Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T01:57:41.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Integrating pesticides with biotic and biological control for arthropod pest management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Edward B. Radcliffe
University of Minnesota
William D. Hutchison
University of Minnesota
Get access


Insecticides and acaricides are used commonly for pest suppression in agriculture, forestry and public health. The National Research Council (2000) and others have documented their value in protecting crops, livestock and humans from injury by insects and other arthropods. However, adverse effects of pesticide use can include the killing of non-target organisms, contamination of water supplies and persistence of unwanted residues on foods and animal feed. The chronic health effects of even extremely low concentrations of pesticides in food and water remain under debate today just as they were when the National Research Council (1993) reported on pesticides in children's diets in the early 1990s. Resistance to one or more pesticides has evolved in populations of over 500 insect and mite species (Clark & Yamaguchi, 2002), rendering many of those pesticides ineffective against the resistant populations. For these and other reasons, supplementing or replacing pesticides with non-chemical control tactics, including biological control, is a goal in many crop and livestock production systems.

As biological control programs that rely on parasites, predators and pathogens are developed, they rarely are so robust as to provide all the pest suppression needed in an entire cropping system for the lifespan of the crop. Even if such robust biological control is attainable over time in specific crops or situations, initial efforts that target only one or a few pests often leave a need for pesticides to manage other species if their populations exceed economic thresholds.

Integrated Pest Management
Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
, pp. 179 - 191
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Al-Deeb, M. A. & Wilde, G. E. (2003). Effect of Bt corn expressing the Cry3Bb1 toxin for corn rootworm control on aboveground nontarget arthropods. Environmental Entomology, 32, 1164–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Deeb, M. A., Wilde, G. E., Blair, J. M. & Todd, T. C. (2003). Effect of Bt corn for corn rootworm control on nontarget soil microarthropods and nematodes. Environmental Entomology, 32, 859–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andow, D. A. & Hilbeck, A. (2004). Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic crops. BioScience, 54, 637–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbara, K. A. & Buss, E. A. (2005). Integration of insect parasitic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) with insecticides for control of pest mole crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae: Scapteriscus spp.). Journal of Economic Entomology, 98, 689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, M. B., Horne, P. A. & Hoffman, A. A. (2004). Developing an ecotoxicological testing standard for predatory mites in Australia: acute and sublethal effects of fungicides on Euseius victoriensis and Galendromus occidentalis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 891–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M. L. & Boethel, D. J. (1998). Susceptibility of predaceous hemipteran species to selected insecticides used on soybeans in Louisiana. Journal of Economic Entomology, 91, 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkman, M. A.Gardner, W. A. (2001). Use of diatomaceous earth and entomopathogen combinations against the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomologist, 84, 740–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. C. (1997). Simple models of natural enemy action and economic thresholds. American Entomologist, 43, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brust, G. E., Stinner, B. R. & McCartney, D. A. (1985). Tillage and soil insecticide effects on predator-black cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) interactions in corn agroecosystems. Journal of Economic Entomology, 78, 1389–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. M. & Yamaguchi, I. (2002). Scope and status of pesticide resistance. In Agrochemical Resistance: Extent, Mechanism, and Detection, eds. Clark, J. M. & amaguchi, I., pp. 1–22. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. (1956). Biological Control of Insect Pests in the Continental United States, Technical Bulletin No. 1139. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Cloyd, R. A.Dickinson, A. (2006). Effect of insecticides on mealybug destroyer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), natural enemies of citrus mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 99, 1596–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, H. E., Steinkraus, D. C., Ruberson, J. R. & Kring, T. J. (2006). Experimental treatment threshold for cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) using natural enemies in cotton. Journal of Entomological Science, 41, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, B. A. (1990). Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Croft, B. A.Brown, A. W. A. (1975). Responses of arthropod natural enemies to insecticides. Annual Review of Entomology, 20, 285–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croft, B. A.Meyer, R. H. (1973). Carbamate and organophosphorus resistance patterns in populations ofAmblyseius fallacis. Environmental Entomology, 2, 691–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J. E. & Horne, P. A. (1995). Effect of chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin applications on non-target invertebrates in a conservation-tillage crop. Australian Journal of Entomology, 34, 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. W. (1974). Parasite–prey ratios among alfalfa weevil larvae in northern Utah. Environmental Entomology, 3, 1031–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desneux, N., Fauvergue, X., Dechaume-Moncharmont, al. (2005). Diaterella rapae limits Myzus persicae populations after application of deltamethrin in oilseed rape. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egel, D., Lam, F., Foster, al. (2007). Midwest Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers, 2007. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.Google Scholar
Ericsson, J. D.,Kabaluk, J. T., Goettel, M. S.Myers, J. H. (2007). Spinosad interacts synergistically with the insect pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae against the exotic wireworms Agriotes lineatus and Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 100, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, O. A., Wright, R. J. & Mayo, Z. B. (1998). Parasitism of greenbugs (Homoptera: Aphididae) by Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in grain sorghum: implications for augmentative biological control. Journal of Economic Entomology, 91, 1315–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, M. J.Groden, E. (2001). Evaluation of synergistic interactions between Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) pathogen Beauveria bassiana and the insecticides imidacloprid and cyromazine. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94, 344–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furlong, M. J., Zu-Hua, S., Yin-Quan, al. (2004). Experimental analysis of the influence of pest management practices on the efficacy of an endemic arthropod natural enemy complex of the diamondback moth. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 1814–1827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, K. L., Jones, D. B., Royer, T. A., Elliott, N. C. & Kindler, S. D. (2003). Development of a sampling plan in winter wheat that estimates cereal aphid parasitism levels and predicts population suppression. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96, 975–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, D. & Wilson, L. T. (1982). A food-web approach to economic thresholds: a sequence of pests/predaceous arthropods on California cotton. Entomophaga, 27, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton-Cardwell, E. E.Hoy, M. A. (1986). Genetic improvement of common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): selection for carbaryl resistance. Environmental Entomology, 15, 1130–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K. S.McMurtry, J. A. (1979). Natural enemies and predator–prey ratios. In Biological Control and Insect Management, Bulletin No. 1191, eds. Davis, D. W., Hoyt, S. C., McMurtry, J. A. & Aliniazee, M. T., pp. 28–40. Riverside, CA: University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C.Laing, J. E. (1989). Effect of pesticides on parasitism of artificially distributed eggs of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 120, 25–33.Google Scholar
Hassan, S. A. (1969). Observations on the effect of insecticides on coleopterous predators of Erioischia brassicae (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 12, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, S. A.Oomen, P. A. (1985). Testing the side effects of pesticides on beneficial organisms by OILP working party. In Biological Pest Control: The Glasshouse Experience, eds. Hussey, N. W. & Scopes, N., pp. 145–152. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Higley, L. G.Wintersteen, W. K. (1992). A novel approach to environmental risk assessment of pesticides as a basis for incorporating environmental costs into economic injury levels. American Entomologist, 38, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M. P., Wilson, L. T., Zalom, F. G. & Hilton, R. J. (1990). Parasitism of Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs: effect on pest management decision rules for processing tomatoes in the Sacramento Valley of California. Environmental Entomology, 19, 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M. P., Wilson, L. T., Zalom, F. G. & Hilton, R. J. (1991). Dynamic sequential sampling plan for Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs in processing tomatoes: parasitism and temporal patterns. Environmental Entomology, 20, 1005–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, R. G., Steinkraus, D. C. & McNew, R. W. (1995). Sampling to predict fungal epizootics in cotton aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environmental Entomology, 24, 1414–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D. J. (1971). The relationship between a parasite, Tetrastichus incertus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), and its host the alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in New York. Canadian Entomologist, 103, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, M. A. (1985). Recent advances in genetics and genetic improvement of the Phytoseiidae. Annual Review of Entomology, 30, 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, M. A. (1989). Integrating biological control into agricultural IPM systems: reordering priorities. In Proceedings, National Integrated Pest Management Symposium/Workshop, ed. Glass, E. H., pp. 41–57. Geneva, NY: New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hoy, M. A. (1995). Multitactic resistance management: an approach that is long overdue?Florida Entomologist, 78, 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, M. A. (2000). Transgenic arthropods for pest management programs: risks and realities. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 24, 463–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoy, M. A. (2006). Evaluating potential risks of transgenic arthropods for pest management programmes. In Status and Risk Assessment of the Use of Transgenic Arthropods in Plant Protection, Proceedings of the FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Association TECDOC-1483, pp. 121–144. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Hoy, M. A.Cave, F. E. (1988). Guthion-resistant strain of the walnut aphid parasite. California Agriculture, 42(4), 4–6.Google Scholar
Hull, L. A. & Beers, E. H. (1985). Ecological selectivity: modifying chemical control practices to preserve natural enemies. In Biological Control in Agricultural IPM Systems, eds. Hoy, M. A. & Herzog, D. C., pp. 103–122. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (2006). IRAC Mode of Action Classification Version 5.2. Available at
James, R. R.Elzen, G. W. (2001). Antagonism between Beauveria bassiana and imidacloprid when combined for Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) control. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94, 357–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, C. J.Weinzierl, R. A. (1997). Geographical and temporal variation in pteromalid (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitism of stable fly and house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae collected from cattle feedlots in Illinois. Environmental Entomology, 26, 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, J., Petzold, C., Degni, J.Tette, J. (1992). A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Food and Life Sciences Bulletin No. 139. Geneva, NY: Cornell University New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Available at Scholar
Landis, D. A., Wrattan, S. D. & Gurr, G. M. (2000). Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lövei, G. L.Arpaia, S. (2005). The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies. Entomologica Experimentalis et Applicata, 114, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.Hoy, M. A. (1996). Adaptability and efficacy of transgenic and wild-type Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) compared as part of a risk assessment. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 20, 563–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maagd, R. A., Bravo, A. & Crickmore, N. (2001). How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxins to colonize the insect world. Trends in Genetics, 17, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medina, P., Smagghe, G., Budia, F., Tirry, L.Viñuela, E. (2003). Toxicity and absorption of azadirachtin, diflubenzuron, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide after topical application in predatory larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology, 32, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, F. E., Nyrop, J. P.Shelton, A. M. (2006). Integrating biological and chemical control in decision making: European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) control in sweet corn as an example. Journal of Economic Entomology, 99, 1538–1549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naranjo, S. E. & Hagler, J. R. (1998). Characterizing and estimating the impact of heteropteran predation. In Predatory Heteroptera: Their Ecology and Use in Biological Control, Thomas Say Symposium Proceedings, eds. Coli, M. & Ruberson, J., pp. 170–197. Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
Naranjo, S. E., Head, G. P. & Dively, G. P. (2005). Field studies assessing arthropod non-target effects in Bt transgenic crops: Introduction. Environmental Entomology, 34, 1178–1180.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (1993). Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Agriculture and Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (2000). The Future Role of Pesticides in US Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources and Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, Committee on the Future Role of Pesticides in US Agriculture.Google Scholar
Newsom, L. D., Smith, R. F. & Whitcomb, W. H. (1976). Selective pesticides and selective use of pesticides. In Theory and Practice of Biological Control, eds. Huffaker, C. & Messenger, P., pp. 565–591. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemczyk, E., Olszak, R.,Miszczayk, M.Bakowski, G. (1974). Effectiveness of Some Predaceous Insects in the Control of Phytophagous Mites and Aphids on Apple Trees, Annual Report. Skierniewice, Poland: Research Institute of Pomology.Google Scholar
Nyrop, J. P. & Werf, W. (1994). Sampling to predict and monitor biological control. In Handbook of Sampling Methods for Arthropod Pests in Agriculture, eds. Pedigo, L. & Buntin, D. G.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ostlie, K. R., Hutchinson, W. D. & Hellmich, R. L. (eds.) (1997). Bt Corn and European Corn Borer, NCR Publication No. 602. St Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
