Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:39:47.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - In Support of Unified Governance

Undermining the Court in an Anti-Party Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Stephen M. Engel
Stephen M. Engel
Affiliation:
Bates College, Maine
Get access

Summary

The Jeffersonian assault on judicial authority was grounded in civic republican ideas that did not grant the validity of dissenting views on constitutional meaning and thus did not acknowledge the legitimacy of opposition. Additional telltale characteristics of the republican idiom were made manifest during these years including rhetoric of a substantive and identifiable common good and conflation of political opposition with anti-constitutional conspiracy. Notwithstanding images of separate institutional powers checked and balanced against one another, the Founding generation expected the federal judiciary to be part of a unified governing regime, which served an identified common good and which was guided by a Constitution of fixed and discoverable meaning. If anything, Jeffersonians (or Republicans as they came to identify themselves) were more insistent on this point than Federalists. They could not conceive of a legitimate federal government in which the different branches would act on competing principles since they considered those principles to be “immutably fixed” by a written Constitution approved by the people themselves. As such, many Jeffersonians considered the practice of constitutional interpretation to be illegitimate and to signal a move away from the Framers' limited intentions for national power; as one member of Congress put it during early debates on establishing a national bank, “We have already gone much too far in explaining the constitution; and if we continue on the same plan, there is a danger that we shall at length persuade ourselves, that every power which is not expressly refused is given to us.”

Type
Chapter
Information
American Politicians Confront the Court
Opposition Politics and Changing Responses to Judicial Power
 , pp. 71 - 130
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Siemers, David, Ratifying the Republic: Antifederalists and Federalists in Constitutional Time (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002), 106Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard, Original Intent and the Framers' Constitution (New York: Macmillan, 1988), 143Google Scholar
Hamburger, Phillip, “The Constitution's Accommodation of Social Change,” Michigan Law Review 88 (1989), 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Thomas Tudor, quoted in Charlene Bangs Bickford, et al., eds., The Documentary History of the First Federal Congress, 1789–1791, 14 vols. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972–),Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard, The Jeffersonian Crisis: Courts and Politics in the Young Republic (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), 139–229Google Scholar
Stimson, Shannon, The American Revolution in the Law: Anglo-American Jurisprudence before John Marshall (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), 48–56Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack, “The Origins of Judicial Review: A Plea for New Contexts,” Stanford Law Review 49 (May 1997), 1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeever, Robert, The United States Supreme Court: A Political and Legal Analysis (New York: Manchester University Press, 1997), 47, 48Google Scholar
Lockhart, William, et al., Constitutional Law: Cases, Comments, and Questions, 8th ed. (St. Paul: West Publishing, 1996)Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, We the People: Foundations (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1991)Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard, “The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the ‘Living Constitution’ in the Course of American State-Building,” Studies in American Political Development 11 (Fall 1992), 191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Johnathan, Originalism in American Law and Politics: A Constitutional History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), 2–4Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 59–60Google Scholar
Dionisopoulos, P. Allan and Peterson, Paul, “Rediscovering the American Origins of Judicial Review: A Rebuttal to the Views Stated by Currie and Other Scholars,” John Marshall Law Review 18 (1984), 49–76Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon, The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787, 2nd ed. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 373–83, 519–36Google Scholar
Leonard, Gerald, “Iredell Reclaimed: Farewell to Snowiss's History of Judicial Review,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 80 (2006), 867–82Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, “Federalist 78,” in The Federalist, Jacob Cooke, ed. (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1961), 524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storing, Herbert, ed. The Complete Anti-Federalist (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), 2, 9, 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slonim, Shlomo, “Federalist No. 78 and Brutus' Neglected Thesis on Judicial Supremacy,” Constitutional Commentary 23 (2006), 10Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael, “How Great Were the ‘Great’ Marshall Court Decisions?” Virginia Law Review 87 (2001), 1113–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher, “A Theory of U.S. Constitutional History,” Journal of Politics 43 (May 1981), 292–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Charles notes, “The prime and most necessary function the Court has been that of validation, not that of invalidation.” Black, The People and the Court (New York: Macmillan, 1960), 52Google Scholar
Marcus, Maeva, “Judicial Review in the Early Republic,” in Launching the ‘Extended Republic’: The Federalist Era, Ronald Hoffman and Peter Albert, eds. (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Newmyer, R. Kent, “Thomas Jefferson and the Rise of the Supreme Court,” Journal of Supreme Court History 31 (July 2006), 126–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Mark, “Establishing Judicial Review: Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court,” Political Research Quarterly 51 (March 1998), 221–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Robert, Jr., “Before Marbury: Hylton v. United States and the Origins of Judicial Review,” Journal of Supreme Court History 28 (April 2003), 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, “Dual Office Holding and the Constitution: A View from Hayburn's Case,” in Origins of the Federal Judiciary, Maeva Marcus, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Simon, James, What Kind of Nation: Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, and the Epic Struggle to Create a United States (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003)Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon, “The Origins of Judicial Review Revisited, or How the Marshall Court Made More Out of Less,” Washington and Lee Law Review 56 (1999), 790Google Scholar
Cook, Charles, The American Codification Movement: A Study of Antebellum Legal Reform (New York: Greenwood Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, Belated Feudalism: Labor, Law, and Liberal Development in the United States (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 62–7Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America, Harvey Mansfield and Delba Winthrop, eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000 [1835, 1840]), 93–9, 130–42, 251–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard, The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States, 1780–1840 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969), 127Google Scholar
Banning, Lance, The Jeffersonian Persuasion: Evolution of a Party Ideology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980), 129, 135–40, 208–70Google Scholar
Horowitz, Morton, “Foreword: The Constitution of Change: Legal Fundamentality without Fundamentalism,” Harvard Law Review 107 (1993), 51Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean, Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics (New York: W.W. Norton, 1971)Google Scholar
Formisano, R., “Federalists and Republicans: Parties, Yes – System, No” in Paul Kleppner et al., eds. The Evolution of American Electoral Systems (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America (New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1955),Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard, The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It (New York: Vintage, 1989 [1948])Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 46–8, 104–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, James, American Politics in the Early Republic (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 7Google Scholar
Hoadley, John, Origins of American Political Parties, 1789–1803 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986)Google Scholar
Charles, Joseph, The Origins of the American Party System (Williamsburg, VA: Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1956)Google Scholar
Chambers, William, Political Parties in a New Nation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Formisano, Ronald, The Transformation of Political Culture: Massachusetts Parties, 1790s–1840s (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 88–9Google Scholar
Formisano, , “Deferential-Participant Politics: The Early Republic's Political Culture, 1789–1840,” American Political Science Review 68 (1973), 473–87, and Formisano (1981), 33–76Google Scholar
Smelser, Marshall, “The Federalist Period as an Age of Passion,” American Quarterly 10 (Winter 1958), 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith, “Give ‘The People’ What They Want?” Chicago-Kent Law Review 81 (2006), 911–22Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon, “Launching the ‘Extended Republic’: The Federalist Era,” in Launching the ‘Extended Republic’: The Federalist Era, Ronald Hoffman and Peter Albert, eds. (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1996), 2Google Scholar
Ferling, John, Adams vs. Jefferson: The Tumultuous Election of 1800 [New York: Oxford University Press, 2004], 82)Google Scholar
Gibbs, George, Memoirs of the Administrations of Washington and Adams (New York: 1846), Vol. 2, 455Google Scholar
Schutz, John A. and Adair, Douglass, The Spur of Fame: Dialogues of John Adams and Benjamin Rush, 1805–1813 (San Marino: Huntington Library, 1966), 48, and Adams to Jefferson, 12 July 1813, The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and Abigail and John Adams, Lestor Cappon, ed. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988), 354Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo Ann, Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004), 105–9 and 116–20Google Scholar
Martin, James, “When Repression Is Democratic and Constitutional: The Federalist Theory of Representation and the Sedition Act of 1798,” University of Chicago Law Review 66 (Winter 1999), 117–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Merrill and Kaminski, John P., eds., The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution (Madison: Madison State Historical Society of Wisconsin, 1976–), Vol. 1, 250 and 262, quoted in Siemers, 26Google Scholar
Fay, Bernard, “Early Party Machinery in the United States: Pennsylvania in the Election of 1796,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 66 (1936), 375–90Google Scholar
Hoadley, , “The Emergence of Political Parties in Congress,” American Political Science Review 74 (September 1980), 575–779Google Scholar
Therialt, , “Party Politics during the Louisiana Purchase,” Social Science History 30 (Summer 2006), 293–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Charles, Economic Origins of Jeffersonian Democracy (New York: Macmillan, 1915)Google Scholar
Bell, Rudolph, Party and Faction in American Politics: The House of Representatives, 1789–1801 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1973)Google Scholar
Cunningham, Noble, Jr., The Jeffersonian Republicans: The Formation of Party Organization, 1789–1801 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Combs, Jerald, The Jay Treaty: Political Battleground of the Founding Fathers (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Elkins, Stanley and McKitrick, Eric, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard, The Origins of American Politics (New York: Vintage, 1970),14–23Google Scholar
Ketcham, Ralph, Presidents above Party: The First American Presidency, 1789–1829 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984), 51–55Google Scholar
Adair, Douglass, “‘That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science’: David Hume, James Madison, and the Tenth Federalist,” in Fame and the Founding Fathers, Colbourn, Trevor, ed. (New York: W. W. Norton, 1974)Google Scholar
Morgan, Edward, “Safety in Numbers: Madison, Hume and the Tenth Federalist,” Huntington Library Quarterly 49 (1986), 95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni, Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976), Vol. 1, 7Google Scholar
Hamilton, , “Federalist 9” in The Federalist, Jacob E. Cooke, ed. (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1961), 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688, Foreword by William Todd, 6 vols. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983), Vol. 6, 123, and Vol. 4, 290Google Scholar
Madison, James, “Federalist No. 10” in The Federalist, Jacob E. Cooke, ed. (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1961), 58Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard, The Constitution Besieged (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993), 29Google Scholar
Conniff, James, “On the Obsolescence of the General Will: Rousseau, Madison, and the Evolution of Republican Political Thought,” Western Political Quarterly 28 (1975), 49–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, Garry, Explaining America: The Federalist (New York: Penguin Books, 1981)Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas and Katznelson, Ira, Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 88, 96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, William, et al., The Papers of James Madison (Chicago and Charlottesville: University of Chicago Press and University of Virginia Press, 1962–), Vol. 14, 197Google Scholar
Harper, Robert Goodloe, “Letter to His Constituents,” 10 February 1798, in Cunningham, Noble E., Jr., ed., Circular Letters of Congressmen to Their Constituents, 1789–1829 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1978), 146–7Google Scholar
Callender, James, The Prospect before Us (Richmond: M. Jones, S. Pheasants, and J Lyon, 1800)Google Scholar
Graber, , “James Buchanan as Savior? Judicial Power, Political Fragmentation, and the Failed 1831 Repeal of Section 25,” Oregon Law Review 88 (2009), 95–155Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard, Jefferson and Civil Liberties: The Darker Side (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963), 46–8Google Scholar
Goldstein, Leslie, Constituting Federal Sovereignty: The European Union in Comparative Context (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001), 31Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth, “Cousin Humphrey,” Constitutional Commentary 14 (1997), 266Google Scholar
Lipscomb, Andrew A., ed., Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Washington, DC: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903), Vol. 11, 50–1Google Scholar
Onuf, Peter, Jefferson's Empire: The Language of American Nationhood (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2001), 85–88Google Scholar
Cunningham, Noble E., Jeffersonian Republicans in Power: Party Operations, 1801–09 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1963), 8Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian, The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006), 90–1Google Scholar
Adams, John Quincy, “Reply to the Appeal of the Massachusetts Federalists,” in Documents relating to New England Federalism, 1800–1815, Henry Adams, ed. (Boston: B. Franklin, 1877), 149Google Scholar
Rehnquist, William, Grand Inquests: The Historic Impeachments of Justice Samuel Chase and President Andrew Johnson (New York: Harper Perennial, 1999)Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert, The American Supreme Court, 2nd ed., revised by S. Levinson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Clinton, Robert, Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1989)Google Scholar
Matson, Cathy, and Onuf, Peter, A Union of Interests: Political and Economic Thought in Revolutionary America (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1990)Google Scholar
Kramnick, Isaac, “The ‘Great National Discussion’: The Discourse of Politics in 1787,” William and Mary Quarterly 45 (September 1988): 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard, A History of the Supreme Court (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 30Google Scholar
Marcus, Maeva, ed., The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789–1800 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), Vol. 1, 344Google Scholar
Turner, Kathryn, “Federalist Policy and the Judiciary Act of 1801,” William and Mary Quarterly 22 (January 1965), 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, The Failure of the Founding Fathers (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2005), 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buren, Martin, The Autobiography of Martin Van Buren, John C. Fitzpatrick, ed. (New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1967 [1920]), 184Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul, Impeachment: The Constitutional Problems (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974), 2–53Google Scholar
Hoffner, Peter Charles and Hull, N. E. H., Impeachment in America: 1635–1805 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 6–59Google Scholar
Madison, James, Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 (New York: W.W. Norton, 1987 [1840]), 605Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, “Federalist 65,” in The Federalist, Jacob E. Cooke, ed. (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1961), 441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, Buckner, Jr., The First Impeachment: The Constitutional Framers and the Case of Senator William Blount (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1998), 76–7Google Scholar
Brant, Irving, Impeachment: Trials and Errors (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1972), 44Google Scholar
Prince, Carl, “The Passing of the Aristocracy: Jefferson's Removal of the Federalists, 1801–1805,” Journal of American History 57 (December 1970), 568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Lynn, “The Impeachment of John Pickering,” American Historical Review 54 (April 1949), 490–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, Albert J., The Life of John Marshall (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1916), Vol. 3, 165Google Scholar
Brown, Everett Somerville, ed., William Plumer's Memorandum of Proceedings in the United States Senate, 1803–1807 (New York: Macmillan, 1923), 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Charles, The Supreme Court in United States History (Boston: Little Brown, 1928), Vol. 1, 143Google Scholar
Ellis, , “The Impeachment of Samuel Chase,” American Political Trials, Michal Belknap, ed. (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1981), 57–78Google Scholar
Adams, Henry, ed., Documents Relating to New England Federalism, 1800–1815 (New York: B. Franklin, 1965 [1877]), 340Google Scholar
Adams, Henry, John Randolph: A New Edition with Primary Documents and Introduction by Robert McColley [Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1996], 92Google Scholar
Smith, Samuel H. and Lloyd, Thomas, The Trial of Samuel Chase An Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Impeached by the House of Representatives, for High Crimes and Misdemeanors before the Senate of the United States, 2 vols. (Washington City: Printed for Samuel H. Smith, 1805),Google Scholar
Reinhardt, John, “The Impeachment Proceedings against Judge James Hawkins Peck,” University of Kansas City Law Review 12 (1944), 108–9Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×