Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:56:31.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Technology and Social Evaluation: Implications for Individuals and Organizations

from Part VII - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Employees and Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

By
Roshni Raveendhran  and
Nathanael J. Fast
Edited by
Richard N. Landers
Richard N. Landers
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior , pp. 921 - 943
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABI Research. (August 20, 2014). More than 30 billion devices will drive wireless connected devices to 40.9 billion in 2020. Retrieved from www.abiresearch.com/press/the-internet-of-things-will-drive-wireless-connect/.Google Scholar
ABI Research. (September 29, 2016). New workplace wearables bridge communication gap between employees and systems. Retrieved from www.abiresearch.com/press/new-workplace-wearables-bridge-communication-gap-b/.Google Scholar
Abraham, M. & Annunziata, M. (March 13, 2017). Augmented reality is already improving worker performance. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/03/augmented-reality-is-already-improving-worker-performance.Google Scholar
Adams, J. S. (1976). The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1175, 1199.Google Scholar
Aiello, J. R. & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(3), 339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alge, B. J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, P. (September 30, 2017). Smart companies are already using Apple’s ARkit to make cash registers ring. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/paularmstrongtech/2017/09/30/smart-companies-are-already-using-apples-arkit-to-make-cash-registers-ring/#1aa8ae59253d.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J. & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the “E” to e-leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailenson, J. N. & Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. In Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. (2014). The transparency trap. Harvard Business Review, 92(10), 58–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Boitnott, J. (April 28, 2015). Wearable tech is improving employee productivity and happiness. Retrieved from www.entrepreneur.com/article/245458.Google Scholar
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2013). Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, J., Rubin, J. Z., & Lang, E. (1981). Face-saving and entrapment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(1), 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. H. (March 28, 2011). Virtual world, mobile tech finding use as innovative education tools. Retrieved from www.masshightech.com/stories/2011/03/28/weekly9-Virtual-world-mobile-tech-finding-use-as-innovative-educationtools.html.Google Scholar
Brown, B. R. & Garland, H. (1971). The effects of incompetency, audience acquaintanceship, and anticipated evaluative feedback on face-saving behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(5), 490–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busel, M. (July 7, 2017). The 6 biggest challenges facing augmented reality: A look at the biggest risk factors for near-term AR adoption. Retrieved from https://medium.com/the-mission/the-6-biggest-challenges-facing-augmented-reality-8d48c470286d.Google Scholar
Cain, M. (November 2, 2016). Top 10 emerging technologies in the digital workplace. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/gartnergroup/2016/11/02/top-10-emerging-technologies-in-the-digital-workplace/#1af99ffc1e48.Google Scholar
Chalykoff, J. & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer‐aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 807–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ClevengerJr, T. (1959). A synthesis of experimental research in stage fright. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45(2), 134–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbert, A., Yee, N., & George, G. (2016). The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsello, J. (January, 2013). What the Internet of Things will bring to the workplace. WIRED. Retrieved from www.wired.com/insights/2013/11/what-the-internet-of-things-will-bring-to-the-workplace/.Google Scholar
Cox, L. (March, 2017). Personal technology in the workplace: Wearables. Retrieved from https://disruptionhub.com/wearables-in-the-workplace/.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. J. & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272-309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (6), 627–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Cremer, D. (April, 2017). CC’ing the boss on email makes employees feel less trusted. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/04/ccing-the-boss-on-email-makes-employees-feel-less-trusted.Google Scholar
Detert, J. R. & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRosa, D. M., Hantula, D. A., Kock, N., & D’Arcy, J. (2004). Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management, 43(2‐3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derousseau, R. (June 14, 2017). The tech that tracks your movements at work. Retrieved from www.bbc.com/capital/story/20170613-the-tech-that-tracks-your-movements-at-work.Google Scholar
Dickerson, S. S. & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, K. (August 26, 2009). Three unexpected dangers of augmented reality. Retrieved from: www.fastcompany.com/1339617/three-unexpected-dangers-augmented-reality.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Administration. New York, NY: Pitman.Google Scholar
Future Workplace Study (July 18, 2016). Dell and Intel Future Workforce Study provides key insights into technology trends shaping the modern global workplace. Retrieved from: www.dell.com/learn/us/en/uscorp1/press-releases/2016–07-18-future-workforce-study-provides-key-insights.Google Scholar
Gallup (2017). State of the American Workplace. Retrieved from: www.gallup.com/reports/199961/state-american-workplace-report-2017.aspx.Google Scholar
Gartner (February 2, 2016). Gartner says worldwide wearable devices sales to grow 18.4 percent in 2016. Retrieved from: www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3198018.Google Scholar
Gartner (October 4, 2017). Gartner identifies the top ten strategic technology trends for 2018. Retrieved from: www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3812063.Google Scholar
Gartner (2018a). Internet of Things. Retrieved from: www.gartner.com/it-glossary/internet-of-things/.Google Scholar
Gartner (2018b). Virtual Reality (VR). Retrieved from: www.gartner.com/it-glossary/vr-virtual-reality/.Google Scholar
Gartner (2018c). Augmented Reality (AR). Retrieved from: www.gartner.com/it-glossary/augmented-reality-ar/.Google Scholar
Garland, H. & Brown, B. R. (1972). Face-saving as affected by subjects’ sex, audiences’ sex and audience expertise. Sociometry, 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudiosi, J. (2015). How Ford goes further with virtual reality. Retrieved from: http://fortune.com/2015/09/23/ford-virtual-reality/. Date published: September 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The moral career of the mental patient. Psychiatry, 22(2), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammick, J. K. & Lee, M. J. (2014). Do shy people feel less communication apprehension online? The effects of virtual reality on the relationship between personality characteristics and communication outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkins, S. G. (2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, (February 5, 2015). Experts: Wearable tech tests our privacy limits. Retrieved from: www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/02/05/tech-wearables-privacy/22955707/.Google Scholar
IDC (June 23, 2015). IDC forecasts U.S. mobile worker population to surpass 105 million by 2020. Retrieved from: www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150623005073/en#.VYmhfEZB58m.Google Scholar
IDC (February 27, 2017a). Worldwide spending on augmented and virtual reality forecast to reach $13.9 billion in 2017, according to IDC. Retrieved from: www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS42331217.Google Scholar
IDC (October, 2017b). IDC futurescape: Worldwide connected devices and augmented reality/virtual reality 2018 Predictions. Retrieved from: www.idc.com/research/viewtoc.jsp?containerId=US43145617.Google Scholar
Identity Theft Resource Center (December 13, 2016). 2016 Data breach category summary. Retrieved from: www.idtheftcenter.org/images/breach/ITRCBreachStatsReportSummary2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Interact Report (February, 2015). New Interact Report: Many leaders shrink from straight talk with employees. Retrieved from: http://interactauthentically.com/new-interact-report-many-leaders-shrink-from-straight-talk-with-employees/.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. M. & Latané, B. (1981). All alone in front of all those people: Stage fright as a function of number and type of co-performers and audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, P. H., Garger, J., Brown, C. A., & Deale, C. S. (2009). Personality and virtual reality team candidates: The roles of personality traits, technology anxiety and trust as predictors of perceptions of virtual reality teams. Journal of Business and Management, 15(2), 143.Google Scholar
Jamieson, J. P. & Mendes, W. B. (2016). Social stress facilitates risk in youths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T., McFee, E., Olguin, D. O., Waber, B., & Pentland, A. (2012). Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 412–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komaki, J. L. (1986). Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komaki, J. L., Zlotnick, S., & Jensen, M. (1986). Development of an operant-based taxonomy and observational index of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslov, K., Mendes, W. B., Pajtas, P. E., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2011). Asymmetry in resting intracortical activity as a buffer to social threat. Psychological Science, 22(5), 641–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lapowsky, I. (April 23, 2015). Oculus’ founder on the pros and cons of VR for social good. Retrieved from: www.wired.com/2015/04/palmer-luckey-social-change/.Google Scholar
Larson, J. R. & Callahan, C. (1990). Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(3), 371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. R. & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. R. & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levski, Y. (2017). 10 Real world examples of AR marketing success. Retrieved from: https://appreal-vr.com/blog/10-augmented-reality-marketing-examples/.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a Practically Useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, M. (November 11, 2016). Augmented and virtual reality fuel the future workplace. Retrieved from: www.forbes.com/sites/maribellopez/2016/11/11/augmented-and-virtual-reality-fuel-the-future-workplace/#b19b9de185df.Google Scholar
