Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T09:57:07.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Imagining China: Brazil, Labor, and the Limits of an Anti-model

from PART I - Deconstructing the Beijing Consensus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Jedidiah Kroncke
Affiliation:
Professor of Law at Fundação Getulio Vargas São Paulo School of Law, Brazil
Weitseng Chen
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

The Beijing Consensus as Anti-model

The idea of a consensus in development discourse is ever alluring. Much like discussions of universal “best practices,” asserting the existence of a consensus offers up the possibility that the most fundamental, if oft-elided, challenge of development has been transcended – that of politics. Especially in the postcolonial era, the universal language of empirical social science has, at its best, expanded the possibility of cross-cultural knowledge exchange while, at its worst, fallen prey to merely cloaking cultural chauvinism or geopolitical self-interest. In this way, the rise of the Washington Consensus was itself as much the construction of a particular vein of development economics as it was an outgrowth of the 1990s post-Soviet euphoria that gave rise to the claim that the United States had achieved a demonstrable and well-understood economic track record. A track record that could be universalized into a model that was powerful enough to transcend global socio-cultural diversity, much akin to Francis Fukuyama's proclaimed end of history.

In similar stead, the relative decline of the influence of the Washington Consensus reflects as much concerns about the empirical validation of its underlying policy prescriptions as it does the end of the 1990s optimistic imagining of a unipolar liberal world order. Understanding the rise of the idea of the Beijing Consensus thus begs the question of what would generate interest in a new “consensus” in a very different, multipolar, geopolitical context. Such search for an alternative was presaged by the focus in the 1980s on Japan as the source of a new “alternative” model of development, spurred then by the Japanese economic and international discord following stagflation and energy crises in the West during the late 1970s.

This chapter will argue that the contemporary geopolitical context and backlash against the Washington Consensus has given rise to the use and invocation of the Beijing Consensus as an anti-model. As an anti-model, the Beijing Consensus discourse is only partly a reaction against the underlying policy content of the Washington Consensus. More fully, it is also a general rejection of the very notion of the coordinated global advocacy of a universal set of policy prescriptions. This observation is not in itself completely novel.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Beijing Consensus?
How China Has Changed Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development
, pp. 43 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×