Acemoglu, D. (2005). Constitutions, politics and economics: A review essay on Persson and Tabellini’s The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(4), 1025–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–401.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2005). A response to Albouy’s “A Reexamination Based on Improved Settler Mortality Data.” Mimeo: MIT.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2006). Reply to the revised (May 2006) version of David Albouy’s “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Investigation of the Settler Mortality Data.” Mimeo.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2000). Why did the West extend the franchise? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1167–99.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2001). A theory of political transitions. American Economic Review, 91(4), 938–63.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aghion, Ph., Alesina, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Endogenous political institutions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 565–611.Google Scholar

Aghion, Ph., Alesina, A., & Trebbi, F. (2005). Choosing Electoral Rules: Theory and Evidence from US Cities. Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper 2065.Google Scholar

Aidt, T. S., Dutta, J., & Loukoianova, E. (2006). Democracy comes to Europe: Franchise extension and fiscal outcomes 1830–1938. European Economic Review, 50(2), 249–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aidt, T. S., & Jensen, P. S. (2014). Workers of the world, unite! Franchise extensions and the threat of revolution in Europe, 1820–1938. European Economic Review, 72, 52–75.Google Scholar

Albouy, D. (2008). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Investigation of the Settler Mortality Data (June 2008). NBER Working Paper, W14130.Google Scholar

Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2004). Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2003). The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alt, J., & Lassen, D. (2003). The political economy of institutions and corruption in American States. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 5(3), 341–65.Google Scholar

Anderson, G., Martin, D., Shugart, W. II, & Tollison, R. (1990). Behind the veil: The political economy of constitutional change. In: Crain, W. & Tollison, R. (eds.), Predicting Politics: Essays in Empirical Public Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 89–100.Google Scholar

Anderson, G., Shugart, W. II, & Tollison, R. (1989). On the incentives of judges to enforce legislative wealth transfers. The Journal of Law & Economics, 32, 215–28.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ardanaz, M., & Scartascini, C. (2014). The economic effects of constitutions: Do budget institutions make forms of government more alike? Constitutional Political Economy, 25(3), 301–29.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1932). The Politics, with an English translation by H. Rackham, London: W. Heinemann.Google Scholar

Arndt, Chr., & Oman, Ch. (2006). Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Arnold, F., & Freier, R. (2015). Signature requirements and citizen initiatives: Quasi-experimental evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 162(1), 43–56.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, J. V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89(7), 1157–89.Google Scholar

Asatryan, Z. (2016). The indirect effects of direct democracy: Local government size and non-budgetary voter initiatives in Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 23(3), 580–601.Google Scholar

Asatryan, Z., Baskaran, T., Grigoriadis, T., & Heinemann, F. (2017). Direct democracy and local public finances under cooperative federalism. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119(3), 801–20.Google Scholar

Asatryan, Z., & de Witte, K. (2015). Direct democracy and local government efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 58–66.Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank (2005). Country Governance Assessment: Philippines. www.adb.org/Documents/Reports/CGA.Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, D. (2000). Redistributing income under proportional representation. Journal of Political Economy, 108(6), 1235–69.Google Scholar

Bannon, A. L. (2007). Designing a constitution-drafting process: Lessons from Kenya. The Yale Law Journal, 116, 1824–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barro, R. J. (1997). Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Barro, R. J. (2000). Rule of law, democracy, and economic performance. In: O’Driscoll, G. Jr., Holmes, K., & Kirkpatrick, M. (eds.), 2000 Index of Economic Freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 31–49.Google Scholar

Barzel, Y. (1997). Parliament as a wealth-maximizing institution: The right to the residual and the right to vote. International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 455–74.Google Scholar

Barzel, Y. (2000). Property rights and the evolution of the state. Economics of Governance, 1(1), 25–51.Google Scholar

Baskaran, T., & da Fonseca, M. L. (2016). Electoral competition and endogenous political institutions: Quasi-experimental evidence from Germany. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 122, 43–61.Google Scholar

Beard, C. (1913/1986). An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States; with a New Introduction by Forrest Mc Donald. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Beath, A., Christia, F., & Enikolopov, R. (2017). Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. Afghanistan Journal of Development Economics, 124, 199–213.Google Scholar

Beetsma, R. M., & Debrun, X. (2016). Fiscal Councils: Rationale and Effectiveness. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar

Ben-Bassat, A. & Dahan, M. (2008). Social rights in the constitution and in practice. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 103–19.Google Scholar

