Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: June 2012

CHAPTER 16 - Digital Literacy



Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41 (2), 34–44.
American Library Association (ALA) Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (1989). Final Report. Chicago: American Library Association.
Ankerson, I., & Sapnar, M. (2001). Cruising: Poems that go, 15. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from
Anshel, J. (1997). Computer vision syndrome: Causes and cures. Ergonomic News, 3 (1), 18–19.
Baldwin, V. (2005). Science and technology information literacy: Review of standards developed by an association task force. Science & Technology Libraries, Vol. 25 (3), pp. 117–125.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word-processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing writing instruction. Review of Education Research, 63 (1), 69–93.
Bardini, T. (1997). Bridging the gulfs: From hypertext to cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3 (2), n.p. Available from
Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication, 18, 133–170.
Baron, N. S. (2005a). The future of written culture. Ibérica, 9, 7–31.
Baron, N. S. (2005b). Instant messaging and the future of language. Communications of the ACM, 46 (7), 30–31.
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. R. Millar (Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.
Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of nations: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Benson, T. (2005). Brazil: Free software's biggest and best friend. New York Times, pp. C1, C6, March 29.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Langa, L. A., & McClure, C. R. (2006). Public access computing and Internet access in public libraries: The role of public libraries in e-government and emergency situations. First Monday, 11 (9).
Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
Bleicher, P. (2006). Web 2.0 revolution: Power to the people. Applied Clinical Trials, 15 (8), 34–36.
Bolter, J. D. (1992). Literature in the electronic writing space. In M. C. Tuman (Ed.), Literacy online: The promise (and peril) of reading and writing with computers (pp. 19–42). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Borges, J. L. (1962). The library of Babel. In Labyrinths: Selected stories and other writings. New York: New Directions.
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of psychology gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18 (1), 63–78.
Bruce, B., Michaels, S., & Watson-Gegeo, K. (1985). How computers can change the writing process. Language Arts, 62, 143–149.
Bruce, C. (1997). The relational approach: A new model for information literacy. The New Review of Information and Library Research, 3, 1–22.
Bryson, M., Petrina, S., Braundy, M., & de Castell, S. (2003). Conditions for success? Gender in technology-intensive courses in British Columbia secondary schools. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3 (2), 185–194.
Burk, A., Kerr, J., & Pope, A. (2002). Archiving and text fluidity/version control: The credibility of electronic publishing. Text Technology, 11 (1), 61–110. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from
Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176 (1, July), 101–108. Available at
Byrd, G. D., Bader, S. A., & Mazzaschi, A. J. (2005). The status of open access publishing by academic societies. Journal of Medical Libraries Association, 93 (4), 423–424.
Calkins, L. M. (1983). Lessons from a child: On the teaching and learning of writing. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
Carrington, V. (2005). Txting: the end of civilization (again)? Cambridge Journal of Education, 35 (2), 161–175.
Cassell, J., & Tversky, D. (2005). The language of online intercultural community formation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (2), n.p. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from
Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. New York: Cornell University Press.
Clinton, W. (1996). State of the Union Address. Washington, DC. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from
Coates, T. (2003). The mass amateurisation of (nearly) everything. In J. Engeström, M. Ahtisaari, & A. Nieminen (Eds.), Exposure: From friction to freedom (pp. 53–57). Helsinki: Aula.
Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Research, 61 (1), 107–155.
Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C. L., & Kahn, J. L. (1991). Learning to write differently: Beginning writers and word processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Colley, A., & Comber, C. (2003). Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: What has changed? Education Research, 45 (2), 155–165.
Colley, A. N., Gale, M. T., & Harris, T. A. (1994). Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10 (2), 129–137.
Compaine, B. M. (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22 (5), 320–334.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.) (2000). Multi-literacies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
Cumming, S. (2005, June). African Journals OnLine (AJOL). International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications Newsletter, No. 29. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from
Daiute, C. (1985). Writing and computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1992). Text representation with traditional text and hypertext. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology.
Delany, P., & Gilbert, S. (1991). Hypercard stacks for Fielding's Joseph Andrews: Issues of design and content. In P. Delaney & G. Landow (Eds.), Hypermedia and literary studies (pp. 287–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diaz, J. A., Griffith, R. A., Ng, J. J., Reinert, S. E., Friedmann, P. D., & Moulton, A. W. (2002). Patients’ use of the Internet for medical information. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17 (3), 180–185.
Dillon, A. (1996). Myths, misconceptions, and an alternative perspective on information usage and the electronic medium. In J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 25–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322–349.
