Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

6 - Evoked potential monitoring

from Section 1 - General considerations

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

1. Daube JR, Rubin DI, eds. Clinical Neurophysiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
2. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 6–11.
3. Husain AM, ed. A Practical Approach to Neurophysiologic Intraoperative Monitoring. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2008.
4. Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Lüders H, et al. Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 1986; 19: 22–5.
5. Tsai TM, Tsai CL, Lin TS, et al. Value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in detecting acute nerve root injury: an experimental study with special emphasis on stimulus intensity. Spine 2005; 30: E540–6.
6. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 11B: Recommended standards for intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials. Bloomfield, CT: American Clinical Neurophysiology Society; October, 2009.
7. Lueders H, Lesser R, Hahn J, et al. Subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation. Brain 1983; 106: 341–72.
8. Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, et al. The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine 2010; 35: S37–46.
9. Vauzelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973; 93: 173–8.
10. Toleikis JR, Skelly JP, Carlvin AO, Burkus JK. Spinally elicited peripheral nerve responses are sensory rather than motor. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111(4): 736–42.
11. Calancie B, Molano MR. Alarm criteria for motor-evoked potentials: what’s wrong with the “presence-or-absence” approach? Spine 2008; 33: 406–14.
12. Langeloo DD, Lelivelt A, Louis Journée H, et al. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: a study of 145 patients. Spine 2003; 28: 1043–50.
13. Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Lyon R, Zada G, et al. Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection correlate with postoperative motor function. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 982–93.
14. Morota N, Deletis V, Constantini S, et al. The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 1327–36.
15. Ulkatan S, Neuwirth M, Bitan F, et al. Monitoring of scoliosis surgery with epidurally recorded motor evoked potentials (D wave) revealed false results. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 2093–101.
16. Levy WJ, York DH, McCaffrey M, Tanzer F. Motor evoked potentials from transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. Neurosurgery 1984; 15: 214–27.
17. Kitagawa H, Itoh T, Takano H, et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring during upper cervical spine surgery. Spine 1989; 14: 1078–83.
18. Nelson KR, Vasconez HC. Nerve transaction without neurotonic discharges during intraoperative electromyographic monitoring. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18: 236–8.
19. Holland NR. Intraoperative electromyography. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19: 444–53.
20. Beatty RM, McGuire P, Moroney JM, et al. Continuous intraoperative electromyographic recording during spinal surgery. J Neurosurg 1995; 82: 401–5.
21. Jimenez JC, Sani S, Braverman B, et al. Palsies of the fifth cervical nerve root after cervical decompression: prevention using continuous intraoperative electromyography monitoring. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 92–7.
22. Gunnarsson T, Krassioukov AV, Sarjeant R, et al. Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: Correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases. Spine 2004; 29: 677–84.
23. Toleikis RJ. Neurophysiological monitoring during pedicle screw placement. In: Deletis V, Shils JL, eds. Neurophysiology in Neurosurgery. New York: Academic Press; 2002: 231–64.
24. Shi YB, Binette M, Martin WH, et al. Electrical stimulation for intraoperative evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement. Spine 2003; 28: 595–601.
25. Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Kim Y, et al. Can triggered electromyograph thresholds predict safe thoracic screw placement? Spine 2002; 27: 2030–5.
26. Reidy DP, Houlden D, Nolan PC, et al. Evaluation of electromyographic monitoring during insertion of thoracic pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 1009–14.