Barroso, C. Beyond Cairo: sexual and reproductive rights of young people in the new development agenda. Glob Public Health 2014;9:639–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haslegrave, M. Sexual and reproductive health and rights in the sustainable development goals and the post-2015 development agenda: less than a year to go. Reprod Health Matters 2014;22:102–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nussbaum, M. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz am 4 juni 1992,” Reproductive Medicine, 1992, www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1992_275_0/1992_275_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 4.XI.1950, as amended by its Protocol No. 14 (CETS No. 194) as from the date of its entry into force on 1 June 2010. http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/005.htmGoogle Scholar

S.H. and others v. Austria, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-107325Google Scholar

Belgian Law regarding medically assisted reproduction and the destination of supernumerary embryos and gametes, 6 July 2007. www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=nl&la=N&cn=2007070632&table_name=wetGoogle Scholar

Belgian law regarding research on embryos in vitro, 11 May 2003. www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=nl&la=N&cn=2003051131&table_name=wetGoogle Scholar

Busardò, F P, Gulino, M, Napoletano, S, Zaami, S, Frati, P. The evolution of legislation in the field of medically assisted reproduction and embryo stem cell research in European Union Members. BioMed Res Int 2014;2014:307160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/307160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 4.IV.1997. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htmGoogle Scholar

Working Party on the Protection of the Human Embryo and Fetus, Council of Europe. The protection of the human embryo in vitro (CDBI-CO-GT3). www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/Activities/04_Human_embryo_and_foetus_en/CDBI-CO-GT3(2003)13E.pdfGoogle Scholar

Steering Committee on Bioethics, Council of Europe. Background document on preimplantation and prenatal genetic testing, last update 16 July 2012. www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/Activities/07_Human_genetics_en/INF(2010)6%20e%20dpi%20dpn.pdfGoogle Scholar

Temmerman, M, Foster, L B, Hannaford, P, et al. Reproductive health indicators in the European Union: the REPROSTAT project. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;126:3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Imamura, M, Tucker, J, Hannaford, P, et al. Factors associated with teenage pregnancy in the European Union countries: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 2007;17:630–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

WHO Regional Office for Europe. Is reproductive health still a topical health issue in the European Union? www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/sexual-and-reproductive-health/news/news/2011/05/is-reproductive-health-still-a-topical-health-issue-in-the-european-unionGoogle Scholar

European Network on Endometriosis, http://ec.europa.eu/chafea/projects/database.html?prjno=2006108Google Scholar

Gürtin, Z B, Inhorn, M C. Introduction: travelling for conception and the global assisted reproduction market. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:535–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennings, G, de Wert, G, Shenfield, F, et al. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2182–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Hoof, W, Pennings, G, De Sutter, P. Cross-border reproductive care for law evasion: a qualitative study into the experiences and moral perspectives of French women who go to Belgium for treatment with donor sperm. Social Sci Med 2015;124:391–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferraretti, A P, Pennings, G, Gianaroli, L, Natali, F, Magli, M C. Cross-border reproductive care: a phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;20:261–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shenfield, F, de Mouzon, J, Pennings, G, et al. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1361–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennings, G, Autin, C, Decleer, W, et al. Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium. Hum Reprod 2009;24:3108–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gomez, V, de La Rochebrochard, E. Cross-border reproductive care among French patients: experiences in Greece, Spain and Belgium. Hum Reprod 2013;28:3103–10.Google Scholar

Culley, L, Hudson, N, Rapport, F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2373–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zanini, G. Abandoned by the state, betrayed by the Church: Italian experiences of cross-border reproductive care. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:565–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bergmann, S. Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:600–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sabatello, M. Are the kids all right? A child-centred approach to assisted reproductive technologies. Neth Q Hum Rights 2013;31:74–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mennesson v. France, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-145179Google Scholar

Labassee v. France, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-145180Google Scholar

Vogel, G, Stokstad, E. U.K. Parliament approves controversial three-parent mitochondrial gene therapy. http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2015/02/u-k-parliament-approves-controversial-three-parent-mitochondrial-gene-therapyCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendriks, S, Dondorp, W, de Wert, G, et al. Potential consequences of clinical application of artificial gametes: a systematic review of stakeholder views. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21:297–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed