Achen, C. 2000. “Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, July 20–22, 2000.Google Scholar

Acuña, C. 1995. “Algunas notas sobre los juegos, las gallinas y la lógica política de los pactos constitucionales (reflexiones a partir del pacto constitucional en la Argentina)” in Acuña, Carlos, ed., La Nueva Matriz Política Argentina, Editorial Nueva VisiónGoogle Scholar

Alemán, E. and Calvo, E.. 2010. “Unified Government, Bill Approval, and the Legislative Weight of the President.” Comparative Political Studies 43(4): 511–534.Google Scholar

Alemán, E., and Pachón, M.. 2008. “Las Comisiones de conciliación en los procesos legislativos de Chile y Colombia.” Política y Gobierno 15(1): 3–34.Google Scholar

Altman, D., and Pérez Liñán, A.. 2002. “Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in Eighteen Latin American Countries.” Democratization 9(2): 85–100.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, O. 2002. “Presidential Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil.” In Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, O. 2006. “The Presidential Calculus. Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas.” Comparative Political Studies 39(4): 415–440.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, O., and Tafner, P.. 2002. “Governos de Coalizão e Mecanismos de Alarme de Incêndio no Controle Legislativo das Medidas Provisórias.” DADOS–Revista de Ciências Sociais 45(1): 5–38.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, O., Cox, G., and McCubbins, M.. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil's Câmara dos Deputados, 1989 to 1998.” World Politics 55(4): 550–578.Google Scholar

Aninat, C. 2006. “Balance de Poderes Legislativos en Chile ¿Presidencialismo exagerado o base de un Sistema politico cooperativo? Revista Política 47: 127–148.Google Scholar

Archer, R., and Shugart, M.. 1997. “The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Dominance in Colombia.” In Mainwaring, S. and Shugart, M. S., eds., Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, R. D. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action, Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Baltagi, B. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Basabe Serrano, S. 2009. “Ecuador: Reforma constitucional, nuevos actores politicos y viejas prácticas partidistas.” Revista de Ciencia Política 29(2): 381–406.Google Scholar

Basabe Serrano, S., and Polga Hecimovich, J.. 2013. “Legislative Coalitions and Judicial Turnover under Political Uncertainty: The Case of Ecuador.” Political Research Quarterly 66(1): 154–166.Google Scholar

Beck, N. 2001. “Time-Series-Cross-Section Data: What have We Learned in the Past Few Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 271–293.Google Scholar

Beck, N., and Katz, J.. 1995. “What To Do (and Not To Do) with Time-Series Cross Section Data.” The American Political Science Review 89(3): 634–647.Google Scholar

Beck, N., and Katz, J. 1996. “Nuisance Versus Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis 6: 1–36.Google Scholar

Beck, N., and Katz, J. 2011. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de la República de Chile. 2017. Buscador de Leyes. Available in website: www.leychile.cl/Consulta/homebasico/.Google Scholar

Botero, F., and Rennó, L.. 2007. “Career Choice and Legislative Reelection: Evidence from Brazil and Colombia.” Brazilian Political Science Review 1: 102–124.Google Scholar

Bronfman Vargas, A., and Martinez Estay, J.. 2005. Constitución Política de la República de Chile. Editorial Lexis Nexis. 5ª Edición.Google Scholar

Calvo, E. 2007. “The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Law Making in Highly Disciplined Legislature.” British Journal of Political Science 37(2): 263–280.Google Scholar

Calvo, E. 2014. Legislator Success in Fragmented Congresses in Argentina. Plurality Cartels, Minority Presidents, and Lawmaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Câmara dos Deputados da República Federativa do Brasil. 2017. Pesquisa Projetos de Lei e Outras Proposicões. Available in website: www.camara.leg.br/buscaProposicoesWeb/pesquisaAvancada/Google Scholar

Câmara dos Deputados da República Federativa do Brasil. 2005. Constituição 1988 com alterações adotadas pelas Emendas Constitucionais (23ª Edição).Google Scholar

Cámara de Diputados de la República Argentina. 2017. Dirección de Información Parlamentaria. Available in website www.hcdn.gov.ar/.Google Scholar

Cameron, C. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Canes Wrone, B. 2001. “The President's Legislative Influence from Public Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canes Wrone, B., Howell, W., and Lewis, D.. 2008. “Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Reevaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis.” The Journal of Politics 70(1): 1–16.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, M., Junguito, R., and Pachón, M.. 2006. “Political Institutions and Policy Outcomes in Colombia: The Effects of the 1991 Constitution.” (IADB Working Paper R-508). Retrieved from Inter-American Development Bank website: https://publications.iadb.org/.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, M., Junguito, R., and Pachón, M.. 2008. “Political Institutions and Policy Outcomes in Colombia: The Effects of the 1991 Constitution.” In Stein, E. and Tommasi, M., eds., Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies. IDB-Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Carey, J., and Shugart, M., eds. 1998. Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casa Civil da Presidência da República, www4.planalto.gov.br/legislacao/portal-legis/legislacao-1/medidas-provisorias, and www4.planalto.gov.br/legislacao/portal-legis/legislacao-1/leis-ordinariasGoogle Scholar

Chasquetti, D., and Micozzi, J.. 2014. “The Subnational Connection in Unitary Regimes: progressive Ambition and Legislative Behavior in Uruguay.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 39(1): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chavez, R. 2003. “The Construction of the Rule of Law in Argentina: A Tale of Two Provinces.” Comparative Politics 35(4): 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheibub, J. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, T. 2010. The Limits of Judicial Independence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Abreu Junior, D. A. 2002. Medidas provisórias: o poder quase absoluto. Câmara dos Deputados, Centro de Documentação e Informação (CEDI), Coordenação de Publicações.Google Scholar

Merlin Clève, C., 2000. Atividade legislativa do poder executivo. Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2da Edição.Google Scholar

Congreso de la Nación Perú. 2017. Archivo Digital de la Legislación en el Perú. Available in website www.leyes.congreso.gob.pe/.Google Scholar

Cox, G. 2016. Marketing Sovereign Promises. Monopoly Brokerage and the Growth of the English State. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, G., and McCubbins, M.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cox, G., and Morgenstern, S.. 2001. “Latin America's Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents.” Comparative Politics 33(2): 171–189.Google Scholar

Cox, G. and Morgenstern, S.. 2002. “Epilogue: Latin America's Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents.” In Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dargent, E., and Urteaga, M.. 2016. “Respuesta estatal por presiones externas: los determinantes del fortalecimiento estatal frente al boom de oro en el Perú (2004–2015).” Revista de Ciencia Política 36(3): 655–677.Google Scholar

De Moraes, A. 2006. Constituição do Brasil Interpretada. Editora Atlas.Google Scholar

Desposato, S. 2006. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diario Oficial de la República de Chile. 2005. Colección de Índices de Leyes, Decretos con Fuerza de Ley y Decretos Leyes, 1979–2004.Google Scholar

Diermeier, D., and Myerson, R.. 1999. “Bicameralism and Its Consequences for the Internal Organization of Legislatures.” The American Economic Review 89(5): 1182–1196.Google Scholar

Epstein, D., and O'Halloran, S.. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, L., and Knight, J.. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, L., and Segal, J.. 2005. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Etchemendy, S., and Palermo, V.. 1998. “Conflicto y concertación. Gobierno, Congreso y organizaciones de interés en la reforma laboral del primer gobierno de Menem (1989–1995).” Desarrollo Económico 37(148): 559–590.Google Scholar

Feld, L., and Voigt, S.. 2003. “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross-Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators.” European Journal of Political Economy 19(3): 497–527.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, J., and Shipan, C.. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6(Especial Issue): 1–20.Google Scholar

