Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T22:09:13.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Neil Smith
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Acquiring Phonology
A Cross-Generational Case-Study
, pp. 249 - 259
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderete, J. (2008) ‘Using learnability as a filter on factorial typology: A new approach to Anderson and Browne's generalization’. Lingua 118: 1177–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. and Lightfoot, D. (2002) The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, A. (2007) ‘Variation and optionality’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 519–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2007) Working Memory, Thought and Action. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D. (1976) ‘The role of perception in the acquisition of phonology’. UCL PhD thesis (distributed by IULC).
Beckman, J. (1998) ‘Positional faithfulness’. Doctoral thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Behne, T. (2008) ‘The early pragmatics of deictic and iconic gestures’. Paper presented at the Workshop on Pragmatics and Social Cognition, UCL.
Berent, I., Steriade, D., Lennertz, T. and Vaknin, V. (2007) ‘What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions’. Cognition 104: 591–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhardt, B. H., Gilbert, J. and Ingram, D. (eds.) (1996) Proceedings of the International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press.
Blevins, J. (2004) Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. (1997) ‘How we learn variation, optionality, and probability’. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21: 43–58.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (1998) ‘Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives’. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Boersma, P. (2003) Review of Tesar and Smolensky (2000). Phonology 20: 436–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. (2006) ‘A programme for bidirectional phonology and phonetics and their acquisition and evolution’. MS, University of Amsterdam.
Boersma, P. and Hayes, B. (2001) ‘Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm’. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. and Wexler, K. (1987) ‘The maturation of syntax’. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E. (eds.) Parameter Setting, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 123–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. (1999) How Language Comes to Children: From Birth to Two Years. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976) Review of Smith (1973). Language 52: 489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. (2000) ‘The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult’. In Archibald, J. (ed.) Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 4–63.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N., Carr, P. and Docherty, G. (eds.) (2000) Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J. (1999) ‘Usage-based phonology’. In Darnell, M., Moravcsik, E., Newmeyer, F., Noonan, M. and Wheatley, K. (eds.) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 211–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2000) ‘Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments’. In Broe, M. and Pierrehumbert, J. (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–68.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2001) Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, C. (1969) ‘Markedness, neutralisation, and universal redundancy rules’. Language 45: 863–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, P. (2000) ‘Scientific realism, sociophonetic variation, and innate endowments in phonology’. In Burton-Roberts, et al. (2000: 67–104).
Carruthers, P. (2006) The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2008) ‘Précis of The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought’. Mind & Language 23: 257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charette, M. (1991) Conditions on Phonological Government. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, S. (1986) ‘Personal pronouns’. In Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (eds.) Language Acquisition (2nd edition), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 339–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1955) ‘The logical structure of linguistic theory’. MS (published 1975, New York, Plenum).
Chomsky, N. (1959) Review of B. F. Skinner: Verbal Behavior. Language 35: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964) ‘The logical basis of linguistic theory’. In Lunt, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, The Hague, Mouton, pp. 914–78.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York, Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2002) On Nature and Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2004) ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’. In Belletti, A. (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 104–31.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2006) Language and Mind (3rd edition). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2007) ‘Of minds and language’. Biolinguistics 1: 9–27.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2009a) ‘Opening remarks’. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J. and Salaburu, P. (eds.) Of Minds and Languages: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 13–43.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2009b) ‘Conclusion’. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J. and Salaburu, P. (eds.) Of Minds and Languages: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 379–409.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Hauser, M. and Fitch, T. (2005) ‘The minimalist program’. Appendix to Fitch, et al., (2005).
Chun, D. (2007) ‘Technological advances in researching and teaching phonology’. In Pennington, M. (ed.) Phonology in Context, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 274–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. and Pencke, M. (1992) ‘The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone corpus’. In Meisel, (1992: 181–224).
Clark, E. (2003) First Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. and Keyser, S. J. (1983) CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, M. P. and Scharenborg, O. (2008) ‘The Interspeech 2008 Consonant Challenge’. Proceedings of Interspeech 2008.
