Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:22:54.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education

Merging Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Anette Kolmos
Affiliation:
Aalborg University
Erik de Graaff
Affiliation:
Limburg University
Aditya Johri
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Barbara M. Olds
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the practice of engineering education, there is a wide variety of implementations of problem-based or project-based learning (PBL). In this chapter we aim to explain the relationships between different types of problem-based and project-based learning to help teachers and educational managers make innovative choices and provide benchmarks for educational researchers. We present a combined understanding of problem- and project-based learning, the theoretical and historical background, and the different models of PBL that can capture the existing practices, ranging from small- to large-scale practice, from classroom teaching to institutional models, and from single-subject to interdisciplinary and complex knowledge construction.

It is well known that one-way dissemination of knowledge by means of lectures is not very effective in achieving learning (van der Vleuten, 1997). In higher education concepts such as “self-directed-learning,” “case-based learning,” “inquiry based learning,” “experiential learning,” “service learning,” “project-based service learning,” “active learning,” CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, and Operate), “project-based learning,” and “problem-based learning” were introduced in the decades after the Second World War. All these new learning concepts come under the umbrella of learner-centered or student-centered learning models. Problem-based and project-based learning, both known as PBL, originate from the reform universities, and the new educational models, established between 1965 and 1975. In problem-based learning, problems form the starting point for students’ learning emphasizing a self-directed learning process in teams. The educational model problem-based learning was introduced at curriculum scale at the medical faculty of McMaster University, Canada, followed by Maastricht University in the Netherlands and many others. Project-based learning shares the aspect of students working on problems in teams, but with the added component that they have to submit a project report completed collaboratively by the project team. The problem- and project-based/project organized model adopted at Aalborg University and Roskilde University, Denmark, was inspired by the critical pedagogy in Europe after the student revolts of the 1960s. At Aalborg University both models of PBL were eventually combined in problem-based project organized learning, which was practiced at all faculties – the Faculty of Engineering and Science being the largest. This combined approach is the central point of reference for this chapter, as the pedagogical development in engineering education indicates that both educational practices are successful in their own way and the abbreviation PBL is here defined as including both practices.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algreen-Ussing, H., & Fruensgaard, N. O. (1990). Metode i projektarbejde. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence – Knowledge,higher education and society. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2004). Engaging the curriculum: Higher education and society. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, R., & Napoli, R. D. (2008). Changing identities in higher education,voicing perspective. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Barrett, T., & Moore, S. (2011). New approaches to problem-based learning – Revitalising your practise in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In Wilkerson, L. & Gijselaers, W. H. (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 3–12). New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 68. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bédard, D., Lison, C., Dalle, D., & Boutin, N. (2010). Predictors of student's engagement and persistence in an innovative PBL curriculum: Application for engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26 (3), 511–522.Google Scholar
Beddoes, K. D., Jesiek, B. K., & Borrego, M. (2010). Identifying opportunities for collaborations in international engineering education research on problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 4(2), Article 3. Retrieved from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university – What the student does. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, S., and Glasner, A. (1999). Assessment Matters in Higher Education. UK:The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University PressGoogle Scholar
Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burch, V. C., Sikakana, C. N., Yeld, N., Seggie, J. L., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). Performance of academically at-risk medical students in a problem-based learning programme: A preliminary report.Advances in Health Science Education: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (Eds.) (2009). Project-based learning – An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Rotterdam: Sense.
Carter, J., Eriksen, K., Horst, S., & Troelsen, R. (2003). If reform is the answer – What are the questions?Copenhagen: Center for Naturfagenes Didaktik, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
Hyldgaard Christensen, S., Delabousse, B., & Meganck, M. (eds). (2009). Engineering in context. Aarhus : Systime Academic.
Chinowsky, P. (2011). Engineering project organization: Defining a line of inquiry and a path forward. The Engineering Project Organization Journal, 27(3), 170–178.Google Scholar
Conway, J., & Williams, A. (1999). Themes and variations in PBL. Callaghan, NSW: Australian Problem Based Learning Network.Google Scholar
Crawley, E. F. (2001). The CDIO syllabus: A statement of goals for undergraduate engineering education. MIT CDIO Report no. 1, 2001. Retrieved from
Crawley, E., Malmquist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking engineering education – The CDIO approach. New York, NY: Springer Science +Business Media.Google Scholar
Crosthwaite, C., Cameron, I., Lant, P., & Litster, J. (2006). Balancing curriculum processes and content in a project centred curriculum – In pursuit of graduate attributes. In Education for Chemical Engineers. Trans IChemE, Part D, no. 1, pp. 39–48. Retrieved from
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier and Kappa Delta Pi.Google Scholar
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, R., & Lewis, S. (2003). Mentoring models in support of P5BL in architecture/ engineering /construction global teamwork. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 663–671.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Galand, B., & Frenay, M. (Eds.) (2006). Problem and project-based learning in higher education: Impact, issues, and challenges. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Galand, B., Raucent, B., & Frenay, M. (2010). Engineering students-self-regulation, study strategies, and motivational believes in traditional and problem-based curricula. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 523–534.Google Scholar
Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In Brown, S. & Glasner, A. (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, S., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Gijselaer, W. H. (1996). Connecting problem-based practices with educational theory. In Wilkerson, L. & Gijselaers, W. H. (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Graaff, E. de (1995). Models of problem-based learning. Paper presented at the Fourth World Conference on Engineering Education, Saint Paul, MN . In E. Krueger, Rex & Kulacki, F. A. (Eds.), Restructuring engineering education for meeting world needs (Vols. 1–4). Technology Based Engineering Education Consortium, The William C. Norris Institute.Google Scholar
Graaff, E. de (2010). Research on engineering education: The development of a field of applied research. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education ICEE, Gliwice, Poland.Google Scholar
Graaff, E. de, & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning, International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657–662.Google Scholar
Graaff, E. de, & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
Graaff, E. de, & Sjoer, E (2006). Positioning educational consultancy and research in engineering education. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual SEFI Conference, Uppsala: Uppsala University (pp. 98–101).Google Scholar
Graham, R. (2009). Approaches to engineering project-based learning, White Paper. Retrieved from
Graham, R. (2012). Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successful change. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
Graham, R., Crawley, E., & Mendelsohn, B. R. (2009). Engineering leadership education: A snapshot review of international good practice. White Paper, Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Programme.Google Scholar
Hiim, H., & Hippe, E. (1993). Learning through experience,understanding and action, (Læring gjennom oplevelse, forståelse og handling: En studiebok i didaktikk.) Oslo: University Publishing.Google Scholar
Holgaard, J. E., & Kolmos, A. (2009). Group or individual assessment in engineering, science and health education: Strengths and weaknesses. In Du, X., Graaff, E. de, & Kolmos, A. (Eds.), Research on PBL practice in engineering education (pp. 57–69). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
Ihsen, S., & Gebauer, S. (2009). Diversity issues in the engineering curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(5), 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illeris, K. (1976). Problemorientering og deltagerstyring: Oplæg til en alternative didaktik. (Problem orientation and participation: Draft for an alternative didactic.) Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Illeris, K. (2003). Towards A contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(4), 396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illeris, K. (2007). How we learn – Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingeniøren. (2004, March 3). Aalborg – Kandidaters Tekniske Viden er i Top.
Ingeniøren. (2008, May 30). Virksomheder dumper nye ingeniøruniversiteter.
Jamison, A. (2001). The making of green knowledge: Environmental politics and cultural transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamison, A., Hylgaard Christensen, S. & Botin, L. (2011). A hybrid imagination. Science and technology in cultural perspective. Golden, CO: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. (1992). Paradoxes of learning: On becoming an individual in society. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, D., & Howard, P. (2005). Ten years in the making – a unique program in engineering. Paper presented at WACE 2005.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19, 319–335.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1925). Foundations of method. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, W. H., Bagley, W. C., Bonser, F. G., Hosic, J. F., & Hatch, R. W. (1921). Dangers and difficulties of the project method and how to overcome them. Teachers College Record, 22, 283–321.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjaersdam, F., & Enemark, S (1994). The Aalborg experiment – Project innovation in university education. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
Klafki, W. (2001). Dannelsesteori og didaktik: Nye studier (Theories of Bildung and didactics: New studies). Århus, Denmark: Forlaget Klim.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning – Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kolmos, A. (1996). Reflections on project work and problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmos, A. (2002). Facilitating change to a problem-based model. The International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmos, A., de Graaff, E., & Du, X. (2009). Diversity of PBL: PBL learning principles and models. In Du, X., Graaff, E. de, & Kolmos, A. (Eds.), Research on PBL practice in engineering education (pp. 9–21). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Kolmos, A., Fink, F., & Krogh, L. (2004). The Aalborg PBL model. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. (2010). Responses to problem based and project organised learning from industry. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 573–583.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. B. (1995, March–April). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 59–67.
