Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

10 - Nations and Nationalism

from 2 - The Traditional Agenda

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we will see that understanding the meaning and political importance of nations and nationalism in world politics is a challenging task. One recent survey of concepts in International Relations (IR) said of the term ‘national interest’ that it was ‘the most vague and therefore easily used and abused’; of nationalism it said that ‘there is a lack of consensus about what it is and why it has maintained such a firm hold over so much of the world’s population’; and that ‘Nations and states seem identical but they are not’ (Griffiths and O’Callaghan 2002: 202–13). The following discussion will survey debates on nation and nationalism around three broad questions. The first concerns debates around terminology and their contemporary relevance for the study of IR. The second relates to questions of nation formation and the origins of nationalism, particularly in terms of how it came to shape modern states and international society. The third illustrates how the ideas of nations and nationalism have been important in IR theory and practice.

The focus here will be on how interdisciplinary debates on nationalism have informed our understanding of this complex issue in IR. As a discipline, the field itself has made a surprisingly modest contribution to this scholarship (see Carr 1945; Hinsley 1973; and Mayall 1990). Nationalism is often not addressed explicitly but it has a significant tacit presence in all of the major schools of thought in the discipline. However, mainstream IR theories have compounded some of the analytical problems associated with understanding nationalism. For example, classical realists have tended to conflate nation and state into the concept of ‘national interest’, while liberal and Marxist theorists have been internally conflicted over the merits of nationalism versus its potential to undermine ideals of internationalism. The study of nationalism should be a central consideration for any analysis of the major issues in contemporary global politics because taking questions of national interest, values and identity seriously is one way of invoking the idea that culture and ‘people’ matter.

Further reading
Gurr, Ted R. 2000 Peoples versus states: minorities at risk in the new centuryWashington DCUnited States Institute of Peace Press
Hutchinson, JohnSmith, Anthony 1994 NationalismOxfordOxford University Press
Mayall, James 1990 Nationalism and international societyCambridgeCambridge University Press
Preece, Jennifer Jackson 2005 Minority rights: between diversity and communityCambridgePolity
Websites
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/default.asp
www.nationalismproject.org
www.unpo.org