Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 17
  • Print publication year: 2002
  • Online publication date: September 2009

2 - The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control

Summary

Introspective observation is what we have to rely on first and foremost and always.

William James (Principles of psychology, p. 185)

William James' (1890) quote foreshadowed the current focus in the field of metacognition, the relation between monitoring and control. Monitoring means the ability to judge successfully one's own cognitive processes, and control means the ability to use those judgments to alter behavior. This chapter, like much of current metacognition research, concerns how we apply our judgments to alter our behavior, both during learning and during remembering.

About twenty years ago, Cavanaugh and Perlmutter (1982) wrote that the “present state of metamemory is not good …” (p. 22), and Flavell (1982) wrote that “none of us has yet come up with deeply insightful, detailed proposals about what metacognition is, how it operates, and how it develops” (p. 28). Some thought that metacognition was no longer a worthwhile topic (see Marshall and Morton, 1978; Wellman, 1983). However, starting with the seminal work of Thomas Nelson and his colleagues (e.g. Nelson, 1984; Nelson et al., 1982; Nelson et al., 1986), metacognition made a strong comeback. Whereas the research on metacognition prior to the 1980s was dominated by research directed at developmental processes (e.g. Flavell, 1979), research in the 1980s and 1990s was dominated by cognitive psychologists interested in already-developed processes in adults. It seems, though, that in order to maximize the knowledge gained from both lines of research, a marriage between the two is needed.