Dobrin, D. N. (1994). Hype and hypertext. In C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 305–315). New York: Modern Language Association.
Dobson, T. M. (2005). Technologies of text: Reflections on teaching, learning and writing with/in digital environments. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 3 (1), 123–137.
Dobson, T. M. (2006). For the love of a good narrative: Digitality and textuality. English teaching: Practice and critique, 5 (2), 56–68. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from
Douglas, J. Y. (2000). The end of books – Or books without end? Reading interactive narratives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Dundell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes toward the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 521–535.
Dyson, M. C., & Haselgrove, M. (2001). The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54 (4), 585–612.
Edelsky, C. (1984). The content of language arts software: A criticism. Computers, Reading, and Language Arts, 1 (4), 8–11.
Electronic Literature Organization (2006). About the ELO. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Englebart, D. (1962). A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man's intellect. In P. W. Hawerton and D. C. Weeks (Eds.), Vistas in information handling, Volume I: The augmentation of man's intellect by machine. Washington, DC: Spartan Books. Augmentation of human intellect: A conceptual framework. Available at
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4 (5): e157.
Fallows, J. (1982). Toys: Living with a computer. The Atlantic, July, 84–91.
Farina, F., Arce, R., Sobral, J., & Carames, R. (1991). Predictors of anxiety towards computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 7 (4), 263–267.
Faulkner, W. (2001). The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women's Studies International Forum, 24 (1), 79–95.
Fink, C., and Kenny, C. J. (2003) W(h)ither the digital divide? Info–The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, 5, 15–24.
Foss, C. (1989). Tools for reading and browsing hypertext. Information Processing and Management, 25 (4), 407–418.
Foster, S. (1993). Information literacy: Some misgivings. American Libraries, 24, 344.
Fox, S., & Rainee, L. (2000). The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved September 28, 2006, from
Gackenback, J. (1998). Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ganley, P. (2006). Google book search: Fair use, fair dealing and the case for intermediary copying. Working paper, SSRN. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Gaur, A. (1992). A history of writing. Revised edition. London: The British Library.
Gee, J. P. (1991). What is literacy? In C. Mitchell and K. Weiler (Eds.), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 1–11). New York: Bergin and Garvey.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies (2nd Ed.). London: Falmer Press.
Gee, J. P. (1999). The new literacy studies and the “social turn.” Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Department of Curriculum and Instruction. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442118.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gelb, I. J. (1952). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ginsparg, P. (1996). Electronic publishing in science. Scientist's View of Electronic Publishing and Issues Raised, Conference, UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Gombrich, E. H. (1982). The image and the eye: Further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in History and Society, 5 (3), 304–345.
Graff, H. (1979). The literacy myth: Literacy and social structure in the nineteenth-century city. New York/London: Academic Press.
Graff, H. (1995). The labyrinths of literacy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Children and teachers at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
Gray, S. H., & Sasha, D. (1989). To link or not to link? Empirical guidance for the design of nonlinear text systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21 (2), 326–333.
Haas, C. (1989). How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 181–207.
Hafner, K., & Lyon, M. (1996). Where wizards stay up late: The origins of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Harnad, S. (2005). The implementation of the Berlin declaration on open access. D-Lib Magazine, 11 (3). Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non–OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10 (6), n.p. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Hart, M. S. (1992). History and philosophy of Project Gutenberg. Salt Lake City UT: Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Hayles, N. K. (2003). Translating media: Why we should rethink textuality. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 16 (2), 263–290.
Hayles, N. K., Montfort, N., Rettberg, S., & Strickland, S. (2006). The electronic literature collection, volume one. College Park, MD: Electronic Literature Organization. Available at
Heap, J. (1989). Sociality and cognition in collaborative writing. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 135–151). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heim, M. (1987). Electric language: A philosophical study of word processing. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Herring, S. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jackson, S. (1995). Patchwork girl: A modern monster [Computer software]. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems.
Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12 (4), 301–333.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Joyce, M. (1987). Afternoon, a story [Computer software]. Cambridge, MA: Eastgate Systems.
Kahn, P., Launhardt, J., Lenk, K., & Peters, R. (1990). Design of hypermedia publications: Issues and solutions. In R. I. Furuta (Ed.), EP90: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Document Manipulation, and Typography (pp. 107–124). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Kim, H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1995). Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing. Behaviour & information technology, 14 (4), 239–250.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95 (2), 163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kinzer, C. K., & Leu, D. J., Jr. (1997). The challenge of change: Exploring literacy and learning in electronic environments. Language Arts, 74 (2), 126–136.
