Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    DeLucia, Patricia R. Preddy, Doug and Oberfeld, Daniel 2016. Audiovisual Integration of Time-to-Contact Information for Approaching Objects. Multisensory Research, Vol. 29, Issue. 4-5, p. 365.

    DeLucia, Patricia R. Meza-Arroyo, Manuel Baurès, Robin Ranjit, Manish Hsiang, Simon and Gorman, Jamie C. 2016. Continuous Response Monitoring of Relative Time-to-Contact Judgments: Does Effective Information Change During an Approach Event?. Ecological Psychology, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    ×
  • Online publication date: July 2015

28 - Perception of Collision

from Part IV - Perception in Context
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Perception Research
  • Online ISBN: 9780511973017
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973017
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×

References

Abe, G. and Richardson, J. (2006). Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 577–586.
Andersen, G. J., Cisneros, J., Atchley, P. and Saidpour, A. (1999). Speed, size, and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 256–269.
Andersen, G. J. and Enriquez, A. (2006). Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions. Psychology and Aging, 2, 74–85.
Andersen, G. J. and Kim, R. D. (2001). Perceptual information and attentional constraints in visual search of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1039–1056.
Andersen, G. J. and Sauer, C. W. (2004). Optical information for collision detection during deceleration. In H. Hecht and G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Advances in Psychology 135, Time-to-Contact (pp. 93–108). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Baurès, R. and Hecht, H. (2011). The effect of body posture on long-range time-to-contact estimation. Perception, 40, 674–681.
Baurès, R., Oberfeld, D. and Hecht, H. (2011). Temporal-range estimation of multiple objects: Evidence for an early bottleneck. Acta Psychologica, 137, 76–82.
Berti, A. and Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420.
Bliss, J. P. and Acton, S. A. (2003). Alarm mistrust in automobiles: How collision alarm reliability affects driving. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 499–509.
Bootsma, R. J. and Craig, C. M. (2003). Information used detecting upcoming collision. Perception, 32, 525–544.
Bootsma, R. J. and Oudejans, R. R. D. (1993). Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1041–1052.
Brendel, E. B., DeLucia, P. R., Hecht, H., Stacy, R. L. and Larsen, J. T. (2012). Threatening pictures induce shortened time-to-contact estimates. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 979–987.
Caird, J. K. and Hancock, P. A. (1994). The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecological Psychology, 6, 83–109.
Caird, J. K. and Hancock, P. A. (2002). Left-turn and gap acceptance crashes. In R. E. Dewar and P. Olson (Eds.), Human factors in traffic safety (pp. 613–652). Tucson, AZ: Lawyers and Judges.
Cinelli, M. E. and Patla, A. E. (2008). Task-specific modulations of locomotor action parameters based on on-lie visual information during collision avoidance with moving objects. Human Movement Science, 27, 513–531.
Cohen, R. G., Biddle, J. C., and Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Manual obstacle avoidance takes into account visual uncertainty, motor noise, and biomechanical costs. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 587–592.
Cummings, M. L., Kilgore, R. M., Wang, K., Tijerina, L., Kochhar, D. S. (2007). Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance. Human Factors, 49, 1097–1106.
Cutting, J. E. and Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein and S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69–117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M. and Braren P. A. (1995). How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving obstacles. Psychological Review, 102, 67–651.
DeLucia, P. R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 738–748.
DeLucia, P. R. (1995). Effects of pictorial relative size and ground-intercept information on judgments about potential collisions in perspective displays. Human Factors, 37, 528–538.
DeLucia, P. R. (2004). Multiple sources of information influence time-to-contact judgments: Do heuristics accommodate limits in sensory and cognitive processes? In H. Hecht and G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Advances in Psychology 135, Time-to-Contact (pp. 243–285). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
DeLucia, P. R. (2005). Does binocular disparity or familiar size override effects of relative size on judgments of time to contact? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 865–886.
DeLucia, P. R. (2008). Critical roles for distance, task, and motion in space perception: Initial conceptual framework and practical implications. Human Factors, 50, 811–820.
DeLucia, P. R. and Meyer, L. E. (1999). Judgments about the time to contact between two objects during simulated self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1813–1833.
DeLucia, P. R. and Novak, J. B. (1997). Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 913–928.
DeLucia, P. R. and Tharanathan, A. (2009). Responses to deceleration during car following: Roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations and interruptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 334–350.
DeLucia, P. R., Tresilian, J. R. and Meyer, L. E. (2000). Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 552–567.
DeLucia, P. R. and Warren, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 783–798.
de Lussanet, M. H. E., Smeets, J. B. J. and Brenner, E. (2001) The effect of expectations on hitting moving targets: Influence of the preceding target’s speed. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 246–248.
Fajen, B. R. (2005). Calibration, information, and control strategies for braking to avoid a collision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 480–501.
Fajen, B. R. and Devaney, M. C. (2006). Learning to control collisions: The role of perceptual attunement ad action boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 300–313.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Goodale, M. A. and Milner, A. D. (2004). Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gray, R. (2002). Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1131–1148.
Gray, R. and Regan, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research, 38, 499–512.
Gray, R. and Regan, D. (2000). Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Current Biology, 10, 587–590.
Gray, R. and Sieffert, R. (2005). Different strategies for using motion-in-depth information in catching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1004–1022.
Hecht, H. and Savelsbergh, G. J. (Eds.) (2004). Time-to-contact. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Helmholtz, H. von. (1924). Treatise on physiological optics, Vol 3 (3rd ed.). In J. P. Southall, (Ed. and Trans.), Rochester, NY: Optical Society of America. (original work published in 1866).
Hochberg, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. Boff, J. Thomas and L. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 22–1 to 21–64). Toronto: Wiley.
Hopkins, B., Churchill, A., Vogt, S. and Rönnqvist, L. (2004). Braking reaching movements: A test of constant tau-dot strategy under different viewing conditions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 3–12.
Kaiser, M. K. and Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers’ sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1028–1040.
Kerzel, D., Hecht, H. and Kim, N. (1999). Image velocity, not tau, explains arrival-time judgments from global optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1540–1555.
Kruk, R. and Regan, D. (1996). Collision avoidance: A helicopter simulator study. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 67, 111–114.
Law, D. J., Pellegrino, J. W., Mitchell, S. R., Fischer, S. C., McDonald, T. P. and Hunt, E. B. (1993). Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival time judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1183–1199.
Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437–459.
Li, F. X. and Laurent, M. (2001). Dodging a ball approaching on a collision path: Effects of eccentricity and velocity. Ecological Psychology, 13, 31–47.
Lobjois, R., Benguigui, N., Bertsch, J. and Broderick, M. P. (2008). Collision avoidance behavior as a function of aging and tennis playing. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 457–468.
López-Moliner, J., Supèr, H., and Keil, M. S. (2013). The time course of estimating time-to-contact: Switching between sources of information. Vision Research, 92, 53–58.
Meskali, M., Barbet, I., Espié, S. and Bootsma, R. J. (2006). Perceptual and motor strategies of car drivers in regulating speed of approach to a preceding vehicle. Le Travail Humain, 69, 183–207.
Miller, R. and Huang, Q. (2002). An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system. 55th IEEE vehicular technology conference, 1, pp. 317–321.
Ni, R. and Andersen, G. J. (2008). Detection of collision events on curved trajectories: Optical information from invariant rate-of-bearing change. Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 1314–1324.
Nicholls, M. E. R., Hadgraft, N. T., Chapman, H. L., Loftus, A. M., Robertson, J. and Bradshaw, J. L. (2010). A hit-and-miss investigation of asymmetries in wheelchair navigation. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 1576–1590.
Norman, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 73–144.
Parasuraman, R., Hancock, P. A. and Olofinboba, O. (1997). Alarm effectiveness in driver-centered collision-warning systems. Ergonomics, 40, 390–399.
Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, and abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253.
Rock, P. B. and Harris, M. G. (2006). [Tau-dot] as a potential control variable for visually guided braking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 251–267.
Runigo, C. L., Benguigui, N. and Bardy, B. G. (2005). Perception-action coupling and expertise in interceptive actions. Human Movement Science, 24, 429–445.
Schiff, W. (1965). Perception of impending collision: A study of visually directed avoidant behavior. Psychological Monographs, 79, 1–26.
Schiff, W. and Detwiler, M. L. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647–658.
Schiff, W. and Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303–316.
Schiff, W., Oldak, R. and Shah, V. (1992). Aging person’s estimates of vehicular motion. Psychology and Aging, 7, 518–525.
Sidaway, B., Fairweather, M., Sekiya, H. and McNitt-Gray, J. (1996). Time-to-collision estimation in a simulated driving task. Human Factors, 38, 101–113.
Smith, M. R. H., Flach, J. M., Dittman, S. M. and Stanard, T. (2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 395–410.
Spence, C. and Ho, C. (2008). Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9, 523–554.
Sun, H. and Frost, B. J. (1998). Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 296–303.
Tharanathan, A. (2008). Effects of size on judgments of collision: Theoretical and practical implications (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://repositories.tdl.org/ttuir/bitstream/handle/2346/11795/Tharanathan_Anand_Diss.pdf?sequence=1.
Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 795–810.
Tresilian, J. R. (1990). Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception, 19, 223–239.
Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 865–876.
Tresilian, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgement tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 231–245.
Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Analysis of recent empirical challenges to an account of interceptive timing. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 515–528.
Vagnoni, E., Lourenco, S.F. and Longo, M. R. (2012) Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli. Current Biology, 22, R826–R827.
von Hofsten, C. and Lee, D. N. (1985). Dialogue on perception and action. In W. H. Warren, Jr. and R. E. Shaw (Eds.) Persistence and Change: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Event Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 231–242.
Wallach, H. and O’Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205–217.
Weiss, P. H., Marshall, J. C., Wunderlich, G., Tellmann, L., Halligan, P. W., Freund, H-J., Zilles, K. and Fink, G. R. (2000) Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain, 123, 2531–2541.
Yan, J.-J., Lorv, B., Li, H., and Sun, H.-J. (2011). Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: Time to collision revisited. Journal of Vision, 11: 7, 1–25.
Yilmaz, E. H. and Warren, Jr., W. H. (1995). Visual control of braking: A test of the [tau-dot] hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 996–1014.