Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:44:35.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Internal Reconstruction

from Part II - Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Ian Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, S.R. 2014. ‘Morphological change’, in Bowern, and Evans, (eds.), pp. 264–85.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. 2014. ‘Syntax and syntactic reconstruction’, in Bowern, and Evans, (eds.), pp. 343–73.Google Scholar
Baxter, W. H. 2002. ‘Where does the ‘comparative method’ come from?’, in Cavoto, F. (ed.), The linguist’s linguist: A collection of papers in honour of Alexis Manaster Ramer. Munich: Lincom Europa, pp. 3352.Google Scholar
Baxter, W. H. and Sagart, L. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, C. and Evans, B. (eds.) 2014. The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Castilho, A. T. 2012. Nova gramática do português brasileiro. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Collé, C. 1974. ‘La vérité dans le vin, ou les désagrémens de la galanterie’, in Truchet, J. (ed.), Théâtre du XVIIIe siècle (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade), vol. 2. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 599655.Google Scholar
Corbin, D. 1987. La morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique, 2 vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. 1971. ‘Über die Rekonstruktion der indogermanischen Syntax’, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 85: 522.Google Scholar
Dufter, A. 2013. ‘Zur Geschichte der ne-Absenz in der neufranzösischen Satznegation’, in Fesenmeier, L., Grutschus, A. and Patzelt, C. (eds.), L’absence au niveau syntagmatique. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 131–58.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, G. and Goldbach, M. (eds.) 2008. Principles of syntactic reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. 1995. Construction: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. and Zanuttini, R. 1991. ‘Negative heads and the Neg-criterion’, The Linguistic Review 8: 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A. C. 2008. ‘Reconstruction in syntax’, in Ferraresi, and Goldbach, (eds.), pp. 7395.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. D. 2010. ‘Internal reconstruction’, in Luraghi, S. and Bubenik, V. (eds.), The continuum companion to historical linguistics. London: Continuum, pp. 5258.Google Scholar
Koch, H. 2014. ‘Morphological reconstruction’, in Bowern, and Evans, (eds.), pp. 286307.Google Scholar
Lühr, R. 2008. ‘Competitive Indo-European syntax’, in Ferraresi, and Goldbach, (eds.), pp. 121–59.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1969. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge, 3rd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ringe, D. 2003. ‘Internal reconstruction’, in Joseph, B. D. and Janda, R. D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 244–61.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1982. ‘Negation, wh-movement and the null subject parameter’, in Rizzi, L., Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 117–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, G. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. II: Morfologia. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Uth, M. 2011. Französische Ereignisnominalisierungen. Abstrakte Bedeutung und regelhafte Wortbildung. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uth, M. 2012. ‘The lexicalist hypothesis and the semantics of event nominalization suffixes’, in Gaglia, S. and Hinzelin, M.-O. (eds.), Inflection and word formation in Romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 347–67.Google Scholar

Websites

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×