Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-qj5tk Total loading time: 0.703 Render date: 2022-07-05T17:08:35.504Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

11 - Simulated Biogeochemical Impacts of Historical Land-Use Changes in the U.S. Great Plains from 1870 to 2003

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Daniel G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Derek T. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Nancy H. F. French
Affiliation:
Michigan Technological University
Bradley C. Reed
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Extensive research has shown that agricultural land-use practices have substantial impacts on the environment, including (1) release of 50 percent of soil carbon (C) following cultivation of the soil, (2) enhanced soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, (3) reduced soil fertility, (4) increases in nitrate (NO3) leaching into groundwater and streams, (5) changes in plant production, and (6) changes in energy balance and water fluxes (Pielke et al. 2007). By linking observed detailed land-use data for the U.S. Great Plains over the past 150 years to the DayCent ecosystem model (Parton et al. 1998), this review demonstrates how historical changes in land use have affected soil organic carbon (SOC), soil fertility, plant production, and greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. A detailed description of the procedure used to link the observed U.S. Great Plains land-use data with the DayCent model, along with a comparison of observed and DayCent simulated historical changes in crop yields for the major crops (corn, wheat, sorghum, hay, and cotton) is presented by Hartman et al. (2011).

The Great Plains region of the United States is unique because by the time it was settled by Euro-American farmers, many modern institutions for information gathering and data analysis were already in place. The settlement and subsequent ecological transformation of this region is therefore well documented in the U.S. censuses of population and agriculture, which contain detailed data at the county level regarding changes in land use, animal production, yields for crops grown under both dryland and irrigated conditions, economic value of animal and crop raising, and movements of human populations, first on the decadal scale and then every five years for agriculture beginning in 1925. These data have been digitized for the Great Plains and are now publicly available in machine-readable form (Gutmann 2005a, 2005b).

Type
Chapter
Information
Land Use and the Carbon Cycle
Advances in Integrated Science, Management, and Policy
, pp. 287 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P.R., Del Grosso, S.J., and Parton, W.J. 2007. Life cycle assessment of net greenhouse gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecological Applications, 17(3):675–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beach, R.H., DeAngelo, B.J., Rose, S., Li, C., Salas, W., and Del Grosso, S.J. 2008. Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. Agricultural Economics, 38:109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunfer, G. 2005. On the Great Plains: Agriculture and environment. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Del Grosso, S.J., Halvorson, A.D., and Parton, W.J. 2008a. Testing DAYCENT model simulations of corn yields and nitrous oxide emissions in irrigated tillage systems in Colorado. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37:1383–1389, .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Grosso, S.J., Mosier, A.R., Parton, W.J., and Ojima, D.S. 2005. DAYCENT model analysis of past and contemporary soil N2O and net greenhouse gas flux for major crops in the USA. Soil and Tillage Research, 83:9–24, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Grosso, S.J., Ojima, D.S., Parton, W.J., Mosier, A.R., and Peterson, G.A. 2002a. Regional assessment of net greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils in the USA Great Plains under current and improved management. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on non-CO2 greenhouse gases, ed. Van Ham, J., Baede, A.P.M., Guicherit, R., and Williams-Jacobs, J.G.F.M.. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Millpress, pp. 469–474.Google Scholar
Del Grosso, S.J., Ojima, D.S., Parton, W.J., Mosier, A.R., Peterson, G.A., and Schimel, D.S. 2002b. Simulated effects of dryland cropping intensification on soil organic matter and greenhouse gas exchanges using the DAYCENT ecosystem model. Environmental Pollution, 116:S75–S83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Grosso, S.J., Ojima, D.S., Parton, W.J., Stehfest, E., Heistemann, M., Deangelo, B., and Rose, S. 2009. Global scale DAYCENT model analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for cropped soils. Global and Planetary Change, 67:44–50, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Grosso, S.J., Parton, W.J., Mosier, A.R., Hartman, M.D., Brenner, J., Ojima, D.S., and Schimel, D.S. 2001. Simulated interaction of carbon dynamics and nitrogen trace gas fluxes using the DAYCENT model. In Modeling carbon and nitrogen dynamics for soil management, ed. Shaffer, M.J., Ma, L., and Hansen, S.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 303–332.Google Scholar
Del Grosso, S.J., Parton, W.J., Mosier, A.R., Walsh, M.K., Ojima, D.S., and Thornton, P.E. 2006. DAYCENT national scale simulations of N2O emissions from cropped soils in the USA. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35:1451–1460, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Grosso, S.J., Parton, W.J., Stohlgren, T.S., Zheng, D., Bachelet, D., Hibbard, K., … Prince, S. 2008b. Global net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation and temperature, Ecology, 89:2117–2126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EPA. 2010. Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2008. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Farahani, H.J., Peterson, G.A., Westfall, D.G., Sherrod, L.A., and Ahuja, L.R. 1998. Soil water storage in dryland cropping systems: The significance of cropping intensification. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62:984–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, M.P. 2005a. Great Plains population and environment data: Agricultural data, 1870–1997 [machine-readable data set]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Gutmann, M.P. 2005b. Great Plains population and environment data: Demographic and social data, 1870–2000 [machine-readable data set]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Gutmann, M.P., Deane, G., Lauster, N., and Peri, A. 2005a. Two population-environment regimes in the Great Plains of the United States, 1930–1990. Population and Environment, 27(2):191–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, M.P., Parton, W.J., Cunfer, G., and Burke, I.C. 2005b. Population and environment in the U.S. Great Plains. In New research on population and the environment, ed. Entwisle, B. and Stern, P.C.. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
Halvorson, A.D., Del Grosso, S.J., and Alluvione, F. 2010a. Nitrogen source effects on nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated no-till corn. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(5):1554–1562, .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halvorson, A.D., Del Grosso, S.J., and Alluvione, F. 2010b. Tillage and inorganic nitrogen source effects on nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated cropping systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74:436–445, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, M.D., Merchant, E.R., Parton, W.J., Gutmann, M.P., Lutz, S.M., and Williams, S.A. 2011. Impact of historical land-use changes on greenhouse gas exchange in the US Great Plains, 1883–2003. Ecological Applications, 21(4):1105–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kittel, T.G.F., Rosenbloom, N.A., Royle, J.A., Daly, C., Gibson, W.P., Fisher, H.H.,…Schimel, D.S. 2004. VEMAP phase 2 bioclimatic database. I. Gridded historical (20th century) climate for modeling ecosystem dynamics across the conterminous USA. Climate Research, 27:151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W.J., Gutmann, M.P., and Ojima, D. 2007. Long-term trends in population, farm income, and crop production in the Great Plains. BioScience, 57:737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W.J., Gutmann, M.P., and Travis, W.R. 2003. Sustainability and historical land-use change in the Great Plains: The case of eastern Colorado. Great Plains Research, 13:97–125.Google Scholar
Parton, W.J., Gutmann, M.P., Williams, S.A., Easter, M., and Ojima, D. 2005. Ecological impact of historical land-use patterns in the Great Plains: A methodological assessment. Ecological Applications, 15:1915–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W.J., Hanson, P.J., Swanston, C., Torn, M., Trumbore, S.E., Riley, W., and Kelly, R. 2010. ForCent model development and testing using the Enriched Background Isotope Study experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115:G04001, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W.J., Hartman, M., Ojima, D.S., and Schimel, D.S. 1998. DAYCENT: Its land surface submodel: Description and testing. Global Planetary Change, 19:35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G.A., Halvorson, A.D., Havlin, J.L., Jones, O.R., Lyon, D.L., and Tanaka, D.L. 1998. Reduced tillage and increasing cropping intensity in the Great Plains conserves soil C. Soil and Tillage Research, 47:207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielke, R.A. Sr., Adegoke, J.O., Chase, T.N., Marshall, C.H., Matsui, T., and Niyogi, D. 2007. A new paradigm for assessing the role of agriculture in the climate system and in climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 142:234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddy, B.C., Lorenz, D.J., and Mueller, D.K. 2006. County-level estimates of nutrient inputs to the land surface of the conterminous United States, 1982–2001. Scientific Investigations rep. 2006–5012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Sala, O.E., Parton, W.J., Joyce, L.A., and Lauenroth, W.K. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology, 69:40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehfest, E., and Bouwman, L. 2006. N2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: Summarizing available measurement data and modeling of global annual emissions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 74:207–228, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P.E., Running, S.W., and White, M.A. 1997. Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. Journal of Hydrology, 190:214–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, J.C. 1954. Crop-combination regions in the Middle West. American Geographical Society, 44:175–2000.Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×