Book contents
- Building BonesBone Formation and Development in Anthropology
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Building Bones
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 What Is a Biological ‘Trait’?
- 2 The Contribution of Angiogenesis to Variation in Bone Development and Evolution
- 3 Association of the Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in Early Skull Formation
- 4 Unique Ontogenetic Patterns of Postorbital Septation in Tarsiers and the Issue of Trait Homology
- 5 Exploring Modern Human Facial Growth at the Micro- and Macroscopic Levels
- 6 Changes in Mandibular Cortical Bone Density and Elastic Properties during Growth
- 7 Postcranial Skeletal Development and Its Evolutionary Implications
- 8 Combining Genetic and Developmental Methods to Study Musculoskeletal Evolution in Primates
- 9 Using Comparisons between Species and Anatomical Locations to Discover Mechanisms of Growth Plate Patterning and Differential Growth
- 10 Ontogenetic and Genetic Influences on Bone’s Responsiveness to Mechanical Signals
- 11 The Havers–Halberg Oscillation and Bone Metabolism
- 12 Structural and Mechanical Changes in Trabecular Bone during Early Development in the Human Femur and Humerus
- Appendix to Chapter 3: Detailed Anatomical Description of Developing Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in the Mouse
- References (not included in citations for Chapter 3)
- Index
- 12 Plate section
- References
6 - Changes in Mandibular Cortical Bone Density and Elastic Properties during Growth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2017
Book contents
- Building BonesBone Formation and Development in Anthropology
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Building Bones
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 What Is a Biological ‘Trait’?
- 2 The Contribution of Angiogenesis to Variation in Bone Development and Evolution
- 3 Association of the Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in Early Skull Formation
- 4 Unique Ontogenetic Patterns of Postorbital Septation in Tarsiers and the Issue of Trait Homology
- 5 Exploring Modern Human Facial Growth at the Micro- and Macroscopic Levels
- 6 Changes in Mandibular Cortical Bone Density and Elastic Properties during Growth
- 7 Postcranial Skeletal Development and Its Evolutionary Implications
- 8 Combining Genetic and Developmental Methods to Study Musculoskeletal Evolution in Primates
- 9 Using Comparisons between Species and Anatomical Locations to Discover Mechanisms of Growth Plate Patterning and Differential Growth
- 10 Ontogenetic and Genetic Influences on Bone’s Responsiveness to Mechanical Signals
- 11 The Havers–Halberg Oscillation and Bone Metabolism
- 12 Structural and Mechanical Changes in Trabecular Bone during Early Development in the Human Femur and Humerus
- Appendix to Chapter 3: Detailed Anatomical Description of Developing Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in the Mouse
- References (not included in citations for Chapter 3)
- Index
- 12 Plate section
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Building Bones: Bone Formation and Development in Anthropology , pp. 128 - 147Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alippi, R. M., Olivera, M. I., Bozzini, C., Huygens, P. A. and Bozzini, C. E. (2005). Changes in material and architectural properties of rat femoral diaphysis during ontogeny in hypophysectomized rats. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 14, 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashman, R. B., Cowin, S. C., Van Buskirk, W. C; and Rice, J. C. (1984). A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 17, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baca, V., Horak, Z., Mikulenka, P. and Dzupa, V. (2008). Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analysis. Medical Engineering & Physics, 30, 924–930.Google Scholar
Berthaume, M. A., Dechow, P. C., Iriarte-Diaz, J., et al. (2012). Probabilistic finite element analysis of a craniofacial finite element model. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 300, 242–253.Google Scholar
Brear, K. and Currey, J. D. (1990). Ontogenetic changes in the mechanical properties of the femur of the polar bear Ursus maritimus. Journal of Zoology, 222, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosh, T., Rozitsky, D., Geron, S. and Pilo, R. (2014). Tensile mechanical properties of swine cortical mandibular bone. PLoS ONE, 91(2), e113229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, D. and Leon, L. R. (1990). Skeletal growth and function in the California gull (Larus californicus). Journal of Zoology, 222, 375–389.Google Scholar
Checa, S., Hesse, B., Roschger, P., et al. (2015). Skeletal maturation substantially affects elastic tissue properties in the endosteal and periosteal regions of loaded mice tibiae. Acta Biomaterialia, 21, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, D. H. and Dechow, P. C. (2011). Elastic anisotropy and off-axis ultrasonic velocity distribution in human cortical bone. Journal of Anatomy, 218, 26–39.Google Scholar
Cowin, S. C. and Hart, R.T. (1990). Errors in the orientation of the principal stress axes if bone tissue is modeled as isotropic. Journal of Biomechanics, 23, 349–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, P. G., Fagan, M. J., Rayfield, E. J. and Jeffery, N. (2011). Finite element modelling of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls: using geometric morphometrics to assess sensitivity. Journal of Anatomy, 219, 696–709.Google Scholar
Currey, J. D. (2001). Ontogenetic changes in compact bone material properties. In: Cowin, S. C. (ed.) Bone Mechanics Handbook, Second Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 19.1–19.16.Google Scholar
Daegling, D. J., Granatosky, M. C., McGraw, W. S. and Rapoff, A. J. (2011a). Reduced stiffness of alveolar bone in the colobine mandible. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 144, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daegling, D. J., Granatosky, M. C., McGraw, W. S. and Rapoff, A. J. (2011b). Spatial patterning of bone stiffness variation in the colobine alveolar process. Archives of Oral Biology, 56, 220–230.Google Scholar
Daegling, D. J., Granatosky, M. C. and McGraw, W. S. (2014). Ontogeny of material stiffness heterogeneity in the macaque mandibular corpus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 153, 297–304.Google Scholar
Davis, M. T., Loyd, A. M., Shen, H. H., et al. (2012). The mechanical and morphological properties of 6 year-old cranial bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 45, 2493–2498.Google Scholar
Dechow, P. C. and Hylander, W. L. (2000). Elastic properties and masticatory bone stress in the macaque mandible. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 112, 553–574.Google Scholar
Dechow, P. C., Schwartz-Dabney, C. L. and Ashman, R. (1992). Elastic properties of the human mandibular corpus. In: Goldstein, S. A. and Carlson, D. S (eds.) Bone Biodynamics in Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment, Volume 27. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, pp. 299–314.Google Scholar
Dechow, P. C., Nail, G. A., Schwartz-Dabney, C. L. and Ashman, R. B. (1993). Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 90, 291–306.Google Scholar
Dechow, P. C., Chung, D. H. and Bolouri, M. (2008). Relationship between three dimensional microstructure and elastic properties of cortical bone in the human mandible and femur. In: Vinyard, C. J., Ravosa, M. J. and Wall, C. E. (eds.) Primate Craniofacial Function and Biology. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechow, P. C., Wang, Q. and Peterson, J. (2010). Edentulation alters material properties of cortical bone in the human craniofacial skeleton: functional implications for craniofacial structure in primate evolution. Anatomical Record, 293, 618–629.Google Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. and Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geraldes, D. M. and Phillips, A. T. M. (2014). A comparative study of orthotropic and isotropic bone adaptation in the femur. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 30, 873–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groning, F., Fagan, M. and O’Higgins, P. (2012). Modeling the human mandible under masticatory loads: which input variables are important? The Anatomical Record, 295, 853–863.Google Scholar
Hara, T., Takizawa, M., Sato, T. and Ide, Y. (1998). Mechanical properties of buccal compact bone of the mandibular ramus in human adults and children: relationship of the elastic modulus to the direction of the osteon and the porosity ratio. Bulletin of the Tokyo Dental College, 39, 47–55.Google Scholar
Lettry, S., Seedhom, B. B., Berry, E. and Cuppone, M. (2003). Quality assessment of the cortical bone of the human mandible. Bone, 32, 35–44.Google Scholar
Main, R. P., Lynch, M. E. and van der Meulen, C. H. (2010). In vivo tibial stiffness is maintained by whole bone morphology and cross-sectional geometry in growing female mice. Journal of Biomechanics, 43, 2689–2694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nomura, T., Gold, E., Powers, M. P., Shingaki, S. and Katz, J. L. (2003). Micromechanics/structure relationships in the human mandible. Dental Materials, 19, 167–173.Google Scholar
Peng, L., Bai, J., Zeng, X. and Zhou, Y. (2006). Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Medical Engineering & Physics, 28, 277–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, J. and Dechow, P. C. (2002). Material properties of the inner and outer cortical tables of the human parietal bone. Anatomical Record, 268, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, J. and Dechow, P. C. (2003). Material properties of the human cranial vault and zygoma. Anatomical Record, 274, 785–797.Google Scholar
Peterson, J., Wang, Q. and Dechow, P. C. (2006). Material properties of the dentate maxilla. Anatomical Record, 288, 962–972.Google Scholar
Rapoff, A. J., Rinaldi, R. G., Hotzman, J. L. and Daegling, D. J. (2008). Elastic modulus variation in mandibular bone: a microindentation study of Macaca fascicularis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135, 100–109.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Dabney, C. L. and Dechow, P. C. (2002a). Accuracy of elastic property measurement in mandibular cortical bone is improved by using cylindrical specimens. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 124, 714–723.Google Scholar
Schwartz-Dabney, C. L. and Dechow, P. C. (2002b). Edentulation alters material properties of cortical bone in the human mandible. Journal of Dental Research, 81, 613–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz-Dabney, C. L. and Dechow, P. C. (2003). Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 120, 252–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strait, D. S., Wang, Q., Dechow, P. C., et al. (2005). Modeling elastic properties in finite-element analysis: how much precision is needed to produce an accurate model? Anatomical Record, 283, 275–287.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Zou, D., Li, Z., et al. (2014). Mechanical properties of cranial bones and sutures in 1–2-year-old infants. Medical Science Monitor, 20, 1808–1813.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q. and Dechow, P. C. (2006). Elastic properties of external cortical bone in the craniofacial skeleton of the rhesus monkey. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 402–415.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Strait, D. S. and Dechow, P. C. (2006). A comparison of cortical elastic properties in the craniofacial skeletons of three primate species and its relevance to the study of human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 375–382.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Ashley, D. W. and Dechow, P. C. (2010). Regional, ontogenetic, and sex-related variations in elastic properties of cortical bone in baboon mandibles. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 141, 526–549.Google Scholar
Wood, S. A., Strait, D. S., Dumont, E. R., Ross, C. F. and Grosse, I. R. (2011). The effects of modeling simplifications on craniofacial finite element models: the alveoli (tooth sockets) and periodontal ligaments. Journal of Biomechanics, 44, 1831–1838.Google Scholar
Yang, H., Ma, X. and Guo, T. (2010). Some factors that affect the comparison between isotropic and orthotropic inhomogeneous finite element material models of femur. Medical Engineering & Physics, 32, 553–560.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by