Benoit, K. (2004). Models of electoral system change. Electoral Studies, 23, 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, K. (2007). Electoral laws as political consequences: Explaining the origins and change of electoral institutions. Political Science, 10(1), 363.Google Scholar

Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Are voters better informed when they have a larger say in politics? – Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland. Public Choice, 119, 31–59.Google Scholar

Berggren, N. (2003). The benefits of economic freedom: A survey. The Independent Review, 8(2), 193–211.Google Scholar

Berggren, N., & Jordahl, H. (2005). Does free trade really reduce growth? Public Choice, 122, 99–114.Google Scholar

Besley, T., & Payne, A. (2003). Judicial accountability and economic policy outcomes: Evidence from employment discrimination charges. Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London, IFS Working Papers No. 03/11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2003.0311, Mimeo, June.Google Scholar

Besley, T. & Reynal-Querol, M. (2017). The Logic of Hereditary Rule: Theory and Evidence. CEPR Discussion Paper 11777.Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, Ch., & Rode, M. (Forthcoming). Regime types and regime change: A new dataset. Review of International Organizations.Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, Ch. and Voigt, S. (2017). Profiting from Natural Disaster? – Inquiring into the Effectiveness of Emergency Constitutions. Typescript. Universities of Aarhus and Hamburg.Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, Ch. and Voigt, S. (2018a). The architecture of emergency constitutions. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(1), 101–27.Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, Ch. and Voigt, S. (2018b). Why do governments call a state of emergency? European Journal of Political Economy, 54, 110–23.Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, Ch. and Voigt, S. (2019). Terrorism and Emergency Constitutions in the Muslim World. Typescript. Universities of Aarhus and Hamburg.Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, Ch. and Voigt, S. (2020). When does terror induce a states of emergency? And what are the effects? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(4) 579–613.Google Scholar

Blankart, Ch. (2000). The process of government centralization: A constitutional view. Constitutional Political Economy, 11(1), 27–39.Google Scholar

Blomberg, S., Hess, G., & Weerapana, A. (2004). The impact of voter initiatives on economic activity. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(1), 207–26.Google Scholar

Blume, L., Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2014). Correlates and Determinants of Direct Democracy. Available at SSRN 2542156.Google Scholar

Blume, L., Müller, J., & Voigt, S. (2009a). The economic effects of direct democracy – A first global assessment. Public Choice, 140, 431–61.Google Scholar

Blume, L., Müller, J., Voigt, S., & Wolf, C. (2009b). The economic effects of constitutions: Replicating–and Extending – Persson and Tabellini. Public Choice, 139, 197–225.Google Scholar

Blume, L., & Voigt, S. (2007). The economic effects of human rights. Kyklos, 60(4), 509–38.Google Scholar

Blume, L., & Voigt, S. (2011). Federalism and decentralization – A critical survey of frequently used indicators. Constitutional Political Economy, 22(3), 238–64.Google Scholar

Boix, C. (1999). Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 609–24.Google Scholar

Bordignon, M., Nannicini, T., & Tabellini, G. (2016). Moderating political extremism: Single round vs. runoff elections under plurality rule. American Economic Review, 106, 2349–70.Google Scholar

Bordo, M. D., Jonung, L., & Markiewicz, A. (2013). A fiscal union for the euro: Some lessons from history. CESifo Economic Studies, 59(3), 449–88.Google Scholar

Bradbury, J. C., & Crain, W. M. (2001). Legislative organization and government spending: cross-country evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 309–25.Google Scholar

Bradbury, J.C., & Crain, W. M. (2002). Bicameral legislatures and fiscal policy. Southern Economic Journal, 68(3), 646–59.Google Scholar

Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The Power to Tax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J. (1985). The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (2000). Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, G., & Kliemt, H. (1994). Finite lives and social institutions. Kyklos, 47(4), 551–71.Google Scholar

Brennan, G., & Kliemt, H. (2019). Fiscal powers revisited: The Leviathan model after 40 years. In: Congleton, R., Grofman, B., & Voigt, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press, vol. 2, 263–85.Google Scholar

Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision – The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. (1975). The Limits of Liberty – Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. (1987). The constitution of economic policy. American Economic Review, 77, 243–50.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J., & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent – Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bucur, C. & Rasch, B. E. (2019). Institutions for amending constitutions. In: Congleton, R., Grofman, B., & Voigt, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press, vol. 2, 156–76.Google Scholar

Carlsson, F., & Lundström, S. (2002). Economic freedom and growth: Decomposing the effects. Public Choice, 112, 335–44.Google Scholar

Caruso, G., Scartascini, C., & Tommasi, M. (2015). Are we all playing the same game? The economic effects of constitutions depend on the degree of institutionalization. European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 212–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheibub, J. A., Elkins, Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2013). Beyond presidentialism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 515–44.Google Scholar

Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilton, A. S., & Versteeg, M. (2015). Do constitutional rights make a difference? American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar

Colomer, J. (2005). It’s parties that choose electoral systems (or, Duverger’s law upside down). Political Studies, 53, 1–21.Google Scholar

Congleton, R. D. (2003). On the merits of bicameral legislatures: Policy stability within partisan polities. Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, 22, 29–49.Google Scholar

Congleton, R. D. (2006). On the merits of bicameral legislatures: Intragovernmental bargaining and policy stability. In Congleton, R. D. (ed.), Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 163–88.Google Scholar

Congleton, R. D. (2011). Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Reform, Liberalism, and the Rise of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crain, W. M., & Tollison, R. (1979). Constitutional change in an interest-group perspective. Journal of Legal Studies, 8, 165–75.Google Scholar

Cusack, T., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2007). Economic interests and the origins of electoral systems. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 373–91.Google Scholar

Cusack, T., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2010). Coevolution of capitalism and political representation: The choice of electoral systems. American Political Science Review, 104(02), 393–403.Google Scholar

Cutrone, M., & McCarty, N. (2006). Does bicameralism matter? In: Weingast, B. & Wittman, D. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 180–95.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. (2008). Direct democracy and good governance: Does it matter? In: Bowler, Sh. & Glazer, A. (eds.), Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Davoodi, H., & Zou, H. F. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(2), 244–57.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. (1985). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Diermeier, D., & Myerson, R. (1999). Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1182–96.Google Scholar

Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 595–619.Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, H., & Ulubasoglu, M. (2008). Democracy and economic growth: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Duverger, M. (1980). A new political system model: Semi-presidential government. European Journal of Political Research, 8(2), 165–87.Google Scholar

Eggers, A., Freier, R., Grembi, V., & Nannicini, T. (2018). Regression discontinuity designs based on population thresholds: Pitfalls and solutions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 210–29.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, T. A., LeVan, A. C., & Maboudi, T. (2015). When talk trumps text: The democratizing effects of deliberation during constitution-making, 1974–2011. American Political Science Review, 109(03), 592–612.Google Scholar

Elazar, D. (1995). From statism to federalism: A paradigm shift. Publius, 25(2), 5–18.Google Scholar

Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., & Melton, J. (2009).The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., & Melton, J. (2014). The content of authoritarian constitutions. In: Ginsburg, T. & Simpser, A. (eds.), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–64.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1984). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1993). Constitution-making in Eastern Europe: Rebuilding the boat in the open sea. Public Administration, 71(1/2), 169–217.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1995). Forces and mechanisms in the constitution-making process. Duke Law Journal, 45(2), 364–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, J. (2000a). Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2000b). Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2, 345–421.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2012). The optimal design of a constituent assembly. In: Landemore, H. & Elster, J. (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–72.Google Scholar

Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11–12), 2261–90.Google Scholar

Facchini, G., & Testa, C. (2016). Corruption and bicameral reforms. Social Choice and Welfare, 47(2), 387–411.Google Scholar

Farber, D. (2002). Rights as signals. Journal of Legal Studies, 31, 83–98.Google Scholar

Feld, L. P., & Kirchgässner, G. (2001). The political economy of direct legislation: Direct democracy and local decision-making. Economic Policy, 33, 329–63.Google Scholar

Feld, L. P., Kirchgässner, G., & Schaltegger, Chr. (2003). Decentralized Taxation and the Size of Government: Evidence from Swiss State and Local Governments. CESifo Working Paper 1087, December.Google Scholar

Feld, L. P., & Savioz, M. (1997). Direct democracy matters for economic performance: An empirical investigation. Kyklos, 50(4), 507–38.Google Scholar

Feld, L. P., Schaltegger, Ch., & Schnellenbach, J. (2008). On government centralization and fiscal referendums. European Economic Review, 52, 611–45.Google Scholar

Feld, L. P., & Voigt, S. (2003). Economic growth and judicial independence: Cross-country evidence using a new set of indicators. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feld, L. P., & Voigt, S. (2006). Making judges independent – Some proposals regarding the judiciary. In: Congleton, R. and Swedenborg, B. (eds.), Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 251–88.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, J. (1997). The politics of imperfection: The amendment of constitutions. Law and Social Inquiry, 22, 501.Google Scholar

Figueiredo, R. & Weingast, B. (2005). Self-enforcing federalism. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 21(1), 103–35.Google Scholar

Fish, M. S. (2006). Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies. Journal of Democracy, 17(1), 5–20.Google Scholar

Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–38.Google Scholar

Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2006). Direct democracy: Designing a living constitution. In: Congleton, R. (ed.), Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 39–80.Google Scholar

Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2018). Public choice and happiness. In: Congleton, R., Grofman, B., & Voigt, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., & Eavey, Ch. (1987). Laboratory results on Rawls’s distributive justice. British Journal of Political Science, 17, 1–21.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. (1964). The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Funk, P., & Gathmann, C. (2011). Does direct democracy reduce the size of government? New evidence from historical data, 1890–2000. The Economic Journal, 121(557), 1252–80.Google Scholar

Funk, P., & Gathmann, C. (2013). How do electoral systems affect fiscal policy? Evidence from cantonal parliaments, 1890–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(5), 1178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T., & Naticchionia, P. (2011). Electoral rules and politicians’ behavior: A micro test. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3), 144–74.Google Scholar

Gallie, W. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–98.Google Scholar

Gandhi, J. (2008). Dictatorial institutions and their impact on economic growth. European Journal of Sociology, 49(01), 3–30.Google Scholar

Gassebner, M., Lamla, M. J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2013). Extreme bounds of democracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(2), 171–97.Google Scholar

Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 115–44.Google Scholar

Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12(02), 313–31.Google Scholar

Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, J., & Thacker, Str. (2004). Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 295–330.Google Scholar

Gerring, J., Thacker, Str., & Moreno, C. (2006). Are Federal Systems Better Than Unitary Systems? Mimeo: Boston University.Google Scholar

Gerring, J., Ziblatt, D., Van Gorp, J., & Arevalo, J. (2011). An institutional theory of direct and indirect rule. World Politics, 63(03), 377–433.Google Scholar

Gilardi, F. (2002). Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: A comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 873–93.Google Scholar

Gilardi, F., & Maggetti, M. (2011). The independence of regulatory authorities. In: Levi Faur, D. (ed.), Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, Chapter 14, 201–15.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. (2002). Economic analysis and the design of constitutional courts. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 3(1), 49–85.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T., Elkins, Z., & Blount, J. (2009). Does the process of constitution-making matter? Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 5(5), 84–105.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T., & Melton, J. (2015). Does the constitutional amendment rule matter at all? Amendment cultures and the challenges of measuring amendment difficulty. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(3), 686–713.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. (2014). Why do countries adopt constitutional review? Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 30, 587–622.Google Scholar

Goderis, B., & Versteeg, M. (2014). The diffusion of constitutional rights. International Review of Law and Economics, 39, 1–19.Google Scholar

Golden, M., & Picci, L. (2005). Proposal for a new measure of corruption, illustrated with Italian data. Economics & Politics, 17(1), 37–75.Google Scholar

Goldwin, R., & Kaufman, A. (eds.). (1988). Constitution-Makers on Constitution-Making. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Gutmann, J., Hayo, B. & Voigt, S. (2017). Correlates and Determinants of Direct Democracy. Typescript.Google Scholar

Gutmann, J., Padovano, F., & Voigt, S. (2019). Perception vs. Experience: Explaining Differences in Corruption Measures Using Microdata. Munich: CESifo Working Paper No. 8027, December 2019.Google Scholar

Gutmann, J., & Voigt, S. (2016). Why Adopt a Federal Constitution? And Why Decentralize? – Searching for Proximate and Deep Causes. Typescript. Institute of Law & Economics, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar

Gutmann, J., & Voigt, S. (2018). Judicial independence in the EU: A puzzle. European Journal of Law and Economics, 1–18.Google Scholar

Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Block, W. (1996). Economic Freedom of the World: 1975–1995. Vancouver et al.: The Fraser Institute et al.Google Scholar

de Haan, J. (2007). Political institutions and economic growth reconsidered. Public Choice, 131, 281–92.Google Scholar

de Haan, J. & Eijffinger, S. (2019). The politics of central bank independence. In: Congleton, R., Grofman, B., & Voigt, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press, vol. 2, 499–519.Google Scholar

de Haan, J., & Sturm, J. E. (2000). On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 215–41.Google Scholar

Hadfield, G. K., & Weingast, B. R. (2014). Constitutions as coordinating devices. In: Galiani, S. & Sened, I. (eds.), Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 121–50.Google Scholar

Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1995). The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1997). The political economy of democratic transitions. Comparative Politics, 29(3), 263–83.Google Scholar

Hall, R. & Jones, Ch. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.Google Scholar

Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1788/1961). The Federalist Papers – With an Introduction, Table of Contents, and Index of Ideas by C. Rossiter. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar

Hanretty, C., & Koop, C. (2012). Measuring the formal independence of regulatory agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 198–216.Google Scholar

Hanssen, A. (2004). Is there a politically optimal level of judicial independence? American Economic Review, 94(3), 712–29.Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (1989). Why a constitution? In: Grofman, B. & Wittman, D. (eds.), The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism. New York: Agathon Press, 100–20.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. (1939). Economic conditions of inter-state federalism. The New Commonwealth Quarterly, 5(2), 131–49.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–30.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. (1979). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. (1988). The Fatal Conceit – The Errors of Socialism, ed. by Bartley III, W. W.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2007). Explaining de facto judicial independence. International Review of Law and Economics, 27(3), 269–90.Google Scholar

Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2010). Determinants of constitutional change: Why do countries change their form of government? Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(3), 283–305.Google Scholar

Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2013). Endogenous constitutions: Politics and politicians matter, economic outcomes don’t. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88, 47–61.Google Scholar

Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2016). Explaining constitutional change: The case of judicial independence. International Review of Law and Economics, 48, 1–13.Google Scholar

Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2019). The long-term relationship between de jure and de facto judicial independence. Economics Letters, 183, 108603.Google Scholar

Heller, W. (1997). Bicameralism and budget deficits: The effect of parliamentary structure on government spending. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22(4), 485–516.Google Scholar

Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.Google Scholar

Hinnerich, B. T., & Pettersson‐Lidbom, P. (2014). Democracy, redistribution, and political participation: Evidence from Sweden 1919–1938. Econometrica, 82(3), 961–93.Google Scholar

Holmes, S. (1988). Precommitment and the paradox of democracy. In: Elster, J. & Slagstad, R. (eds.), Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–240.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A., Niedzwiecki, S., Chapman Osterkatz, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1777/1987). Essays – Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. and with a Foreword, Notes, and Glossary by Miller, Eugene F., Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar

Inman, R., & Rubinfeld, D. (2016). Economics of federalism. In: Parisi, F. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100, 165–181.Google Scholar

Justesen, M. (2008). The effect of economic freedom on growth revisited: New evidence on causality from a panel of countries 1970–1999. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 642–60.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Worldwide Governance Indicators Project: Answering the Critics. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4149, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=965077.Google Scholar

Kirchgässner, G., & Frey, B. (1990). Volksabstimmung und direkte Demokratie: Ein Beitrag zur Verfassungsdiskussion. In: Klingmann, H. D. & Kaase, M. (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler – Analysen aus Anlaß der Bundestagswahl. Westdeutscher Verlag: Opladen, 42–69.Google Scholar

Knack, St. (2006). Measuring Corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A Critique of the Cross-Country Indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3968.Google Scholar

Knack, St., & Keefer, Ph. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207–27.Google Scholar

Kocher, M., Strauß, S., & Sutter, M. (2006). Individual or team decision-making – Causes and consequences of self-selection. Games and Economic Behavior, 56, 259–70.Google Scholar

Kreuzer, M. (2010). Historical knowledge and quantitative analysis: The case of the origins of proportional representation. American Political Science Review, 104(02), 369–92.Google Scholar

Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2000). The constitutional economics of autocratic succession. Public Choice, 103(1-2), 63–84.Google Scholar

Kurtz, M., & Schrank, A. (2007a). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 538–54.Google Scholar

Kurtz, M., & Schrank, A. (2007b). Conceptualizing and measuring institutions: A view from political science. Mimeo: Prepared for Second Workshop on Measuring Law & Institutions held in Paris December 14–15, 2007.Google Scholar

Landes, W., & Posner, R. (1975). The independent judiciary in an interest-group perspective. The Journal of Law & Economics, 18(3), 875–911.Google Scholar

Lascher, E., & Wassmer, R. (2007). Reconsidering Claims about the Secondary Benefits of Direct Democracy. Mimeo: Department of Public Policy and Administration, California State University at Sacramento.Google Scholar

Law, D., & Versteeg, M. (2013). Sham constitutions. California Law Review, 101(4), 863ff.Google Scholar

Lederman, D., Loayza, N., & Soares, R. (2005). Accountability and corruption. Economics & Politics, 17(1), 1–35.Google Scholar

Lessmann, C. (2014). Spatial inequality and development: Is there an inverted-U relationship? Journal of Development Economics, 106, 35–51.Google Scholar

Levmore, S. (1992). Bicameralism: When are two decisions better than one? International Review of Law and Economics, 12, 145–62.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1994). A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy – Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

List, J. A. (2011). Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 3–15.Google Scholar

Lizzeri, A., & Persico, N. (2001). The provision of public goods under alternative electoral incentives. American Economic Review, 91(1), 225–39.Google Scholar

Lizzeri, A., & Persico, N. (2004). Why did the elites extend the suffrage? Democracy and the scope of government, with an application to Britain’s “Age of Reform”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 705–63.Google Scholar

Ludwikowski, R. (1996). Constitution-Making in the Region of Former Soviet Dominance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Lutz, D. (1994). Toward a theory of constitutional amendment. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 355–70.Google Scholar

Lutz, D. (2006). Principles of Constitutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Majone, G. (1996). Temporal Consistency and Policy Credibility: Why Democracies Need Non-majoritarian Institutions. San Domenico di Fiesole: Robert Schuman Centre Working Paper RSC No. 95/57.Google Scholar

Marshall, G., & Trotter, D. (1984). Constitutional Conventions: The Rules and Forms of Political Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R., & Jaggers, K. (2018). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2016. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar

Matsusaka, J. (1995). Fiscal effects of the voter initiative: Evidence from the last 30 years. Journal of Political Economy, 102(2), 587–623.Google Scholar

Matsusaka, J. (2000). Fiscal effects of the voter initiative in the first half of the twentieth century. The Journal of Law & Economics, 43, 619–50.Google Scholar

Matsusaka, J. (2004). For the Many or the Few. The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCormick, R., & Tollison, R. (1981). Politicians, Legislation, and the Economy – An Inquiry into the Interest-Group Theory of Government. Boston: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

McGuire, M., & Olson, M. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: The invisible hand. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 72–96.Google Scholar

Melton, J., & Ginsburg, T. (2014). Does de jure judicial independence really matter? A reevaluation of explanations for judicial independence. Journal of Law and Courts, 2(2), 187–217.Google Scholar

Meltzer, A., & Richard, S. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914–27.Google Scholar

Metelska-Szaniawska, Katarzyna (2016). Economic Effects of Post-Socialist Constitutions 25 Years from the Outset of Transition. Polish Studies in Economics, vol. 7. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Michel, S., & Cofone, I. N. (2017). Majority rules in constitutional referendums. Kyklos, 70(3), 402–24.Google Scholar

Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R., & Ristagno, M. (2002). Electoral systems and public spendine. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 609–57.Google Scholar

Miller, G., & Hammond, T. (1989). Stability and efficiency in a separation-of-powers constitutional system. In: Grofman, B. & Wittman, D. (eds.), The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism. New York: Agathon Press, 85–99.Google Scholar

Miller, L. (2010). Framing the State in Times of Transition – Case Studies in Constitution Making. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar

Muthoo, A., & Shepsle, K. (2008). The constitutional choice of bicameralism. In: Helpman, E. (ed.), Institutions and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 249–92.Google Scholar

Mueller, D. (1996). Constitutional Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mulligan, C. B., Gil, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Do democracies have different public policies than nondemocracies? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), 51–74.Google Scholar

North, D. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and Social Orders – A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., Webb, S. B., & Weingast, B. R. (eds.). (2013). In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics, and the Problems of Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–49.Google Scholar

Oates, W. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 349–73.Google Scholar

Olken, B. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200–49.Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87(03), 567–76.Google Scholar

Ordeshook, P. (1992). Constitutional stability. Constitutional Political Economy, 3(2), 137–75.Google Scholar

Ordeshook, P. (1993). Some rules of constitutional design. In: Frankel, P. E., Miller, F., & Paul, J. (eds.), Liberalism and the Economic Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198–232.Google Scholar

Padovano, F., Sgarra, G., & Fiorino, N. (2003). Judicial branch, checks and balances and political accountability. Constitutional Political Economy, 14(1), 47–70.Google Scholar

Panizza, U. (2001). Electoral rules, political systems, and institutional quality. Economics & Politics, 13(3), 311–42.Google Scholar

Patterson, S. C., & Mughan, A. (1999). Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Persson, T. (2005). Forms of Democracy, Policy and Economic Development. Mimeo, January.Google Scholar

Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (1997). Separation of powers and political accountability. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 310–27.Google Scholar

Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Comparative politics and public finance. Journal of Political Economy, 108(6), 1121–61.Google Scholar

Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (2007). Electoral rules and government spending in parliamentary democracies. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(2), 155–88.Google Scholar

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics – Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge et al.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2002). Do Electoral Cycles Differ across Political Systems? Mimeo: Universities of Stockholm and Bocconi.Google Scholar

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2003). The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2006). Democracy and development. American Economic Review, 96(2), 319–24.Google Scholar

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2007). The Growth Effect of Democracy: Is It Heterogeneous and How Can It Be Estimated? CESifo Working Paper, 2016.Google Scholar

Pommerehne, W. (1983). Private vs. öffentliche Müllabfuhr: Nochmals betrachtet. Finanzarchiv, 41, 466–75.Google Scholar

Pommerehne, W. (1990). The empirical relevance of comparative institutional analysis. European Economic Review, 34, 458–68.Google Scholar

Plümper, Th., & Martin, Chr. (2003). Democracy, government spending, and economic growth: A political-economic explanation of the Barro-effect. Public Choice, 117, 27–50.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market – Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 51–69.Google Scholar

Ramseyer, M. (1994). The puzzling (in)dependence of courts: A comparative approach. Journal of Legal Studies, 23(2), 721–47.Google Scholar

Rasch, B. E., & Congleton, R. (2006). Constitutional amendment procedures. In: Congleton, R. (ed.), Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 319–42.Google Scholar

Raudla, Ringa (2010). Explaining Constitution-Makers’ Preferences: The Cases of Estonia and the United States. Constitutional Political Economy, 21(3):249–69.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar

Reynolds, A. (2002). The Architecture of Democracy – Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, W. (1975). Federalism. In: Greenstein, Fred I. & Polsby, Nelson (eds.), The Handbook of Political Science, Vol. V: Government Institutions and Processes. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Riker, W. (1983). Political theory and the art of heresthetics. In: Finifter, A. (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 47–67.Google Scholar

Riker, W. (1984). The heresthetics of constitution-making: The presidency in 1787, with comments on determinism and rational choice. American Political Science Review, 78, 1–16.Google Scholar

Robinson, J., & Torvik, R. (2016). Endogenous presidentialism. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(4), 907–42.Google Scholar

Rockey, J. (2012). Reconsidering the fiscal effects of constitutions. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(3), 313–23.Google Scholar

Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 670–87.Google Scholar

Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization, 57, 695–729.Google Scholar

Rodden, J., & Wibbels, E. (2002). Beyond the fiction of federalism – Macroeconomic management in multitiered systems. World Politics, 54, 494–531.Google Scholar

Rodrik, D. (2008). Second-best Institutions. Mimeo. Downloadable at: http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/Second-best%20institutions%20paper.pdf.Google Scholar

Roll, R., & Talbott, J. (2001). Why Many Developing Countries Just Aren’t. Mimeo: University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Sanz, C. (2017). Direct Democracy and Government Size: Evidence from Spain. Available at ssrnc.com.Google Scholar

Sartori, G. (1994). Comparative Constitutional Engineering. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Scully, G. (2001). Institutions, policy, and economic growth. In: Shughart, W. & Razzoli, L. (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Public Choice, Cheltenham et al.: Edward Elgar, 611–27.Google Scholar

Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralization in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40, 61–89.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shugart, W. & Tollison, R. (1998). Interest groups and the courts. George Mason Law Review, 6, 953–69.Google Scholar

Smith, D., & Tolbert, C. (2004). Educated by Initiative. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Spamann, H. (2015). Empirical comparative law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 131–53.Google Scholar

Spindler, Z., & de Vanssay, X. (2002). Constitutions and economic freedom: An international comparison. South African Journal of Economics, 70(6), 1135–46.Google Scholar

Stadelmann, D., Portmann, M., & Eichenberger, R. (2014). The law of large districts: How district magnitude affects the quality of political representation. European Journal of Political Economy, 35, 128–40.Google Scholar

Sutter, D. (1995). Potholes along the transition from authoritarian rule. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39(1), 110–28.Google Scholar

Sutter, D. (2006). The deterrent effects of the International Criminal Court. In: Voigt, S., Albert, M., & Schmidtchen, D. (eds.), International Conflict Resolution Conferences on New Political Economy, vol. 23.Google Scholar

Sutter, M., Haigner, S., & Kocher, M. (2010). Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Review of Economic Studies online first.Google Scholar

Tanzi, V. (2000). Some politically incorrect remarks on decentralization and public finance. In: Dethier, J.-J. (ed.), Governance, Decentralization and Reform in China, India and Russia. Boston et al.: Kluwer, 47–63.Google Scholar

Tavares, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2001). How democracy affects growth. European Economic Review, 45, 1341–78.Google Scholar

Tergiman, C. (2015). Institution design and public good provision: An experimental study of the vote of confidence procedure. Experimental Economics, 18(4), 697–717.Google Scholar

Testa, C. (2010). Bicameralism and corruption. European Economic Review, 54(2), 181–98.Google Scholar

Thatcher, M. (2002). Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: Pressures, functions and contextual mediation. West European Politics, 25(1), 125–47.Google Scholar

Thießen, U. (2003a). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in high income OECD countries. Fiscal Studies, 24(3), 237–74.Google Scholar

Thießen, U. (2003b). Fiscal Federalism in Western European and Selected Other Countries: Centralization or Decentralization? What Is Better for Economic Growth. Berlin: DIW.Google Scholar

Thomas, M. (2006). What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure? Mimeo: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar

Ticchi, D., & Vindigni, A. (2010). Endogenous constitutions. Economic Journal, 120(543), 1–39.Google Scholar

Tiebout, Ch. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–24.Google Scholar

Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399–457.Google Scholar

Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–44.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G., & Money, J. (1997). Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tullock, G. (1974). The Social Dilemma: The Economics of War and Revolution. Blacksburg, VA: University Publications.Google Scholar

Tullock, G. (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

de Vanssay, X., & Spindler, Z. (1994). Freedom and growth: Do constitutions matter? Public Choice, 78, 359–72.Google Scholar

Vaubel, R. (1996). Constitutional safeguards against centralization in federal states: An independent cross-section analysis. Constitutional Political Economy, 7(2), 79–102.Google Scholar

Vibert, F. (2007). The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Voigt, S. (1997). Positive constitutional economics – A survey. Public Choice, 90, 11–53.Google Scholar

Voigt, S. (1999). Explaining Constitutional Change – A Positive Economics Approach. Cheltenham et al.: Elgar.Google Scholar

Voigt, S. (2009). Explaining constitutional garrulity. International Review of Law and Economics, 29, 290–303.Google Scholar

Voigt, S. (2015). Veilonomics: On the use and utility of veils in constitutional political economy. In: Imbeau, Louis M. & Jacob, Steve (eds.), Behind a Veil of Ignorance? Power and Uncertainty in Constitutional Design. Heidelberg: Springer, 9–33.Google Scholar

Voigt, S. (2019). Institutional Economics – An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Voigt, S., & Blume, L. (2012). The economic effects of federalism and decentralization – A cross-country assessment. Public Choice, 151(1–2), 229–54.Google Scholar

Voigt, S., & Blume, L. (2015). Does direct democracy make for better citizens? A cautionary warning based on cross-country evidence. Constitutional Political Economy, 26(4), 391–420.Google Scholar

Voigt, S., & El-Bialy, N. (2016). Identifying the determinants of aggregate judicial performance: Taxpayers’ money well spent? European Journal of Law and Economics, 41(2), 283–319.Google Scholar

Voigt, S., & Gutmann, J. (2013). Turning cheap talk into economic growth: On the relationship between property rights and judicial independence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 66–73.Google Scholar

Voigt, S., Gutmann, J., & Feld, L. P. (2015). Economic growth and judicial independence, a dozen years on: Cross-country evidence using an updated set of indicators. European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 197–211.Google Scholar

Voigt, S., & Kiwit, D. (1998). The role and evolution of beliefs, habits, moral norms, and institutions. In: Giersch, H. (Hrsg.), Merits and Limits of Markets. Berlin et al.: Springer, 83–108.Google Scholar

Voigt, S., & Salzberger, E. (2002). Choosing not to choose: When politicians choose to delegate powers. Kyklos, 55(2), 247–68.Google Scholar

Wagemann, C., & Schneider, C. (2010). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy sets: Agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology, 9, 376–96.Google Scholar

Weingast, B. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of the law. American Political Science Review, 91(02), 245–63.Google Scholar

Wildasin, D. (1997). Externalities and Bailouts: Hard and Soft Budget Constraints in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations. Nashville, TN: Mimeo.Google Scholar

Wintrobe, R. (1990). The tinpot and the totalitarian: An economic theory of dictatorship. American Political Science Review, 84(3), 849–72.Google Scholar

Wintrobe, R. (1998). The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wintrobe, R. (2019). Are there types of dictatorship? In: Congleton, R., Grofman, B., & Voigt, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press, vol. 2, 286–310.Google Scholar

Wright, J. (2008). Do authoritarian institutions constrain? How legislatures affect economic growth and investment. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 322–43.Google Scholar