Krogh, L., & Rasmussen, J. G. (2004). Employability and problem-based learning in project-organized settings at the University. In Kolmos, A., Flink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (Eds.), The Aalborg PBL Model: Progress, diversity and challenges (pp. 37–56). Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
Litzinger, T. A., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R. G., & Newstetter, W. C. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Islas, J. R. (2001). Collaborative learning at Monterrey Tech-Virtual University. Paper presented at the Invited Symposium on Web-based Learning Environments to Support Learning at a Distance: Design and Evaluation, Asilomar, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
McKenzie, L. J., Trevisan, M. S., Davis, D. C., & Beyerlein, S. W. (2004). Capstone design courses and assessment: A national study. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,American Society for Engineering Education.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020 – Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Neufeld, V. R., & Barrows, H. S. (1974). The McMaster philosophy: An approach to medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 49, 1040–1050.Google ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, Jørgen Lerche., & Webb, Thomas W. (1999). Project work at the new reform university of Roskilde – Different interpretations? In Olesen, H. Salling & Højgaard Jensen, J. (Eds.), Project studies – A late modern university reform. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, G. R. (1988). Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning. Medical Education, 22, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in age of uncertainty. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
O’Grady, G., & Alvis, W. A. M. (2002). One day one problem: PBL at Republic Polytechnic. Paper presented at 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on PBL, Hatyai, Thailand.Google Scholar
Olsen, P. B., & Pedersen, K. (2005). Problem-oriented project work – A workbook. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
Ozansoy, C., & Stojcevski, A. (2009). Problem-based learning in electrical and electronic engineering education. In Du, X., Graaff, E. de, & Kolmos, A. (Eds.), PBL – Diversity in research questions and methodologies. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Powel, P., & Weenk, W. (2003). Project-led engineering education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.Google Scholar
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Academy of Engineering. (2007). Educating engineers for 21st century, Retrieved from
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savin-Baden, M. (2003). Facilitation problem-based learning. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Savin-Baden, M. (2007). Challenging models and perspectives of problem-ased learning. In Graaff, E. de & Kolmos, A. (Eds.), Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering (pp. 9–30). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
Savin-Baden, M., & Wilkie, K. (Eds.). (2004). Challenging research in problem-based learning. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
Sawyer, K. (2008). Group genius – The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research. In Evensen, D. H. & Hmelo, C. E. (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Scott, G. (2003). Effective change management in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(6), 64–80. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Shinde, V., & Kolmos, A. (2011). Problem based learning in Indian engineering education: Drivers and challenges. In Proceedings of Wireless VITAE 2011: 2nd International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information & Theory and Aerospace & Electronic System Technology (pp. 179–184). Bangalore, India: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for problem-based learning: The students’ perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), 6–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville, M., Anderson, D., Berbeco, H., Bourne, J. R., Crisman, J., Dabby, D., Zastavker, Y. (2005). The Olin Curriculum: Thinking toward the future. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(1), 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.Google Scholar
Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (1995). Managing complex change towards inclusive schooling. In Villa, R. A. & Thousand, J. S. (Eds.), Creating an inclusive school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).Google Scholar
Turns, J., Cuddihy, E., & Guan, Z. (2010). I thought this was going to be a waste of time: How portfolio construction can support student learning from project-based experiences. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulisses, A., Valéria, A. A., & Homero, F. F. (2009). Ensino de Sensoriamento Remoto através da Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas ePor Projetos: Uma proposta metodológica. In Anais XIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Natal, Brazil (pp. 2365–2371).Google Scholar
van Barneveld, A., & Ströbel, J. (2009). Problem-based learning: Effectiveness, drivers and implementation challenges. In Du, X, Graaff, E. de, & Kolmos, A. (Eds.), Research on PBL practice in engineering education. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Vleuten, C. P. M. van der (1997). De intuïtie voorbij [Beyond intuition] Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, 15(1), 34–46.
Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem-based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), Article 3. Retrieved from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (Eds.). (1996). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Woods, D. (1994). How to gain most from problem-based learning. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University.Google Scholar
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based learning. Electrical Engineering – Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Evidence for constructive, self-regulatory, and collaborative processes in problem-based learning. Advances in Health Science Education, 14(2), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusof, K., Tasir, Z., Harun, J., & Helmi, S. A. (2005). Promoting problem-based learning (PBL) in engineering courses at the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Global Journal of Engineering Education 9(2) pp. 175-184. Retrieved from Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×