Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

12 - From attitudes to (in)action: the darker side of ‘we’

from Part II - Prejudice and social change revisited

Summary

The study of intergroup relations has traditionally focused on the role of individual prejudice in motivating discrimination and creating disparities. Prejudice has been classically defined as a negative attitude, in Allport’s (1954) terms ‘an antipathy based on faulty and inflexible generalization. It may be felt or expressed. It may be directed toward a group as a whole, or toward an individual because he [sic] is a member of that group’ (p. 9). Over the past fifty years, in particular, psychologists have invested considerable energy in exploring how interventions, such as appropriately structured intergroup contact, can reduce prejudice (Pettigrew and Tropp, 2006). In addition, stimulated by the classic work of Tajfel and Turner (1979), recent approaches have also examined how group perceptions and identity can influence intergroup prejudice (Brown, 1996) and inform strategies for reducing bias (Gaertner and Dovidio, 2010). Extending the line of analysis presented by Wright and Baray in the previous chapter, this chapter acknowledges the benefits of these frameworks for improving intergroup attitudes and relieving immediate tensions but also suggests that such approaches, in isolation, may have unintended consequences that inhibit action by members of disadvantaged and advantaged groups towards social structural changes towards equality in the longer term.

We focus our analysis in this chapter on a line of research that we initiated over twenty years ago on the common ingroup identity model (Gaertner and Dovidio, 2000, 2009; Gaertner et al., 1989, 1993). Previous research on prejudice reduction had, over an extended period, identified positive intergroup contact as a potent intervention for reducing prejudice and investigated the parameters (e.g. equal status and cooperative interaction) that moderated the effectiveness of contact (Pettigrew and Tropp, 2006, 2008). The common ingroup identity model, in contrast, considered the psychological processes – specifically, cognitive representations of social groups – that mediate the impact of various conditions of contact on reductions in prejudice.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Allport, G. W. 1954 The Nature of PrejudiceCambridge, MAAddison-Wesley
Aron, A.McLaughlin-Volpe, T.Mashek, D.Lewandowski, G.Wright, S. C.Aron, E. N. 2005 Including others in the selfStroebe, W.M. Hewstone, andEuropean Review of Social Psychology101Hove, UKPsychology Press
Blumer, H. 1958 Race prejudice as a sense of group positionPacific Sociological Review 1 3
Brown, R. 1996 Prejudice: its Social PsychologyMalden, MABlackwell
Brown, R.Hewstone, M. 2005 An integrative theory of intergroup contactZanna, M. P.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology255San Diego, CAAcademic Press
Dixon, J. A.Durrheim, K.Tredoux, C. 2005 Beyond the optimal strategy: a ‘reality check’ for the contact hypothesisAmerican Psychologist 60 697
Dixon, J. A.Durrheim, K.Tredoux, C. 2007 Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equalityPsychological Science 18 867
Doosje, B.Ellemers, N.Spears, R. 1999 Commitment and intergroup behaviourEllemers, N.Spears, R.Doosje, B.Social Identity: Context, Commitment and Content84Oxford, UKBlackwell
Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L. 1996 Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relationsJournal of Social Issues 52 51
Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L. 2010 Intergroup biasFiske, S. T.Gilbert, D.Lindzey, G.Handbook of Social Psychology1,084New YorkWiley
Dovidio, J. F.Brigham, J. C.Johnson, B. T.Gaertner, S. L. 1996 Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: another lookMacrae, C. N.Hewstone, M.Stangor, C.Foundations of Stereotypes and Stereotyping276New YorkGuilford
Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L.Kafati, G. 2000 Group identity and intergroup relations: the common in-group identity modelThye, S. R.Lawler, E. J.Macy, M. W.Walker, H. A.Advances in Group Processes1Stamford, CTJAI Press
Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L.Saguy, T. 2008 Another view of ‘we’: majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identityEuropean Review of Social Psychology 18 296
Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L.Saguy, T. 2009 Commonality and the complexity of ‘we’: social attitudes and social changePersonality and Social Psychology Review 13 3
Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L.Shnabel, N.Saguy, T.Johnson, J. D. 2010 Recategorization and prosocial behavior: common identity and a dual identityStürmer, S.Snyder, M.The Psychology of Prosocial Behavior191Malden, MAWiley-Blackwell
Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L.Validzic, A.Matoka, K.Johnson, B.Frazier, S. 1997 Extending the benefits of re-categorization: evaluations, self-disclosure and helpingJournal of Experimental Social Psychology 33 401
Ellemers, N.Barreto, M. 2001 The impact of relative group status: affective, behavioral, and perceptual consequencesBrown, R.Gaertner, S. L.Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes324Oxford, UKBlackwell
Fiske, S. T.Taylor, S. E. 2007 Social Cognition: from Brains to CultureNew YorkMcGraw-Hill
Gaertner, S. L.Dovidio, J. F. 2000 Reducing Intergroup Bias: the Common Ingroup Identity ModelPhiladelphia, PAThe Psychology Press
Gaertner, S. L.Dovidio, J. F. 2009 A common ingroup identity: a categorization-based approach for reducing intergroup biasNelson, T.Handbook of Prejudice489Philadelphia, PATaylor and Francis
Gaertner, S. L.Dovidio, J. F. 2010 Social categorizationDovidio, J. F.Hewstone, M.Glick, P.Esses, V. M.Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination526Thousand Oaks, CASage
Gaertner, S. L.Dovidio, J. F.Anastasio, P. A.Bachman, B. A.Rust, M. C. 1993 The common ingroup identity model: recategorization and the reduction of intergroup biasStroebe, W.M. Hewstone, andEuropean Review of Social Psychology1New YorkJohn Wiley and Sons
Gaertner, S. L.Dovidio, J. F.Nier, J.Ward, C.Banker, B. 1999 Across cultural divides: the value of a superordinate identityPrentice, D.Miller, D.Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict173New YorkRussell Sage Foundation
Gaertner, S. L.Mann, J. A.Dovidio, J. F.Murrell, A. J.Pomare, M. 1990 How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 692
Gaertner, S. L.Mann, J. A.Murrell, A. J.Dovidio, J. F. 1989 Reduction of intergroup bias: the benefits of recategorizationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 239
González, R.Brown, R. 2003 Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identification in intergroup contactEuropean Journal of Social Psychology 33 195
Guerra, R.Rebelo, M.Monteiro, M. B.Riek, B. M.Maia, E. W.Gaertner, S. L.Dovidio, J. F. 2010 How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children?Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 13 445
Huo, Y. J. 2003 Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 336
Jost, J. T.Banaji, M.Nosek, B. A. 2004 A decade of system justification theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quoPolitical Psychology 25 881
Kaiser, C.Pratt-Hyatt, J. 2009 Distributing prejudice unequally: do whites distribute their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 432
Nadler, A.Halabi, S. 2006 Intergroup helping as status relations: effects of status stability in-group identification and type of help on receptivity to help from high status groupJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 97
Nier, J. A.Gaertner, S. L.Dovidio, J. F.Banker, B. S.Ward, C. M. 2001 Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: the effects of a common group identityGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations 4 299
Opotow, S. 1995 Drawing the line: social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justiceBunker, B. B.Rubin, J. Z.Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch347San Francisco, CAJossey-Bass
Pettigrew, T. F.Tropp, L. R. 2006 A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theoryJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 751
Pettigrew, T. F.Tropp, L. R. 2008 How does contact reduce prejudice? A meta analytic test of three mediatorsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology 38 922
Ryan, C. S.Hunt, J. S.Weible, J. A.Peterson, C. R.Casas, J. F. 2007 Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among black and white AmericansGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations 10 617
Saguy, T.Dovidio, J. F.Pratto, F. 2008 Beyond contact: intergroup contact in the context of power relationsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 432
Saguy, T.Tausch, N.Dovidio, J. F.Pratto, F. 2009 The irony of harmony: intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equalityPsychological Science 29 114
Saguy, T.Tausch, N.Dovidio, J. F.Pratto, F.Singh, P. 2011 Tension and harmony in intergroup relationsShaver, P. R.Mikulincer, M.Understanding and Reducing Aggression, Violence, and their Consequences333Washington, DCAmerican Psychological Association
Scheepers, D.Saguy, T.Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L. 2010
Simon, B.Klandermans, B. 2001 Politicized collective identity: a social-psychological analysisAmerican Psychologist 56 319
Tajfel, H.Turner, J. C. 1979 Austin, W. G.Worchel, S.The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations33Monterey, CABrooks/Cole
Talaska, C. A.Fiske, S. T.Chaiken, S. 2008 Legitimating racial discrimination: emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysisSocial Justice Research 21 263
Thomas, E. L.Saguy, T.Dovidio, J. F.Gaertner, S. L. 2009
Turner, J. C.Hogg, M. A.Oakes, P. J.Reicher, S. D.Wetherell, M. S. 1987 Rediscovering the Social Group: a Self-categorization TheoryOxford, UKBlackwell
Tyler, T.Blader, S. L. 2003 The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behaviorPersonality and Social Psychology Review 7 349
van Oudenhoven, J. P.Prins, K. S.Buunk, B. 1998 Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrantsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology 28 013
van Zomeren, M.Postmes, T.Spears, R. 2008 Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectivesPsychological Bulletin 134 504
Verkuyten, M. 2006 Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: a social identity perspectiveStroebe, W.Hewstone, M.European Review of Social Psychology148Hove, UKPsychology Press
West, T. V.Pearson, A. R.Dovidio, J. F.Shelton, J. N.Trail, T. 2009 Superordinate identity and intergroup roommate friendship developmentJournal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 1,266
Wolsko, C.Park, B.Judd, C. M. 2006 Considering the Tower of Babel: correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United StatesSocial Justice Research 19 277
Wright, S. C. 2001 Brown, R.Gaertner, S. L.Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes223Oxford, UKBlackwell
Wright, S. C.Lubensky, M. E. 2009 The struggle for social equality: collective action versus prejudice reductionDemoulin, S.Leyens, J.-P.Dovidio, J. F.Intergroup Misunderstandings: Impact of Divergent Social Realities291New YorkPsychology Press
Wright, S. C.Kiu, L.Semenya, A.Comeau, J. 2008