relationships, 15, 493509. doi: 10.1111/j.1475–6811.2008.00212.xGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×