Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T08:24:02.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Anxieties of Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2019

Frances E. Lee
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Nolan McCarty
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

We provide an overview of the concept of the “policyscape,” a dense network of policies that structure the current political order, and then assess its relationship with four aspects of American institutional behavior: the creation of new policies; the maintenance of existing policies and programs; policy “thickening” that may lead to additional gridlock and dysfunction during what is an already laborious lawmaking process; and the monitoring of the current policyscape through executive oversight in Congress. We address, among other questions, why new and broad-reaching policy reforms have been scarce in recent years; why Congress has failed to update extant policies in accordance with social, economic, political, and technological developments; and how partisan polarization has affected Congress’ ability to oversee policy implementation and hold the executive branch accountable for administrative failures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aberbach, Joel D. 1991. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Aberbach, Joel D. 2002. “Improving Oversight: The Endless Task of Congress.” Society 40(1): 6063.Google Scholar
Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. 2012. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. 2012. “The Lives and Deaths of Federal Programs, 1971–2003.” In Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M. (eds.), Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 86110.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2000. “Going Nowhere: A Gridlocked Congress?Brookings Review 18(1): 1619.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2002. “Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 190199.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, David, and Morone, James A.. 2009. The Heart of Power: Health and Politics in the Oval Office. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burman, Leonard E., and Slemrod, Joel. 2013. Taxes in America: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (hereafter, CBO). 2014. “Updated Budget Projections: 2014–2024.” Retrieved from www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/113th-congress-2013-2014/reports/45229-UpdatedBudgetProjections_2.pdf (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
CBO. 2015a. “The Federal Budget in 2015.” Retrieved from www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/graphic/51110-budget1overall.pdf (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
CBO. 2015b. “Updated Budget Projections: 2015–2015.” Retrieved from www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/reports/49973-UpdatedBudgetProjections_0.pdf (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
CBO. 2017a. “The Federal Budget in 2017: An Infographic.” Retrieved from www.cbo.gov/publication/53624 (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
CBO. 2017b. “Discretionary Spending in 2017: An Infographic.” Retrieved from www.cbo.gov/publication/53626 (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2016. “Policy Basics: Non-Defense Discretionary Programs.” Retrieved from www.cbpp.org/research/policy-basics-non-defense-discretionary-programs (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides: Nominating Contests before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, John J. 1999. “Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 93(4): 821835.Google Scholar
Conway, Madeline. 2017. “Ryan: Obamacare Is the Law of the Land for the Foreseeable Future.” Politico. March 24. Retrieved from www.politico.com/story/2017/03/obamacare-repeal-failed-paul-ryan-reaction-236478 (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Cox, James H. 2004. Reviewing Delegation: An Analysis of the Congressional Reauthorization Process. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee, and Teles, Steven. 2015. “A New Agenda for Political Reform.” Washington Monthly. March/April/May. Retrieved from https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/maraprmay-2015/a-new-agenda-for-political-reform/ (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III, Barrett, Andrew, and Peake, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 545563.Google Scholar
Ejdemyr, Simon, Nall, Clayton, and O’Keefe, Zachary. 2015. “Building Inequality: The Permanence of Infrastructure and the Limits of Democratic Representation.” Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/~nall/docs/di.pdf (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1995 (1973). Congressmen in Committees. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1977. “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration.” American Political Science Review 71(3): 883917.Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 2016. “Federal Net Outlays as Percent of Gross Domestic Product,” Economic Research. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYONGDA188S (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. “Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy: A Mismatch of Incentives and Capabilities.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce J. (eds.), Congress Reconsidered, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Firozi, Paulina. 2017. “Poll: Just 17 Percent of Voters Back ObamaCare Repeal Plan.” The Hill. March 23. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/325448-poll-majority-of-voters-disapprove-of-gop-obamacare-repeal-plan (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin and Shefter, Martin. 1990. Politics by Other Means: The Declining Importance of Elections in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jeffrey. 2006. “Central Casting: The Democrats Think about Who Can Win in the Midterms—and in 2008.” The New Yorker. 29 May. Retrieved from www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/05/29/central-casting (last accessed January 17, 2019).Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haberman, Maggie and Schmidt, Michael S.. 2018. “Trump Sought to Fire Mueller in December.” The New York Times, April 10. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/us/politics/trump-sought-to-fire-mueller-in-december.html (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2001. “Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Politics & Society 38(2): 152204.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2005a. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 64362.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 243260.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005b. “Abandoning the Middle: The Revealing Case of the Bush Tax Cuts.” Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 3353. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592705050048Google Scholar
Hall, Thad. 2004. Authorizing Policy. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 2002. “Tax Expenditures.” In Salamon, Lester M. (ed.), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 1997. The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, William G., Adler, Scott, Cameron, Charles, and Riemann, Charles. 2000. “Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–94.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(2): 285312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Skocpol, Theda, 2010. Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Mettler, Suzanne. 2017. “Outside of Washington, There Is a New Vital Center in Health Care Reform.” Health Affairs. July 31. Retrieved from www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170731.061320/full/ (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffery A., and Milkis, Sidney M.. 2014. “Introduction: The Rise of a Policy State?” In Jenkins, and Milkis, (eds.), The Politics of Major Postwar Policy Reforms in Postwar America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Frederick M. 1988. “Congressional Oversight of the Presidency.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 499: 7589.Google Scholar
Kamarck, Elaine C. 2016. Why Presidents Fail. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kelly, Sean Q. 1993. “Divided We Govern? A Reassessment.” Polity 25(3): 475484.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas. 2010. After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L. 2009. “Can Enhanced Oversight Repair the ‘Broken Branch?’Boston University Law Review 89: 765793.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Schickler, Eric. 2014. “Investigating the President: Committee Probes and Presidential Approval, 1953–2006.” Journal of Politics 76(2): 521534.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Schwartz, Liam. 2008. “Divided Government and Congressional Investigations.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(2): 295321.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2013. “Presidents and Party Teams: The Politics of Debt Limits and Executive Oversight, 2001–2013.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43(4): 775791.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2015. “How Party Polarization Affects Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 261282.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David E. 2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lerman, Amy A., and Weaver, Vesla M.. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewallen, Jonathan, Theriault, Sean M., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2015. “Congressional Dysfunction and the Decline of Problem Solving.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 2015 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 2014. “A Cascade of Failures: Why Government Fails, and How to Stop It.” Center for Effective Public Management, The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jason A., and McGrath, Robert J.. 2016. “Retrospective Congressional Oversight and the Dynamics of Legislative Influence Over the Bureaucracy.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(4): 899934. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/lsq.12138 (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, and Shipan, Charles R.. 2012. “Beyond Legislative Productivity: Enactment Conditions, Subsequent Conditions, and the Shape and Life of the Law,” In Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M. (eds.), Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 111134.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2016 (2012). It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2006. The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2004. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection, 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2005. “Actions in the Public Sphere.” In Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A. (eds.), The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 63106.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2005. (1991). Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990, 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrol versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165179.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 3(2): 243277.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2014. Degrees of Inequality: How the Politics of Higher Education Policy Sabotaged the American Dream. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2016. “The Policyscape and the Challenges of Contemporary Politics to Policy Maintenance.” Perspectives on Politics 14(2): 369390.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2018. The Government-Citizen Disconnect. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1987. “An Assessment of the Positive Theory of ‘Congressional Dominance.”’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 12(4): 475520.Google Scholar
Nall, Clayton. 2015. “The Political Consequences of Spatial Policies: How Interstate Highways Facilitated Geographic Polarization.” Journal of Politics 77(2): 394406.Google Scholar
Ogul, Morris S. 2009. (1976). Congress Oversees the Bureaucracy: Studies in Legislative Supervision. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Oleszek, Mark J., and Oleszek, Walter J.. 2012. “Institutional Challenges Confronting Congress after 9/11: Partisan Polarization and Effective Oversight.” in Auerswald, David P. and Campbell, Colton C. (eds.), Congress and the Politics of National Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oleszek, Walter J. 2010. “Congressional Oversight: An Overview.” Congressional Research Service report No. R41079. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2014. “Pathways to the Present: Political Development in America.” In Valelly, Richard, Mettler, Suzanne, and Lieberman, Robert (eds.), Oxford Handbook on American Political Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2009. Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parker, David C.W., and Dull, Matthew. 2009. “Divided We Quarrel: The Politics of Congressional Investigations, 1947–2004.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(3): 319345.Google Scholar
Parker, David C.W., and Dull, Matthew. 2013. “The Weaponization of Congressional Oversight: The Politics of the Watchful Eye, 1947–2010.” In Frisch, Scott A. and Kelly, Sean Q (eds.), Politics to the Extreme: American Political Institutions in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 4769.Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M. 2008. Reforms at Risk: What Happens after Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patel, Jugal K., and Parlapiano, Alicia. 2017. “The Senate’s Official Scorekeeper Says the Republican Tax Plan Would Add $1 Trillion to the Deficit.” The New York Times, December 1. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/28/us/politics/tax-bill-deficits.html (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Pearson, James B. 1975. “Oversight: A Vital Yet Neglected Congressional Function.” Kansas Law Review 23: 277288.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 5(4): 595628.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2014. “Conclusion: Madison Upside Down.” in Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Milkis, Sidney M. (eds.), The Politics of Major Policy Reform in Postwar America. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 282302.Google Scholar
Robertson, David Brian. 2005. The Constitution and America’s Destiny. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, James R. 2005. “The Impact of Divided Government on Legislative Production.” Public Choice 123(1/2): 217233.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, and Davies, Phillip L.. 1994. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change without Choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Saeki, Manabu. 2009. “Gridlock in the Government of the United States: Influence of Divided Government and Veto Players.” British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 587607.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1935. Politics, Pressure, and the Tariff. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Scher, Seymour. 1963. “Conditions for Legislative Control.” Journal of Politics 25 (3): 526551.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne Larason, and Ingram, Helen. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R. 2005. “Congress and the Bureaucracy.” In Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A. (eds.), The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 432458.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 2009. “Taking Stock.” In Jacobs, Lawrence and King, Desmond (eds.), The Unsustainable American State. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stid, Daniel. 2017. “Why the GOP Congress Will Stop Trump from Going Too Far.” Washington Monthly, January/February. Retrieved from https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/januaryfebruary-2017/why-the-gop-congress-will-stop-trump-from-going-too-far/ (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. “The Myth of the Unitary Executive.” The Administrative Law Journal 7(1): 297308.Google Scholar
Talbert, Jeffery C., Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 1995. “Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 383405.Google Scholar
Teles, Stephen. 2013. “Kludgeocracy In America.” National Affairs, 17(Fall). Retrieved from www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/kludgeocracy-in-america (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Teter, Michael J. 2013. “Gridlock, Legislative Supremacy, and the Problem of Arbitrary Inaction.” Notre Dame Law Review 88(5): 22172232.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Streeck, Wolfgang, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toner, Robin. 2006. “How the Democrats Would Rule the Hill.” The New York Times, October 8. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2006/10/08/weekinreview/08toner.html?pagewanted=all (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2001. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Co.Google Scholar

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2011. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Balla, Steven J. 1998. “Administrative Procedures and Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 92: 663673.Google Scholar
Balla, Steven J. 2012. “The Politicization of Administration.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 10: 357359.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen. 1995. “Political Control versus Agency Expertise: Congressional choices about Administrative Procedures.” American Political Science Review 89: 6273.Google Scholar
Bertelli, Anthony M. 2011. “Federalist No. 41: Does Polarization Inhibit Coordination?Public Administration Review (Special Issue) 71: s62s71.Google Scholar
Bertelli, Anthony M., and Grose, Christian R.. 2011. “The Lengthened Shadow of Another Institution? Ideal Point Estimates for the Executive Branch and Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 766780.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, Bill. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bolton, Alexander, and Thrower, Sharece. 2015. “Legislative Capacity and Executive Unilateralism.” American Journal of Political Science 60: 649663.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Gates, Scott. 1995. “Donut Shops and Speed Traps: Evaluating Models of Supervision and Police Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 555581.Google Scholar
Bulman-Pozen, Jessica. 2014. “Partisan Federalism.” Harvard Law Review 127: 10781146.Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor. 1963. The Deadlock of Democracy: Four-Party Politics in America Hardcover. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Callander, Steven, and Krehbiel, Keith. 2014. “Gridlock and Delegation in a Changing World.” American Journal of Political Science 58: 819834.Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall L., Moran, Mark J., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “Congressonal Influence over Policymaking: The Cast of the FTC.” In McCubbins, Mathew D. and Sullivan, Terry (eds.), Congress: Structure and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Maeve P. 2016. “Counting Regulations: An Overview of Rulemaking, Types of Federal Regulations, and Pages in the Federal Register.” (Congressional Research Service). Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43056.pdf (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. 2004. “Protection without Capture: Dynamic Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator.” American Political Science Review 98: 613631.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, and Moss, David. 2013. “Introduction.” In Carpenter, Daniel and Moss, David (eds.), Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Crespin, Michael H., Finocchiaro, Charles J., and Rohde, David W.. 2007. Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representative.” American Politics Research 35: 878904.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., and Lewis, David E.. 2008. “Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics and Agency Preferences.” Political Analysis 16(1): 320.Google Scholar
Cohen, Roger. 2016. “The Age of Distrust.” The New York Times (September 19). Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/opinion/the-age-of-distrust.html (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Cole, Kenneth C. 1942. “Presidential Influence on Independent Agencies.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 221: 7277.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crespin, Michael H., and Rohde, David W.. 2010. “Dimensions, Issues and Bills: Appropriations Voting on the House Floor.” Journal of Politics 72: 976989.Google Scholar
Devins, Neil, and Lewis, David E.. 2008. “Not so Independent Agencies: Party Polarization and the Limits of Institutional Design.” William and Mary Law Review 88: 459498.Google Scholar
Dowd, John M. 2017. “Letter to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, January 29.” The New York Times (June 2). Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/02/us/politics/trump-legal-documents.html (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Dudley, Susan. 2012. “Is the Execution of the Law Hyper-Partisan?Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 10: 359361.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, and O’Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. “Administrative Procedures, Information and Agency Discretion.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 697722.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. 1994. Dynamic Statutory Interpretation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N., and Ferejohn, John. 1992. “Making the Deal Stick: Enforcing the Original Constitutional Structure of Lawmaking in the Modern State.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 8: 165189.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N., and Ferejohn, John. 2001. “Super-Statutes.” Duke Law Journal 50: 12151276.Google Scholar
Fahrang, Sean. 2008. “Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the American Separation-of-Powers System.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 821839.Google Scholar
Fahrang, Sean, and Yaver, Miranda. 2015. “Divided Government and the Fragmentation of American Law.” American Journal of Political Science 60: 401417.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A., and O’Connell, Anne Joseph. 2014. “The Lost World of Administrative Law.” Texas Law Review 92: 11371189.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A., and Frickey, Philip P.. 1992. Law and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farina, Cynthia R. 2015. “Congressional Polarization: Terminal Constitutional Dysfunction.” Columbia Law Review 115: 16891738.Google Scholar
Finer, Herman. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Administration Review 1: 335350.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 563588.Google Scholar
Fong, Christian, and Krehbiel, Keith. 2018. “Limited Obstruction.” American Political Science Review 112: 114.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jody, and Spence, David B.. 2014. “Old Statutes, New Problems.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 163: 193.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. 1940. “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility.” Public Policy 1: 324.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Michael J. 2013. “Why Gridlock Matters.” Notre Dame Law Review 88: 21072120.Google Scholar
Gerken, Heather K. 2014. Federalism and the New Nationalism: An Overview. Yale Law Journal 123: 18891919.Google Scholar
Gluck, Abbe, O’Connell, Anne Joseph, and Po, Rosa. 2015. “Unorthodox Lawmaking, Unorthodox Rulemaking.” Columbia Law Review 115: 17891865.Google Scholar
Goodsell, Charles T. 2012. “Public Administration as Its Own Steward in Times of Partisan Deadlock and Fiscal Stress.” Public Administration Review 72: 1011.Google Scholar
Greve, Michael S., and Parish, Ashley C.. 2015Administrative Law without Congress.” George Mason Law Review 22: 501548.Google Scholar
Groser, Jens, and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 2013. “Candidate Entry and Political Polarization: An Antimedian Voter Theorem.” American Journal of Political Science 58: 127143.Google Scholar
Gulick, Luther. 1937. “Science, Values and Administration.” In Gulick, Luther and Urwick, L. (eds.), Papers in the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Hammond, Thomas H., and Knott, Jack. 1996. “Who Controls the Bureaucracy?: Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, Legal Constraints and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policy-Making.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12: 119167.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In King, John (ed.), The New American Political System. New York: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel. 2010. “Measuring Agency Preferences: Experts, Voting and the Power of Chairs.” DePaul Law Review 59: 333387.Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Shields, Todd G.. 2009. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hollibaugh, Gary E., and Rothenberg, Lawrence. 2018. “The Who, When and Where of Executive Nominations: Integrating Agency Independence and Appointee Ideology.” American Journal of Political Science 62: 296311.Google Scholar
Howell, William G., and Moe, Terry M.. 2016. Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Government—and Why We Need a More Powerful Presidency. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R., 2002. The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, John D., and McCarty, Nolan. 2004. “Bureaucratic Capacity, Delegation and Political Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 98: 481494.Google Scholar
Irwin, Neil. 2013. The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59: 1939.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59: 690707.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Capella, Joseph N.. 2010. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., and Braman, Donald. 2006. “Cultural Cognition and Public Policy.” Yale Law and Policy Review 24: 147170.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1967. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kovacic, William E. 2014. “Politics and Partisanship in Antitrust Enforcement.” Antitrust Law Journal 79: 687711.Google Scholar
Krause, George, and O’Connell, Anne Joseph. 2015. “Experiential Learning and Presidential Management of the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy: Logic and Evidence from Agency Leadership Appointments.” American Journal of Political Science 60: 914931.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas, and Schwarz, Liam. 2008. “Divided Government and Congressional Investigations.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33: 295321.Google Scholar
Larsen, Alison Orr. 2015. “Do Laws Have a Constitutional Shelf Life?Texas Law Review 94: 59114.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83104.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Daniel E. 2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review 19(2): 7988.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 1994. “Designing Bureaucratic Accountability.” Law and Contemporary Problems 57(1): 91126.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jason A. 2010. “Limitation Riders and Congressional Influence over Bureaucratic Policy Decisions.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 766782.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jason A., and McGrath, Robert J.. 2016. “Retrospective Congressional Oversight and the Dynamics of Legislative Influence over the Bureaucracy.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41: 899934.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 1992a. “Organizational Design and the Political Control of Administrative Agencies.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 8: 93110.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 1992b. “Separated Powers and Positive Political Theory: The Tug of War over Administrative Agencies.” Georgetown Law Journal 80: 671704.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forest and Shipan, Charles R.. 2008. “Change, Continuity and the Evolution of the Law.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 352367.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. 1990. “Explaining Administrative Process: Normative, Positive and Critical Stories of Legal Development.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6: 267298.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. 1997. Greed, Chaos and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2004. “The Appointments Dilemma.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 413428.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006.Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009. “Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?American Journal of Political Science 53: 666680.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 3: 243277.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.” Virginia Law Review 75: 431482.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D. and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 2: 165179.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian E. 2015a. “Agencies, Polarization and the States.” Columbia Law Review 115: 17391771.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian E. 2015b. “Appointments, Innovation and the Judicial-Political Divide.” Duke Law Journal 64: 16071643.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian E. 2015c. “The Constitutional Duty to Supervise.” Yale Law Journal 124: 18261933.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian E. 2017. “Foreward: 1930s Redux: The Administrative State under Seige.” Harvard Law Review 131: 293.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1987. “An Assessment of the Positive Theory of ‘Congressional Dominance.’” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12(4): 475520.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Donald P. and Roberts, Alasdair S.. 2010. “The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence: The Bush Administration and the Exhaustion of the Politicized Presidency.” Public Administration Review 70: 572581.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32(2): 303330.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211240.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2013. “Trust in Government Nears Record Low, but Most Federal Agencies Are Viewed Favorably.” October 18. Retrieved from www.people-press.org/2013/10/18/trust-in-government-nears-record-low-but-most-federal-agencies-are-viewed-favorably/ (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2014a. “Political Polarization in the American Public: How Increasing Ideological Uniformity and Partisan Antipathy Affect Politics, Compromise and Everyday Life.” June 12. Retrieved from www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/6-12-2014-Political-Polarization-Release.pdf (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2014b. “Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology—Fragmented Center Poses Election Challenges for Both Parties.” June 26. Retrieved from www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/6-26-14-Political-Typology-release1.pdf (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2015. “Most View the CDC Favorably; VA’s Image Slips.” January 22. Retrieved from www.people-press.org/2015/01/22/most-view-the-cdc-favorably-vas-image-slips/ (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H. 2011. “Why the Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America,” California Law Review 99: 273333.Google Scholar
Pope, Jeremy C. 2011. “Book Review: Americans, Congress and Democratic Responsiveness: Public Evaluations of Congress and Electoral Consequences (by David R. Jones and Monika L. McDermott).” Journal of Politics 73: 287288.Google Scholar
Rinquist, Evan J. 1995. “Political Control and Policy Impact in EPA’s Office of Water Quality.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 336363.Google Scholar
Robinson, Glen O. 1991. American Bureaucracy: Public Choice and Public Law. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1992. Rethinking the Progressive Agenda: The Reform of the American Regulatory State. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H. 2011. “Federalist No. 10: How Do Factions Affect the President as Administrator-in-Chief.” Public Administration Review (Special Issue) 71: s21s28.Google Scholar
Selin, Jennifer. 2015. “What Makes an Agency Independent?American Journal of Political Science 59: 971987.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1992. “Congress Is a ‘They,’ Not an ‘It’: Legislative Intent as Oxymoron.” International Review of Law & Economics 12: 239256.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1946. “The Proverbs of Administration,” Public Administration Review 6(1): 5367.Google Scholar
Shor, Boris, Berry, Christopher, and McCarty, Nolan. 2010. “A Bridge to Somewhere: Mapping State and Congressional Ideology on a Cross-Institutional Common Space.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35: 417448.Google Scholar
Sohoni, Mila. 2016. “The Administrative Constitution in Exile.” William & Mary Law Review 57: 923974.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Flynn, James, Mertz, C. K., Poumadere, Marc, and Mays, Claire. 2000. “Nuclear Power and the Public.” In Renn, Ortwin and Bernd, Rohrman (eds.), Cross-Cultural Risk Perception. Technology, Risk, and Society (An International Series in Risk Analysis). Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 55102.Google Scholar
Spence, David B. 1997. Administrative Law and Agency Policymaking: Rethinking the Positive Theory of Political Control. Yale Journal on Regulation 14: 407450.Google Scholar
Spence, David B. 1999. “Managing Delegation Ex Ante: Using Law to Steer Administrative Agencies.” Journal of Legal Studies 28: 413459.Google Scholar
Spence, David B., and Cross, Frank. 2000. “A Public Choice Case for the Administrative State.” Georgetown Law Journal 89: 97147.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2: 321.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffery M., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mack. 2002. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter. 1984. “The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch.” Columbia Law Review 84: 574669.Google Scholar
University of Texas. 2016. “Energy Poll: Top Line Wave 10 Results.” Retrieved from www.utenergypoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Topline-Wave-10.pdf (last accessed December 11, 2018).Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul R. 1980. “Jawboning Administrative Agencies: Ex Parte Contacts by the White House.” Columbia Law Review 80: 943989.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., and Moran, Mark J.. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy: 765–800.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., and Carpenter, Daniel P.. 2003. “Executive Power in American Institutional Development.” Perspectives on Politics 1: 495513.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2: 197222.Google Scholar
Wood, B. Dan, and Waterman, Richard. 1991. “They Dynamics of Political Control in a Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 85: 801828.Google Scholar
Yaver, Miranda. 2015. “When Do Agencies Have Agency?: The Limits of Compliance in the EPA.” Working Paper. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/075d/7745c7356b4dab5b4ce61137f357c264fae3.pdf (last accessed January 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Yoo, Christopher, Calabresi, Steven, and Colangelo, Anthony. 2005. “The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945–2004.” Iowa Law Review 90: 601731.Google Scholar

References

Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. 2013. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A., and Demsetz, Harold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” The American Economic Review 62(5): 777795.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2000. The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection. In Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce (eds.), Congress Reconsidered, 7th Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties.” 44(3): part 2, Supplement.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael, and McCarty, Nolan. 2013. The Causes and Consequences of Polarization. In Martin, Cathie Jo and Mansbridge, Jane (eds.), Negotiating Agreement in Politics. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2015. “The Dysfunctional Congress.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 85101.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. New York: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2002. “Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 190199.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1948. “The Decisions of a Committee Using a Special Majority.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 16(3): 245261.Google Scholar
Brady, David W., and Volden, Craig. 2005. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bulman-Pozen, Jessica. 2014. “Partisan Federalism.” Harvard Law Review 127(4): 10771146.Google Scholar
Bulman-Pozen, Jessica, and Gerken, Heather K.. 2009. “Uncooperative Federalism.” Yale Law Journal 118: 12561310.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., and McCarty, Nolan. 2004. “Models of Vetoes and Veto Bargaining.” Annual Review Political Science 7: 409435.Google Scholar
Chafetz, Josh. 2017. Congress’ss Constitution: Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2008. “Measuring Ideological Polarization on the United States Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 62(1): 146157.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., Bertelli, Anthony, Grose, Christian R., Lewis, David E., and Nixon, David C.. 2012. “Separated Powers in the United States: The Ideology of Agencies, Presidents, and Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 341354.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal. 2008. “Presidential Unilateralism and Political Polarization: Why Today’s Congress Lacks the Will and the Way to Stop Presidential Initiatives.” Willamette Law Review 45: 395.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal, and Lewis, David E.. 2008. “Not-So Independent Agencies: Party Polarization and the Limits of Institutional Design.” Boston University Law Review 1988: 459.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal E. 1988. “Appropriations Redux: A Critical Look at the Fiscal Year 1988 Continuing Resolution.” Duke Law Journal: 389.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, and O‘Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. 1991. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions.” Yale Law Journal 101: 331455.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Shipan, Charles. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6: 120.Google Scholar
Gely, Rafael, and Spiller, Pablo T.. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6(2): 263300.Google Scholar
Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1):100119.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing Risk Without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 243260.Google Scholar
Hanson, Peter. 2013. “Abandoning the Regular Order: Majority Party Influence on Appropriations in the US Senate.” Political Research Quarterly 67(3): 519532.Google Scholar
Hanson, Peter. 2014. Too Weak to Govern: Majority Party Power and Appropriations in the US Senate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2012. “End of the Dialogue: Political Polarization, the Supreme Court, and Congress.” Southern California Law Review 86: 205.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2017. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Howell, William G. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, William G., and Moe, Terry M.. 2016. Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Government–and Why We Need a More Powerful Presidency. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Schickler, Eric. 2016. Investigating the President: Congressional Checks on Presidential Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the US Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Daryl J., and Pildes, Richard H.. 2006. “Separation of Parties, Not Powers.” Harvard Law Review 119: 23112386.Google Scholar
Lewis, David E. 2010. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, and Shipan, Charles R.. 2008. “Change, Continuity, and the Evolution of the Law.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2):252267. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–5907.2008.00311.xGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 1997. “Presidential Reputation and the Veto.” Economics & Politics 9(1): 126.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2007. The Policy Effects of Political Polarization. In Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda (eds.), Transformations of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2015a. “Reducing Polarization by Making Parties Stronger.” In Persily, Nathaniel (ed.), Solutions to Political Polarization in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2015b. “Reducing Polarization: Some Facts for Reformers.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 2015: 243278.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2016. “The Decline of Regular Order in Appropriations – Does It Matter?” In Jenkins, Jeffrey and Patashnik, Eric (eds.), Congress and Policy Making in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 162.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2013. Political Bubbles: Financial Crises and the Failure of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, and Razaghian, Rose. 1999. “Advice and Consent: Senate Responses to Executive Branch Nominations 1885–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 43(3): 11221143.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Howell, William G.. 1999. “The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15(1): 132179.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Anne Joseph. 2009. “Vacant Offices: Delays in Staffing Top Agency Positions.” Southern California Law Review 82: 913.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Anne Joseph. 2015. “Shortening Agency and Judicial Vacancies through Filibuster Reform? An Examination of Confirmation Rates and Delays from 1981 to 2014.” Duke Law Journal, 64.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H. 2015. “Focus on Fragmentation, Not Polarization: Re-Empower Party Leadership.” In Persily, Nathaniel (ed.), Solutions to Political Polarization in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” The Journal of Politics 46(4): 10611079.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Vermeule, Adrian. 2011. The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Steven. 2016. “National Forces in State Legislative Elections.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667(1): 207225.Google Scholar
Rogers, Steven. 2017. “Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll Calls and Ideological Representation.” American Political Science Review 111(3): 555571.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 530551.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1998. Trust and Democratic Governance. In Braithwaite, Valerie and Levi, Maragret (eds.), Trust and Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 269294.Google Scholar
White, Joe. 1988. “The Continuing Resolution: A Crazy Way to Govern?The Brookings Review 6(3): 2835.Google Scholar
Widiss, Deborah A. 2011. “Undermining Congressional Overrides: The Hydra Problem in Statutory Interpretation.” Texas Law Review 90: 859.Google Scholar
Woon, Jonathan, and Anderson, Sarah. 2012. “Political Bargaining and the Timing of Congressional Appropriations.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37(4): 409436.Google Scholar

References

Albright, Madeleine. 2018. Fascism: A Warning. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Albertson, Bethany, and Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 388405.Google Scholar
Bulman-Pozen, Jessica, and Gerken, Heather K.. 2009. “Uncooperative Federalism.” Yale Law Journal (118): 12561583.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2016. “Party versus Faction in the Reformed Presidential Nominating System,” P.S.: Political Science and Politics 49: 701708.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 2001. How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2015.“Facing Up to the Democratic Recession,” Journal of Democracy 26: 141155.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 2018. “‘Closer’ or Context? Explaining Donald Trump’s Relations with Congress.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48: 456479.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence & Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens,” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564581.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael, 1995. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Schickler, Eric. 2016. Investigating the President: Congressional Checks on Presidential Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas, and Schickler, Eric. 2018. “The Resilience of Separation of Powers? Congress and the Russia Investigation.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48(3): 436455.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2018. “The 115th Congress and Questions of Party Unity in a Polarized Era,” Journal of Politics 80(4): 14641473.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, and Marcus, George. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 440458.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns,” American Political Science Review 87(3): 672685.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–2002, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mickey, Robert, Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan Ahmad. 2017. “Is America Still Safe for Democracy? Why the United States Is in Danger of Backsliding,” Foreign Affairs 96(May/June): 2029.Google Scholar
Miler, Kristina C. 2018. Poor Representation: Congress and the Politics of Poverty in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist,” Government and Opposition 39(4): 541563.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werne. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn. 2017. “President Trump and Congressional Republicans: Uncertain Teamwork in the 115th Congress.” The Forum 15(3): 513524.Google Scholar
Reich, Gary. 2018. “Hitting a Wall? The Trump Administration Meets Immigration Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 48(3): 372395.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy. 2018. The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. New York: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., ed. 2018. Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J., and Davis, Anne I.. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning Via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29(2): 247273.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2013. “The Threat from the Populist Left,” Journal of Democracy 24: 1832.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt, and Madrid, Raúl L.. 2019. Trump’s Populism: The Mobilization of Nationalist Cleavages and the Future of U.S. Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Anxieties of Governance
  • Edited by Frances E. Lee, University of Maryland, College Park, Nolan McCarty, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Can America Govern Itself?
  • Online publication: 25 May 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667357.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Anxieties of Governance
  • Edited by Frances E. Lee, University of Maryland, College Park, Nolan McCarty, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Can America Govern Itself?
  • Online publication: 25 May 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667357.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Anxieties of Governance
  • Edited by Frances E. Lee, University of Maryland, College Park, Nolan McCarty, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Can America Govern Itself?
  • Online publication: 25 May 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667357.012
Available formats
×