Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: May 2011

2 - The Creation of Times

Export citation

Summary

The Historical and the Customary: Two Legal Times

All over Western Europe, the political and religious upheavals of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries compelled legal thinkers to reflect upon the temporality of law. When, where, and how had law arisen? If one could identify law's temporal origins, did that mean that law could be remade? If so, by whom? In pondering such questions, early modern legal thinkers accomplished a range of objectives. They bolstered or diminished the claims of nations, monarchs, popes, parliaments, and judges; reinforced or fractured the holism of medieval legal thought; and juggled multiple political, religious, legal, and intellectual constituencies. We can trace to their efforts the appearance of two distinct and powerful temporalities as ways of thinking about law: the historical and the customary.

European countries with strong Roman law traditions appear to have been at the forefront of the emerging historical thinking about law. According to Donald Kelley, the earliest modern attempts to historicize law – which began as efforts to fit bits of law into temporal context – grew out of Renaissance philology. From a deep commitment to language and rhetorical style, the fifteenth-century Italian humanist and legal scholar Lorenzo Valla sought to demonstrate how the Latin language had changed over the centuries by dating shifts in usage. In tracking linguistic and stylistic changes in Latin, and in relating such changes rigorously to legal doctrine, Valla was able to reveal the transformations that Roman law had undergone.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Fasolt, Constantin, The Limits of History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004)
Kelley, Donald R., Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law and History in the French Renaissance (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970)
Pocock, J. G. A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) (1957)
Grafton, Anthony, What Was History? The Art of History in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
McIlwain, Charles H., The Political Works of James I (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1918), p. 62
Loux, Andrea C., “The Persistence of the Ancient Regime: Custom, Utility, and the Common Law in the Nineteenth Century,” Cornell Law Review 79 (1993): 183–218, at 192–195
Coke, Sir Edward, The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England; or A Commentary Upon Littleton (2 vols.) (reprint of the 1832 ed.; J. & W. T. Clark, London) (New York: Garland, 1979), Vol. 1, L.2.C.6 Sec. 138
Coke, Sir Edward, The Reports of Sir Edward Coke, Knt (London: Joseph Butterworth & Sons, 1826) (1602), Vol. 2, Pt. 3, Preface, p. xiii
Selden, John, Preface to Jani Anglorum Facies Altera (London: Thomas Basset & Richard Chiswell, 1682) (1610)
Coke, Sir Edward, Reports of Sir Edward Coke, Knt (London: Joseph Butterworth & Sons, 1826), Vol. 4, Pt. 8, Preface, p. iv
Hobbes, Thomas, A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England (Cropsey, Joseph, ed.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971) (1681)
Hobbes, Thomas, The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic (Tönnies, Ferdinand, ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928) (1650), Pt. I, Ch. 4, Sec. 11
Hale, Sir Matthew, The History and Analysis of the Common Law of England (Union, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange, 2000)
Hale, Sir Matthew, The History of the Common Law of England (Charles M. Gray, ed.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), p. ix
Holdsworth, W. S., A History of English Law (9 vols.) (London: Methuen, 1973)
Kramnick, Isaac, “Augustan Politics and English Historiography: The Debate on the English Past, 1730–35,” History and Theory 6, No. 1 (1967): 33–56, at 33–34
Bolingbroke, , Political Writings (Armitage, David, ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
Ferguson, Adam, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (Edinburgh, 1767) (New York: Garland, 1971), pp. 1–2
Smith, Adam, Lectures on Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), p. 14
Spadefora, David, The Idea of Progress in Eighteenth-Century Britain (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1990), p. 271
Pittock, Murray, “Historiography,” in The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment (Alexander Broadie, ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Ross, Ian Simpson, Lord Kames and the Scotland of His Day (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972)
Home, Henry, Lord Kames, Historical Law-Tracts (Edinburgh: A Kincaid, 1761) (1758) (Union, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange, 2000), p. vi
Home, Henry, Kames, Lord, Essays upon Several Subjects Concerning British Antiquities (Edinburgh: A. Kincaid, 1747), pp. 135–140, 155–158
Home, Henry, Kames, Lord, Elucidations Respecting the Common and Statute Law of Scotland (London: Routledge, 1993) (1777), pp. 378–380
Home, Henry, Kames, Lord, Sketches of the History of Man (3 vols.) (Edinburgh: Creech, 1813) (1774), Vol. 3, p. 462
Katz, Stanley, “Introduction to Book I,” in William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England: A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765–1769 (4 vols.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979)