Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: March 2012

Chapter 9 - Adaptive Tutoring Technologies and Ill-Defined Domains

from Part III - Experiential Learning and Ill-Defined Domains

References

Aleven, V. (2003). Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environment. Artificial Intelligence, 150:183–237.
Aleven, V. (2006). An intelligent learning environment for case-based argumentation. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 4(2):191–241.
Aleven, V., Ashley, K. D., Lynch, C., & Pinkwart, N. (Eds.) (2006). Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains. Held in conjunction with the 8th International conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Jhongli Taiwan.
Alexander, C. (1977). A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashley, K. D., Lynch, C., Pinkwart, N., & Aleven, V. (2008). A process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. In Francesconi, E., Sartor, G., & Tiscornia, D. (Eds.), JURIX, vol. 189 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (pp 1–10). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Barrows, H. S., & Feltovich, P. J. (1987). The clinical reasoning process. Medical Education, 21(2):86–91.
Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Education Technology & Research Development, 56:401–422.
Berman, D. M., & Hafner, C. (1985). Obstacles to the development of logic-based models of legal reasoning. In Walter, C. & Allen, L. E. (Eds.), Computing Power and Legal Reasoning (pp. 183–214). Eagan, MN: West Publishing.
Buchanan, B. G. (2001). Creativity at the metalevel: Aaai-2000 presidential address. AI Magazine, 22(3):13–28.
Burke, R. D., & Kass, A. K. (1996). Interest-focused tutoring: A tractable approach to modeling in intelligent tutoring systems. Technical Report TR-96–08.
Charlin, B., Boshuizen, H. P., Custers, E. J., & Eltovich, P. J. (2007). Scripts and clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 41:1178–1184.
Checkland, P. B. (1985). Formulating problems for systems analysis. In Miser, H. J. & Quade, E. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Systems Analysis: Overview of Uses, Procedures, Applications, and Practice (pp. 151–170). New York: North-Holland.
Chi, M. (2009). Does step-level tutorial decisions matter: Applying reinforcement learning to induce pedagogical tutorial tactics. PhD thesis, Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh.
Chi, M., & VanLehn, K. (2008). Eliminating the gap between the high and low students through meta-cognitive strategy instruction. In Woolf, B. P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., & Lajoie, S. P. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 9th International Conference, ITS 2008, Montreal, Canada, June 23–27, 2008, Proceedings, vol. 5091 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (pp. 603–613). Berlin: Springer.
Chi, M. T. H., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self- explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3):439–477.
Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students’ understanding accurately?Cognition and Instruction, 22(3):363–387.
Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: an empirical investigation. Communications in ACM, 51(3):83–88.
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A Web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers and Education, 48(3):409–426.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction:Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Conklin, J. (2006). Chapter 1: Wicked problems & social complexity. In Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. London: Wiley.
Dragon, T., & Woolf, B. P. (2006). Guidance and collaboration strategies in ill-defined domains. In Aleven, V., Ashley, K. D., Lynch, C., & Pinkwart, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains. Held in conjunction with the 8th International conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Jhongli Taiwan (pp. 65–73).
Fernandes, R., & Simon, H. A. (1999). A study of how individuals solve complex and ill- structured problems. Policy Sciences, 32:225–245.
Fields, A. M. (2006). Ill-structured problems and the reference consultation: The librarian’s role in developing student expertise. Reference Services Review, 34(3):405–420.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1):21–38.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2):5–22.
Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16:345–429.
Goldin, I., Ashley, K., & Pinkus, R. (2006). Teaching case analysis through framing: Prospects for an its in an ill-defined domain. In Aleven, V., Ashley, K. D., Lynch, C., & Pinkwart, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains. Held in conjunction with the 8th International conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Jhongli Taiwan (pp. 83–91).
Greeno, J. G. (1976). Indefinite goals in well-structured problems. Psychological Review, 83(6):479–491.
Hardy, G. H. (1940). A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Vintage Books.
Holland, S. (2000). Artificial intelligence in music education: A critical review. In Miranda, Eduardo Reck (Ed.), Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 239–274). New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured learning outcomes. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 45(1):65–94.
Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C.K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Education Technology & Research Development, 55:439–459.
Katz, S., Lesgold, A., Hughes, E., Peters, D., Eggan, G., Gordin, M., & Greenberg, L. (1998). Sherlock 2: An intelligent tutoring system built on the lrdc tutor framework. In Bloom, C. P. & Loftin, R. B. (Eds.), Facilitating the Development and Use of Interactive Learning Environments (pp. 227–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kay, J., Reimann, P., & Yacef, K. (2007). Mirroring of group activity to support learning as participation. In Luckin, R., Koedinger, K. R., & Greer, J. E. (Eds.), AIED, vol. 158 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (pp. 584–586). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larson, C. E. (2005). A survey of research on automated mathematical conjecturemaking, graphs and discovery. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (pp. 297–318).
Llewellyn, K. N. (1960). The Bramble Bush; On Our Law and Its study. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.
Luger, G. F. (Ed.) (1995). Computation & Intelligence: Collected Readings. Menlo Park, CA and Cambridge, MA: AAAI and MIT Press.
Lynch, C., Ashley, K. D., Aleven, V., & Pinkwart, N. (2006). Defining ill-defined domains; a literature survey. In Aleven, V., Ashley, K. D., Lynch, C., & Pinkwart, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains. Held in conjunction with the 8th International conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Jhongli Taiwan (pp. 1–10).
Lynch, C., Ashley, K. D., Aleven, V., & Pinkwart, N. (2009). Concepts structures and goals: Redefining ill-definedness. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Special Issue on Ill-Defined Domains. 19(3):253–266.
Mauldin, B. (1945). Up Front. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
McCarthy, J. (1956). The inversion of functions defined by turing machines. In Shannon, J. M. (Ed.), Automata Studies, Annals of Mathematical Studies, 34:177–181. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McCarthy, J. (1999). Creative solutions to problems. In the AISB Symposium on AI and Scientific Creativity (pp. 44–48).
Minsky, M. (1995). Steps to artificial intelligence. In Luger, G. F. (Ed.), Computation & Intelligence: Collected Readings. (pp. 47–90). Menlo Park, CA and Cambridge, MA: AAAI and MIT Press.
Mitrovic, A., & Weerasinghe, A. (2009). Revisiting ill-definedness and the consequences for itss. In Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., duBoulay, B., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.), AIED, vol. 200 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (pp. 375–382). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Morris, D. R. (2009). Networked communities in an advanced blended learning framework architecture. Presented at the ARI Workshop on Adaptive Training Technologies.
Newell, A. (1969). Heuristic programming: Ill-structured problems. Progress in Operations Research, 3:361–413.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1995). Gps, a program that simulates human thought. In Luger, G. F. (Ed.), Computation & Intelligence: Collected Readings. (pp. 415–428). Menlo Park, CA and Cambridge, MA: AAAI and MIT Press.
Ogan, A., Aleven, V., & Jones, C. (2008a). Pause, predict, and ponder: Use of narrative videos to improve cultural discussion and learning. In Czerwinski, M., Lund, A. M., & Tan, D. S. (Eds.), CHI (pp. 155–162). New York: ACM.
Ogan, A., Aleven, V., & Jones, C. (2009). Advancing development of intercultural competence through supporting predictions in narrative video. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Special Issue on Ill-Defined Domains, 19(3):267–288.
Ogan, A., Walker, E., Aleven, V., & Jones, C. (2008b). Toward supporting collaborative discussion in an ill-defined domain. In Woolf, B. P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., & Lajoie, S. P. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 9th International Conference, ITS 2008, Montreal, Canada, June 23–27, 2008, Proceedings, vol. 5091 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (pp. 825–827). Berlin: Springer.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K. D., & Lynch, C. (2006). Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques. In Ikeda, M., Ashley, K. D., & Chan, T.-W. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, vol. 4053 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 227–236). Berlin: Springer.
Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., & Lynch, C. (2007). Evaluating legal argument instruction with graphical representations using largo. In Proceedings of AIED2007 (pp. 101–108). Marina Del Rey, CA.
Pople, H. E. (1982). Heuristic methods for imposing structure on ill-structured problems: The structuring of medical diagnostics. In Szolovits, P. (Ed.), AI in Medicine, Chapter 5. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Reitman, W. R. (1964). Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints and the structure of ill-defined problems. In Shelly, II, M. & Bryan, G. L. (Eds.), Human Judgments and Optimality (pp. 282–315). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Reitman, W.R. (1965). Cognition and Thought: An Information Processing Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4:155–169.
Scheuer, O., & McLaren, B. M. (2008). Helping teachers handle the flood of data in online student discussions. In Woolf, B. P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., & Lajoie, S. P. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 9th International Conference, ITS 2008, Montreal, Canada, June 23–27, 2008, Proceedings, vol. 5091 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 323–332). Berlin: Springer.
Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L.D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9:523–538.
Shin, N., Jonassen, D. H., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill- structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1):6–33.
Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4:181–201.
Sipser, M. (1997). Introduction to the Theory of Com putation. Boston: PWS Publishing Company.
Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Patel, V. L. & Croen, G. J. (Eds.), Program of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Duffy, T. M. & Jonassen, D. H. (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction (pp. 57–75). London: Routledge.
Spiro, R. J. & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In Nix, D. & Spiro, R.(Eds.), Cognition, Education and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. P., Schmitz, J. G., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In Britton, B. K. & Glynn, S. M. (Eds.), Executive Control Processes in Reading (pp. 177–199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Taylor, R. N. (1974). Nature of problem ill-structuredness: Implications for problem formulation and solution. Decision Sciences, 5(4):632–643.
van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Cognitive tools to support discovery learning. In Goettl, B. P., Halff, H. M., Redfield, C. L., & Shute, V. J. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, vol. 1452 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (p. 5). Berlin: Springer.
VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3):227–265.
VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K. G., Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., & Wintersgill, M. (2005). The andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(3):147–204.
von Clauswitz, G. C. (1873). Vom Kriege (On War). Translated by Colonel J. J. Graham. London: N. Trübner.
Voss, J. F. (2006). Toulmin’s model and the solving of ill-structured problems. In Hitchcock, D. & Verheij, B. (Eds.), Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analy sis and Evaluation (pp. 303–311). Berlin: Springer.
Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., & Penner, B. C. (1983). Problem solving skill in the social sciences. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 17:165–213.
Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems: The nature of expertise. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.), The Nature of Expertise (pp. 261–285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Walker, E., Ogan, A., Aleven, V., & Jones, C. (2008). Two approaches for providing adaptive support for discussion in an ill-defined domain. In Aleven, V., Ashley, K. D., Lynch, C., & Pinkwart, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains: Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains. Held in conjunction with the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Montréal Canada (pp. 1–12).
Woolf, B. P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., & Lajoie, S. P. (Eds.), (2008). Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 9th International Conference, ITS 2008, Montreal, Canada, June 23–27, 2008, Proceedings, vol. 5091 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer.