Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:27:54.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Elizabeth Fisher  and
Sidney A. Shapiro
Elizabeth Fisher
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Sidney A. Shapiro
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Administrative Competence
Reimagining Administrative Law
 , pp. 298 - 338
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Ackerman, Bruce. “The New Separation of Powers.” Harvard Law Review 113, no. 3 (2000): 633–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Jonathan. “Fables of the Cuyahoga: Reconstructing a History of Environmental Protection.” Fordham Environmental Law Journal 14, no. 1 (2002): 138–46.Google Scholar
Adler, Robert. “Resilience, Restoration, and Sustainability: Revisiting the Fundamental Principles of the Clean Water Act.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 32, no. 1 (2010): 139–74.Google Scholar
Alexander, Laurie. “Science at the Boundaries: Scientific Support for the Clean Water Rule.” Freshwater Science 34, no. 4 (2015): 1588–94.Google Scholar
American Bar Association Annual Reports. “Report of the Special Committee on Administrative Law.” 57 (1934): 539–64.Google Scholar
American Bar Association Annual Reports. “Report of the Special Committee on Administrative Law.” 63 (1938): 331–68.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. “The Epistemology of Democracy.” Episteme 3, no. 1–2 (2006): 8–22.Google Scholar
Anderson, Oscar E. Jr. “Pioneer Statute: The Pure Food and Drugs Act of 1906.” Journal of Public Law 13, no. 1 (1964): 189–96.Google Scholar
Andreen, William. “Success and Backlash: The Remarkable (Continuing) Story of the Clean Water Act.” George Washington Journal of Energy and Environmental Law 4, no. 1 (2013): 25–37.Google Scholar
Andreen, William. “No Virtue Like Necessity: Dealing with Nonpoint Source Pollution and Environmental Flaws in the Face of Climate Change.” Virginia Environmental Law Journal 34, no. 2 (2016): 225–96.Google Scholar
Asimow, Michael. “Five Models of Adjudication.” American Journal of Comparative Law 63, no. 1 (2015): 3–32.Google Scholar
Bachmann, John. “Will the Circle Be Unbroken: A History of the U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards.” Journal of Air & Waste Management Association 57, no. 6 (2007): 650–51.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnmore, Martha. “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies on International Organizations.” International Organizations 53, no. 4 (1999): 699–732.Google Scholar
Barton Hutt, Peter. “Symposium on the History of Fifty Years of Food Regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: A Historical Introduction.” Food, Drug, Cosmetic Law Journal 45, no. 1 (1990): 17–20.Google Scholar
Bazelon, David. “Coping with Technology through the Legal Process.” Cornell Law Review 62, no. 5 (1977): 817–32.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. “The Expansion of American Administrative Law.” Harvard Law Review 30, no. 5 (1917): 430–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett Foote, Susan, and Berlin, Robert J.. “Can Regulation Be As Innovative As Science and Technology—The FDA’s Regulation of Combination Products.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 6, no. 2 (2005): 619–44.Google Scholar
Brandeis Law Review, “Administrative Law Discussion Forum,” 38, no. 2 (2000): 159–405.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. “The Executive Branch, Administrative Action, and Comparative Expertise.” Cardozo Law Review 32, no. 6 (2011): 2189–202.Google Scholar
Bruff, Harold H. “Presidential Power Meets Bureaucratic Expertise.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 2 (2010): 461–90.Google Scholar
Butler, William J. “The Rising Tide of Expertise.” Fordham Law Review 15, no. 1 (1946): 19–61.Google Scholar
Buzbee, William W. “Regulatory ‘Reform’ Is Anything But.” New York Times, June 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Byse, Clark. “Walter Gellhorn: Administrative Law Scholar, Teacher, Reformer.” Columbia Law Review 96, no. 3 (1996): 589–94.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven G. “Some Normative Arguments for the Unitary Executive.” Arkansas Law Review 48, no. 1 (1995): 23–104.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven G., and Prakash, Saikrishna B.. “The President’s Power to Execute the Laws.” Yale Law Journal 104, no. 3 (1994): 541–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candeub, D. A. “Tyranny and Administrative Law.” Arizona Law Review 59, no. 1 (2017): 49–94.Google Scholar
Carrington, Damian. “Green Movement ‘Greatest Threat to Freedom,’ Says Trump Adviser.” The Guardian, January 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel J., and Sin, Gisela. “Policy Tragedy and the Emergence of Regulation: The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938.” Studies in American Political Development 21, no. 2 (2007): 149–80.Google Scholar
Cavers, David. “The Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938: Its Legislative History and Its Substantive Contents.” Law & Contemporary Problems 6, no. 1 (1939): 2–42.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram. “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation.” Harvard Law Review 89, no. 7 (1976): 1281–316.Google Scholar
Cole, David. “The Sacrificial Yoo: Accounting for Torture in the OPR Report.” Journal of National Security Law and Policy 4, no. 2 (2010): 455–64.Google Scholar
Cook, Brian J. “Curing the Mischiefs of Faction in the American Administrative State.” American Review of Public Administration 46, no. 1 (2016): 3–27.Google Scholar
Criddle, Evan J. “Chevron’s Consensus.” Boston University Law Review 88, no. 5 (2008): 1271–326.Google Scholar
Criddle, Even J. “Fiduciary Administration: Rethinking Popular Representation in Rulemaking.” Texas Law Review 88, no. 3 (2010): 441–504.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp. “Dean Pound and Administrative Law.” Columbia Law Review 42, no. 5 (1942): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V. “The Development of Administrative Law in England.” Law Quarterly Review 31, no. 2 (1915): 148–53.Google Scholar
Dickinson, John. “Crowell v. Benson: Judicial Review of Administrative Questions of ‘Constitutional Fact.’” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 80, no. 8 (1932): 1055–82.Google Scholar
Diver, Colin S. “Policy-Making Paradigms in Administrative Law.” Harvard Law Review 95, no. 2 (1981): 393–434.Google Scholar
Dodek, Adam. “Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and Legal Ethics: Government Lawyers and Custodians of the Rule of Law.” Dalhousie Law Journal 33, no. 1 (2010): 1–54.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. “Jerome Frank and the Legacy of Legal Realism.” Journal of Law and Society 18, no. 2 (1991): 175–205.Google Scholar
Eagle, Steven J. “Economic Salvation in a Restive Age: The Demand for Secular Salvation Has Not Abated.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 56, no. 3 (2006): 569–86.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. “Unitary Executive Interpretations: A Comment.” Cardozo Law Review 15, nos 1–2 (1993): 313–21.Google Scholar
The Economist. “When Government Fails.” September 13, 2005.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. Donald. “Re-inventing Rulemaking.” Duke Law Journal 41, no. 6 (1992): 1490–96.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. Donald, et al. “Science, Agencies, and the Courts: Is Three a Crowd?” Environmental Law Reporter 31, no. 1 (2001): 10125–40.Google Scholar
Entrikin, J. Lyn. “The Death of the Common Law.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 42, no. 2 (2019): 351–488.Google Scholar
Eoyang, Carson K. “Federal Retirement Crisis: Danger or Opportunity.” Public Manager 37, no. 3 (2008): 55–6.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. “Why the Modern Administrative State Is Inconsistent with the Rule of Law.” New York University Journal of Law and Liberty 3, no. 3 (2008): 491–515.Google Scholar
Estreicher, Samuel. “Pragmatic Justice: The Contributions of Judge Harold Leventhal to Administrative Law.” Columbia Law Review 80, no. 5 (1980): 894–930.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard. “Marbury and the Constitutional Mind: A Bicentennial Essay on the Wages of Doctrinal Tension.” California Law Review 91, no. 1 (2003): 1–56.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. “Environmental Protection as a Learning Experience.” Loyola of Los Angles Law Review 27, no. 3 (1994): 791–808.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A., and O’Connell, Anne Joseph. “The Lost World of Administrative Law.” Texas Law Review 92, no. 5 (2014) 1137–90.Google Scholar
Feller, A. H. “Prospectus for the Further Study of Administrative Law.” Yale Law Journal 47, no. 4 (1938): 647–74.Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. “Beyond the Rationality Project: Policy Analysis and the Post Positive Challenge.” Policy Studies Journal 17, no. 4 (1989): 941–51.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “Food Safety Crises as Crises in Administrative Constitutionalism.” Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine 20, no. 1 (2010): 55–92.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth, Pascual, Pasky, and Wagner, Wendy. “Models in Their Legal and Regulatory Context.” Journal of Environmental Law 22, no. 2 (2010): 251–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth, Pascual, Pasky, and Wagner, Wendy. “Rethinking Judicial Review of Expert Agencies.” Texas Law Review 93, no. 7 (2015): 1681–722.Google Scholar
Flatt, Victor. “A Dirty River Runs through It (the Failure of Enforcement in the Clean Water Act).” Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 25, no. 1 (1998): 1–46.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix. “Foreword.” Yale Law Journal 47, no. 4 (1938): 515–18b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, James O. “Expertise and the Administrative Process.” Administrative Law Review 28, no. 3 (1976): 363–78.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst. “Book Review: Cases and Other Materials on Administrative Law. Edited by Felix Frankfurter and J. Forrester Davison.” Harvard Law Review 46, no. 1 (1932): 167–71.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst. “The Law of the Administration in America.” Political Science Quarterly 9, no. 3 (1894): 403–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. “The Rise and Decline of the Spoils Tradition.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 189, Jan. (1937): 10–16.Google Scholar
Frug, Gerald E. “The Ideology of Bureaucracy in American Law.” Harvard Law Review 97, no. 6 (1984): 1276–388.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Ralph F. “Concepts and Policies in Anglo-American Administrative Law Theory.” Yale Law Journal 47, no. 4 (1937): 538–76.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Ralph F. “The Formulation and Review of Regulations under the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act.” Law & Contempary Problems 6, no. 1 (1939): 43–69.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Ralph F. “The Hoover Commission and Task Force Reports on Legal Services and Procedure.” Indiana Law Journal 31, no. 1 (1955): 1–44.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 92, no. 2 (1978): 353–409.Google Scholar
Funk, William. “When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Regulatory Negotiation and the Public Interest—EPA’s Woodstove Standards.” Environmental Law 18, no. 1 (1987): 55–98.Google Scholar
Funk, William. “Bargaining Toward the New Millennium: Regulatory Negotiation and the Subversion of the Public Interest.” Duke Law Journal 46, no. 6 (1997): 1351–88.Google Scholar
Funk, William F. “To Preserve Meaningful Judicial Review.” Administrative Law Review 49, no. 1 (1997): 171–78.Google Scholar
Funk, William. “My Ideal ‘Casebook’ or What’s Wrong with Administrative Law Education and How to Fix It,” Brandeis Law Journal 38, no. 2 (2000): 247–58.Google Scholar
Gardner, Royal C., et al. “Advocating for Science: Amici Curiae Brief of Wetland and Water Scientists in Support of the Clean Water Rule.” Wetlands 39, no. 3 (2019): 403–14.Google Scholar
Gellhorn, Ernest, and Robinson, Glen O.. “Perspectives on Administrative Law,” Columbia Law Review 75, no. 4 (1975): 771–99.Google Scholar
Gellhorn, Walter. “Administrative Procedure Reform: Hardy Perennial.” American Bar Association Journal 48, no. 3 (1962): 243–51.Google Scholar
Gersen, Jacob, and Vermeule, Adrian. “Thin Rationality Review.” Michigan Law Review 114, no. 8 (2016): 1355–412.Google Scholar
Gifford, Daniel J. “Discretionary Decisionmaking in the Regulatory Agencies: A Conceptual Framework.” Southern California Law Review 57, no. 1 (1983): 101–38.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Douglas, and Menashi, Steve, “Our Illiberal Administrative Law.” New York University Journal of Law and Liberty 10, no. 2 (2016): 475–521.Google Scholar
Glicksman, Robert. “From Cooperative to Inoperative Federalism: The Perverse Mutation of Environmental Law and Policy.” Wake Forest Law Review 41, no. 3 (2006): 719–804.Google Scholar
Glicksman, Robert, and Batzel, Matthew. “Science, Politics, Law, and the Arc of the Clean Water Act: The Role of Assumptions in the Adoption of a Pollution Control Landmark.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 32, no. 1 (2010): 99–138.Google Scholar
Green, Richard. “Alexander Hamilton: Founder of the American Public Administration.” Administration and Society 34, no. 5 (2002) 541–62.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Robert W. “Procedure for the Adoption of Rules of General Applicability: The Need for Procedural Innovation in Administrative Rulemaking.” California Law Review 60, no. 5 (1972): 1276–338.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. “Controlling Official Behavior in Welfare Administration.” California Law Review 54, no. 2 (1966): 479–510.Google Scholar
Hastie, Reid, and Hawkins, Scott A.. “Hindsight: Biased Judgments of Past Events after the Outcomes Are Known.” Psychology Bulletin 107, no. 3 (1990): 311–27.Google Scholar
Hatch, Orrin. “A Constitutional Conservatism for Our Time.” Texas Review of Law & Politics 19, no. 2 (2015): 199–212.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. “OMB and the Presidency – The Problem of ‘Neutral Competence.’” Public Interest 38 (1975): 80–98.Google Scholar
Heinzerling, Lisa. “Regulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions.” Yale Law Journal 107, no. 7 (1998): 1981–2070.Google Scholar
Heinzerling, Lisa. “Five-Hundred Life-Saving Interventions and Their Misuse in the Debate over Regulatory Reform.” Risk 13, no. 1 (2002): 151–76.Google Scholar
Heinzerling, Lisa. “Classical Administrative Law in the Era of Presidential Administration.” 92 (2014): Texas Law Review See Also (online): 171–80.Google Scholar
Heinzerling, Lisa. “Inside EPA: A Former Insider’s Reflections on the Relationship between the Obama EPA and the Obama White House,” Pace Environmental Law Review 31, no. 1 (2014): 1–369.Google Scholar
Heinzerling, Lisa. “Quality Control: A Reply to Professor Sunstein,” California Law Review 102, no. 6 (2014): 1457–68.Google Scholar
Hersh, Seymour. “Chain of Command.” The New Yorker, May 17, 2004.Google Scholar
Hertwig, Ralph, Hoffrage, Ulrich, and Gigerenzer, Gerd. “Hindsight Bias: A By-Product of Knowledge Updating?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 26, no. 3 (2000): 566–81.Google Scholar
Hickman, Kristin E. “To Repudiate or Merely Curtail: Justice Gorsuch and Chevron Deference.” Alabama Law Review 70, no. 3 (2019): 733–59.Google Scholar
Hoogenboom, Ari. “The Pendleton Act and the Civil Service,” The American Historical Review 64 (1959) 301–18.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L. “The Reform of Federal Administrative Procedure,” Public Administration Review 2, no. 2 (1942): 141–58.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L. “The Effective Limits of the Administrative Process: A Reevaluation.” Harvard Law Review 67, no. 7 (1954): 1105–35.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L. “The Illusion of the Ideal Administration.” Harvard Law Review 86, no. 7 (1973): 1183–99.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. “(No?) Accounting for Expertise.” Science and Public Policy 30, no. 2 (2003): 157–62.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. “Serviceable Truths: Science for Action in Law and Policy.” Texas Law Review 93, no. 7 (2015): 1723–50.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Shelia. “Perspective: Back from the Brink: Truth and Trust in the Public Sphere.” Issues in Science and Technology 33, no. 4 (2017). https://issues.org/perspective-back-from-the-brink-truth-and-trust-in-the-public-sphere/.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael, and Heckling, William. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (1976): 305–60.Google Scholar
Johnson, Stephen M. “Ossification’s Demise – An Empirical Analysis of EPA Rulemaking from 2001–2005,” Environmental Law 38, no. 3 (2008): 767–92.Google Scholar
Kagan, Elena. “Presidential Administration.” Harvard Law Review 114, no. 8 (2001): 2245–385.Google Scholar
Katyal, Neal Kumar. “Internal Separation of Powers: Checking Today’s Most Dangerous Branch from Within.” Yale Law Journal 115, no. 9 (2006): 2314–49.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Hebert. “Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration.” American Political Science Review 50, no. 4 (1956): 1057–73.Google Scholar
Kessler, Jeremy. “Book Review: The Struggle for Administrative Legitimacy.” Harvard Law Review 129, no. 3 (2016): 718–74.Google Scholar
Kleeman, Rosslyn S. “Managing the Federal Brain Drain: Introduction and Overview.” The Public Manager 37, no. 3 (2008): 43–4.Google Scholar
Kleinfeld, Vincent A. “Legislative History of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.” Food Drug Cosmetic Law Quarterly 1, no. 4 (December 1946): 532–76.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. “Protecting the Office of Legal Counsel from Itself.” Cardozo Law Review 15, nos 1–2 (1993): 513–24.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. “A World without Torture.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43, no. 3 (2005): 641–62.Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, Ronald J. Jr. “‘History Belongs to The Winners’: The Bazelon-Leventhal Debate and the Continuing Relevance of the Process/Substance Dichotomy in Judicial Review of Agency Action.” Administrative Law Review 58, no. 4 (2006): 995–1016.Google Scholar
Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.. “Rational Judicial Behavior: A Statistical Study.” Journal of Legal Analysis 1, no. 2 (2009): 775–831.Google Scholar
Landis, James M. “Crucial Issues in Administrative Law: The Walter-Logan Bill.” Harvard Law Review 53, no. 7 (1940): 1077–102.Google Scholar
Landis, James M. “The Administrative Process—The Third Decade.” Administrative Law Review 13, no. 2 (1960): 17–26.Google Scholar
Leventhal, Harold. “Environmental Decisionmaking and the Role of the Courts.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 122, no. 3 (1974): 509–55.Google Scholar
Levin, Ronald M. “Judicial Review and the Uncertain Appeal of Certainty on Appeal.” Duke Law Journal 44, no. 6 (1995): 1081–103.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. “Why I Do Not Teach Marbury (Except to Eastern Europeans) and Why You Shouldn’t Either.” Wake Forest Law Review 38, no. 2 (2003): 553–78.Google Scholar
Levy, Richard E., and Shapiro, Sidney A.. “Administrative Procedure and the Decline of the Trial.” Kansas Law Review 51, no. 3 (2003): 473–508.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. “The Constitution as an Institution.” Columbia Law Review 34, no. 1 (1934): 1–40.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. “The Crafts of Law Re-valued.” American Bar Association Journal 28, no. 12 (1942): 801–03.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. “Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons about How Statutes Are to Be Construed.” Vanderbilt Law Review 3, no. 3 (1950): 395–406.Google Scholar
Lowery, David. “A Bureaucratic Centered Image of Governance: The Founders’ Thought in Modern Perspective.” Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 3, no. 2 (1993): 182–208.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. “Two Roads to Serfdom: Liberalism, Conservatism and Administrative Power.” American University Law Review 36, no. 2 (1987): 295–322.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence. “Restoring the Rule of Law to Public Administration: What Frank Goodnow Got Right and Leonard White Didn’t.” Public Administration Review 69, no. 5 (2009): 803–13.Google Scholar
Magg, Christopher. “From the Ashes of ‘69, a River Reborn.” New York Times, June 20, 2009.Google Scholar
Magill, Elizabeth, and Vermeule, Adrian. “Allocating Power within Agencies.” Yale Law Journal 120, no. 5 (2011): 1032–83.Google Scholar
Majdik, Zoltan P., and Keith, William M.. “Expertise as Argument: Authority, Democracy, and Problem-Solving.” Argumentation 25, no. 3 (2011): 371–84.Google Scholar
Mancias, Joe Jr.. “Will the Retirement Tsunami Leave the Government High and Dry?” Public Manager 37, no. 3 (2008): 51–3.Google Scholar
Manning, John F., and Stephenson, Matthew. “Legislation and Regulation and Reform of the First Year.” Journal of Legal Education 65, no. 1 (2015): 45–69.Google Scholar
Maranto, Robert, and Skelly, B. Douglas. “Neutrality: An Enduring Principle of Federal Service.” American Review of Public Administration 22, no. 3 (1992): 173–87.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. “Deconstructing Debate, Reconstructing Law.” Cornell Law Review 87, no. 2 (2002): 682–89.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. “Structuring a Dense Complexity: Accountability and the Project of Administrative Law.” Issues in Legal Scholarship 5 (2005): 1–38.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. “Recovering American Administrative Law: Federalist Foundations 1787–1801.” Yale Law Journal 115, no. 6 (2006): 1256–344.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. “The American Model of Federal Administrative Law: Remembering the First 100 Years.” George Washington Law Review 78, no. 5 (2010): 975–92.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. “Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Gilded Age.” Yale Law Journal 119, no. 7 (2010): 1362–472.Google Scholar
McCarty, James F. “Cuyahoga River Cleanup Reaches New Benchmark with Walleye Discovery.” Cleveland Plain Dealer, September 13, 2016.Google Scholar
McClintock, Michael. “Foreword.” Gonzaga Law Review 9, no. 2 (1974): 317–26.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry R. (McNollgast). “The Political Origins of the Administrative Procedure Act,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15, no. 1 (1999): 180–217.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O. “The Internal Structure of EPA Rulemaking.” Law and Contemporary Problems 54, no. 4 (1991): 57–112.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O. “Some Thoughts on ‘Deossifying’ the Rulemaking Process.” Duke Law Journal 41, no. 6 (1992): 1385–462.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O. “On Making Judges Do the Right Thing.” Duke Law Journal 44, no. 6 (1995): 1104–9.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O. “The Courts and the Ossification of Rulemaking: A Response to Professor Seidenfeld.” Texas Law Review 75, no. 3 (1997): 525–58.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O. “Administrative Law as Blood Sport: Policy Erosion in a High Partisan Age.” Duke Law Journal 61, no. 8 (2012): 1671–762.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O., and Shapiro, Sidney A.. “Reorienting OSHA: Regulatory Alternatives and Legislative Reform.” Yale Journal on Regulation 6, no. 1 (1989): 1–64.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O., and Wagner, Wendy. “Deregulation Using ‘Stealth’ Scientific Strategies.” Duke Law Journal 68, no. 8 (2019): 1720–803.Google Scholar
McGowan, Carl. “Congress, Court and the Control of Delegated Power.” Columbia Law Review 77, no. 8 (1977): 1119–74.Google Scholar
McGowan, Carl. “Reflections on Rulemaking Review.” Tulane Law Review 53, no. 3 (1979): 681–96.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Michael E. “Democratizing the Administrative Process: Toward Increased Responsiveness.” Arizona Law Review 13, no. 4 (1971): 835–56.Google Scholar
Meazell, Emily Hammond. “Presidential Control, Expertise and the Deference Dilemma.” Duke Law Journal 61, no. 8 (2012): 1763–810.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. “Marbury v. Madison as the First Great Administrative Law Decision.” John Marshall Law Review 37, no. 2 (2004): 481–522.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. “Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law,” Columbia Law Review 111, no. 5 (2011): 939–1003.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. “Justice Stevens and the Chevron Puzzle.” Northwestern University Law Review 106, no. 2 (2012): 551–56.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Hickman, Kristin. “Chevron’s Domain.” Georgetown Law Journal 89, no. 4 (2001): 833–922.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian E. “The Independent Relationship between Internal and External Separation of Powers,” Emory Law Journal 59, no. 2 (2009): 423–57.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian. “1930s Redux: The Administrative State under Siege.” Harvard Law Review 131, no. 1 (2017): 1–95.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian, and Stack, Kevin M.. “Internal Administrative Law.” Michigan Law Review 115, no. 8 (2017): 1239–308.Google Scholar
Michaels, Jon D. “The American Deep State.” Notre Dame Law Review 93, no. 4 (2018): 1653–70.Google Scholar
Michaels, Jon D. “An Enduring, Evolving Separation of Powers.” Columbia Law Review 115, no. 3 (2015): 515–98.Google Scholar
Miles, Rufus E. “The Origin and Meaning of Miles’ Law.” Public Administration Review 38, no. 5 (1978): 399–403.Google Scholar
Mintz, Joel A. “Agencies, Congress, and Regulatory Enforcement: A Review of EPA’s Hazardous Waste Enforcement Effort, 1970–1987.” Environmental Law Review 18, no. 4 (1988): 683–778.Google Scholar
Morgan, Douglas, Kirwan, Kent A., Rohr, John A., Rosenbloom, David H., and Schaefer, David Lewis. “Recovering, Restoring, and Renewing the Foundations of American Public Administration: The Contributions of Herbert J. Storing.” Public Administration Review 70, no. 4 (2010): 621–33.Google Scholar
Morrall, John F. III “A Review of the Record.” Regulation 10, no. 2 (1886): 25–34.Google Scholar
Nickerson, Raymond S. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2, no. 2 (1998): 175–220.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Aaron. “Confessions of an ‘Anti-Administrativist.’” Harvard Law Review Forum 131 (2017): 1–12.Google Scholar
Noah, Lars. “Scientific ‘Republicanism’: Expert Peer Review and the Quest for Regulatory Deliberation.” Emory Law Journal 49, no. 4 (2000): 1033–84.Google Scholar
Novak, William. “The Myth of the ‘Weak’ American State.” The American Historical Review 113, no. 3 (2008): 752–72.Google Scholar
Novak, William. “Response: The People’s Welfare Redux.” American Journal of Legal History 57, no. 2 (2017): 248–55.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Ann Joseph. “Vacant Offices: Delays in Staffing Top Agency Positions.” Southern California Law Review 82, no. 5 (2019): 913–1000.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, John D. Jr. “Administrative Absolutism.” Fordham Law Review 7, no. 3 (1938): 31Google Scholar
Owen, Dave. “Little Streams and Legal Transformations.” Utah Law Review, no. 1 (2017): 1–56.Google Scholar
P., III, J. W., P. A. W., and S. P. H. “Note—The Federal Regulatory Agencies: A Need for Rules of Decision.” Virginia Law Review 50, no. 4 (1964): 652–743.Google Scholar
Parker, Richard. “Grading the Government.” Chicago Law Review 70, no. 4 (2003): 1345–486.Google Scholar
Parrillo, Nicholas R. “Federal Agency Guidance and the Power to Bind: An Empirical Study of Agencies and Industries.” Yale Journal on Regulation 36, no. 1 (2019): 165–272.Google Scholar
Percival, Robert V. “Presidential Management of the Administrative State: The Not-So-Unitary Executive.” Duke Law Journal 51, no. 3 (2001): 963–1014.Google Scholar
Picardo, Nelson A. “New Social Movements: A Critical Review.” Annual Review of Sociology 23 (1997): 411–30.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. “Chevron and Its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions.” Vanderbilt Law Review 41, no. 2 (1988): 301–14.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. “Unruly Judicial Review of Rulemaking.” Natural Resources & Environment 5, no. 2 (1990): 23–5.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. “Legislative Reform of Judicial Review of Agency Actions.” Duke Law Journal 44, no. 6 (1995): 1110–32.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. “Seven Ways to Deossify Agency Rulemaking,” Administrative Law Review 47, no. 1 (1995): 59–96.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. “Judicial Review of Agency Actions in a Period of Diminishing Resources.” Administrative Law Review 49, no. 1 (1997): 61–94.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. “Waiting for Vermont Yankee III, IV, and V? A Response to Beermann and Lawson.” George Washington Law Review 75, no. 4 (2007): 902–20.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. “Rulemaking Ossification Is Real: A Response to Testing the Ossification Thesis.” George Washington Law Review 80, no. 5 (2012): 1493–503.Google Scholar
Pillard, Cornelia. “Unitariness and Myopia: The Executive Branch, Legal Process and Torture.” Indiana Law Journal 81, no. 4 (2006): 1297–312.Google Scholar
Plides, Richard, and Sunstein, Cass. “Reinventing the Regulatory State.” University of Chicago Law Review 62, no. 1 (1995): 1–130.Google Scholar
Pojanowski, Jeffrey A., and Walsh, Kevin C.. “Enduring Originalism.” Georgetown Law Journal 105, no. 1 (2016): 97–158.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore. “Thin Description: Surface and Depth in Science and Science Studies,” Osiris 27, no. 1 (2012): 209–26.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. “The Rise and Fall of Administrative Law.” Chicago Kent Law Review 72, no. 4 (1997): 953–64.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. “The Growth of Administrative Justice.” Wisconsin Law Review 2, no. 6 (1924): 321–39.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. “The Future of Law.” Yale Law Journal 47, no. 1 (1937): 1–13.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. “Proposed Legislation as to Federal Administrative Procedure.” Indiana Law Journal 20, no. 1 (1944): 29–54.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert L. “Administrative Law in Transition: A Discipline in Search of an Organising Principle.” Northwestern University Law Review 72, no. 1 (1977): 120–45.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert L. “Legitimacy, Discretion and the Concept of Rights.” Yale Law Journal 92, no. 7 (1983): 1174–88.Google Scholar
Raso, Connor. “Agency Avoidance of Rulemaking Procedures.” Administrative Law Review 67, no. 1 (2015): 65–132.Google Scholar
Regier, C. C. “The Struggle for Federal Food and Drugs Legislation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 1, no. 1 (1933): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Charles A. “Midnight Welfare Searches and the Social Security Act,” Yale Law Journal 72 (1963): 1347.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles A. “The New Property.” Yale Law Journal 73, no. 3 (1964): 733–98.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles A. “Individual Rights and Social Welfare: The Emerging Legal Issues.” Yale Law Journal 74, no. 7 (1965): 1245–58.Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard L. “Environmental Regulation, Ideology and the D.C. Circuit.” Virginia Law Review 83, no. 8 (1997): 1717–72.Google Scholar
Roberts, Martha. “The Misguided Regulatory Accountability Act.” The Regulatory Review, March 29, 2017.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Daniel B., and Weingast, Barry R.. “The ‘Reformation of Administrative Law’ Revisited.” Journal of Law Economics and Organization 15, no. 4 (2015): 782–807.Google Scholar
Romzek, Barbara, and Dubnik, Melvin. “Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy.” Public Administration Review 47, no. 3 (1989): 227–38.Google Scholar
Roiphe, Rebecca. “The Most Dangerous Profession.” Connecticut Law Review 39, no. 2 (2006): 603–66.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D. “Logan-Walter Bill Fails.” American Bar Association Journal 27, no. 1 (1941): 52–4.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, David. “The Politics and Administration Dichotomy in US Historical Context.” Public Administration Review 68 (2008): 57–60.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Lawrence. “Those Who Can’t Teach: What the Legal Career of John Yoo Tells Us about Who Should Be Teaching Law.” Mississippi Law Journal 80, no. 4 (2011): 1563–632.Google Scholar
Rossi, Jim. “Bargaining in the Shadow of Administrative Procedure: The Public Interest in Rulemaking Settlement.” Duke Law Journal 51, no. 3 (2001): 1015–58.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward L. “The Practice and Discourse of Legal Scholarship.” Michigan Law Review 86, no. 8 (1988): 1835–905.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward L. “Law and Legislation in the Administrative State.” Columbia Law Review 89, no. 3 (1989): 369–426.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. “It’s Time to Make the Administrative Procedure Act Administrative.” Cornell Law Review 89, no. 3 (2003): 95–190.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. “The Myth of Accountability and the Anti-administrative Impulse.” Michigan Law Review 103, no. 8 (2005): 2073–136.Google Scholar
Ryan, Erin. “Federalism, Regulatory Architecture, and the Clean Water Rule: Seeking Consensus on the Waters of the United States.” Environmental Law 46, no. 2 (2016): 277–312.Google Scholar
Sargentich, Thomas O. “The Emphasis on the Presidency in U.S. Public Law: An Essay Critiquing Presidential Administration.” Administrative Law Review 59, no. 1 (2007): 1–36.Google Scholar
Sautterm, John A., and Littvay, Levente. “Environmental Judicial Interpretation and Agency Review: An Empirical Investigation of Judicial Decision-Making in the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act.” Buffalo Environmental Law Journal 19, no. 2 (2012): 269–300.Google Scholar
Sayre, Paul L. “A Common Law of Administrative Powers.” Iowa Law Review 18, no. 2 (1933): 241–48.Google Scholar
Sayre, Wallace. “Premises of Public Administration: Past and Emerging.” Public Administration Review 18, no. 2 (1958): 102–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. “Vermont Yankee, the APA, the D.C. Circuit, and the Supreme Court.” Supreme Court Review (1978): 345–410.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. “Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of the Law.” Duke Law Journal 38, no. 3 (1989): 511–21.Google Scholar
Scharffs, Brett G. “Law as Craft.” Vanderbilt Law Review 54, no. 6 (1999): 2245–348.Google Scholar
Schiller, Reuel E. “The Era of Deference: Courts, Expertise, and the Emergence of New Deal Administrative Law.” Michigan Law Review 106, no. 3 (2007): 399–441.Google Scholar
Schultz Bressman, Lisa. “Chevron’s Mistake.” Duke Law Journal 58, no. 4 (2009): 549–622.Google Scholar
Seidenfeld, Mark. “A Civic Republican Justification for the Bureaucratic State.” Harvard Law Review 105, no. 7 (1992): 1512–92.Google Scholar
Seidenfeld, Mark. “The Challenge of Teaching Administrative Law.” Brandeis Law Journal 38, no. 2 (2000): 293–302.Google Scholar
Seidenfeld, Mark. “A Table of Requirements for Federal Administrative Rulemaking.” Florida State University Law Review 27, no. 2 (2000): 533–46.Google Scholar
Shane, Peter. “The Quiet GOP Campaign against Government Regulation.” The Atlantic, January 26, 2017.Google Scholar
Shapiro, David. “The Choice of Rulemaking or Adjudication in the Development of Administrative Policy.” Harvard Law Review 78, no. 5 (1965): 921–72.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Fred R., and Pearse, Michelle. “The Most-Cited Law Review Articles of All Time.” Michigan Law Review 110, no. 8 (2012): 1483–520.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. “APA: Past, Present, Future.” Virginia Law Review 72, no. 2 (1986): 447–92.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “Administrative Law after the Counter-Reformation: Restoring Faith in Pragmatic Government.” University of Kansas Law Review 48, no. 4 (2000): 689–750.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “The Top Ten Reasons That Law Students Dislike Administrative Law and What Can (or Should) be Done about Them?” Brandeis University Law Journal 38, no. 2 (2000): 351–60.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “United Church of Christ v. FCC: Private Attorney Generals and the Rule of Law.” Administrative Law Review 58, no. 4 (2006): 939–60.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “The Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011: Way Too Much of a Good Thing.” Administrative and Regulatory Law News 37, no. 3 (Spring 2012): 10–11.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “Why Administrative Law Misunderstands How Government Works: The Missing Institutional Analysis.” Washburn Law Journal 53, no. 1 (2013): 1–26.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “The Failure to Understand Expertise in Administrative Law: The Problem and Its Consequences.” Wake Forest Law Review 50, no. 5 (2015): 1097–154.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “Rulemaking Ossification and the Debate over Reforming Hard Look Review.” Administrative and Regulatory Law News 41, no. 1 (2015): 13–16.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “Law, Expertise and Rulemaking Legitimacy: Revisiting the Reformation.” Environmental Law 49, no. 3 (2019): 101–82.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A. “Rulemaking Inaction and the Failure of Administrative Law.” Duke Law Journal 68, no. 8 (2019): 1805–42.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Christopher, H. Schroeder. “Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Pragmatic Reorientation.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 32, no. 2 (2008): 433–502.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Fisher, Elizabeth, “Chevron and the Legitimacy of Public Administration.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Law Journal 22, no. 2 (2013): 465–96.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., Fisher, Elizabeth, and Wagner, Wendy. “The Enlightenment of Administrative Law: Looking Inside the Agency for Legitimacy.” Wake Forest Law Review 47, no. 3 (2012): 463–502.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Glicksman, Robert L.. “The APA and the Back-End of Regulation: Procedures for Informal Adjudication.” Administrative Law Review 56, no. 4 (2004): 1159–78.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Glicksman, Robert L.. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Quiet Revolution in Administrative Law.” Duke Law Journal 37, no. 5 (1988): 819–78.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Levy, Richard E.. “Judicial Incentives and Indeterminacy in Substantive Review of Administrative Decisions.” Duke Law Journal 44, no. 6 (1995): 1051–80.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Murphy, Richard W.. “Eight Things That Americans Can’t Figure Out about Controlling Administrative Power.” Administrative Law Review 61, no. 1 (2009): 5–28.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Murphy, Richard W.. “Politicized Judicial Review in Administrative Law: Three Improbable Responses.” George Mason Law Review 19, no. 2 (2012): 319–60.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Murphy, Richard W.. “Constraining White House Political Control of Agency Rulemaking through the Duty of Reasoned Explanation.” University of California, Davis Law Review 48, no. 4 (2015): 1457–508.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Murphy, Richard W.. “Arbitrariness Review Made Reasonable: Structural and Conceptual Reform of the ‘Hard Look.’” Notre Dame Law Review 92, no. 1 (2017): 331–80.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Wright, Ronald F.. “The Future of the Administrative Presidency: Turning Administrative Law Inside-Out.” Miami Law Review 65, no. 2 (2011): 577–620.Google Scholar
Shepherd, George. “Fierce Compromise: The Administrative Procedure Act Emerges from New Deal Politics.” Northwestern University Law Review 90, no. 4 (1996): 1557–683.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Finegold, Kenneth. “State Capacity and Economic Intervention in the Early New Deal.” Political Science Quarterly 97, no. 2 (1982): 255–78.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael P. “Alienation and the Bureaucracy: The Role of Participatory Administration.” Public Administration Review 31, no. 6 (1971): 658–64.Google Scholar
Sohoni, Mila. “Response, A Bureaucracy – If You Can Keep It.” Harvard Law Review Forum 131 (2017): 13–31.Google Scholar
Special issue. “Administrative Law and Emergency Management: Katrina and Beyond.” Duke Law Journal, 56, no. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Stack, Kevin M. “Lessons from the Turn of the Twentieth Century for First-Year Courses on Legislation and Regulation.” Journal of Legal Education 65, no. 1 (2015): 28–44.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. “A Costly Signaling Theory of ‘Hard Look’ Judicial Review.” Administrative Law Review 58, no. 4 (2006): 753–814.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. “The Reformation of American Administrative Law.” Harvard Law Review 88, no. 8 (1975): 1667–813.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. “The Discontents of Legalism: Interest Group Relations in Administrative Regulation.” Wisconsin Law Review, no. 3 (1985): 655–86.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. “Madison’s Nightmare,” University of Chicago Law Review 57, no. 2 (1990): 335–56.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “Teaching Administrative Law: The Wonder of the Unknown.” Journal of Legal Education 33, no. 1 (1983): 1–12.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch.” Columbia Law Review 84, no. 3 (1984): 573–669.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “Revisiting Overton Park: Political and Judicial Controls over Administrative Action Affecting the Community.” UCLA Law Review 39, no. 5 (1992): 1251–330.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “The Rulemaking Continuum.” Duke Law Journal 41, no. 6 (1992): 1463–89.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “In Memoriam: Walter Gellhorn.” Columbia Law review 96, no. 3 (1996): 600–4.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “Publication Rules in the Rulemaking Spectrum: Assuring Proper Respect for an Essential Element.” Administrative Law Review 53, no. 3 (2001): 803–50.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “Overseer, or the Decider—The President in Administrative Law.” George Washington Law Review 75, no. 4 (2007): 696–760.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “‘Deference’ Is Too Confusing – Let’s Call Them ‘Chevron Space’ and ‘Skidmore Weight.’” Columbia Law Review 112, no. 5 (2012): 1143–73.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “Christopher Columbus Langdell and the Public Law Curriculum.” Journal of Legal Education 66, no. 1 (2016): 157–85.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “Law and Administration after Chevron.” Columbia Law Review 90, no. 8 (1990): 2071–120.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “Beyond Marbury: The Executive’s Power to Say What the Law Is,” Yale Law Journal 115, no. 9 (2006): 2580–610.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “Chevron Step Zero.” Virginia Law Review 92, no. 2 (2006): 187–249.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, and Vermeule, Adrian. “Libertarian Administrative Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 82, no. 1 (2015): 393–474.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, and Vermeule, Adrian, “The New Coke: On the Plural Aims of Administrative Law.” Supreme Court Review (2015): 41–88.Google Scholar
Theiriault, Sean M. “Patronage, the Pendleton Act, and the Power of the People.” The Journal of Politics 65 (2003): 50–68.Google Scholar
Thomson, David. “Using Wikis to Teach Administrative Law.” Administrative Law and Regulatory News 35, no. 3 (2010): 18–21.Google Scholar
Tomain, Joseph P., and Shapiro, Sidney A.. “Analyzing Government Regulation.” Administrative Law Review 49, no. 2 (1997): 377–414.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. “Without a Paddle: Can Stephen Breyer Save the Obama Agenda in the Supreme Court?” New Yorker, September 27, 2010.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “Administrative Law in the 1930s: The Supreme Court’s Accommodation of Progressive Legal Theory.” Duke Law Journal 60, no. 7 (2011): 1565–638.Google Scholar
Urick, Jonathan. “Chevron and Constitutional Doubt.” Virginia Law Review 99, no. 2 (2013): 375–418.Google Scholar
University of Chicago Law Review. “Ernst Freund—Pioneer of Administrative Law.” 29, no. 4 (1962): 755–81.Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul R. “What the Return of the Administrative Conference of the United States Means for Administrative Law.” Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law 1, no. 1 (2012): 17–32.Google Scholar
Virelli, Louis J. III “Scientific Peer Review and Administrative Legitimacy.” Administrative Law Review 61, no. 4 (2009): 723–80.Google Scholar
Wagner, Wendy. “The Science Charade in Toxic Risk Regulation.” Columbia Law Review 95, no. 7 (1995): 1613–723.Google Scholar
Wagner, Wendy. “A Place for Agency Expertise: Reconciling Agency Expertise with Presdiential Power.” Columbia Law Review 115, no. 7 (2015): 2019–70.Google Scholar
Wagner, Wendy, Fisher, Elizabeth, and Pascual, Pasky. “Misunderstanding Models in Environmental and Public Health Regulation.” New York University Environmental Law Journal 18, no. 2 (2010): 293–356.Google Scholar
Wagner, Wendy, Fisher, Elizabeth, and Pascual, Pasky. “Whose Science? A New Era in Regulatory ‘Science Wars.’” Science 362(6415) (2018): 636–39.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M. “The D.C. Circuit: Here and Now.” George Washington Law Review 55, nos. 4–5 (1987): 718–28.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M. “Judicial Review in Mid-passage: The Uneasy Partnership between Courts and Agencies Plays On.” Tulsa Law Journal 32, no. 2 (1997): 221–58.Google Scholar
Wald, Patricia M., et al. “The Contribution of the D.C. Circuit to Administrative Law.” Administrative Law Review 40, no. 4 (1988): 507–59.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law.” British Academy Review 18 (2011): 1–22.Google Scholar
Walker, Christopher J. “Attacking Auer and Chevron Deference: A Literature Review.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 16, no. 1 (2018): 103–22.Google Scholar
Walker, Christopher J. “Restoring Congress’s Role in the Modern Administrative State.” Michigan Law Review 116, no. 6 (2018): 1102–22.Google Scholar
Wendel, David. “Negotiated Rulemaking: An Analysis of Administrative Issues and Concerns Associated with Congressional Attempts to Codify a Negotiated Rulemaking Statute Comments.” Administrative Law Journal 4, no. 1 (1990): 227–74.Google Scholar
Wendel, W. Bradley. “The Torture Memos and the Demands of Legality.” Legal Ethics, 12 (2009): 107–24.Google Scholar
Wendel, W. Bradley. “Government Lawyers in the Trump Administration.” Hastings Law Journal 69, no. 1 (2017): 275–352.Google Scholar
Werhan, Keith. “Delegalizing Administrative Law.” University of Illinois Law Review 1996, no. 2 (1996): 423–66.Google Scholar
White, Leonard. “Public Administration under the Federalists.” Boston University Law Review 24, no. 3 (1944): 144–87.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2, no. 2 (1887): 197–222.Google Scholar
Woll, Peter. “Administrative Law in the Seventies.” Public Administration Review 32, no. 5 (1972): 557–64.Google Scholar
Woods, Sean. “‘Show Me a Hero’: David Simon Is Still Mad As Hell.” Rolling Stone, August 11, 2015.Google Scholar
Wright, J. Skelly. “The Courts and the Rulemaking Process: The Limits of Judicial Review.” Cornell Law Review 59, no. 3 (1974): 375–97.Google Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb, and Yackee, Susan Webb. “Testing the Ossification Thesis: An Empirical Examination of Federal Regulatory Volume and Speed, 1950–1990.” George Washington Law Review 80, no. 5 (2012): 1414–92.Google Scholar
Ye Hee Lee, Michelle. “Trump’s Claim That Waters of the United States Rule Cost ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of Jobs.’” Washington Post, March 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, Volume 2: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. The Failure of the Founding Fathers and the Rise of Presidential Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, and Hassler, William. Clean Coal/Dirty Air: Or How the Clean Air Act Became a Multimillion Dollar Bail Out for High Sulfur Coal Producers and What Should Be Done about It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, and Zelikhow, Phillip. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. Report of the ABA Commission to Study the Federal Trade Commission. Chicago: American Bar Association, 1969.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian. A Government Out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bamforth, Nicholas, and Leyland, Peter. “Introduction: Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution.” In Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution, edited by Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Theory and Practice of Managerial Craftsmenship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutional Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. 2nd ed. Chatham: CQ Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty, rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Beck, James. Our Wonderland of Bureaucracy. New York: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. New York: Doubleday, 1960.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Marver. Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Bertelli, Anthony, and Lynn, Laurence. Madison’s Managers: Public Administration and the Constitution. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Beven, Keith. Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future? London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. The Genius of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Bovens, Mark, and Schillemans, Thomas. “Meaningful Accountability.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert, and Schillemans, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Boyd White, James. The Legal Imagination. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1973.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Gates, Scott. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response in a Democratic Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Towards Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bruff, Harold. Bad Advice: Bush’s Lawyers in the War on Terror. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2009.Google Scholar
Burke, James Lee. Jesus Out to Sea. New York: Simon and Shuster, 2007.Google Scholar
Burke, James Lee. Tin Roof Blowdown. London: Orion Books Ltd, 2008.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton. The Administrative Theories of Hamilton and Jefferson: Their Contribution to Thought on Public Administration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Carlson, Ann, and Burtraw, Dallas. “Introduction.” In Lessons from the Clean Air Act: Building Durability and Adaptability into US Climate and Energy Policy, edited by Carlson, Ann and Burtraw, Dallas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. Reputation and Power: Organisational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Joseph P., Dowling, Noel T., and Hays, Paul R.. The Judicial Function in Federal Administrative Agencies. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1942.Google Scholar
Chase, William C. The American Law School and the Rise of Administrative Government. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry, and Evans, Robert, Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cook, Brian J. Bureaucracy and Self Government: Reconsidering the Role of Public Administration in American Politics. 2nd ed. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cook, Brian J. Democracy and Administration: Woodrow Wilson’s Ideas and the Challenges of Public Management. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Crenson, Mathew A. The Federal Machine: Beginnings of Bureaucracy in Jacksonian America. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Crenson, Matthew A., and Rourke, Francis. “By Way of Conclusion: American Bureaucracy since World War Two.” In The New American State: Bureaucracies and Polices since World War II, edited by Galambos, L.. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Croly, Herbert. Progressive Democracy. New York: Macmillan, 1915.Google Scholar
Davies, A. C. L. Accountability: A Public Law Analysis of Government by Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp. Administrative Law Treatise. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1958.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp. Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Enquiry. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.Google Scholar
De Bell, Garrett. The Environmental Handbook: Prepared for the First National Environmental Teach-In. New York: Ballentine Books, 1970.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America and Two Essays on America. London: Penguin Books, 2003.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Columbus: Ohio University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: MacMillian & Company Limited, 1964.Google Scholar
Dickinson, John. Administrative Justice and the Supremacy of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Dodd, Walter F. Administration of Workmen’s Compensation. New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1936.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: University of Syracuse Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1967.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth, 1977.Google Scholar
Edley, Christopher F. Jr. Administrative Law: Rethinking Judicial Control of Bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the U.S. Constitution and the Making of the American State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. A Hercules in the Cradle: War, Money, and the American State 1783–1867. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Emerson, Blake. The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. The Classic Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel. Tocqueville’s Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America 1900–1940. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Eskeridge, William N. Jr., and Ferejohn, John. A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fellmeth, Robert C. The Interstate Commerce Commission: Ralph Nader’s Study Group Report on the Interstate Commerce Commission & Transportation. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1970.Google Scholar
Fellmeth, Robert C., Cox, Edward F., and Schutz, John E.. The Nader Report on the Federal Trade Commission. New York: Grove Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. Environmental Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “Imagining Technology and Environmental Law.” In Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology, edited by Brownsword, Roger, Scotford, Eloise, and Yeung, Karen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “Sciences, Environmental Laws, and Legal Cultures: Fostering Collective Epistemic Responsibility.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Environmental Law, edited by Lees, Emma and Viñuales, Jorge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “The Open Road? Navigating Public Administration and the Failed Promise of Administrative Law.” In The Foundations and Future of Public Law, edited by Fisher, Elizabeth, King, Jeff, and Young, Alison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Flaumenhaft, Harvey. The Effective Republic: Administration and Constitution in the Thought of Alexandra Hamilton. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome. If Men Were Angels: Some Aspects of Government in a Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros, 1942.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix. The Public and Its Government. Boston: Beacon Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, and Davison, J. Forrester. Cases and Other Materials on Administrative Law. Chicago: Commerce Clearing House, Inc., 1931.Google Scholar
Freedman, James O. Crisis and Legitimacy: The Administrative Process and American Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles. Order and Law: Arguing the Reagan Revolution—A Firsthand Account. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst. Cases on Administrative Law: Selected from Decisions of English and American Courts. St. Paul, MN: West Law Book Company, 1911.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst. Administrative Powers over Persons and Property: A Comparative Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1928.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst, et al. The Growth of American Administrative Law. St. Louis, MO: Thomas Law Book Company, 1923.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Lawrence. History of American Law. 2nd ed. New York: Touchstone Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Friendly, Henry. The Federal Administrative Agencies: The Need for Better Definition of Standards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Fry, Brian R., and Raadschelders, Jos N.. Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gellhorn, Walter. Federal Administrative Proceedings. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, ed. Durkheim on Politics and the State. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. “Living in a Post Traditional Society.” In Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, edited by Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, and Lash, S.. Cambridge: The Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Golden, Marissa Martino. What Motivates Bureaucrats? Politics and Administration during the Reagan Years. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack. The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2007.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank Johnson. Comparative Administrative Law: An Analysis of the Administrative Systems National and Local of the US, England, France and Germany. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1893.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank Johnson. Politics and Administration. London: Macmillan, 1900.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank Johnson. The Principles of the Administrative Law of the United States. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1905.Google Scholar
Green, Richard T., Morgan, Douglas F., Shinn, Craig W., and Robinson, Kent S.. Foundations of Public Service. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. Statutory and Common Law Intepretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. “Regulatory Reform: What Do the Government’s Numbers Tell Us?” In Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved, edited by Hahn, Robert W.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Halachimi, Arie. “Accountability Overloads.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert, and Schillemans, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. The Federalist. London: Everyman, 1992.Google Scholar
Hartig, John H. Burning Rivers: Revival of Four Urban Industrial Rivers That Caught Fire. London: Multi-Science Publishing Company, 2010.Google Scholar
Harvey Young, James. Pure Food: Securing the Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Henderson, Gerald. The Federal Trade Commission: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Herrin, Dean. “The Eclectic Engineer: Montgomery C. Meigs and His Engineering Projects.” In Montgomery C. Meigs and the Building of the Nation’s Capital, edited by Dickinson, William, Herrin, Dean, and Kennon, Donald. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hewart, Gordon. The New Despotism. London: Ernest Benn Limited, 1929.Google Scholar
Hill, Kermit. The Magic Mirror: Law in American History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. New York: Vintage Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. New York: Vintage Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Holloway, Carson. Hamilton versus Jefferson in the Washington Administration. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Democratic Enlightenment: Philsophy, Revolution and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Patricia Wallace. The Foundation of Merit: Public Service in American Democracy. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press 1995.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L. Judicial Control of Administrative Action. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1965.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Jillson, Cal. Pursuing the American Dream: Opportunity and Exclusion over Four Centuries. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ronald N., and Libecap, Gary D.. The Federal Civil Service System and the Problem of Bureaucracy: The Economics and Politics of Institutional Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jones, Brian D. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul. The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Durham: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Hebert. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Reform. Washington, DC: RFF Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kessler, David. A Question of Intent: A Great American Battle with a Deadly Industry. New York: Public Affairs, 2001.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. 2nd ed. London: Addison Wesley Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. Towards Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Komesar, Neil K. Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Anne. Debating the American State: Liberal Anxieties and the New Leviathan, 1930–1970. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Landis, James M. The Administrative Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil D’État. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lepore, Jill. These Truths: A History of the United States. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2018.Google Scholar
Levy, David. Herbert Croly of the New Republic: The Life and Thought of an American Progressive. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Lewis, David E. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael. The Fifth Risk. London: Allen Lane, 2018.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. A Government Ill Executed: The Decline of the Federal Service and How to Reverse It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. Drift and Mastery. New York: Mitchell Kennerley, 1914.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. “My Philosophy of Law.” In My Philosophy of Law: Credos of Sixteen American Scholars, edited by Rosenthal, Julius Foundation for General Law. Littleton, CO: F. B. Rothman, 1941.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1979.Google Scholar
Lyons, Linda. “The Pension Building: Function and Form.” In Montgomery C. Meigs and the Building of the Nation’s Capital, edited by Dickinson, William, Herrin, Dean, and Kennon, Donald. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Powers, Mechanisms and Results.” In States in History, edited by Hall, John. Oxford: Blackwells, 1986.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Marcus, Alfred. Promise and Performance: Choosing and Implementing an Environmental Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Martin, Albro. Enterprise Denied: Origins of the Decline of American Railroads. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Greed, Chaos and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives of Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
McFarland, Andrew S. Public Interest Lobbies: Decision-Making on Energy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1976.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O. Reinventing Rationality: The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O., and Shapiro, Sidney. Workers at Risk: The Failed Promise of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O., and Wagner, Wendy. Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Member Scholars of the Center for Progressive Reform. An Unnatural Disaster: The Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Washington, DC: Center for Progressive Reform, 2005.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert King, Social Theory and Social Structure, rev. ed. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Michaels, David. Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Michaels, Jon D. Constitutional Coup: Privatization’s Threat to the American Republic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Milkis, Sidney, and Nelson, Michael. The American Presidency: Origins and Development, 1776–1993. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mollenhoff, Clark. Despoilers of Democracy. New York: Double Day & Co., 1965.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Richard, Vaughan, Steven, and Godinho, Cristina. In-House Lawyers’ Ethics: Institutional Logics, Legal Risk and the Tournament of Influence. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
Moreno, Paul. The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Moreno, Paul. The Bureaucrat Kings: The Origins and Underpinnings of America’s Bureaucratic Development. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2017.Google Scholar
Morone, James. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government, rev. ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Morrisey, Patrick, and Lin, Elbert. “Federal Overreach in Environmental Regulation: ‘A Severe Blow to the Separation of Powers.’” In Liberty’s Nemesis: The Unchecked Expansion of the State, edited by Reuter, Dean and Yoo, John. New York: Encounter Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Moss, David. Democracy: A Case Study. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Nader, Ralph. Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-In Dangers of the American Automobile. New York: Grossman, 1965.Google Scholar
Nader, Ralph. “Ralph Nader Asks Law Students to Change.” In The Ralph Nader Reader, by Nader, Ralph. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2000.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Decision-Making in the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1977.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Building a Foundation for Sound Environmental Decisions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1997.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Science for Environmental Protection: The Road Ahead. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Newbold, Stephanie, and Rosenbloom, David, eds. The Constitutional School of Public Administration. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Novak, William. The People’s Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1989).Google Scholar
Parrillo, Nicholas. Against the Profit Motive: The Salary Revolution in American Government 1780–1940. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Perrin, Andrew. American Democracy: From Tocqueville to Town Halls to Twitter. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. “Introduction.” In The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, by Wildavsky, Aaron, rev. ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity and Science in Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. Administrative Agencies and the Law. New York: American Affairs Pamphlets, National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1946.Google Scholar
Power, Michael. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Prindle, David. The Paradox of Democratic Capitalism: Politics and Economics in American Thought. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Pritzker, David M., and Dalton, Deborah S., eds. Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook. Administrative Conference of the U.S., 1990.Google Scholar
Rainey, Hal G. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in The Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
Rana, Aziz. “Progressivism and the Disenchanted Constitution.” In The Progressives’ Century: Poltical Reform, Constitutional Government, and the Modern American State, edited by Skowrenek, Stephen, Engel, Stephen, and Ackerman, Bruce. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Rauchway, Eric. The Great Depression and the New Deal: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Redford, Emmette S. Democracy in the Administrative State. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Resh, William. Rethinking the Administrative Presidency: Trust, Intellectual Capital, and Appointee-Careerist Relations in the George W. Bush Administration. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rohr, John A. To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State. Lawrence: University Press Of Kansas, 1986.Google Scholar
Rohr, John A. Founding Fathers in France and America: A Study in Constitutional Governance. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rohrborough, Malcolm. The Land Office Business: The Settlement and Administration of American Public Lands 1789–1837. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ryan, Erin. Federalism and the Tug of War Within. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. “Policy Change over a Decade or More,” in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy-Coalition Approach, edited by Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H.. “The Management Side of Due Process in the Service-Based Welfare State.” In Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry Mashaw, edited by Perillo, Nicholas R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur. Jr. The Cycles of American History. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1986.Google Scholar
Schoenbrod, David. Power without Responsibility: How Congress Abuses the People through Delegation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Schon, Donald A., and Rein, Martin. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intracable Policy Controversies, rev. ed. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. A Fierce Green Fire: The American Environmental Movement. New York: Hill & Wang, 1993.Google Scholar
Shallat, Todd. Structures in the Stream: Water, Science and the Rise of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. Who Guards the Guardians: Judicial Control of Administration. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Tomain, Joseph. Achieving Democracy: The Future of Progressive Reform. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., Funk, William F., and Weaver, Russell L.. Administrative Procedure and Practice: Problems and Cases. 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Sharfman, I. Leo. The Interstate Commerce Commission: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure, Part One. New York: Oxford University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Sharfman, I. Leo. The Interstate Commerce Commission: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure, Part Two. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1931.Google Scholar
Short, Lloyd Milton. The Development of National Administrative Capacity. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen, and Engel, Stephen. “Introduction: The Progressive’s Century.” In The Progressives’ Century: Political Reform, Constitutional Government, and the Modern American State, edited by Skowronek, Stephen, Engel, Stephen, and Ackerman, Bruce. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Stack, Kevin M. “Reclaiming ‘the Real Subject’ of Administrative Law: A Critical Introduction.” In Administrative Law: Governing the Relations of Public Officers, by Wyman, Bruce, rev. ed. Clark, NJ: The LawBook Exchange, Ltd., 2014.Google Scholar
Steinzor, Rena, and Shapiro, Sidney A., The People’s Agents and the Battle to Protect the American Public: Special Interests, Government, and Threats to Health, Safety, and The Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Stephens, Harold. Administrative Tribunals and the Rules of Evidence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L., ed. Administrative Law Stories. Minneapolis: West Group, 2006.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “Jerry L. Mashaw and the Public Law Curriculum.” In Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw, edited by Parrillo, Nicholas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company, 1988.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. “Clinical Authority in the Construction of Citizenship.” In Public Policy for Democracy, edited by Ingram, Helen and Smith, Stephen Rathgeb. Washington, DC: Washington Brookings Institution, 1993.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2012.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Ezra. Dismantling Democratic States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. Risk and Reason: Safety, Law and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. The Cost-Benefit Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. A Realistic Theory of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tengs, Tamy O., and Graham, John D.. “The Opportunity Costs of Haphazard Social Investments in Life-Saving.” In Risks, Costs, and Lifes Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation, edited by Hahn, Robert W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. Law, Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Townsend, Frances Fragos. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: The White House, 2006.Google Scholar
Turner, Jim. The Chemical Feast: Ralph Nader’s Study Group Report on the Food and Drug Administration. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1970.Google Scholar
Van Riper, Paul. History of the United States Civil Service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company, 1958.Google Scholar
Van Vleck, William C. The Administrative Control of Aliens: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure. New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1936.Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul. Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What Can We Do about It. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul. Valuing Bureaucracy: The Case for Professional Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. “The Administrative State: Law, Democracy and Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of the U.S. Constitution, edited by Tushnet, Mark, Levinson, Sanford, and Graber, Mark. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. Law’s Abnegation: From Law’s Empire to the Administrative State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1998.Google Scholar
Waldo, Dwight. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Political Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wellford, Harrison. Sowing the Wind: A Report for Ralph Nader’s Center for Study of Response Food Safety and Chemical Harvest. New York: Bantam Books, 1973.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. Law in American History, Volume I: From the Colonial Years through the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
White, G. Edmund. Law in American History, Volume II: From Reconstruction through the 1920s. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
White, Leonard. Introduction to the Study of Public Administration. New York: Macmillan, 1926.Google Scholar
White, Leonard. The Federalists: A Study in Administrative History. New York: Macmillan, 1948.Google Scholar
White, Morton. Philosophy, the Federalist, and the Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Wilson, James. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Wintrerer, Caroline. “What Was the American Enlightenment?” In The Worlds of American Intellectual History, edited by Issac, Joel et al. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2001.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic (1776–1787). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Radicialism of the American Revolution. New York: Vintage, 1993.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. “The American Enlightenment.” In America and Enlightenment Constitutionalism, edited by McDowell, Gary and O’Neill, Johnathan. New York: Palgrave Macmillian US, 2006.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic 1789-1815. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wyman, Bruce. The Principles of Administrative Law Governing the Relations of Public Officers. St. Paul, MN: Davidson Company, 1903.Google Scholar
Yeager, Peter. The Limits of Law: The Public Regulation of Private Pollution. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Zwick, David, and Benstock, Marcy. Waster Wasteland: Ralph Nader’s Study Group Report on Water Pollution. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
Gore, Al. “Report of the National Performance Review: Improving Regulatory Systems.” Washington, DC: Office of the Vice President of the U.S., 1993.Google Scholar
Hoover Commission, “Report on Organization of the Executive Branch of Government.” New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., 1949.Google Scholar
House of Representatives Report No. 92-911 (1972).Google Scholar
Landis, James M. “Report on Regulatory Agencies to the President Elect.” Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1960.Google Scholar
Marshall, Justice Thurgood. “Memorandum to the Conference, May 6.” In Papers of Justice Thurgood Marshall. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 1980.Google Scholar
