Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: August 2014

33 - Multimedia Learning from Multiple Documents

from Part V - Multimedia Learning in Advanced Computer-Based Contexts

Summary

Abstract

This chapter examines learning from multiple documents, that is, the construction of new knowledge, beliefs or opinions from more than a single source of information. First, we introduce the specific discourse processes that come into play when multiple-source documents are considered, as opposed to single-source texts or multimedia documents. We focus on the definition and role of sources, as well as on the semantic and rhetorical relationships at an intertextual level. Then we examine learning from multiple documents from a cognitive standpoint. We define two core principles: the sourcing principle and the multiple-document integration principle. Finally, we examine some implications of these principles for a general theory of text-based learning and for instructional practice throughout primary, secondary and higher education curricula.

References

Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007.
Baker, L., & Anderson, R. I. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 281–294.
Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3–23.
Braasch, J. L. G., Lawless, K. A., Goldman, S. R., Manning, F. H., Gomez, K.W., & MacLeod, S. M. (2009). Evaluating search results: An empirical analysis of middle school students’ use of source attributes to select useful sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41, 63–82.
Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L.E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 180–195. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.003,
Braasch, J. L. G., Rouet, J.-F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M.A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 40, 450–465. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Effects of personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts. Reading Psychology: An International Journal, 27, 457–484.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010a). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47, 1–31.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010b). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: Examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38, 655–657.
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M.A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6–28.
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H., Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Towards an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48–70.
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H., & Salmerón, L. (2010). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180–192.
Brem, S. K., Russell, J., & Weems, L. (2001). Science on the Web: Students’ evaluation of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191–213.
Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485–522.
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J. F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., van Dyke, J., & Gabrys, G. (2000). The Sourcer’s Apprentice: A tool for document-supported history instruction. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 437–470). New York: New York University Press.
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In M. J. Lawson and J. R. Kirby (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning (pp. 276–314). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Braasch, J. L.G. (2013). Documents as entities. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman & J.-F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to multiple texts (pp. 160–179). New York: Routledge.
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. P. Dillon & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 43–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britt, M. A., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing task. Reading Psychology, 25, 313–339. doi:10.1080/02702710490522658.
Britt, M. A., Wiemer-Hasting, P., Larson, A., & Perfetti, C. A. (2004). Automated feedback on source citation in essay writing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 359–374.
de Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W.U. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
Eastin, M. S. (2008). Toward a cognitive development approach to youth perceptions of credibility. In M. J. Metzger and A. J. Flanagin (Eds.). Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 29–48). The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.029.
Eastin, M. S., Yang, M., & Nathanson, A. (2006). Children of the Net: An empirical exploration into the evaluation of internet content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 211–30.
Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). Understanding and integrating multiple science texts: Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks. Reading Psychology, 31, 30–68.
Goldman, S. R. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. Shuart-Ferris & D. M. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research (pp. 313–347). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 356–381. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.027
Graesser, A. C., Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., O’Reilly, T., Jeon, M., & McDaniel, B. (2007). SEEK Web Tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 89–105.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13, 963–980.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hirsh, S. (2000). Children’s relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50, 1265–1283.
Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2010). How the interface design influences users’ spontaneous trustworthiness evaluations of Web search results: Comparing a list and a grid interface. In C. Morimoto & H. Instance (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications ETRA ’10 (pp. 299–306). New York: ACM.
Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2012). Effects of search interface and Internet-specific epistemic beliefs on source evaluations during Web search for medical information: An eye-tracking study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31, 83–97.
Kammerer, Y., Wollny, E., Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2009). How authority-related epistemological beliefs and salience of source information influence the evaluation of Web search results: An eye tracking study. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2158–2163). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the Web: When expert information breeds laypersons’ doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 21, 193–204.
Kim, H. J., & Millis, K. (2006). The influence of sourcing and relatedness on event integration. Discourse Processes, 41, 51–65.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Laupa, M. (1991). Children’s reasoning about three authority attributes: Adult status, knowledge, and social position. Developmental Psychology, 27, 321–329.
Le Bigot, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 445–470.
Lundeberg, M. A. (1987). Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: Studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 407–432.
Macedo-Rouet, M., Braasch, J. G. L., Britt, M. A. & Rouet, J.-F. (2013). Teaching fourth and fifth graders to evaluate information sources during text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction. 31, 204–226. dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769995.
Mason, L., Ariasi, N., & Boldrin, A. (2010). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21, 137–151. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.01.001.
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2009). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38, 607–633. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y.
Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U., & Groeben, N. (2008). Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 197–213.
OECD (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on line: Digital technologies and performance, vol. 6. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en.
Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., and Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), article 3. jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue3/pan.html.
Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Towards a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pew Internet and American Life Project (2012). Search Engine Use 2012. Retrieved March 6, 2013, from www.pewinternet.org.
Rieh, S.Y. (2002). Judgements of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145–161.
Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Relevance instructions and goal-focusing in text learning (pp. 19–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478–493.
Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C.A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85–106.
Rouet, J.-F., & Le Bigot, L. (2007). Effects of academic training on metatextual knowledge and hypertext navigation. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 157–268.
Rouet, J.-F., Ros, C., Goumi, A., Macedo-Rouet, A., & Dinet, J. (2011). The influence of surface and deep cues on grade school students’ assessment of relevance in Web menus. Learning and Instruction, 21, 205–219.
Rouet, J.-F., Vörös, Z., & Pléh, C. (2012). Incidental learning of links during navigation: The role of visuo-spatial capacity. Behavior and Information Technology, 31, 71–81.
Rukavina, I., & Danneman, M. (1996). Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 272–287.
Sanchez, C. A., Wiley, J., & Goldman, S. R. (2006). Teaching students to evaluate source reliability during internet research tasks. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, N. B. Songer & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 662–666). New York: Routledge Education.
Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
Sparks, J. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Readers’ reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 230–247.
Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 191–210.
Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Bromme, R. (2013). Dealing with uncertainty: Readers’ memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 130–150.
Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456.
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2002). Norwegian students’ use of multiple sources while reading expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 208–227.
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M.A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20,192–204.
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L.E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 176–203.
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple-text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18, 513–527. doi:10.1016/j.
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wiley, J. (2005). A fair and balanced look at the news: What affects memory for controversial arguments? Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 95–109.
Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106.
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1997). The effects of “playing historian” on learning in history. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 63–72.
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311.
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
Wineburg, S. S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 85–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.