Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: June 2012

11 - Sociocultural Implications for Assessment II


This chapter takes up issues of opportunity to learn (OTL) and assessment at the level of schools, considered as organizations. An effort directed toward improving OTL for students in a school is an effort to bring about learning by the organization that is that school. The question we address is part of the general question of OTL for an organization: What kinds of resources, programs, and commitments may be needed or helpful in an effort to improve the learning effectiveness of a school? In keeping with the focus of this volume, we concentrate on issues of obtaining and using information to evaluate and support an organization's progress in changing its practices and achieving stronger OTL.

In Chapter 9, Moss focuses on the practice of assessment, broadly conceived, within a single (classroom) activity system. Here, we enlarge that focus. Assessments and evaluations used to inform changes in practice across a school are practices that cross the boundaries of activity systems to support professional learning, decision making, and accountability. Here, we consider aspects of such practices, especially ways in which teachers and other participants are positioned in the processes.

We begin with the premise that assessment is (or should be) at least, in part, about professionals learning to support students' learning and, in turn, to support one another's learning. Another way of saying this is that it should be about OTL for the professionals in the educational system as well as for students.

Boudett, K. P., City, E. A., and Murnane, R. J., eds. 2005. Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bowker, G. C. and. Star, S. L.. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brown, A. L. 1994. The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher 23(8): 4–12.
Brown, J. S. (1991, January-February). Research that reinvents the corporation. Harvard Business Review, pp. 102–111.
Carnoy, M., Elmore, R., and Sisken, L. L.. 2003. The new accountability: High schools and high stakes testing. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, J.. 1999. Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education 24: 249–305.
Commission on No Child Left Behind. 2007. Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the promise to our nation's children. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute.
Diamond, J. B. and Spillane, J. P.. 2004. High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality?Teachers College Record 106: 1145–76.
Diamond, J. B. and C. Cooper. 2007. The uses of testing data in early elementary schools: Some lessons from Chicago. In Evidence and decision making (Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), issue 1, edited by Moss, P. A.. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
Dweck, C. and J. Bempechat. 1983. Children's theories of intelligence: Consequences for teaching. In Learning and motivation in the classroom, edited by Paris, S., Olson, G., and Stevenson, H., 239–56. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dweck, C. S. 2000. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & French/Psychology Press.
Elmore, R. F. 1996. Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 1–26.
Elmore, R. F. and Rothman, R.. 1999. Testing, teaching, and learning: A guide for states and districts. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Engeström, Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and work 14(1): 134–156.
Felner, R. D., Jackson, A. W., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N. 1997. The impact of school reform for the middle years: Longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points–based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan 78: 528–32, 541–50.
Forum on Educational Accountability. 2007. Redefining accountability: Improving student learning by building capacity. Author.
Fuhrman, S. H., and Elmore, R. F.. 2004. Redesigning accountability systems for education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gee, J. P. 2007. Reflections on assessment from a sociocultural/situated perspective. In Evidence and decision making (Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), issue 1, edited by Moss, P. A.. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
Greeno, J. G. 2002. Students with competence, authority and accountability: Affording intellective identities in the classroom. New York: The College Board.
Gresalfi, M. S. 2004. Taking up opportunities to learn: Examining the construction of participatory mathematical identities in middle school students. Palo Alto: Stanford University.
Halverson, R. R. 2003. Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives 11(37).[]
Herman, J. L. and Haertel, E. H.. 2005. Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), issue 2. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
Institute for Learning. 2003. Informational packet, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Institute for Learning. 2004. Learning Walk SM Sourcebook. Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Jackson, A. W. and Davis, G. A.. 2000. Turning Points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.
Jordan, B. and Putz, P.. 2004. Assessment as practice: Notes on measures, tests, and targets. Human organization 63: 346–58.
Lampert, M. 2001. Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lave, J. 1993. The practice of learning. In Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, edited by Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J., 3–32. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matsumura, L. C., S. C. Slater, B. J. Junker, M. Peterson, M. Boston, M. Steel, and L. Resnick. 2006. Measuring Reading Comprehension and Mathematics Instruction in Urban Middle Schools: A Pilot Study of the Instructional Quality Assessment. CSE Technical Report 681. University of California, Los Angeles: CRESST.
McLaughlin, M. W. and Talbert, J. E.. 2001. Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mertens, S. B. and Flowers, N.. 2004. Assessing the success of Turning Points in Boston public schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, April 12–16, 2004, San Diego, Calif.
Mislevy, R J., J. P. Gee, and P. A Moss. In press. On qualitative and quantitative reasoning about assessment validity. In Generalizing from educational research: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative opposition, edited by Ercikan, K. and Roth, W.-M.. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Moss, P. A., B. Girard, L. Haniford. 2006. Validity in education assessment, Review of Research in Education, 30, 109–162.
Moss, P. A. and P. J. Piety. 2007. Introduction: Evidence and decision making. In P. A. Moss, (Ed.) Evidence and Decision Making. The 106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
National Turning Points Center. 2001. Design Overview. Boston: Author.
National Turning Points Center. 2002. Benchmarks to Becoming a Turning Points School. Boston: Author.
National Turning Points Center. 2002. School Quality Review. Boston: Author.
Peterson, P. E. and West, M. R.. 2003. No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Press.
Resnick, L. B. and T. K. Glennan, Jr. 2002. Leadership for learning: A theory of action for urban school districts. In School districts and instructional renewal, edited by Hightower, A. M. et al. New York: Teachers College Press.
Resnick, L. B. and S. Nelson-LeGall. 1997. Socializing intelligence. In Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond, edited by Smikth, L., Dockrell, J., and Tomlinson, P., 145–58. London: Routledge.
Skrla, L. and Scheurich, J. J. 2004. Educational equality and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics. London: Routledge Falmer.
Snow, C. E. 2002. Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
Spillane, J. P. 2006. Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., and Diamond, J. B.. 2001. Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher 30(1): 23–28.
Spillane, J. P. and D. B. Miele. 2007. Evidence in practice: A framing of the terrain. In Evidence and decision making (Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), issue 1, edited by Moss, P. A.. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R.. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., and Henningsen, M.. 1996. Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal 33: 455–88.
Task Force on Education of Young Adolescents. 1989. Turning Points: Preparing American Youth for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.
Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., P. Del Rio, and A. Alverez. 1995. Sociocultural studies: History, action, and mediation. In Sociocultural studies of mind, edited by Wertsch, J. V., Rio, P. Del, and Alverez, A., 1–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.