Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation and competitive advantage
- 1 Innovation by Brazilian EMNEs
- 2 Innovation by Russian EMNEs
- 3 Innovation by Indian EMNEs
- 4 Innovation by Chinese EMNEs
- Commentaries on Part I
- Part II Value-chain configuration and competitive advantage
- Commentaries on Part II
- Part III Mergers and acquisitions and competitive advantage
- Commentaries on Part III
- References
- Index
3 - Innovation by Indian EMNEs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation and competitive advantage
- 1 Innovation by Brazilian EMNEs
- 2 Innovation by Russian EMNEs
- 3 Innovation by Indian EMNEs
- 4 Innovation by Chinese EMNEs
- Commentaries on Part I
- Part II Value-chain configuration and competitive advantage
- Commentaries on Part II
- Part III Mergers and acquisitions and competitive advantage
- Commentaries on Part III
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
In 2010, there were fifty-six Indian firms in the Fortune Global 1000. These included firms like Sun Pharmaceutical with revenues of slightly less than $1 billion, to Infosys and Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) with market values of roughly $30 billion, and Indian Oil with revenues of about $50 billion. Most of these firms now have operations overseas. Some, such as the Tata Group, have more than 57 per cent of their revenues coming from abroad. In this chapter, we examine the links between Indian firms’ internationalisation and their innovation capabilities over the last two decades. We also discuss the implications of these recent trends for developments in Indian firms’ innovation and internationalisation in the future.
The innovation and internationalisation process of Indian firms has been dynamic, with both elements changing qualitatively and quantitatively over the last two decades. We identify three broad phases in this process: an initial phase (which roughly covers the 1990s) and two subsequent phases (which together roughly cover the 2000s). These phases correspond to the changing institutional landscape in India (and overseas). For instance, in India, the 1990s was a period of opening up of the economy following several decades of import substitution and tight internal controls. Thus, Indian firms in the 1990s were still constrained in what they could do internally but were even more constrained in terms of what they could do outside the country.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
- 2
- Cited by