Culicover, P. (1999) Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory and Language Acquisition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lacy, P. (2006) Markedness. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (1997) ‘Multiple optimal outputs in acquisition’. In Miglio, V. and Morén, B. (eds.) University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 53–71, College Park, MD, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Villiers, J. (1992) ‘On the acquisition of functional categories: A general commentary’. In Meisel, (1992: 423–43).
Dinnsen, D. (2008) ‘A typology of opacity effects in acquisition’. In Dinnsen, D. and Gierut, J. (eds.) Optimality Theory, Phonological Acquisition and Disorders, London, Equinox, pp. 121–76.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D., O'Connor, K. M. and Gierut, J. A. (2001) ‘The puzzle-puddle-pickle problem and the Duke-of-York gambit in acquisition’. Journal of Linguistics 37: 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, B. (1975) ‘Children's understanding of their own phonological forms’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 27: 165–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donegan, P. (1997) Review of Archibald, John (ed.) (1995) Phonological Acquisition and Phonological Theory, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum. Journal of Linguistics 33: 213–15.Google Scholar
Dresher, E. (2004) ‘On the acquisition of phonological representations’. In Kampen, J. and Baauw, S. (eds.) Proceedings of GALA 2003, Vol. 1, LOT Occasional Series, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Dresher, E. and Kaye, J. (1990) ‘A computational learning model for metrical phonology’. Cognition 34: 137–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eimas, P. (1996) ‘The perception and representation of speech by infants’. In Morgan, J. and Demuth, K. (eds.) Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Feldman, N. and Griffiths, T. (2007) ‘A rational account of the perceptual magnet effect’. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Ferguson, C. and Farwell, C. (1975) ‘Words and sounds in early language acquisition’. Language 51: 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C., Menn, L. and Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds.) (1992) Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, MD, York Press.
Fikkert, P. (1994) On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. Dordrecht, HIL Dissertations.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1995) ‘The acquisition of phonology’. Glot International 1: 3–7.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (2007) ‘Acquiring phonology’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 537–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, T., Hauser, M. and Chomsky, N. (2005) ‘The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications’. Cognition 97: 179–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fodor, J. (1975) The Language of Thought. New York, Crowell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (2008) LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E. (1969) ‘Syllables’. Journal of Linguistics 5: 253–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gafos, A. and Benus, S. (2006) ‘Dynamics of phonological cognition’. Cognitive Science 30: 905–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, F. (2007) ‘Research and practice in developmental phonological disorders’. In Pennington, M. (ed.) Phonology in Context, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierut, J. (2008) ‘Phonological disorders and the Developmental Phonology Archive’. In Dinnsen, D. and Gierut, J. (eds.) Optimality Theory, Phonological Acquisition and Disorders, London, Equinox, pp. 37–92.Google Scholar
Gierut, J., Morrisette, M. and Champion, A. (1999) ‘Lexical constraints in phonological acquisition’. Journal of Child Language 26: 261–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gnanadesikan, A. (1995) ‘Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology’. MS. Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Gnanadesikan, A. (2004) ‘Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology’. In Kager, et al. (2004a: 73–108).
Goad, H. (1996) ‘Consonant harmony in child language: Evidence against coronal underspecification’. In Bernhardt, et al. (1996: 187–200).
Goad, H. (1997) ‘Consonant harmony in child language: An Optimality-Theoretic account’. In Hannahs, and Young-Scholten, (1997: 113–42).
Goad, H. and Ingram, D. (1987) ‘Individual variation and its relevance to a theory of phonological acquisition’. Journal of Child Language 14: 419–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999) ‘The role of gesture in communication and thinking’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 419–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gombert, J.-E. (1992) Metalinguistic Development. New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (1985) ‘Level-ordering in lexical development’. Cognition 21: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, M. and Kissock, M. (2007) ‘The phonetics–phonology interface and the acquisition of perseverant underspecification’. In Ramchand, G. and Reiss, M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 81–101.Google Scholar
Hale, M. and Reiss, C. (1995) ‘The initial ranking of faithfulness constraints in UG’. MS. Concordia University, Montreal.
Hale, M. and Reiss, C. (1998) ‘Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition’. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 656–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, M. and Reiss, C. (2008) The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, T. (2007) ‘Segmental features’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1959) The Sound Pattern of Russian. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Hannahs, S. J. and Young-Scholten, M. (eds.) (1997) Focus on Phonological Acquisition. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.CrossRef
Harris, J. (2007) ‘Representation’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2002) ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 298: 1569–79 (22 November).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, R. (2008) ‘The nativist perspective on second language acquisition’. Lingua 118: 465–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1999) ‘Phonetically driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding’. In Darnell, M., Moravcsik, E., Newmeyer, F., Noonan, M. and Wheatley, K. (eds.) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 243–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (2004) ‘Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: The early stages’. In Kager, et al. (2004a: 158–203).
Hoekstra, T. and Hyams, N. (1998) ‘Agreement and the finiteness of V2: Evidence from child language’. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Howard, D. and Franklin, S. (1988) Missing the Meaning? A Cognitive Neuropsychological Study of the Processing of Words by an Aphasic Patient. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. (2003) ‘The language mosaic and its evolution’. In Christiansen, M. and Kirby, S. (eds.) Language Evolution, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 38–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacoboni, M. (2008) Mirroring People. New York; Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974) ‘Phonological rules in young children’. Journal of Child Language 1: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesney, K. (2007) ‘Child chain shifts as faithfulness to input prominence’. In Belikova, A., Meroni, L. and Umeda, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), pp. 188–99.
Jouitteau, M. (2004) ‘Gestures as expletives, multichannel syntax’. In Schmeiser, B., Chand, V., Kelleher, A. and Rodriguez, A. (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 23, pp. 422–35.
Jusczyk, P. (1997) The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kager, R. (1999) Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R., Pater, J. and Zonneveld, W. (eds) (2004a) Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kager, R., Pater, J. and Zonneveld, W. (2004b) ‘Introduction: Constraints in phonological acquisition’. In Kager, et al. (2004a: 1–53).
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992) Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Quinn, P., Slater, A., Lee, K., Ge, L. and Pascalis, O. (2007) ‘The other-race effect develops during infancy: Evidence of perceptual narrowing’. Psychological Science 18: 1084–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerswill, P. and Shockey, L. (2007) ‘The description and acquisition of variable phonological patterns: Phonology and sociolinguistics’. In Pennington, M. (ed.) Phonology in Context, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, J. (2007) ‘The phonetics–phonology interface’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1972) ‘Explanation in phonology’. In Peters, S. (ed.) Goals of Linguistic Theory, Englewood, NJ, Prentice Hall, pp. 189–227.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973) ‘Phonological representations’. In Fujimura, O. (ed.) Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory, TEC, Tokyo, pp. 1–135.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. and Menn, L. (1977) ‘On the acquisition of phonology’. In Macnamara, J. (ed.) Language Learning and Thought, New York, Academic Press, pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. (1971) ‘On the functional unity of phonological rules’. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 291–306.Google Scholar
Kohonen, T. (1982) ‘Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps’. Biological Cybernetics 43: 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, S. (2000) ‘Lessons from language learning’. In Medsker, L. R. and Jain, L. C. (eds.) Recurrent Neural Networks: Design and Applications, Zug, CRC Press, pp. 179–204.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. (1991) ‘Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not’. Perception and Psychophysics 50: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. and Miller, J. (1975) ‘Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced–voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants’. Science 190: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, B. and Gleitman, L. (1985) Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967) Biological Foundations of Language. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Levelt, C. (2008) ‘Phonology and phonetics in the development of schwa in Dutch child language’. Lingua 118: 1344–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, P. (2000) Human Language and our Reptilian Brain: The Subcortical Bases of Speech, Syntax and Thought. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1992) ‘Phonological units as adaptive emergents of lexical development’. In Ferguson, et al., (1992: 131–63).
Lindblom, B. (2000) ‘Developmental origins of adult phonology: The interplay between phonetic emergents and the evolutionary adaptations of sound patterns’. Phonetica 57: 297–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, J. (1993) The Child's Path to Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Macken, M. (1980) ‘The child's lexical representation: The puzzle-puddle-pickle evidence’. Journal of Linguistics 16: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, M. (1992) ‘Where's phonology?’ In Ferguson, et al. (1992: 249–69).
Macken, M. (1995) ‘Phonological acquisition’. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 671–96.Google Scholar
Macken, M. and Barton, D. (1980) ‘The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: A study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants’. Journal of Child Language 7: 41–74.Google ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (1999) ‘Emergent language’. In Darnell, M., Moravcsik, E., Newmeyer, F., Noonan, M. and Wheatley, K. (eds.) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 361–86.Google Scholar
Mani, N. and Plunkett, K. (2007) ‘Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations’. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. (1992) ‘Constraints on word learning: Speculations about their nature, origins, and word specificity’. In Gunnar, M. and Maratsos, M. (eds.) Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 59–101.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (2002) A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (2007) ‘Derivations and levels of representation’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (2008) Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, A. (2007) ‘Sounds, brain, and evolution: Or, why phonology is plural’. In Pennington, M. (ed.) Phonology in Context, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 159–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, R. (2002) ‘The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages’. In Morgan, G. and Woll, B. (eds.) Directions in Sign Language Acquisition, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 115–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (ed.) (1992) The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht, Kluwer.CrossRef
Menn, L. (1978) ‘Phonological units in beginning speech’. In Bell, A. and Hooper, J. (eds.) Syllables and Segments, Amsterdam, North Holland, pp. 157–71.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1980) ‘Phonological theory and child phonology’. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. and Ferguson, C. (eds.) Child Phonology, Vol. 1: Production, New York, Academic Press, pp. 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (2004) ‘Saving the baby: Making sure that old data survive new theories’. In Kager, et al. (2004a: 54–72).
Menn, L. and Matthei, E. (1992) ‘The “two-lexicon” account of child phonology: Looking back, looking ahead’. In Ferguson, et al., (1992: 211–47).
Messum, P. (2007) ‘The role of imitation in learning to pronounce’. Unpublished UCL PhD thesis.
Miller, G. and Chomsky, N. (1963) ‘Finitary models of language users’. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R. and Galanter, E. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 11, New York, Wiley, pp. 419–92.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Chater, N. and Christiansen, M. (2005) ‘The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation’. Cognition 96: 143–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, G. (2006) ‘“Children are just lingual”: The development of phonology in British Sign Language (BSL)’. Lingua 116: 1507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. and Smith, N. V. (1974) ‘Some ideas concerning the acquisition of phonology’. In Bresson, F. (ed.) Problèmes Actuels en Psycholinguistique, Paris, CNRS, pp. 161–77.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T. (2005) ‘Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels’. Cognition 98: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevins, A. and Vaux, B. (2008) ‘Introduction: The division of labor between rules, representations, and constraints in phonological theory’. In Vaux, B. and Nevins, A. (eds.) Rules, Constraints and Phonological Phenomena, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Niyogi, P. (2006) The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pan, N. and Snyder, W. (2004) ‘Acquisition of /s/-initial clusters: A parametric approach’. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. and Smith, C. E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 436–46.
Pascalis, O., Scott, L., Kelly, D., Shannon, R., Nicholson, E., Coleman, M., Nelson, C. and Carey, S. (2005) ‘Plasticity of face processing in infancy’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 102: 5297–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pater, J. (2002) ‘Form and substance in phonological development’. In Mikkelsen, L. and Potts, C. (eds.) Proceedings of WCCFL 21, pp. 348–72.