Martens, R. & Landers, D. M. (1972). Evaluation potential as a determinant of coaction effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8(4), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCroskey, J. C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, M. J. & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. (May 17, 2017). Best practices for using wearable devices in wellness programs. Retrieved from: www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/benefits/pages/wearable-trackers-best-practices.aspx.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Modigliani, A. (1971). Embarrassment, facework, and eye contact: Testing a theory of embarrassment. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 17(1), 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, D. & Butera, F. (2007). The focusing effect of self-evaluation threat in coaction and social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nah, F. F. H., Eschenbrenner, B., & DeWester, D. (2011). Enhancing brand equity through flow and telepresence: A comparison of 2D and 3D virtual worlds. MIS Quarterly, 731–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehoff, B. P. & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, K. & DuRivage, V. (1986). Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control. Business and Society Review, 56, 16–20.Google Scholar
Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76(3), 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, D. M. (1999). Model for types of privacy by privacy functions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepitone, J. (October 27, 2016). Designing the workplace of the future: Virtual reality and 3D panoramas. Retrieved from: http://money.cnn.com/gallery/technology/2016/10/25/workplace-of-the-future/index.html.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (May 20, 2015). Americans’ attitudes about privacy, security and surveillance. Retrieved from: www.pewinternet.org/2015/05/20/americans-attitudes-about-privacy-security-and-surveillance/.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (June 6, 2017). The Internet of Things connectivity binge: What are the implications?. Retrieved from: www.pewinternet.org/2017/06/06/the-internet-of-things-connectivity-binge-what-are-the-implications/.Google Scholar
Phillips, G. M. (1968). Reticence: Pathology of the normal speaker. Communications Monographs, 35(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 36–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raveendhran, R. & Fast, N.J. (2018). Tracked by technology: Adoption of behavior-tracking products. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Raveendhran, R., Fast, N.J., & Carnevale, P.J. (2018). Hiding behind technology: Managers adopt technology to avoid negative evaluations. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Roberts, K., Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Managing the global workforce: Challenges and strategies. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 93–106.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M. & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabelman, E. & Lam, R. (June 23, 2015). The real-life dangers of augmented reality. Retrieved from: https://spectrum.ieee.org/consumer-electronics/portable-devices/the-reallife-dangers-of-augmented-reality.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, B. R. & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, G. & Barker, J. R. (2006). Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 934–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, J. (2003). Automatic for the people: how representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, C. (June 6, 2017). The Internet of Things is becoming more difficult to escape. Retrieved from: www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/06/06/531747037/the-internet-of-things-is-becoming-more-difficult-to-escape.Google Scholar
Smith, W. P. & Tabak, F. (2009). Monitoring employee e-mails: Is there any room for privacy?. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39(11), 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, F. (April 6, 2017). Future of communication with VR and AR. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/ma-communication-design/future-of-communication-with-vr-ar-aa9792f7223e.Google Scholar
Strickland, L. H. (1958). Surveillance and trust. Journal of Personality, 26(2), 200–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stritzke, W. G., Nguyen, A., & Durkin, K. (2004). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, L. (March 9, 2016). Two-thirds of managers are uncomfortable communicating with employees. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2016/03/two-thirds-of-managers-are-uncomfortable-communicating-with-employees.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P. (1992). Situational determinants of shame and guilt in young adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P. (1999). The self-conscious emotions: Shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride. In Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion, 541–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., & Dunning, D. (2005). The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasko, M., Teigland, R., Leidner, D., & Jarvenpaa, S. (2011). Stepping into the internet: New ventures in virtual worlds. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (September, 2013). Wearables in the workplace. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2013/09/wearables-in-the-workplace.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×