Marshall, Justice Thurgood. “Memorandum to the Conference, May 12.” In Papers of Justice Thurgood Marshall. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 1980.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard. “Special Message from the President to the Congress about Reorganization Plans to Establish the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.” Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States 215 (1970).Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Permanent Standard for the Regulation of Benzene.” 43 Federal Register 5918 (February 10, 1978).Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Identification, Classification and Regulation of Potential Occupational Carcinogens.” 45 Federal Register 5002 (January 22, 1980).Google Scholar
Occupational Health and Safety Administration. “Final Rule: Air Contaminants.” 54 Federal Register 2332. January 19, 1989.Google Scholar
Presidential Advisory Council on Executive Organization. “A New Regulatory Framework: Report on Selected Independent Agencies.” Washington, DC: Office of the President of the U.S., 1971.Google Scholar
Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. “A Failure of Initiative: Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina.” House of Representatives Report No. 109-377 (2006).Google Scholar
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. “Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared.” Senate Report No. 109-322 (2006).Google Scholar
Senate Report No. 92-414 (1972).Google Scholar
Task Force on Legal Services and Procedure. “Task Force Report on Legal Services and Procedure.” Washington, DC: Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government, 1955.Google Scholar
Testimony of Sidney A. Shapiro. “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011: Hearing on H.R. 3010 before the House Committee on the Judiciary.” H.R. 3010 112th Congress (2011-2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers. “Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers.” 42 Federal Register 37122 (July 19, 1977).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers. “Final Rule for Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers.” 51 Federal Register 41206-01 (November 13, 1986).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency. “Clean Water Rule: Definition of Waters of the United States.” 80 Federal Register 37054 (June 29, 2015).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency. “Revised Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’.” 84 Federal Register 4154 (February 14, 2019).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency. “Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’—Recodification of Pre-Existing Rules.” 84 Federal Register 56626 (October 22 2019).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Homeland Security – Office of Inspector General. “A Performance Review of FEMA’s Disaster Management Activities in Response to Hurricane Katrina.” OIG-06-32. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security – Office of Inspections and Special Reviews, 2006.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Occupational Safety and Health Standards: Toxic and Hazardous Substances.” 29 C.F.R. § 1910 Subpart Z.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Attorney General. “Final Report of the Attorney General’s Committee on Administrative Procedure.” Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1941.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Professional Responsibility. “Investigation into the Office of Legal Counsel’s Memoranda concerning Issues Relating to the Central Intelligence Agency’s Use of ‘Enhanced Interrogation Techniques’ on Suspected Terrorists.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Professional Responsibility, 2009.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Requirements for Preparation, Adoption and Submittal of Implementation Plans and Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans.” 46 Federal Register 50766 (October 14 1981).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals,” 76 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 8 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. “Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence (External Review Draft).” EPA/600/R11/098B. Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, September 2013.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency – NAAQS Process Review Workgroup. “EPA Review of the Process for Setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards.” Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, March 2006.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency – Science Advisory Board. “Future Risk: Research Strategies for the 1990s.” SAB-EC-88-040. Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, September 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency – Science Advisory Board. “Letter to EPA Administrator. Subject: Commentary on the Proposed Rule Defining the Scope of Waters Federally Regulated Under the Clean Water Act” (EPA-SAB-20-002, February 27 2020).Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco Products to Protect Children and Adolescents.” (Proposed Rule) 60 Federal Register 41314 (August 11, 1995).Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco to Protect Children and Adolescents.” (Final Rule) 61 Federal Register 44396 (August 28 1996).Google Scholar
U.S. President’s Committee on Administrative Management. “Administrative Management in the Government of the United States.” Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1937.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. “Notes for Lectures on Administration.” In Papers of Woodrow Wilson: Volume 6 1888–1890, edited by Link, Arthur. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. “Notes for Lectures at the John Hopkins (First Year Course).” In Papers of Woodrow Wilson: Volume 7 1890–1892, edited by Link, Arthur. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Aspen Institute. EPA 40th Anniversary: 10 Ways EPA Has Strengthened America. Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute, 2010.Google Scholar
National Commission for Public Service. Urgent Business for America: Revitalizing The Federal Government for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Commission for Public Service, 2003.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, November 2015.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor – Directorate of Enforcement Programs. OSHA’s Field Operations Manual. CPL 02-00-148. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor – Office of General Industry Enforcement, November 2009.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. Guidelines for Developing or Revising Water Quality Standards under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, January 1973.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. Guidance on the Development, Evaluation and Application of Environmental Models. Wasington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, 2009.Google Scholar
Barton, Peter Hutt. “Celebrating 20 Years at Harvard Law.” Harvard Law School. Shared February 13, 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQGW2PEI51k.Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald. “The President’s News Conference, August 12, 1986.” Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute. Shared June 22, 2010, www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ySHtDHrLJY.Google Scholar
U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. “The Provider Reimbursement Manual.” Updated May 4, 2012, www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Paper-Based-Manuals.html.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “Through ‘Thick’ and ‘Thin’: Comparison in Administrative Law and Regulation Scholarship.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law, edited by Cane, Peter et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome. “Experimental Jurisprudence and the ‘New Deal.’” Address before the Association of American Law Schools. Chicago, December 30, 1933.Google Scholar
Lee, Spike director. When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts. Aired August 16, 2006, on HBO.Google Scholar
Newman, Randy singer. “Burn On,” track 8 on Randy Newman, Sail Away, Warner Bros. Records, 1972.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, Volume 2: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. The Failure of the Founding Fathers and the Rise of Presidential Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, and Hassler, William. Clean Coal/Dirty Air: Or How the Clean Air Act Became a Multimillion Dollar Bail Out for High Sulfur Coal Producers and What Should Be Done about It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, and Zelikhow, Phillip. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. Report of the ABA Commission to Study the Federal Trade Commission. Chicago: American Bar Association, 1969.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian. A Government Out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bamforth, Nicholas, and Leyland, Peter. “Introduction: Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution.” In Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution, edited by Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Theory and Practice of Managerial Craftsmenship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutional Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. 2nd ed. Chatham: CQ Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty, rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Beck, James. Our Wonderland of Bureaucracy. New York: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. New York: Doubleday, 1960.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Marver. Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Bertelli, Anthony, and Lynn, Laurence. Madison’s Managers: Public Administration and the Constitution. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Beven, Keith. Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future? London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. The Genius of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Bovens, Mark, and Schillemans, Thomas. “Meaningful Accountability.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert, and Schillemans, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Boyd White, James. The Legal Imagination. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1973.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Gates, Scott. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response in a Democratic Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Towards Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Bruff, Harold. Bad Advice: Bush’s Lawyers in the War on Terror. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2009.Google Scholar
Burke, James Lee. Jesus Out to Sea. New York: Simon and Shuster, 2007.Google Scholar
Burke, James Lee. Tin Roof Blowdown. London: Orion Books Ltd, 2008.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Lynton. The Administrative Theories of Hamilton and Jefferson: Their Contribution to Thought on Public Administration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Carlson, Ann, and Burtraw, Dallas. “Introduction.” In Lessons from the Clean Air Act: Building Durability and Adaptability into US Climate and Energy Policy, edited by Carlson, Ann and Burtraw, Dallas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. Reputation and Power: Organisational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Joseph P., Dowling, Noel T., and Hays, Paul R.. The Judicial Function in Federal Administrative Agencies. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1942.Google Scholar
Chase, William C. The American Law School and the Rise of Administrative Government. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry, and Evans, Robert, Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cook, Brian J. Bureaucracy and Self Government: Reconsidering the Role of Public Administration in American Politics. 2nd ed. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cook, Brian J. Democracy and Administration: Woodrow Wilson’s Ideas and the Challenges of Public Management. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Crenson, Mathew A. The Federal Machine: Beginnings of Bureaucracy in Jacksonian America. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Crenson, Matthew A., and Rourke, Francis. “By Way of Conclusion: American Bureaucracy since World War Two.” In The New American State: Bureaucracies and Polices since World War II, edited by Galambos, L.. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Croly, Herbert. Progressive Democracy. New York: Macmillan, 1915.Google Scholar
Davies, A. C. L. Accountability: A Public Law Analysis of Government by Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp. Administrative Law Treatise. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1958.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp. Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Enquiry. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.Google Scholar
De Bell, Garrett. The Environmental Handbook: Prepared for the First National Environmental Teach-In. New York: Ballentine Books, 1970.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America and Two Essays on America. London: Penguin Books, 2003.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Columbus: Ohio University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: MacMillian & Company Limited, 1964.Google Scholar
Dickinson, John. Administrative Justice and the Supremacy of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Dodd, Walter F. Administration of Workmen’s Compensation. New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1936.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: University of Syracuse Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1967.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth, 1977.Google Scholar
Edley, Christopher F. Jr. Administrative Law: Rethinking Judicial Control of Bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the U.S. Constitution and the Making of the American State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. A Hercules in the Cradle: War, Money, and the American State 1783–1867. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Emerson, Blake. The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. The Classic Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel. Tocqueville’s Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America 1900–1940. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Eskeridge, William N. Jr., and Ferejohn, John. A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fellmeth, Robert C. The Interstate Commerce Commission: Ralph Nader’s Study Group Report on the Interstate Commerce Commission & Transportation. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1970.Google Scholar
Fellmeth, Robert C., Cox, Edward F., and Schutz, John E.. The Nader Report on the Federal Trade Commission. New York: Grove Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. Environmental Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “Imagining Technology and Environmental Law.” In Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology, edited by Brownsword, Roger, Scotford, Eloise, and Yeung, Karen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “Sciences, Environmental Laws, and Legal Cultures: Fostering Collective Epistemic Responsibility.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Environmental Law, edited by Lees, Emma and Viñuales, Jorge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “The Open Road? Navigating Public Administration and the Failed Promise of Administrative Law.” In The Foundations and Future of Public Law, edited by Fisher, Elizabeth, King, Jeff, and Young, Alison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Flaumenhaft, Harvey. The Effective Republic: Administration and Constitution in the Thought of Alexandra Hamilton. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome. If Men Were Angels: Some Aspects of Government in a Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros, 1942.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix. The Public and Its Government. Boston: Beacon Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, and Davison, J. Forrester. Cases and Other Materials on Administrative Law. Chicago: Commerce Clearing House, Inc., 1931.Google Scholar
Freedman, James O. Crisis and Legitimacy: The Administrative Process and American Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles. Order and Law: Arguing the Reagan Revolution—A Firsthand Account. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst. Cases on Administrative Law: Selected from Decisions of English and American Courts. St. Paul, MN: West Law Book Company, 1911.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst. Administrative Powers over Persons and Property: A Comparative Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1928.Google Scholar
Freund, Ernst, et al. The Growth of American Administrative Law. St. Louis, MO: Thomas Law Book Company, 1923.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Lawrence. History of American Law. 2nd ed. New York: Touchstone Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Friendly, Henry. The Federal Administrative Agencies: The Need for Better Definition of Standards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Fry, Brian R., and Raadschelders, Jos N.. Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gellhorn, Walter. Federal Administrative Proceedings. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, ed. Durkheim on Politics and the State. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. “Living in a Post Traditional Society.” In Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, edited by Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, and Lash, S.. Cambridge: The Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Golden, Marissa Martino. What Motivates Bureaucrats? Politics and Administration during the Reagan Years. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack. The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2007.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank Johnson. Comparative Administrative Law: An Analysis of the Administrative Systems National and Local of the US, England, France and Germany. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1893.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank Johnson. Politics and Administration. London: Macmillan, 1900.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank Johnson. The Principles of the Administrative Law of the United States. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1905.Google Scholar
Green, Richard T., Morgan, Douglas F., Shinn, Craig W., and Robinson, Kent S.. Foundations of Public Service. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. Statutory and Common Law Intepretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. “Regulatory Reform: What Do the Government’s Numbers Tell Us?” In Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved, edited by Hahn, Robert W.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Halachimi, Arie. “Accountability Overloads.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert, and Schillemans, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. The Federalist. London: Everyman, 1992.Google Scholar
Hartig, John H. Burning Rivers: Revival of Four Urban Industrial Rivers That Caught Fire. London: Multi-Science Publishing Company, 2010.Google Scholar
Harvey Young, James. Pure Food: Securing the Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Henderson, Gerald. The Federal Trade Commission: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Herrin, Dean. “The Eclectic Engineer: Montgomery C. Meigs and His Engineering Projects.” In Montgomery C. Meigs and the Building of the Nation’s Capital, edited by Dickinson, William, Herrin, Dean, and Kennon, Donald. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hewart, Gordon. The New Despotism. London: Ernest Benn Limited, 1929.Google Scholar
Hill, Kermit. The Magic Mirror: Law in American History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. New York: Vintage Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. New York: Vintage Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Holloway, Carson. Hamilton versus Jefferson in the Washington Administration. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Democratic Enlightenment: Philsophy, Revolution and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Patricia Wallace. The Foundation of Merit: Public Service in American Democracy. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press 1995.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L. Judicial Control of Administrative Action. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1965.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Jillson, Cal. Pursuing the American Dream: Opportunity and Exclusion over Four Centuries. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ronald N., and Libecap, Gary D.. The Federal Civil Service System and the Problem of Bureaucracy: The Economics and Politics of Institutional Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jones, Brian D. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul. The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Durham: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Hebert. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Reform. Washington, DC: RFF Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kessler, David. A Question of Intent: A Great American Battle with a Deadly Industry. New York: Public Affairs, 2001.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. 2nd ed. London: Addison Wesley Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. Towards Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Komesar, Neil K. Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Anne. Debating the American State: Liberal Anxieties and the New Leviathan, 1930–1970. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Landis, James M. The Administrative Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil D’État. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lepore, Jill. These Truths: A History of the United States. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2018.Google Scholar
Levy, David. Herbert Croly of the New Republic: The Life and Thought of an American Progressive. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Lewis, David E. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael. The Fifth Risk. London: Allen Lane, 2018.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. A Government Ill Executed: The Decline of the Federal Service and How to Reverse It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. Drift and Mastery. New York: Mitchell Kennerley, 1914.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. “My Philosophy of Law.” In My Philosophy of Law: Credos of Sixteen American Scholars, edited by Rosenthal, Julius Foundation for General Law. Littleton, CO: F. B. Rothman, 1941.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1979.Google Scholar
Lyons, Linda. “The Pension Building: Function and Form.” In Montgomery C. Meigs and the Building of the Nation’s Capital, edited by Dickinson, William, Herrin, Dean, and Kennon, Donald. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Powers, Mechanisms and Results.” In States in History, edited by Hall, John. Oxford: Blackwells, 1986.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Marcus, Alfred. Promise and Performance: Choosing and Implementing an Environmental Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Martin, Albro. Enterprise Denied: Origins of the Decline of American Railroads. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Greed, Chaos and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives of Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
McFarland, Andrew S. Public Interest Lobbies: Decision-Making on Energy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1976.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O. Reinventing Rationality: The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O., and Shapiro, Sidney. Workers at Risk: The Failed Promise of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993.Google Scholar
McGarity, Thomas O., and Wagner, Wendy. Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Member Scholars of the Center for Progressive Reform. An Unnatural Disaster: The Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Washington, DC: Center for Progressive Reform, 2005.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert King, Social Theory and Social Structure, rev. ed. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Michaels, David. Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Michaels, Jon D. Constitutional Coup: Privatization’s Threat to the American Republic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Milkis, Sidney, and Nelson, Michael. The American Presidency: Origins and Development, 1776–1993. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mollenhoff, Clark. Despoilers of Democracy. New York: Double Day & Co., 1965.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Richard, Vaughan, Steven, and Godinho, Cristina. In-House Lawyers’ Ethics: Institutional Logics, Legal Risk and the Tournament of Influence. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
Moreno, Paul. The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Moreno, Paul. The Bureaucrat Kings: The Origins and Underpinnings of America’s Bureaucratic Development. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2017.Google Scholar
Morone, James. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government, rev. ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Morrisey, Patrick, and Lin, Elbert. “Federal Overreach in Environmental Regulation: ‘A Severe Blow to the Separation of Powers.’” In Liberty’s Nemesis: The Unchecked Expansion of the State, edited by Reuter, Dean and Yoo, John. New York: Encounter Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Moss, David. Democracy: A Case Study. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Nader, Ralph. Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-In Dangers of the American Automobile. New York: Grossman, 1965.Google Scholar
Nader, Ralph. “Ralph Nader Asks Law Students to Change.” In The Ralph Nader Reader, by Nader, Ralph. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2000.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Decision-Making in the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1977.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Building a Foundation for Sound Environmental Decisions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1997.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Science for Environmental Protection: The Road Ahead. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Newbold, Stephanie, and Rosenbloom, David, eds. The Constitutional School of Public Administration. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Novak, William. The People’s Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1989).Google Scholar
Parrillo, Nicholas. Against the Profit Motive: The Salary Revolution in American Government 1780–1940. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Perrin, Andrew. American Democracy: From Tocqueville to Town Halls to Twitter. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. “Introduction.” In The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, by Wildavsky, Aaron, rev. ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity and Science in Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. Administrative Agencies and the Law. New York: American Affairs Pamphlets, National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1946.Google Scholar
Power, Michael. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Prindle, David. The Paradox of Democratic Capitalism: Politics and Economics in American Thought. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Pritzker, David M., and Dalton, Deborah S., eds. Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook. Administrative Conference of the U.S., 1990.Google Scholar
Rainey, Hal G. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in The Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
Rana, Aziz. “Progressivism and the Disenchanted Constitution.” In The Progressives’ Century: Poltical Reform, Constitutional Government, and the Modern American State, edited by Skowrenek, Stephen, Engel, Stephen, and Ackerman, Bruce. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Rauchway, Eric. The Great Depression and the New Deal: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Redford, Emmette S. Democracy in the Administrative State. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Resh, William. Rethinking the Administrative Presidency: Trust, Intellectual Capital, and Appointee-Careerist Relations in the George W. Bush Administration. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rohr, John A. To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State. Lawrence: University Press Of Kansas, 1986.Google Scholar
Rohr, John A. Founding Fathers in France and America: A Study in Constitutional Governance. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rohrborough, Malcolm. The Land Office Business: The Settlement and Administration of American Public Lands 1789–1837. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ryan, Erin. Federalism and the Tug of War Within. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. “Policy Change over a Decade or More,” in Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy-Coalition Approach, edited by Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H.. “The Management Side of Due Process in the Service-Based Welfare State.” In Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry Mashaw, edited by Perillo, Nicholas R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur. Jr. The Cycles of American History. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1986.Google Scholar
Schoenbrod, David. Power without Responsibility: How Congress Abuses the People through Delegation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Schon, Donald A., and Rein, Martin. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intracable Policy Controversies, rev. ed. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Shabecoff, Philip. A Fierce Green Fire: The American Environmental Movement. New York: Hill & Wang, 1993.Google Scholar
Shallat, Todd. Structures in the Stream: Water, Science and the Rise of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. Who Guards the Guardians: Judicial Control of Administration. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., and Tomain, Joseph. Achieving Democracy: The Future of Progressive Reform. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Sidney A., Funk, William F., and Weaver, Russell L.. Administrative Procedure and Practice: Problems and Cases. 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Sharfman, I. Leo. The Interstate Commerce Commission: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure, Part One. New York: Oxford University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Sharfman, I. Leo. The Interstate Commerce Commission: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure, Part Two. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1931.Google Scholar
Short, Lloyd Milton. The Development of National Administrative Capacity. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen, and Engel, Stephen. “Introduction: The Progressive’s Century.” In The Progressives’ Century: Political Reform, Constitutional Government, and the Modern American State, edited by Skowronek, Stephen, Engel, Stephen, and Ackerman, Bruce. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Stack, Kevin M. “Reclaiming ‘the Real Subject’ of Administrative Law: A Critical Introduction.” In Administrative Law: Governing the Relations of Public Officers, by Wyman, Bruce, rev. ed. Clark, NJ: The LawBook Exchange, Ltd., 2014.Google Scholar
Steinzor, Rena, and Shapiro, Sidney A., The People’s Agents and the Battle to Protect the American Public: Special Interests, Government, and Threats to Health, Safety, and The Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Stephens, Harold. Administrative Tribunals and the Rules of Evidence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L., ed. Administrative Law Stories. Minneapolis: West Group, 2006.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. “Jerry L. Mashaw and the Public Law Curriculum.” In Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw, edited by Parrillo, Nicholas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company, 1988.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. “Clinical Authority in the Construction of Citizenship.” In Public Policy for Democracy, edited by Ingram, Helen and Smith, Stephen Rathgeb. Washington, DC: Washington Brookings Institution, 1993.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2012.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Ezra. Dismantling Democratic States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. Risk and Reason: Safety, Law and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. The Cost-Benefit Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. A Realistic Theory of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tengs, Tamy O., and Graham, John D.. “The Opportunity Costs of Haphazard Social Investments in Life-Saving.” In Risks, Costs, and Lifes Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation, edited by Hahn, Robert W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. Law, Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Townsend, Frances Fragos. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: The White House, 2006.Google Scholar
Turner, Jim. The Chemical Feast: Ralph Nader’s Study Group Report on the Food and Drug Administration. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1970.Google Scholar
Van Riper, Paul. History of the United States Civil Service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company, 1958.Google Scholar
Van Vleck, William C. The Administrative Control of Aliens: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure. New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1936.Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul. Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What Can We Do about It. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul. Valuing Bureaucracy: The Case for Professional Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. “The Administrative State: Law, Democracy and Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of the U.S. Constitution, edited by Tushnet, Mark, Levinson, Sanford, and Graber, Mark. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. Law’s Abnegation: From Law’s Empire to the Administrative State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1998.Google Scholar
Waldo, Dwight. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Political Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wellford, Harrison. Sowing the Wind: A Report for Ralph Nader’s Center for Study of Response Food Safety and Chemical Harvest. New York: Bantam Books, 1973.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. Law in American History, Volume I: From the Colonial Years through the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
White, G. Edmund. Law in American History, Volume II: From Reconstruction through the 1920s. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
White, Leonard. Introduction to the Study of Public Administration. New York: Macmillan, 1926.Google Scholar
White, Leonard. The Federalists: A Study in Administrative History. New York: Macmillan, 1948.Google Scholar
White, Morton. Philosophy, the Federalist, and the Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Wilson, James. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Wintrerer, Caroline. “What Was the American Enlightenment?” In The Worlds of American Intellectual History, edited by Issac, Joel et al. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2001.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic (1776–1787). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Radicialism of the American Revolution. New York: Vintage, 1993.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. “The American Enlightenment.” In America and Enlightenment Constitutionalism, edited by McDowell, Gary and O’Neill, Johnathan. New York: Palgrave Macmillian US, 2006.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic 1789-1815. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wyman, Bruce. The Principles of Administrative Law Governing the Relations of Public Officers. St. Paul, MN: Davidson Company, 1903.Google Scholar
Yeager, Peter. The Limits of Law: The Public Regulation of Private Pollution. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Zwick, David, and Benstock, Marcy. Waster Wasteland: Ralph Nader’s Study Group Report on Water Pollution. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
Gore, Al. “Report of the National Performance Review: Improving Regulatory Systems.” Washington, DC: Office of the Vice President of the U.S., 1993.Google Scholar
Hoover Commission, “Report on Organization of the Executive Branch of Government.” New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., 1949.Google Scholar
House of Representatives Report No. 92-911 (1972).Google Scholar
Landis, James M. “Report on Regulatory Agencies to the President Elect.” Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1960.Google Scholar
Marshall, Justice Thurgood. “Memorandum to the Conference, May 6.” In Papers of Justice Thurgood Marshall. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 1980.Google Scholar
Marshall, Justice Thurgood. “Memorandum to the Conference, May 12.” In Papers of Justice Thurgood Marshall. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 1980.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard. “Special Message from the President to the Congress about Reorganization Plans to Establish the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.” Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States 215 (1970).Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Permanent Standard for the Regulation of Benzene.” 43 Federal Register 5918 (February 10, 1978).Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Identification, Classification and Regulation of Potential Occupational Carcinogens.” 45 Federal Register 5002 (January 22, 1980).Google Scholar
Occupational Health and Safety Administration. “Final Rule: Air Contaminants.” 54 Federal Register 2332. January 19, 1989.Google Scholar
Presidential Advisory Council on Executive Organization. “A New Regulatory Framework: Report on Selected Independent Agencies.” Washington, DC: Office of the President of the U.S., 1971.Google Scholar
Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. “A Failure of Initiative: Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina.” House of Representatives Report No. 109-377 (2006).Google Scholar
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. “Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared.” Senate Report No. 109-322 (2006).Google Scholar
Senate Report No. 92-414 (1972).Google Scholar
Task Force on Legal Services and Procedure. “Task Force Report on Legal Services and Procedure.” Washington, DC: Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government, 1955.Google Scholar
Testimony of Sidney A. Shapiro. “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011: Hearing on H.R. 3010 before the House Committee on the Judiciary.” H.R. 3010 112th Congress (2011-2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers. “Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers.” 42 Federal Register 37122 (July 19, 1977).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers. “Final Rule for Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers.” 51 Federal Register 41206-01 (November 13, 1986).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency. “Clean Water Rule: Definition of Waters of the United States.” 80 Federal Register 37054 (June 29, 2015).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency. “Revised Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’.” 84 Federal Register 4154 (February 14, 2019).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense: Department of the Army – Corp of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency. “Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’—Recodification of Pre-Existing Rules.” 84 Federal Register 56626 (October 22 2019).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Homeland Security – Office of Inspector General. “A Performance Review of FEMA’s Disaster Management Activities in Response to Hurricane Katrina.” OIG-06-32. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security – Office of Inspections and Special Reviews, 2006.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Occupational Safety and Health Standards: Toxic and Hazardous Substances.” 29 C.F.R. § 1910 Subpart Z.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Attorney General. “Final Report of the Attorney General’s Committee on Administrative Procedure.” Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1941.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Professional Responsibility. “Investigation into the Office of Legal Counsel’s Memoranda concerning Issues Relating to the Central Intelligence Agency’s Use of ‘Enhanced Interrogation Techniques’ on Suspected Terrorists.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Professional Responsibility, 2009.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Requirements for Preparation, Adoption and Submittal of Implementation Plans and Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans.” 46 Federal Register 50766 (October 14 1981).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals,” 76 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 8 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. “Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence (External Review Draft).” EPA/600/R11/098B. Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, September 2013.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency – NAAQS Process Review Workgroup. “EPA Review of the Process for Setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards.” Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, March 2006.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency – Science Advisory Board. “Future Risk: Research Strategies for the 1990s.” SAB-EC-88-040. Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, September 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency – Science Advisory Board. “Letter to EPA Administrator. Subject: Commentary on the Proposed Rule Defining the Scope of Waters Federally Regulated Under the Clean Water Act” (EPA-SAB-20-002, February 27 2020).Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco Products to Protect Children and Adolescents.” (Proposed Rule) 60 Federal Register 41314 (August 11, 1995).Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco to Protect Children and Adolescents.” (Final Rule) 61 Federal Register 44396 (August 28 1996).Google Scholar
U.S. President’s Committee on Administrative Management. “Administrative Management in the Government of the United States.” Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1937.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. “Notes for Lectures on Administration.” In Papers of Woodrow Wilson: Volume 6 1888–1890, edited by Link, Arthur. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. “Notes for Lectures at the John Hopkins (First Year Course).” In Papers of Woodrow Wilson: Volume 7 1890–1892, edited by Link, Arthur. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Aspen Institute. EPA 40th Anniversary: 10 Ways EPA Has Strengthened America. Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute, 2010.Google Scholar
National Commission for Public Service. Urgent Business for America: Revitalizing The Federal Government for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Commission for Public Service, 2003.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, November 2015.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor – Directorate of Enforcement Programs. OSHA’s Field Operations Manual. CPL 02-00-148. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor – Office of General Industry Enforcement, November 2009.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. Guidelines for Developing or Revising Water Quality Standards under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. Washington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, January 1973.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. Guidance on the Development, Evaluation and Application of Environmental Models. Wasington, DC: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, 2009.Google Scholar
Barton, Peter Hutt. “Celebrating 20 Years at Harvard Law.” Harvard Law School. Shared February 13, 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQGW2PEI51k.Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald. “The President’s News Conference, August 12, 1986.” Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute. Shared June 22, 2010, www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ySHtDHrLJY.Google Scholar
U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. “The Provider Reimbursement Manual.” Updated May 4, 2012, www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Paper-Based-Manuals.html.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elizabeth. “Through ‘Thick’ and ‘Thin’: Comparison in Administrative Law and Regulation Scholarship.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law, edited by Cane, Peter et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome. “Experimental Jurisprudence and the ‘New Deal.’” Address before the Association of American Law Schools. Chicago, December 30, 1933.Google Scholar
Lee, Spike director. When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts. Aired August 16, 2006, on HBO.Google Scholar
Newman, Randy singer. “Burn On,” track 8 on Randy Newman, Sail Away, Warner Bros. Records, 1972.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Elizabeth Fisher, University of Oxford, Sidney A. Shapiro, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Administrative Competence
  • Online publication: 02 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870818.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Elizabeth Fisher, University of Oxford, Sidney A. Shapiro, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Administrative Competence
  • Online publication: 02 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870818.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Elizabeth Fisher, University of Oxford, Sidney A. Shapiro, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Administrative Competence
  • Online publication: 02 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870818.014
Available formats
×