Pater, J. (2004) ‘Bridging the gap between receptive and productive development with minimally violable constraints’. In Kager, et al. (2004a: 219–44).
Petitto, L. A. (2005) ‘How the brain begets language’. In McGilvray, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989) ‘Evolution, selection and cognition: From “learning” to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language’. Cognition 31: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., Beckman, M. and Ladd, D. (2000) ‘Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science’. In Burton-Roberts, et al. (2000: 273–303).
Pinker, S. (1984) Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plaut, D. and Kello, C. (1999) ‘The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach’. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.) The Emergence of Language, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 381–415.Google Scholar
Poizner, H., Bellugi, U. and Klima, E. (1987) What the Hands Reveal About the Brain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, T. M. S. (1977) ‘One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology’. Journal of Child Language 4: 45–66.Google Scholar
Prince, A. and Smolensky, P. (2004) Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1976) ‘The Duke of York gambit’. Journal of Linguistics 12: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. (1990) Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reiss, C. (2008) ‘Constraining the learning path without constraints, or the OCP and NoBanana’. In Vaux, B. and Nevins, A. (eds.) Rules, Constraints and Phonological Phenomena, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 252–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roca, I. and Johnson, W. (1999) A Course in Phonology. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1961) ‘Use, usage and meaning’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 35. Reprinted in part in Cashdan, A. and Grugeon, E. (eds.) (1972) Language in Education: A Source Book, London, Open University Press, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R. (2001) ‘Words in a sea of sounds: The output of statistical learning’. Cognition 81: 149–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J., Newport, E. and Aslin, R. (1996) ‘Statistical learning by eight-month-old infants’. Science 274: 1926–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagey, E. (1986) ‘The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology’, MIT PhD thesis.
Sanoudaki, E. (2007) ‘A CVCV model of consonant cluster acquisition: evidence from Greek’. UCL PhD thesis.
Scheer, T. (2004) A Lateral Theory of Phonology, Vol. 1: What is CVCV, and Why Should It Be?Berlin, Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, R. G. and Leonard, L. B. (1982) ‘Do children pick and choose? An examination of phonological selection and avoidance in early lexical acquisition’. Journal of Child Language 9: 319–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scobbie, J. (2007) ‘Interface and overlap in phonetics and phonology’. In Ramchand, G. and Reiss, M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 17–52.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J., Gibbon, F., Hardcastle, W. and Fletcher, P. (2000) ‘Covert contrast as a stage in the acquisition of phonetics and phonology’. In Broe, M. and Pierrehumbert, J. (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 194–207.Google Scholar
Smith, L. B. (2000) ‘Learning how to learn words: An associative crane’. In Golinkoff, R. and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (eds.) Becoming a Word Learner, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973) The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1978) ‘Lexical representation and the acquisition of phonology’. In Kachru, B. (ed.) Linguistics in the Seventies: Directions and Prospects. Special Issue, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8: 259–73.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1989) The Twitter Machine. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1990) ‘Can pragmatic fix parameters?’ In Roca, I. (ed.) Logical Issues in Language Acquisition, Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 277–89.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1998) ‘Jackdaws, sex and language acquisition’. Glot International 3,7: 7. Reprinted in Smith (2002: 95–9).Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (2002) Language, Bananas and Bonobos: Linguistic Problems, Puzzles and Polemics. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (2003) ‘Representations and responsibilities’. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 3: 527–45.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (2004) Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals (2nd edition), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. V. (2005) Language, Frogs and Savants: More Problems, Puzzles and Polemics in Linguistics. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. V. and Cormack, A. (2002) ‘Parametric poverty’. Glot International 6: 285–7. Reprinted in Smith (2005: 103–8).Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. and Law, A. (2007) ‘Twangling instruments: Is parametric variation definitional of human language?’ UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 19: 1–28.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. and Law, A. (forthcoming) ‘Parametric variation: Language and birdsong’. In Bolhuis, J. and Everaert, M. (eds.) Birdsong, Speech and Language: Converging Mechanisms, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Smith, N. V. and Wilson, D. (1979) Modern Linguistics: The Results of Chomsky's Revolution. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Smolensky, P. (1996) ‘On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language’. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 720–31.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2007) Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. (1986) ‘Towards a theory of phonological development’. Lingua 68: 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1969) ‘The acquisition of phonetic representation’. In Binnick, R., Green, G., Morgan, J. and Davison, A. (eds.) Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 433–44.
Stelmachowicz, P., Lewis, D., Choi, S. and Hoover, B. (2007) ‘The effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children’. Ear and Hearing 28: 483–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stemberger, J. (1992) ‘A connectionist view of child phonology: Phonological processing without phonological processes’. In Ferguson, et al., (1992: 165–89).
Stemberger, J. and Bernhardt, B. (1999) ‘The emergence of faithfulness’. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.) The Emergence of Language, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 417–46.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1995) ‘Underspecification and markedness’. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 114–74.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (2001) ‘Directional asymmetries in place assimilation’. In Hume, E. and Johnson, K. (eds.) The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, San Diego, Academic Press, pp. 219–50.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1996) ‘On the acquisition of velars in English’. In Bernhardt, et al., (1996: 201–14).
Stoel-Gammon, C. and Sosa, A. V. (2007) ‘Phonological development’. In Hoff, E. and Shatz, M. (eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Language Development, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 238–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesar, B. and Smolensky, P. (1993) ‘The learnability of Optimality Theory: An algorithm and some basic complexity results’. Technical Report cu-cs-678–93, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder: Rod-2.Google Scholar
Tesar, B. and Smolensky, P. (1998) ‘Learnability in Optimality Theory’. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 229–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesar, B. and Smolensky, P. (2000) Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. (2008) Review of Snyder (2007). Journal of Linguistics 44: 545–52.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000a) ‘Do young children have adult syntactic competence?Cognition 74: 209–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000b) ‘The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 156–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008) ‘Communication before language’. Lecture delivered at UCL Pragmatics Workshop, 25 April.
Truckenbrodt, H. (2007) ‘The syntax–phonology interface’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. (1996) The Prefunctional Stage of First Language Acquisition: A Crosslinguistic Study. New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Vaux, B. (2008) ‘Why the phonological component must be serial and rule-based’. In Vaux, B. and Nevins, A. (eds.) Rules, Constraints and Phonological Phenomena, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 20–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, S. and Vihman, M. (2007) ‘Phonology in infancy and early childhood: Implications for theories of language learning’. In Pennington, M. (ed.) Phonology in Context, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1996) Phonological Development: The Origins of Language in the Child. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. and Velleman, S. (2000a) ‘Phonetics and the origins of phonology’. In Burton-Roberts, et al. (2000: 305–39).
Vihman, M. M. and Velleman, S. (2000b) ‘The construction of a first phonology’. Phonetica 57: 255–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, J. C. (1990) The Longman Pronunciation Dictionary. Harlow, Longman.Google Scholar
Werker, J. and Stager, C. (2000) ‘Developmental changes in infant speech perception and early word learning: Is there a link?’ In Broe, M. and Pierrehumbert, J. (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–93.Google Scholar
Yang, C. (2002) Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (2003) ‘Casting doubt on the Onset–Rime distinction’. Lingua 113: 779–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, M. (2006) ‘Phonology in the Smith era’. Lingua 116: 1470–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamuner, T., Gerken, L. and Hammond, M. (2005) ‘The acquisition of phonology based on input: A closer look at the relation of cross-linguistic and child language data’. Lingua 115: 1403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zec, D. (2007) ‘The syllable’. In Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zonneveld, W. (in press) ‘Catching heffalumps’.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Neil Smith, University College London
  • Book: Acquiring Phonology
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770692.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Neil Smith, University College London
  • Book: Acquiring Phonology
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770692.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Neil Smith, University College London
  • Book: Acquiring Phonology
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770692.009
Available formats
×