references
Arbuckle, T. Y., and Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 126–131
Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 124–129
Balli, S. J., Demo, D. H., and Wedman, J. F. (1998). Family involvement with children's homework: an intervention in the middle grades. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 47, 149–157
Barnes, A. E., Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Mazzoni, G., and Narens, L. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In D. Gopher and A. Koriat (eds.), Attention and performance ⅩⅦ: cognitive regulation of performance: interaction of theory and application, pp. 287–313. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., and Schwartz, B. L. (1998) The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68
Blake, M. (1973). Prediction of recognition when recall fails: exploring the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 311–319
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: a problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, Volume 1, pp. 77–165. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe (eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, pp. 65–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733
Cavanaugh, J. C., and Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: a critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11–28
Costermans, J., Lories, G., and Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 142–150
Cull, W. L., and Zechmeister, E. B. (1994). The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners?Memory and Cognition, 22, 249–257
Delucchi, J. J., Rohwer, W. D., and Thomas, J. W. (1987). Study time allocation as a function of grade level and course characteristics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 365–380
Dunlosky, J., and Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser (eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 249–276. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Dunlosky, J., and Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory and Cognition, 20, 374–380
Dunlosky, J., and Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur?Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545–565
Dunlosky, J., and Nelson, T. O. (1997). Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 34–49
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: the appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 552–564
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (ed.), The nature of intelligence, pp. 231–235. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In J. M Scandura and C. J. Brainerd (eds.), Structural-process theories of complex human behavior. Leyden: Sijthoff and Noordhoff
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognitive and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911
Flavell, J. H. (1982). On cognitive development. Child Development, 53, 1–10
Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., and Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119–136
Gruneberg, M. M., and Monks, J. (1974). “Feeling of knowing” and cued recall. Acta Psychologica, 38, 257–265
Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208–216
Jacoby, L. L., Bjork, R. A., and Kelley, C. M. (1993). Illusions of comprehension and competence. In D. Druckman and R. A. Bjork (eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: enhancing team and individual performance, pp. 57–80. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: an experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 390–394
Johnson, M. K., and Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85
Keith, T. Z. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: a large sample-path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 248–253
Keniston, A. H., and Flavell, J. H. (1979). A developmental study of intelligent retrieval. Child Development, 50, 1144–1152
King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. B., and Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: the influence of retrieval practice. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 329–343
Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive knowledge and executive control. In D. Griffin (ed.), Human mind – animal mind, pp. 201–224. New York: Springer
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639
Koriat, A. (1994). Memory's knowledge of its own knowledge: the accessibility account of the feeling of knowing. In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing, pp. 115–135. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311–333
Koriat, A., and Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517
Leonesio, R. J., and Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 464–470
Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 20, 159–183
Loftus, E. F., and Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: the influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86–88
Loftus, E. F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H. G., and Schooler, J. W. (1989). Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held. Memory and Cognition, 17, 607–616
Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 756–766
Marshall, J. C., and Morton, J. (1978). On the mechanics of EMMA. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella, and W. J. M. Levelt (eds.), The child's conception of language. Berlin: Springer
Mau, W. C., and Lynn, R. (1999). Racial and ethnic differences in motivation for educational achievement in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1091–1096
Mazzoni, G., and Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study-time allocation: why is study time sometimes not effective?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47–60
Mazzoni, G., Cornoldi, C., and Marchitelli, G. (1990). Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?Memory and Cognition, 18, 196–204
Mazzoni, G., Cornoldi, C., Tomat, L., and Vecchi, T. (1997). Remembering the grocery shopping list: a study on metacognitive biases. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 253–267
Mazzoni, G., and Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1263–1274
McWhirter, J. J., McWhirter, B. T., McWhirter, A. M., and McWhirter, E. H. (1998). Educational interventions. In J. J. McWhirter, B. T. McWhirter, A. M. McWhirter, and E. H. McWhirter (eds.), At-risk youth, pp. 280–299. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole
Metcalfe, J. (1986a). Premonitions of insight impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 623–634
Metcalfe, J. (1986b). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288–294
Metcalfe, J. (1993a). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: implications for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100, 3–22
Metcalfe, J. (1993b). Monitoring and gain control in an episodic memory model: relation to the P300 event-related potential. In A. F. Collins and S. E. Gathercole (eds.), Theories of memory, pp. 327–353. Hove, UK: Erlbaum
Metcalfe, J. (1999). Metamemory: theory and data. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (eds.), Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., and Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 851–864
Metcalfe, J., and Weibe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 15, 238–246
Miner, A. C., and Reder, L. M. (1994). A new look at feeling of knowing: its metacognitive role in regulating question answering. In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing, pp. 47–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133
Nelson, T. O. (1988). Predictive accuracy of the feeling of knowing across different criterion tasks and across different subject populations and individuals. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes (eds.), Practical aspects of memory: current research and issues, pp. 190–196. Chichester, UK: Wiley
Nelson, T. O., and Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOL) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the delayed-JOL effect. Psychological Science, 2, 267–270
Nelson, T. O., and Dunlosky, J. (1994). How shall we explain the delayed-judgment-of-learning effect?Psychological Science, 3, 317–318
Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., and Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207–213
Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., and Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 282–300
Nelson, T. O., Kruglanski, A. W., and Jost, J. T. (1998). Knowing thyself and others: progress in metacognitive social psychology. In V. Y. Yzerbyt and G. Lories (eds.), Metacognition: cognitive and social dimensions, pp. 69–89. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Nelson, T. O., and Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the “labor-in-vain effect.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 676–686
Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Landwehr, R. S., and Narens, L. (1986). A comparison of three predictors of an individual's memory performance: the individual's feeling of knowing versus the normative feeling of knowing versus base-rate item difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 279–287
Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Shimamura, A. P., Landwehr, R. S., and Narens, L. (1982). Overlearning and the feeling of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 279–288
Nelson, T. O., and Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Volume 26, pp. 125–141. New York: Academic Press
Nelson, T. O., and Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe, and A. P. Shimamura (eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing, pp. 1–25. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Olympia, D. E., Sheridan, S. M., Jenson, W. R., and Andrews, D. (1994). Using student-managed interventions to increase homework completion and accuracy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 85–99
Openshaw, D. K. (1998). Increasing homework compliance: the SEA method. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 9, 21–29
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., and O'sullivan, J. T. (1985). Children's metamemory and the teaching of memory strategies. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, and T. G. Waller (eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance, Volume Ⅰ, pp. 111–149. New York: Academic Press
Pressley, M., Van Etten, S., Yokoi, L., Freeburn, G., and Meter, P. V. (1998). The metacognition of college studentship: a grounded theory approach. In D. J. Hacker and J. Dunlosky (eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice. The educational psychology series, pp. 347–363. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90–138
Reder, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, Vol. 22, pp. 227–259. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Reder, L. M., and Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435–451
Reder, L. M., and Schunn, C. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition, pp. 45–77. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Salatas, H., and Flavell, J. H. (1976). Retrieval of recently learned information: development of strategies and control skills. Child Development, 47, 941–948
Schumann, H., Walsh, E., Olsen, C., and Etheridge, B. (1985). Effort and reward: the assumption that college grades are affected by quantity of study. Social Forces, 63, 945–966
Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 357–375
Schwartz, B. L. (2001). The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time. Memory and Cognition, 29, 117–126
Schwartz, B. L., and Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing, pp. 93–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Schwartz, B. L., and Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1074–1083
Siegel, J. M., and Loftus, E. F. (1978). Impact of anxiety and life stress upon eyewitness testimony. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 479–480
Son, L. K., and Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204–221
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S. Y., and Stigler, J. W. (1986). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. Science, 231, 693–699
Thiede, K. W., and Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 290–302
Thiede, K. W., and Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037
Travers, K. J., Crosswhite, F. J., Dossey, J. A., Swafford, J. O., McKnight, C. C., and Cooney, T. J. (1985). Second international mathematics study summary report for the United States. Champaign, IL: Stipes
Tymms, P. B., and Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1992). The relationship of homework to A-level results. Educational Research, 34, 3–10
Underwood, B. J. (1966). Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free-recall learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 673–679
Vesonder, G., and Voss, J. (1985). On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 363–376
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Weaver, C. A. , and Kelemen, W. L. (1997). Judgments of learning at delays: shifts in response patterns or increased metamemory accuracy?Psychological Science, 8, 318–321
Wellman, H. M. (1983). Metamemory revisited. Contribution to Human Development, 9, 31–51
Widner, R. L., and Smith, S. M. (1996). Feeling-of-knowing judgments from the subject's perspective. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 373–387
Widner, R. L., Smith, S. M., and Graziano, W. G. (1996). The effects of demand characteristics on the reporting of tip-of-the-tongue and feeling-of-knowing states. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 525–538
Winne, P. H., and Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser (eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 277–304. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Zimmerman, B. J., and Martin-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628
Zimmerman, B. J., and Martin-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290
Zimmerman, B. J., and Martin-Pons, M. (1990). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schunk and J. L. Meece (eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom, pp. 185–207. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates