Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: October 2015

7 - Practical relevance of practice-based research on strategy

from Part I - Ontological and Epistemological Questions


The practical relevance of research is of great concern to strategy scholars. Indeed, the lack of practical relevance that traditional strategy research was widely perceived to have was one of the main factors that spurred the practice-based approach to strategy (Jarzabkowski and Whittington 2008; Johnson, Melin and Whittington 2003; Whittington et al. 2003). According to some of the proponents of the strategy-as-practice approach, the preoccupation with ‘what people do in strategy’ is the key to increasing the practical relevance of strategy research (Whittington 2006). Nevertheless, we are just beginning to understand in more detail how and in what way a practice-based approach to strategy can produce practically relevant knowledge – that is, can make a difference to management practice (Nicolai and Seidl 2010).

Traditionally, the relevance gap has been seen as resulting either from obstacles in the transfer of scientific knowledge to management practice or from problems in the production of scientific knowledge itself (for an overview of the literature, see Bartunek and Rynes 2014). In response to the former we find various suggestions for improving the mode of communication between academics and practitioners (Beer 2001), and in response to the latter there are calls for more collaborative forms of research (Gibbons et al. 1994; Van de Ven 2007) and alternative research designs (Lawler 1999). While these arguments are well rehearsed, practice-based management scholars have offered a new take on the relevance debate by examining the particular ontological and epistemological conditions for generating practically relevant knowledge in research. Practice-based scholars apply practice theory to examine the relation of the practices of management practitioners with those of management researchers. As Jarzabkowski, Mohrman and Scherer (2010: 8) put it: ‘Academics are also practitioners – of scholarly pursuit. Their practices…reflect their interests and occur within an institutional setting that they shape and from which they derive meaning.’ A common argument (Sandberg and Tsoukas 2011; Splitter and Seidl 2011) is that, although researchers and managers are practitioners, they operate in two distinct areas of practice that function according to two different modes of reasoning: the logic of management research and the logic of management practice. As a consequence, managers and researchers differ in their perceptions of the world, limiting their mutual understanding and hence the potential impact of research.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
  • Online ISBN: 9781139681032
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
Astley, W. G., and Zammuto, R. F. (1992), ‘Organization science, managers, and language games’, Organization Science, 3/4: 443–60.
Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17/1: 99–120.
Bartunek, J. M., and Rynes, S. L. (2014), ‘Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: the paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships’, Journal of Management, 40/5: 1181–201.
Beer, M. (2001), ‘Why management research findings are unimplementable: an action science perspective’, Reflections, 2/3: 58–65.
Bourdieu, P. (1975), ‘The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason’, Social Science Information, 14/6: 19–47.
Bourdieu, P. (1976), Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis: Auf der ethnologischen Grundlage der kabylischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Bourdieu, P. (1978), ‘Sur l'objectivation participante: réponse à quelques objections’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 23: 67–9.
Bourdieu, P. (1988), Homo Academicus. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998), Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2000), Pascalian Meditations. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2002), La domination masculine. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (2003), ‘Participant objectivation’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9/2: 281–94.
Bourdieu, P. (2004), Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press.
Chesley, J. A., and Wenger, M. S. (1999), ‘Transforming an organization: using models to foster a strategic conversation’, California Management Review, 41/3: 54–73.
Chia, R., and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.
Chia, R., and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge University Press.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Grand, S., Rüegg-Stürm, J., and von Arx, W. (2010), ‘Constructivist epistemologies in strategy as practice research’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 63–78. Cambridge University Press.
Hendry, J., and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.
Jarzabkowski, P., Giulietti, M., Oliveira, B., and Amoo, N. (2013), ‘“We don't need no education” – or do we? Management education and alumni adoption of strategy tools’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 22/1: 4–24.
Jarzabkowski, P., Mohrman, S. A., and Scherer, A. G. (2010), ‘Organization studies as applied science: the generation and use of academic knowledge about organizations: introduction to the special issue’, Organization Studies, 31/9–10: 1189–207.
Jarzabkowski, P., and Whittington, R. (2008), ‘Directions for a troubled discipline: strategy research, teaching, and practice – introduction to the dialog’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 17/4: 266–8.
Jarzabkowski, P., and Wilson, D. C. (2006), ‘Actionable strategy knowledge’, European Management Journal, 24/5: 348–67.
Johnson, G., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.
Knorr, D. (1980), ‘Effect of recovery methods on yield, quality and functional properties of potato protein concentrates’, Journal of Food Science, 45/5: 1183–6.
Knorr, K. D. (1976), Policy-Makers Use of Social Science Knowledge: Symbolic or Instrumental?, Research Memorandum no. 103. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
Langley, A. (ed.) (2010), The Challenge of Developing Cumulative Knowledge about Strategy as Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Lawler, E. E. (1999), Doing Research that Is Useful for Theory and Practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966), The Savage Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Nicolai, A., and Seidl, D. (2010), ‘That's relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science’, Organization Studies, 31/9–10: 1257–85.
Paroutis, S., and Heracleous, L. (2010), ‘First-order strategy discourse: the strategy meaning-making process in practice’, paper presented at Strategic Management Society Finland special conference ‘Intersections of strategy processes and practices’, Helsinki, 19 March.
Pelz, D. C. (1978), ‘Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy’, in Yinger, M. J., and Cutler, S. J. (eds.), Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View: 346–57. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1979), ‘How competitive forces shape strategy’, Harvard Business Review, 57/2: 137–45.
Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. (1990), ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68/3: 79–91.
Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.
Sandberg, J., and Tsoukas, H. (2011), ‘Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality’, Academy of Management Review, 36/2: 338–60.
Schatzki, T. R. (2005), ‘Peripheral vision: the sites of organizations’, Organization Studies, 26/3: 465–84.
Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.
Splitter, V., and Seidl, D. (2011), ‘Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47/1: 98–120.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997), ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Mangement Journal, 18/7: 509–33.
Vaara, E., and Faÿ, E. (2011), ‘How can a Bourdieusian perspective aid analysis of MBA education?’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10/1: 27–39.
Vaara, E., and Faÿ, E. (2012), ‘Reproduction and change on the global scale: a Bourdieusian perspective on management education’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/6: 1023–51.
Van de Ven, A. H. (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press.
Weick, K. E. (2005), ‘Theory and practice in the real world’, in Tsoukas, H., and Knudsen, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: 453–7. Oxford University Press.
Whitley, R. (1995), ‘Academic knowledge and work jurisdiction in management’, Organization Studies, 16/1: 81–105.
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.
Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E., Nahapiet, J., and Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously: responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.
Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S., and Blettner, D. P. (2013), ‘How useful are the strategic tools we teach in business schools?’, Journal of Management Studies, 50/1: 92–125.