Kolbitsch, J., & Maurer, K. (2006). The transformation of the Web: How emerging communities shape the information we consume. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12 (2), 187–213.
Kress, G. (2000). A curriculum for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30 (1), 133–145.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
Labbo, L. D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Theory and research into practice: Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34 (2), 478–492.
Landow, G. P. (1997). Hypertext 2.0: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology (revised ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Landow, G. P. (1991). The rhetoric of hypermedia: Some rules for authors. In G. P. Landow & P. Delany (Eds.), Hypermedia and literary studies (pp. 81–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lanham, R. A. (1992). Digital rhetoric: Theory, practice, and property. In M. C. Tuman (Ed.), Literacy online: The promise (and peril) of reading and writing with computers (pp. 221–243). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Lanham, R. A. (1995). Digital literacy. Scientific American, September, 198–199.
Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Lebo, H., & Wolpert, S. (2004, 14 January). First release of findings from the UCLA World Internet Project shows significant “digital gender gap” in many countries. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA News. Retrieved February 6, 2005, from
Lehto, M., Zhu, W., & Carpenter, B. (1995). The relative effectiveness of hypertext and text. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, I, 293–313.
Lemke, J. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World By Rethinking (pp. 283–302). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Levin, J., & Boruta, M. (1983). Writing with computers in the classroom: You get EXACTLY the right amount of space. Theory into Practice, 22, 291–295.
Licklider, J. C. R., & Vezza, A. (1978). Applications of information networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 66 (11), 1330–1346.
Liff, S., & Shepherd, A. (2004). An evolving gender digital divide? Oxford Internet Institute Issue Brief No. 2. Oxford.
Looker, D., & Thiessen, V. (2003). The digital divide in Canadian schools: Factors affecting student access to and use of information technology. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Luke, A., & Luke, C. (2001). Adolescence lost/childhood regained: On early intervention and the emergence of the techno-subject. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1, (1), 91–120.
Luke, C. (1989). Pedagogy, printing and Protestantism: The discourse on childhood. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marchionini, G. (1989). Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (1), 54–66.
Marchionini, G., & Crane, G. (1994). Evaluating hypermedia and learning: Methods and results from the Perseus Project. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 5–34.
Marcum, R. (2002). Rethinking information literacy. Library Quarterly, 72 (1), 1–26.
Maurer, M. M. (1994). Computer anxiety correlates and what they tell us: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 10 (3), 369–376.
Maurer, S. M. (2003). New institutions for doing science: From databases to open-source biology. A paper presented to the European Policy for Intellectual Property Conference, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interaction of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–42.
Michaels, S., & Bruce, B. (1989). Classroom contexts and literacy development: How writing systems shape the teaching and learning of composition. Technical Report No. 476. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
Miller, W. (1992). The future of bibliographic instruction and information literacy for the academic librarian. In B. Baker & M. E. Litzinger (Eds.), The evolving educational mission of the library. Chicago: American Library Association.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mohageg, M. F. (1992). The influence of hypertext linking structures on the efficacy of information retrieval. Human Factors, 34 (3), 351–367.
Morrison, H., & Waller, A. (2006). Open access for the medical librarian. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, Summer 2006. Retrieved January 8, 2007, from
Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., Catania, J., White, M., et al. (2003). The impact of health information on the Internet on the physician-patient relationship: Patient perceptions, Archives of Internal Medicine, 163, 1727–1734.
Nelson, T. H. (1965). A file structure for the complex, the changing and the indeterminate. Association for Computing Machinery's 20th National Conference. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 84–100.
New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multi-literacies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60–92.
Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypermedia document on users’ navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57 (1), 1–26.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge.
Oppenheimer, T. (1997). The computer delusion. Atlantic Monthly, 280 (1), 45–62.
O’Reilly, T. (2005, September 30). What is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. O’Reilly Network. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from
Palfreyman, D., & Khalil, M. A. (2003). “A funky language for teenzz to use”: Representing Gulf Arabic in instant messaging. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9 (1). Retrieved January 9, 2007, from
Panyametheekul, S., & Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9 (1). Retrieved January 9, 2007, from
Paolillo, J., Pimienta, D., Prado, D., Mikami, Y., & Fantognon, X. (2005). Measuring linguistic diversity on the Internet. Montreal, CA: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Pinfield, S. (2001). How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (12). Retrieved January 9, 2007, from
Platt, C. (1994). Why hypertext doesn't really work. The New York Review of Science Fiction, 72 (1), 3–5.
Potelle, H., & Rouet, J. F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58 (3), 327–345.
Psotka, J., Kerst, S., & Westerman, T. (1993). The use of hypertext and sensory-level supports for visual learning of aircraft names and shapes. Behaviour Research Methods, 25, 168–172.
Public Libraries and the Internet 2004: Survey Results and Findings (2005). Information Use Management and Policy Institute, College of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Rabinowitz, P. J. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L., & Kieffer, R. (Eds.) (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past. Journal of American History, 93 (1), 117–146.
Rouet, J. F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rowen, L., Wong, G. K. S., Lane, R. P., & Hood, L. (2000). Publication rights in the era of open data release policies. Science, 289 (5486): 1881. Retrieved January 9, 2007, from
Ryan, M. (2005). Narrative and the split condition of digital textuality. Dichtung-digital: Journal für digitale ästhetik, 5 (34), n.p. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from
Salmerón, L., Cañas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40 (3), 171–191.
Schaefermeyer, M., & Sewell, E. H. (1988). Communicating by electronic mail. American Behavioural Scientist, 32 (2), 112–123.
Schiff, S. (2006, July 31). Know it all: Wikipedia takes on the experts. New Yorker, 36–43.
Schwartz, C. (1998). Web search engines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (11), 973–982.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shirky, C. (2002, October 3). Weblogs and the mass amateurization of publishing. Networks, economics, and culture [Internet mailing list]. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from
Simpson, A., & McKnight, C. (1990). Navigation in hypertext: Structural cues and mental maps. In R. McAleese & C. Green (Eds.), Hypertext: The state of the art (pp. 74–83). Oxford: Intellect Books Ltd.
Smith, C. (1994). Hypertextual thinking. In C. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 164–281). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
Snavely, L., & Cooper, N. (1997, January). The information literacy debate. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23 (1), 9–14.
Solomon, S. J. (1998). Corresponding effects: Artless writing in the age of e-mail. Modern Age, 40 (3), 319–323.
Solvberg, A. M. (2002). Gender differences in computer-related control beliefs and home computer use. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 409–426.
Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1994). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography, and education. London: Longman.
Street, B. (2003). What's “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5 (2), 77–91.
Sudol, R. A. (1990). Principles of generic word processing for students with independent access to computers. College Composition and Communication, 41 (3), 325–331.
Swaminathan, M. S. (2006). Role of ICT in rural economy proven. New Delhi: Mission 2007 Secretariat. Retrieved September 6, 2006, from
Temple, L., & Lips, H. M. (1989). Gender differences and similarities in attitudes toward computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 215–226.
Tierney, J. (July 5, 1993). In multi-media storm, text survives. New York Times. The Digital Divide Report: ICS Diffusion Index, 2005 (2006). Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
Todman, J., & Dick, G. (1993). Primary children and teachers' attitudes to computers. Computers and Education, 20, 199–203.
Tufte, E. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press.
Unz, D. C., & Hesse, F. W. (1999). The use of hypertext for learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 279–295.
U.S. Census Bureau (2003). Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from
U.S. National Defense Education Act of 1958 (1958). Public Law 85-8642, 85th Congress, September 2, 1958. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Varian, H. R. (2006a). A plug for the unplugged $100 laptop computer for developing nations. New York Times, p. C3, February 9.
Varian, H. R. (2006b). The Google Library Project. Paper presented at The Google Copyright Controversy: Implications of Digitizing the World's Libraries, AEI-Brookings, Washington, DC. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from
Walton, M. (2004). Behind the screen: The language of Web design. In I. Snyder & C. Beavis (Eds.), Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7 (7), n.p. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from
Webber, S., & Johnson, B. (2000). Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science, 26 (6), 381–397.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1–22.
Wiggins, L. L., & Shiffer, M. J. (1990). Planning with hypermedia. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56 (2), 226–236.
Wiki's Wild World: Editorial. (2005, December 15). Nature, 438, 890 (15 December 2005) | doi:10.1038/438890a.
Wileman, R. E. (1993). Visual communicating. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Willinsky, J. (1990). The new literacy: Redefining reading and writing in the schools. New York: Routledge.
Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wiske, M. S., Zodhiates, P., Wilson, B., Gordon, M., Harvey, W., Krensky, L., et al. (1988, March). How technology affects teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Educational Technology Center.
Zinsser, W. K. (1983). Writing with a word processor. New York: Harper and Row.