Ferreira Rubio, D., and Goretti, M.. 1998. “When the President Governs Alone: The Decretazo in Argentina, 1989–93.” In Carey, J. and Shugart, M., eds., Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Figueiredo, A., and Limongi, F.. 1997. “O Congresso e as medidas provisórias: abdicação ou delegação?” Novos Estudos-CEBRAP 47: 127–154.Google Scholar

Figueiredo, A., and Limongi, F.. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2): 151–170.Google Scholar

García Villegas, M. 2001. “Constitucionalismo perverso, normalidad y anormalidad constitucional en Colombia: 1957–1997.” In de Sousa Santos, B. and García Villegas, M., eds., El Caleidoscopio de la Justicia Colombiana. Uniandes Siglo del Hombre.Google Scholar

Gallardo, C. y Muñiz, D.. 2004. Análisis de la Carrera Legislativa en el Perú: Estrategias para permanecer en el cargo,” typescript, Universidad del Pacífico, Perú.Google Scholar

Gely, R., and Spiller, P.. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the ‘State Farm’ and ‘Grove City’ Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6(2): 263–300.Google Scholar

González-Ocantos, E., de Jonge, C., Meléndez, C., and Nickerson, D.. 2012. “Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua.” American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 202–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groseclose, T., Levitt, S., and Snyder, J.. 1999. “Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress.” The American Political Science Review 93(1): 33–50.Google Scholar

Groseclose, T., and McCarty, N.. 1996. Presidential Vetoes: Bargaining, Blame-Game, and Gridlock. (Unpublished Manuscript). Department of Political Science, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Groseclose, T., and McCarty, N. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 100–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groseclose, T., and Snyder, J.. 1996. “Buying Supermajorities.” The American Political Science Review 90(2): 303–315.Google Scholar

Gross, O., and Wagner, R.. 1950. “A Continuous Colonel Blotto Game.” Research Memorandum 408 RAND Corporation.Google Scholar

Hanmer, M. and Kalkan, K. O.. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 263–277.Google Scholar

Helmke, G. and Ríos Figueroa, J.. 2011. Courts in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmke, G. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy.” The American Political Science Review 96(2): 291–303.Google Scholar

Helmke, G. 2005. Courts under Constraints. Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henisz, W. 2000. “The Institutional Environment of Economic Growth.” Economics and Politics 12(1): 1–31.Google Scholar

Hiroi, T. 2005. Bicameral Politics: The Dynamics of Lawmaking in Brazil. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Howell, W. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, W., and Lewis, D.. 2002. “Agencies by Presidential Design.” The Journal of Politics 64(4): 1095–1114.Google Scholar

Huber, J., and Shipan, C.. 2002. Deliberative Dicretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iaryczower, M., Spiller, P., and Tommasi, M.. 2002. “Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 699–716.Google Scholar

Indridason, I. 2011. “Executive Veto Power and Credit Claiming: Comparing the Effects of the Line-item Veto and the Package Veto.” Public Choice 146(3/4): 375–394.Google Scholar

Jones, M. 2002a. “Explaining the High Levels of Party Discipline in the Argentine Congress.” In Morgenstern, S. and Nacif, B., eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, M. 2002b. “Legislator Behavior and Executive-Legislative Relations in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 37(3): 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, M. 2005. “The Role of Parties and Party Systems in the Policymaking Process.” Paper presented at the workshop of State Reform, Public Policies, and Policymaking Processes, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC, February 28–March 2, 2005.Google Scholar

Jones, M., Saiegh, S., Spiller, P., and Tommasi, M.. 2002. “Amateur Legislators – Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 656–669.Google Scholar

Jones, M. and Hwang, W.. 2005. “Party Government in Presidential Democracies: Extending Cartel Theory beyond the U.S. Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 267–282.Google Scholar

Jones, M. and Saiegh, S.. 2007. “Congress, Political Careers, and the Provincial Connection.” In Spiller, P. and Tommasi, M., eds., The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, D. 2005. Challenging Decisions: High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, D. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keele, L. and Kelly, N.. 2006. “Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables.” Political Analysis 14(2): 186–205.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D., and McCubbins, M.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kim, J. 2006. “Institutional Constraints on Presidential Lawmaking Power: Analysis of Necessity and Urgency Decrees in Argentina from 1916 to 2004.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, January 5-7, 2006.Google Scholar

Kim, J. 2007. Constrained Unilateralism: Comparing Institutional Foundations of Executive Decrees in Presidential Democracies. (Ph.D.) Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 1992. Information and Legislative Organization. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 1998. Pivotal Politics. A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 212–227.Google Scholar

Landa Arroyo, C., and Velazco Lozada, A.. 2005. Constitución Política del Perú 1993. Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar

La Nación. (2008, March, 19). “El paro agropecuario se extenderá una semana más.” In Sección Economía, La Nación. Retrieved from: www.lanacion.com.arGoogle Scholar

La Nación. (2008, October, 23). “El gobierno ya decidió la expropiación de Aerolíneas.” In Sección Economía, La Nación. Retrieved from: www.lanacion.com.arGoogle Scholar

Lara-Borges, O., Castagnola, A., and Pérez Liñán, A.. 2012. “Diseño Constitucional y Estabilidad Judicial en América Latina, 1900–2009.” Política y Gobierno 19(1): 3–40.Google Scholar

Leoni, E., Pereira, C., and Renno, L.. 2004. “Political Survival Strategies: Political Career Decisions in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies.” Journal of Latin American Studies 36(1): 109–130.Google Scholar

Levitsky, S., and Murillo, M.. 2005. Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 2003. Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946–1997. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Llanos, M. 1998. “El Presidente, el Congreso y la Política de Privatizaciones en la Argentina (1989–1997).” Desarrollo Económico 38(151): 743–770.Google Scholar

Llanos, M. 2002. Privatization and democracy in Argentina: An Analysis of President-Congress Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Limongi, F., and Figueiredo, A.. 1998. “Bases institucionais do presidencialismo de coalizão.” Lua Nova 44: 81–106.Google Scholar

Londregan, J. 2000. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Londregan, J., and Aninat, C.. 2006. “Measuring Spatial Aspects of Legislative Delay: Evidence from the Chilean Congress.” (CI&G Working Paper Nº 26). Retrieved from Center for Institutions and Governance, University of California, Berkeley website: http://igov.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/No26_Londregan.pdf.Google Scholar

Machado, F., Scartascini, C., and Tommasi, M.. 2011. “Political Institutions and Street Protests in Latin America.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(3): 340–365.Google Scholar

Magar, E. 2001. “The Elusive Authority of Argentina's Congress: Decrees, Statutes, and Veto Incidence, 1983–1994.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 30–September 2, 2001.Google Scholar

Martí I Puig, S. 2009. “Nicaragua 2008: Polarización y Pactos.” Revista de Ciencia Política 29(2): 515–531.Google Scholar

Martí I Puig, S. 2013. “Nicaragua 2008: La Consolidación de un Régimen Híbrido.” Revista de Ciencia Política 33(1): 269–286.Google Scholar

Martínez, E., and Brenes, A.. 2012. “Y volver, volver, voler…” Un Análisis de los Casos de Intervención de las Cortes Supremas en la Reelección Presidencial en Centroamérica.” Anuario de Estudios Centroamericanos 38: 109–136.Google Scholar

Maurich, M., and Liendo, G.. 1998. “La Argentina de Alfonsín y Menem: ¿Estilo decisionista o estrategia decretista de Gobierno?” In Kvaternik, E., ed., Elementos para el Análisis Político. La Argentina y el Cono Sur en los `90. Editorial Paidós.Google Scholar

Maurich, Mario and Liendo, Gabriela. 1998. “¿La Argentina de Alfonsín y Menem: Estilo decisionista de Gobierno o Estrategia decretista de Gobierno (1983–1995)?.” In Kvaternik, Eugenio (Ed.) Elementos para el Análisis Político. La Argentina y el Cono Sur en los '90. Editorial Paidos, pp. 371–394.Google Scholar

Mayer, K. 2001. With the Stroke of a Pen. Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, D. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, D. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party control, lawmaking, and investigations, 1946–1990. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, N. 2000. “Proposal Rights, Veto Rights, and Political Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 506–522.Google Scholar

McCarty, N., Poole, K., and Rosenthal, H.. 2001. “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.” The American Political Science Review 95(3): 673–687.Google Scholar

McCubbins, M., Noll, R., and Weingast, B.. 1989. “Structure and Process. Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.” Virginia Law Review 75(2): 431–482.Google Scholar

McCubbins, M. and Schwartz, T.. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165–179.Google Scholar

Mejía Acosta, A., and Polga Hecimovich, J.. 2010. “Parliamentary Solutions to Presidential Crises in Ecuador.” In Llanos, M., and Marsteintredet, L., eds., Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America: Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mejía Acosta, A., and Polga Hecimovich, J. 2011. “Coalition Erosion and Presidential Instability in Ecuador.” Latin American Politics and Society 53(2): 87–111.Google Scholar

Meléndez, C. and León, C.. 2010. “Perú 2009: Los Legados del Autoritarismo.” Revista de Ciencia Política 30(2): 451–477.Google Scholar

Meléndez, C. and Sosa Villagarcia, P.. 2013. “Perú 2012: ¿Atrapados por la Historia?” Revista de Ciencia Política 33(1): 325–350.Google Scholar

Micozzi, J. P. 2013. “Does Electoral Accountability Make a Difference? Direct Elections, Career Ambition, and Legislative Performance in the Argentine Senate.” The Journal of Politics 75(1): 137–149.Google Scholar

Micozzi, J. P. 2014. “From House to Home: Strategic Bill Drafting in Multilevel Systems with Non-static Ambition,” The Journal of Legislative Studies 20(3): 265–284.Google Scholar

Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas Públicas de Argentina. 2017. Dirección de Análisis de Gasto Público y Programas Sociales. Available in website www.economia.gob.ar/peconomica/basehome/gastosocial.html/.Google Scholar

Mittal, S. and Weingast, B. R.. 2013. “Self-Enforcing Constitutions: With an Application to Democratic Stability In America's First Century,” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(2): 278–302.Google Scholar

Moe, T., and Howell, W.. 1999. “The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15(1): 132–179.Google Scholar

Molinelli, G. 1999. “La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación frente a los poderes politicos, a través del control de constitucionalidad, 1983–1998.” (Mimeo). Instituto de Investigaciones Ambrosio Gioja. Facultad de Derecho Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Molinelli, G., Palanza, V., and Sin, G.. 1999. Congreso, Presidencia y Justicia en Argentina. Materiales para su estudio. Editorial Temas.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, S. and Nacif, B., eds. 2002. Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morón, E. A. and Sanborn, C.. 2006. “The Pitfalls of Policymaking in Peru: Actors, Institutions and Rules of the Game,” IDB Working Paper No. 206. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1814760 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1814760.Google Scholar

Murphy, W. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Mustapic, A. 2002. “Oscillating Relations: President and Congress in Argentina.” In Morgenstern, S. and Nacif, B., eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Navia, P. 2004. “Legislative Candidate Selection in Chile.” Paper presented at the Symposium Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America, Winston-Salem, April 3–4, 2004.Google Scholar

Negretto, G. 2000. “Does the President Govern Alone? Legislative Decree Authority and Institutional Design in Brazil and Argentina.” Paper presented at Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, December 13, 2000.Google Scholar

Negretto, G. 2004. “Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America: The Cases of Brazil and Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 37(5): 531–562.Google Scholar

Negretto, G. 2009. “Political Parties and Institutional Design: Explaining Constitutional Choice in Latin America.” British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 117–139.Google Scholar

Negretto, G. 2013. Making Constitutions. Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Núcleo de Estudos Comparados e Internacionais. 2017. Banco de Dados Legislativos CEBRAP [Dataset]. Available from http://neci.fflch.usp.br/node/506/.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, G. 1993. “On the State, Democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American View with Glances at some Post-Communist Countries.” World Development 21(8): 1355–1369.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, G. 1994. “Delegative Democracy” Journal of Democracy 15(1): 55–69.Google Scholar

Osborne, M. J. 2004. An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Palanza, V. 2020. “Variations on the Veto Prerogative: Evidence from Chile,” Latin American Research Review 55(2).Google Scholar

Palanza, V., and Sin, G.. 1997. “Partidos Provinciales y Gobierno Nacional en el Congreso (1983–1995)” Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Político 5: 46–94.Google Scholar

Palanza, V. and Espinoza, R.. 2017. “El locus del Congreso en el sistema político chileno,” in Luna, J. P. and Mardones, R., eds., La Columna Vertebral Fracturada: Revisitando Intermediarios Políticos en Chile. Santiago: RIL EditoresGoogle Scholar

Palanza, V., Scartascini, C. and Tommasi, M.. 2016. “Congressional Institutionalization: A Cross-National Comparison.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(1): 7–34.Google Scholar

Palanza, V., and Sin, G.. 2013. “Item Vetoes and Attempts to Override Them in Multiparty Legislatures.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 5(1): 37–66.Google Scholar

Palanza, V., and Sin, G. 2014. “Veto Bargaining and the Legislative Process in Multiparty Presidential Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 47(5): 766–792.Google Scholar

Pereira, C., and Mejía Acosta, A.. 2010. “Policymaking in Multiparty Presidential Regimes: A Comparison between Brazil and Ecuador.” Governance 23(4): 641–666.Google Scholar

Pereira, C., and Mueller, B.. 2002. “Comportamento Estratégico em Presidencialismo de Coalizão: As Relações entre Executivo e Legislativo na Elaboração do Orçamento Brasileiro.” DADOS–Revista de Ciências Sociais 45(2): 265–301.Google Scholar

Pereira, C., and Mueller, B. 2004. “The Cost of Governing. Strategic Behavior of the President and Legislators in Brazil Budgetary Process.” Comparative Political Studies 37(7): 781–815.Google Scholar

Pereira, C., and Power, T., and Rennó, L.. 2005. “Under what Conditions do Presidents Resort to Decree Power? Theory and Evidence from the Brazilian Case.” Journal of Politics 67(1): 178–200.Google Scholar

Pereira, C., Power, T., and Rennó, L.. 2008. “Agenda Power, Executive Decree Authority, and the Mixed Results of Reform in the Brazilian Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(1): 5–33.Google Scholar

Pérez Liñán, A. (Coord.). 2011. “Legislatures in Latin America.” Unpublished dataset, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Pérez Liñán, A. 2011. “Replication data for Diseño Constitucional y Estabilidad Judicial en América Latina, 1900–2009”. Harvard Dataverse V1, hdl:1902.1/15801 UNF:5:LZ954jtaZVCahdjwpWgllw==.Google Scholar

Plümper, T., Troeger, V., and Manow, P.. 2005. “Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics. Linking Method to Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 44(2): 327–354.Google Scholar

Polga Hecimovich, J. 2013. “Ecuador: Estabilidad Institucional y la Consolidación de poder de Rafael Correa.” Revista de Ciencia Política 33(1): 135–160.Google Scholar

Polsby, N. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” The American Political Science Review 62(1): 144–168.Google Scholar

Posdeley, C. 2016. “Apuntes sobre el rol y las funciones de control de la Comisión Bicameral de Trámite Legislativo.” In Asociación de Docentes de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, eds., El Control de la Actividad Estatal: Discrecionalidad, División de Poderes y Control Extrajudicial. Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Power, T. 1998. “The Pen is Mightier than the Congress: Presidential Decree Power in Brazil.” In Carey, J. and Shugart, M., eds., Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Protsyk, O. 2004. “Ruling with Decrees: Presidential Decree Making in Russia and Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 56(5): 637–660.Google Scholar

Quinzio, J. 2003. Tratado de Derecho Constitucional (Vol. 1 & 2). Editorial Lexis Nexis.Google Scholar

Remington, T. 2014. Presidential Decree in Russia. A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rohde, D. 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 1–26.Google Scholar

Sabsay, D. and Onaindia, J., eds. 1995. La Constitución de los Argentinos. Errepar.Google Scholar

Saiegh, S. 2005. “The Role of Legislatures in the Policymaking Process.” Paper presented at the workshop of State Reform, Public Policies, and Policymaking Processes, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC, February 28–March 2, 2005.Google Scholar

Saiegh, S. 2010. “Active Players or Rubber Stamps? An Evaluation of the Policymaking Role of Latin American Legislature.” In Scartascini, C., Stein, E. and Tommasi, M., eds., How Democracy Works. Inter-American Development Bank – David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Saiegh, S. 2011. Ruling by Statute. How Uncertainty and Vote Buying Shape Lawmaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Samuels, D. 2002. Progressive Ambition, Federalism, and Pork-Barreling in Brazil. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scartascini, C., Stein, E. and Tommasi, M., eds. 2010. How Democracy Works. Inter-American Development Bank – David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Scartascini, C., Spiller, P., Stein, E., and Tommasi, M., eds. 2011. El Juego Político en América Latina: ¿Cómo se deciden las políticas públicas? Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo – Mayol Ediciones.Google Scholar

Schickler, E., and Rich, A.. 1997a. “Controlling the Floor: Parties as Procedural Coalitions in the House.” American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1340–1375.Google Scholar

Schickler, E., and Rich, A. 1997b. “Party Government in the House Reconsidered: A Response to Cox and McCubbins.” American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1387–1394.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, J. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Schmidt, G. 1998. “Presidential Usurpation or Congressional Preference? The Evolution of Executive Decree Authority in Peru.” In Carey, J. and Shugart, M., eds., Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, G. 2000. “Delegative Democracy in Peru? Fujimori's 1995 Landslide and the Prospects for 2000.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42(1): 99–132.Google Scholar

Shor, B., Bafumi, J., Keele, L., and Park, D.. 2007. “A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data.” Political Analysis 15(2): 165–181.Google Scholar

Scribner, D. 2002. “Executive Accountability: Juridical Control of Presidential Decree Authority in Chile.” Paper presented at the 61st Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago, April 27–30, 2002.Google Scholar

Scribner, D. 2004. “Limiting Presidential Power: Supreme Court-Executive Relations in Argentina and Chile.” (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Scribner, D. 2007. “Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina (Review).” Latin American Politics and Society 49(4): 202–205.Google Scholar

Secretaria-Geral da Mesa do Senado in Brazil, www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/legislacaoGoogle Scholar

Segal, J. 1997. “Separation of Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts.” The American Political Science Review 91(1): 28–44.Google Scholar

Shepsle, K., and Weingast, B.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review 81(1): 85–104.Google Scholar

Shugart, M., and Carey, J.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Siavelis, P. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile. Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Siavelis, P. 2002. “Exaggerated Presidentialism and Moderate Presidents: Executive-Legislative Relations in Chile.” In Morgenstern, S. and Nacif, B., eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Siavelis, Peter. 2006. “Electoral Reform Doesn't Matter – or Does it?: A Moderate PR System for Chile.” Revista de Ciencia Política 26(1): 216–225.Google Scholar

Sin, G. 2015. Separation of Powers and Legislative Organization: The President, the Senate, and Political Parties in the Making of House Rules. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

SICON. Sistema de Informações do Congresso http://legis.senado.gov.br/sicon/#/basicaGoogle Scholar

Smulovitz, C. 1995. “Reforma y Constitución en la Argentina: del Consenso Negativo al Acuerdo.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 8: 69–84.Google Scholar

Snyder, J., and Groseclose, T.. 2001. “Estimating Party Influence on Roll Call Voting: Regression Coefficients versus Classification Success.” The American Political Science Review 95(3): 689–698.Google Scholar

Sonnleitner, W. 2010. “Las últimas elecciones en América Central: ¿el Quiebre de la Tercera Ola de Democratizaciones?” Foro Internacional 50, 3/4(201/202): 808–849.Google Scholar

Spiller, P., and Gely, R.. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949–1988.” The RAND Journal of Economics 23(4): 463–492.Google Scholar

Spiller, P., and Liao, S.. 2006. “Buy, Lobby or Sue: Interest Groups’ Participation in Policy Making – A Selective Survey.” (NBER Working Paper Nº 12209). Retrieved from The National Bureau of Economic Research website: www.nber.org/papers/w12209.Google Scholar

Spiller, P., and Tommasi, M.. 2000. Los Determinantes Institucionales del Desarrollo Argentino. Hacia una Agenda Institucional. Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Institucional (Fundación Gobierno y Sociedad) and United Nations Program for Development. EUDEBA.Google Scholar

Spiller, P., and Tommasi, M. 2007. The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina: A Transactions Cost Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, E., Tommasi, M., Echebarría, K., Lora, E., and Payne, M. (Coords.) 2006. The Politics of Policies. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America (2006 Report). Inter-American Development Bank – David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Stein, E., Tommasi, M., and Scartascini, C., eds. 2008. Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies. Inter-American Development Bank – David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Stinga, L. 2008. “Revisiting Governance by Decree in Argentina: Political Culture or Structure?” Paper presented at the ECPR Graduate Conference in Barcelona, August 24–26, 2008.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G., and Alemán, E.. 2005. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America.” World Politics 57(3): 396–420.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Alemán, E. (Eds.). 2016. Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America, Oxford Studies in Democratization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Uprimny, R. 2010. “The Constitutional Court and Control of Presidential Extraordinary Powers in Colombia.” Democratization 10(4): 46–69.Google Scholar

Walker, L. 2009. “Delegative Democratic Attitudes and Institutional Support in Central America.” Comparative Politics 42(1): 83–101.Google Scholar

Weingast, B. 1989. “The Political Institutions of Representative Government: Legislatures.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 145(4): 693–703.Google Scholar

Weingast, B. 2005. “Self-Enforcing Constitutions: With an Application to Democratic Stability in America's First Century,” typescript Stanford University, copy available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1153527.Google Scholar

Wiesehomeier, N. and Benoit, K.. 2009. “Presidents, Parties, and Policy Competition.” The Journal of Politics 71(4): 1435–1447.Google Scholar

Wilson, S., and Butler, D.. 2007. “A Lot More to do: the Sensitivity of Time-Series Cross-Section Analyses to Simple Alternative Specifications.” Political Analysis 15(2): 101–123.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, J. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zavalía, R. 2001. Constitución de la Nación Argentina. Editorial Zavalía.Google Scholar

Zucco, C. 2009. “Ideology or What? Legislative Behavior in Multiparty Presidential Settings.” The Journal of Politics 71(3): 1076–1092.Google Scholar

Zucco, C. 2013. “When Payouts Pay Off: Conditional Cash Transfers and Voting Behavior in Brazil, 2002–2010.” American Journal of Political Science 57(4): 810–822.Google Scholar

Zucco, C., and Lauderdale, B.. 2011. “Distinguishing between Influences on Brazilian Legislative Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(3): 363–396.Google Scholar

Zucco, C., and Power, T.. 2013. “Bolsa Familia and the Shift in Lula's Electoral Base, 2002–2006: A Reply to Bohn.” Latin American Research Review 48(2): 3–24.Google Scholar

Zuñiga, F. (Coord.). 2005. Reforma Constitucional. Editorial Lexis Nexis.Google Scholar