Pielou, D. P.Glasser, R. F. (1952). Selection for DDT resistance in a beneficial insect parasite. Science, 115, 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintela, E. D.McCoy, C. W. (1998). Synergistic effect of imidacloprid and two entomopathogenic fungi on the behavior and survival of larvae of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in soil. Journal of Economic Entomology, 91, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, D. W., McCornack, B. P., Venette, R. al. (2007). Economic threshold for soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 100, 1258–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, R. L.Jones, S. L. (1969). Inundative release of Chrysopa carnea for control of Heliothis in cotton. Journal of Economic Entomology, 62, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripper, W. E., Greenslade, R. M.Hartley, G. S. (1951). Selective insecticides and biological control. Journal of Economic Entomology, 44, 448–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenheim, J. A.Hoy, M. A. (1988). Genetic improvement of a parasitoid biological control agent: artificial selection for insecticide resistance in Aphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 81, 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwangi, K. B., Cloyd, R. A.Wiedenmann, R. N. (2004). Effects of growth regulators on citrus mealybug parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 1239–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rytter, J. L.Travis, J. W. (2006). Pennsylvania Tree Fruit Production Guide, 2006–07 edn. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. Available at Scholar
Shelton, A. M., Zhao, J. Z.Roush, R. T. (2002). Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 845–881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. F.Hagen, K. S. (1959). Impact of commercial insecticide treatments. Hilgardia, 29, 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J. D.Banks, J. E. (2003). Population-level effects of pesticides and other toxicants on arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 48, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, J. D., Vargas, R.Miller, N. (2004). Toxicity of spinosad in protein bait to three economically important tephritid fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 911–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffey, K. L.Gray, M. E. (2007). Insect pest management for field and forage crops. In 2007 Illinois Agricultural Pest Management Handbook, ed. Bissonnette, S., pp. 1–19. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Extension.Google Scholar
Stern, V. M.Bosch, R. (1959). Field experiments on the effects of insecticides. Hilgardia, 29, 103–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., Bosch, R.Hagen, K. S. (1959). The integrated control concept. Hilgardia, 29, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, G.Long, G. E. (1978). Predator complex of the green peach aphid on sugar beets: expansion of the predator power and efficacy model. Environmental Entomology, 7, 835–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, G., McGuire, J. V.Turner, J. E. (1974). Predator power and efficacy: a model to evaluate their impact. Environmental Entomology, 3, 625–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teetes, G. L. (1994). Adjusting crop management recommendations for insect-resistant crop varieties. Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 11, 191–200.Google Scholar
Theiling, K. M.Croft, B. A. (1988). Pesticide side-effects on arthropod natural enemies: a database summary. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 21, 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, P. G.Mullinix, B. G. (2004). Comparison of susceptibility of pest Euschistus servus and predator Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) to selected insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 800–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turpin, F. T.York, A. C.. (1981). Insect management and the pesticide syndrome. Environmental Entomology, 10, 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinzierl, R.Cloyd, C. (2007). Insect pest management for commercial vegetable crops. In 2007 Illinois Agricultural Pest Management Handbook, ed. Bissonnette, S., pp. 199–235. Urbana, IL: University. of Illinois Extension.Google Scholar
Weinzierl, R.Henn, T. (1991). Alternatives in Insect Management: Biological and Biorational Approaches, North Central Regional Publication No. 401. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Extension. Available at Scholar
Weires, R. W. (1980). Predatory Phytoseiid Mite, Amblyseius fallacis (Garman), Tree Fruit IPM Insect Identification Sheet No. 7. Geneva, NY: Cornell University New York State Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Whitten, M. J.Hoy, M. A. (1999). Genetic improvement and other genetic considerations for improving the efficacy and success rate of biological control. In Principles and Applications of Biological Control, eds. Bellows, T. S. Jr. & Fisher, T. W., pp. 271–296. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T. K., Landis, D. A.Gut, L. J. (2004). Parasitism of obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in commercially managed Michigan apple orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 1524–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats