Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T20:46:36.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Time and Thinking

An Alternative to Traditional Learning and Development Activities

from Part III - Designing the Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Kenneth G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, H. M., Schneider, F., and Martijn, C. 2012. Dealing efficiently with emotions: Acceptance-based coping with negative emotions requires fewer resources than suppression. Cognition and Emotion 26: 863870.Google Scholar
Allianz Insurance. 2016. Employee benefits. https://www.allianzlife.com/about/careers/benefits (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Amabile, T. 1983. The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T., and Gryskiewicz, S. 1989. The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal 2: 231253.Google Scholar
Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., and Herron, M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal 39: 11541184.Google Scholar
Amabile, T., Mueller, J., Simpson, W., Hadley, C., Kramer, S., and Fleming, L. 2003. Time pressures and creativity in organisations: A longitudinal field study. HBS Working Paper: 273.Google Scholar
Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., and Zhou, J. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management 40: 12971333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews-Hanna, J. R. 2012. The brain’s default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation. Neuroscientist 18: 251270.Google Scholar
Atlassian. 2016. ShipIt. https://www.atlassian.com/company/shipit (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Atwater, L. E., and Yammarino, F. J. 1992. Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology 45(1): 141164.Google Scholar
Axtell, C. M., Parker, S. K., Holman, D., and Totterdell, P. 2007. Enhancing customer service: Perspective taking in a call centre. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 16: 141168.Google Scholar
Baer, M., and Oldham, G. R. 2006. The curvilinear relationship between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 963970.Google Scholar
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., and Schooler, J. W. 2011. Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition 20: 16041611.Google Scholar
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., and Schooler, J. W. 2012. Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science 23:11171122.Google Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., and Weathersby, R. P. 1983. Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. The Academy of Management Review 8: 273284.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. 1991. Escaping the Self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., and Tice, D. M. 1998. Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 12521265>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdi, K., Allan, C., and Warr, P. 1997. Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types of employee development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(6): 845857.Google Scholar
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., and Farr, J. 2009. A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2: 305337.Google Scholar
Brown, K. W., and Ryan, R. M. 2003. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84: 822848.Google Scholar
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., and Creswell, D. 2007. Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory 18: 211237.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. 2009. Play: How it Shapes the Brain, Opens the Imagination, and Invigorates the Soul. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
BusinessDictionary.com. 2016. Slack. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/slack.html (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Carver, C., and Scheier, M. F. 1981. Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control Theory Approach to Human Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Chiesa, A., and Serretti, A. 2009. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 15: 593600.Google Scholar
Choi, J. N., and Chang, J. Y. 2009. Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology 94: 245253.Google Scholar
Christoff, K. 2012. Undirected thought: Neural determinants and correlates. Brain Research 1428: 5159.Google Scholar
Dane, E. 2011. Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the workplace. Journal of Management 37: 9971018.Google Scholar
Daudelin, M. W. 1996. Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics 26: 3648.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10: 85.Google Scholar
Dolmans, S. A. M., van Burg, E., Reymen, I. M. M. J., and Romme, A. G. L. 2014. Dynamics of resource slack and constraints: Resource positions in action. Organization Studies 35(4): 511549.Google Scholar
Duval, T. S., and Wicklund, R. A. 1972. A Theory of Objective Self Awareness. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Ellis, S., Mendel, R., and Nir, M. 2006. Learning from successful and failed experience: The moderating role of kind of after-event review. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 669680.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. A., and Hargadon, A. B. 2006. Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science 17: 470483.Google Scholar
Evans, L. 2014. The exact amount of time you should work every day. http://www.fastcompany.com/3035605/how-to-be-a-success-at-everything/the-exact-amount-of-time-you-should-work-every-day (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., and Buss, A. H. 1975. Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43: 522527.Google Scholar
Fleenor, J. W., Smither, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Braddy, P. W., and Sturm, R. E. 2010. Self–other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly 21: 10051034.Google Scholar
Franzoi, S. L., Davis, M. H., and Young, R. D. 1985. The effects of private self-consciousness and perspective taking on satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 15841594.Google Scholar
Fried, Y., and Slowik, L. H. 2004. Enriching goal-setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Academy of Management Review 29(3): 404422.Google Scholar
Fritz, C., Ellis, A. M., Demsky, C. A., Lin, B. C., and Guros, F. 2013. Embracing work breaks: Recovering from work stress. Organizational Dynamics 42: 274280.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., and Moskowitz, G. B. 2000. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favouritisim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 708724.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. G. 1986. Activation theory and task design: An empirical test of several new predictions. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 411418.Google Scholar
Gilson, L. L., Litchfield, R. C., and Gilson, P. W. 2014. An examination of the relationship between time and creativity. In Shipp, A. and Fried, Y., eds., Time and Work: How Time Impacts Individuals, 141162. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., and Yang, T. 2011. Mindfulness at Work. In Martocchio, J., Liao, H., and Joshi, A., eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 30: 115157.Google Scholar
Govern, J. M., and Marsch, L. A. 2001. Development and validation of the Situational Self-Awareness Scale. Consciousness and Cognition 10: 366378.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., and Berry, J. W. 2011. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal 54(1): 7396.Google Scholar
Gray, D. E. 2007. Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management Learning 38: 495517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2003. A behavioural theory of RandD expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal 46: 685702.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E. 1981. On the relation between “a ha” experiences and the construction of ideas. History of Science 19: 4159.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. M., Neff, N. L., Schwall, A. R., and Zhao, X. 2006. A meta-analytic investigation of individual creativity and innovation. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Hoever, I. J., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., and Barkema, H. G. 2012. Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology 97: 982996.Google Scholar
Holzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., and Ott, U. 2011. How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 537559.Google Scholar
Honoré, C. 2004. In Praise of Slowness: How a Worldwide Movement is Challenging the Cult of Speed. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Horton, W. S., and Keysar, B. 1996. When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition 59: 91117.Google Scholar
Hulsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J. E. M., Feinholdt, A., and Lang, J. W. B. 2013. Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 98: 310325.Google Scholar
Hurtz, G. M., and Williams, K. J. 2009. Attitudinal and motivational antecedents of participation in voluntary employee development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology 94: 635653.Google Scholar
Ingram, R. E. 1990. Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model. Psychological Bulletin 107: 156176.Google Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J. 1990. Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain and Illness. New York: Delacorte.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., and Stone, A. A. 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science 306(5702): 17761780.Google Scholar
Kane, C. 2015. These 21 companies will pay you to take time off. Fortune, March 16. http://fortune.com/2015/03/16/paid-sabbaticals (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Kasser, T., and Sheldon, K. M. 2009. Time affluence as a path toward personal happiness and ethical business practice: Empirical evidence from four studies. Journal of Business Ethics 84: 243255.Google Scholar
Klinger, E., Gregoire, K. C., and Barta, S. G. 1973. Physiological correlates of mental activity: Eye movements, alpha, and heart rate during imagining, suppression, concentration, search, and choice. Psychophysiology 10: 471477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluger, A., and DeNisi, A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119(2): 254284.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1976. Collected Papers on Moral Development and Moral Education. Cambridge, MA: Center for Moral Education.Google Scholar
Kreider, T. 2012. The “busy” trap. The New York Times, June 30. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/30/the-busy-trap/?_r=1 (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Latham, S. F., and Braun, M. 2009. Managerial risk, innovation, and organizational decline. Journal of Management 35: 258281.Google Scholar
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Dimitrova, N. G., and Sels, L. 2013. Mindfulness, authentic functioning, and work engagement: A growth modeling approach. Journal of Vocational Behaviour 82: 238247.Google Scholar
Levitin, D. 2015. The Organized Mind: Thinking Straight in the Age of Information Overload. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lieberman, J. N. 1977. Playfulness: Its Relationship to Imagination and Creativity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lord, R., Diefendorff, J., Schmidt, A., and Hall, R. 2010. Self-regulation at work. Annual Review of Psychology 61: 543568.Google Scholar
Mainemelis, C., and Ronson, S. 2006. Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organisational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior 27: 81131.Google Scholar
Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., and Fletcher, T. D. 2006. Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 927935.Google Scholar
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning. Organization Science 2: 7187.Google Scholar
Marzuq, N., and Drach-Zahavy, A. 2012. Recovery during a short period of respite: The interactive roles of mindfulness and respite experiences. Work and Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health and Organisations 26: 175194.Google Scholar
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., and Macrae, C. N. 2007. Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science 315(5810): 393395.Google Scholar
Maurer, T. J., Weiss, E. M., and Barbeite, F. G. 2003. A model of involvement in work-related learning and development activity: The effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 707724.Google Scholar
Mazoyer, P., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Etard, O., Houde, F., Crivello, F., Joliot, M., Petit, L., and Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. 2001. Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man. Brain Research Bulletin 54: 287298.Google Scholar
McVay, J. C., and Kane, M. J. 2010. Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin 136: 188197.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. 1962. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69: 220232.Google Scholar
Mims, C. 2013. Google engineers insist 20% time is not dead – it’s just turned into 120% time. Quartz, August 16. http://qz.com/116196/google-engineers-insist-20-time-is-not-dead-its-just-turned-into-120-time (accessed August 28 2016).Google Scholar
Mogilner, C., Chance, Z., and Norton, M. I. 2012. Giving time gives you time. Psychological Science 23: 12331235.Google Scholar
Moshman, D. 1998. Cognitive development beyond childhood. In Kuhn, D., Siegler, R., and Damon, W., eds., Handbook of Child Psychology, 5th ed., 2: 947978. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S., Phillips, D. T., Baird, B., and Schooler, J. W. 2013. Mindfulness training improves Working Memory Capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science 24: 776781.Google Scholar
Nesbit, P. L. 2012. The role of self-reflection, emotional management of feedback, and self-regulation processes in self-directed leadership development. Human Resource Development Review 11: 203226.Google Scholar
Noe, R. A., Wilk, S. L., Mullen, E., and Wanek, J. 1997. Employee development: Issues in construct definition and investigation of antecedents. In Ford, J and Associates, eds., Improving Training Effectiveness in Work Organizations, 153189. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ohly, S., and Fritz, C. 2010. Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behaviour: A multilevel study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 31: 543565.Google Scholar
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., and Pluntke, F. 2006. Routinisation, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviours. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 27: 257279.Google Scholar
Park, H. S., and Raile, A. N. W. 2010. Perspective taking and communication satisfaction in coworker dyads. Journal of Business and Psychology 25: 569581.Google Scholar
Parker, S. K. 2014. Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology 65: 661691.Google Scholar
Parker, S. K., and Axtell, C. M. 2001. Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal 44: 10851100.Google Scholar
Parker, S. K., Atkins, P. W. B., and Axtell, C. M. 2008. Building better workplaces through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 23: 149.Google Scholar
Perls, F., Hefferline, R. F., and Goodman, P. 1951. Gestalt Therapy: Excitement and Growth in the Human Personality. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1932. The Moral Judgement of the Child. London: Paul Keegan.Google Scholar
Pyszczynski, T., and Greenberg, J. 1987. Self-regulatory perseveration and the depressive self-focusing style: A self-awareness theory of reactive depression. Psychological Bulletin 102: 122138.Google Scholar
Raelin, J. A. 2002. “I don’t have time to think!” versus the art of reflective practice. Reflections 4: 6675.Google Scholar
Randall, J., Oswald, F., and Beier, M. 2014. Mind-wandering, cognition and performance: A theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation. Psychological Bulletin 140(6): 14111431.Google Scholar
Risko, E. F., Anderson, N., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., and Kingstone, A. 2012. Everyday attention: Variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology 16: 234242.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. 2003. Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronised high-speed society. Constellations 10: 433.Google Scholar
Rosnagel, C. 2000. Cognitive load and perspective-taking: Applying the automatic-controlled distinction to verbal communication. European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 429445.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. 2004. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 657687.Google Scholar
Scott, W. E. 1966. Activation theory and task design. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 1: 330.Google Scholar
Seiter, C. 2014. Why you need to stop thinking you are too busy to take breaks. Fast Company, October 2. http://www.fastcompany.com/3034928/the-future-of-work/why-you-need-to-stop-thinking-you-are-too-busy-to-take-breaks (accessed August 28 2016).Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E., and Gilson, L. L. 2004. What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly 15: 3353.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., and Duval, T. S. 2001. Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring problems. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5: 230241.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., and O’Brien, M. E. 2004. Self-awareness and constructive functioning: Revisiting “The Human Dilemma.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 23: 475489.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., and Phillips, A. G. 2013. Self-awareness without awareness? Implicit self-focused attention and behavioral self-regulation. Self and Identity 12: 114127.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J. 2013. Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: A process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychological Bulletin 139: 519535.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., and Schooler, J. W. 2006. The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin 132: 946958.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., and Schooler, J. W. 2008. When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory and Cognition 36(6): 11441150.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., Ruby, F. J. M., and Singer, T. 2013. Letting go of the present: Mind-wandering is associated with reduced delay discounting. Consciousness and Cognition 22: 17.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., Baracaia, S. F., Lowe, M., and Obonsawin, M. 2003. Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness and Cognition 12(3): 452484.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., Fitzgerald, A., Miles, L. K., and Phillips, L. H. 2009. Shifting moods, wandering minds: Negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion 9(2): 271.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W., Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., Burns, P., and Macrae, C. N. 2011. Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition 20: 11201126.Google Scholar
Smillie, L. D., Yeo, G., Furnham, A., and Jackson, C. J. 2006. Benefits of all work and no play: The relationship between neuroticism and performance as a function of resource allocation. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 131155.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S., and Fritz, C. 2014. Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 36(S1): S72S103.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M., and Kunzmann, U. 2005. Positive adult personality development: Adjustment and/or growth? European Psychologist 10 : 320329.Google Scholar
Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Maj, M., Van der Linden, M., and D’Argembeau, A. 2011. Mind-wandering: Phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. Acta Psychologica 136: 370381.Google Scholar
Szollos, A. 2009. Toward a psychology of chronic time pressure: Conceptual and methodological review. Time and Society 18: 332350.Google Scholar
Take back your time. 2016. https://www.takebackyourtime.org (accessed August 28 2016).Google Scholar
Trapnell, P. D., and Campbell, J. D. 1999. Private self-consciousness and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 284304.Google Scholar
Turnbull, S. 2004. Perceptions and experience of time-space compression and acceleration: The shaping of leaders’ identities. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19: 809824.Google Scholar
Unsworth, K. L., Yeo, G. B., and Beck, J. 2014. Multiple goals: A review and derivation of general principles. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 35(8): 10641078.Google Scholar
Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., and Voss, Z. G. 2008. The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 51: 147164.Google Scholar
Williams, M., and Penman, D. 2011. Mindfulness: A Practical Guide to Finding Peace in a Frantic World. London: Piatkus.Google Scholar
Wolever, R. Q., Bobinet, K. J., McCabe, K., Mackenzie, E. R., Fekete, E., Kusnick, C. A., and Baime, M. 2012. Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 17(2): 246.Google Scholar
Zauberman, G., and Lynch, J. G. 2005. Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134: 2337.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., and Hoever, I. J. 2014. Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1: 333359.Google Scholar
Zoogah, D. B. 2010. Why should I be left behind? Employees’ perceived relative deprivation and participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology 95: 159173.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×