Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T01:33:36.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Evolution of plastid genomes: inferences from discordant molecular phylogenies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Craig D. Sandgren
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
J. P. Smol
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
J. Kristiansen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Substantial morphological, biochemical and genetic diversity exists among photosynthetic eukaryotes. Some of the most conspicuous differences involve plastid-based characters. These features, such as the photosynthetic pigment complement, have provided a basis for defining plant and algal taxa. Christensen (1962) classified algae into three divisions according to their pigment composition. In this system, the division chlorophyta includes plants and algae that possess chlorophylls a and b, the Chromophyta are algae that predominantly contain chlorophylls a and c, while the Rhodophyta are defined in part as those algae having primarily chlorophyll a and accessory phycobilin pigments. However, autotrophic eukaryotes evolved in a stepwise manner with the mitochondrial and plastid organelles originating from formerly free-living prokaryotic endosymbionts (Gray & Doolittle 1982). In examining the evolution of these organisms, one must consider the evolution of not only the host, but also its organelles with their prokaryotic ancestors.

By examining cytosolic and nuclear features exclusive of plastid characters, one can infer relationships between extant plants and algae. Such studies have lent support to the validity of the Rhodophyta and Chlorophyta as true phylogenetic assemblages (natural taxa). For example, the complete absence of actual or vestigial flagella in rhodophytes (Gabrielson et al. 1985) and conserved features of karyokinesis and flagellar root structure in chlorophytes (Mattox & Stewart 1984) support the evolutionary cohesiveness of these groups. Furthermore, comparison of nuclearencoded ribosomal RNA (rRNA) supports the model of a monophyletic origin for green and red algae (Perasso et al. 1989; Chapman & Buchheim 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
Chrysophyte Algae
Ecology, Phylogeny and Development
, pp. 25 - 45
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×